Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Must be VDGG for me, but I think the problem might be that I haven't really listened to enough of their music. I must admit that I, and please don't kill me, don't really dig Pink Floyd that much.
This user has left the PA fora, but will occasionally post reviews so as to support artists.
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: In repose.
Status: Offline
Points: 38974
Posted: July 25 2009 at 15:24
Of late I don't find myself listening to much Magma, but what albums of Magma have you listened to? And what are your favourite categories and bands in the archives? EDIT: never mind, saw your welcome thread. I would've thought a Zappa-head could find much to like in Magma's first two albums, and a Crimson fan could like Kohntarkosz too. But everyone's different (erm, other than those music fans here who are very much the same in their tastes. I'm a dime-a-dozen apparently).
Edited by Logan - July 25 2009 at 16:42
Watching while most appreciating a sunset in the moment need not diminish all the glorious sunsets I have observed before. It can be much like that with music for me.
Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Posted: July 25 2009 at 17:11
I dig most if not all of the big 70s prog bands.
But there are some I can't understand the appeal of, namely Kansas and Mike Oldfield, both are insanely popular down in these parts.
And a lot of the neo prog stuff from the 80s and early 90s. I'll never get all the Marillion hype, to me they just sound like a poor imitation of late 70s Collins era Genesis but with David Gilmour instead of Steve Hackett.
Dream Theater are in my opinion a complete insult to what prog rock is actually about, talk about a total w**kfest. And I'm saying that as an ELP fan for god's sake.
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: In repose.
Status: Offline
Points: 38974
Posted: July 25 2009 at 17:22
I'm not a Marillion fan (nor DT for that matter), but maybe this will get its hooks in you:
.
Watching while most appreciating a sunset in the moment need not diminish all the glorious sunsets I have observed before. It can be much like that with music for me.
Joined: July 01 2004
Location: CA
Status: Offline
Points: 19721
Posted: July 26 2009 at 19:25
boo boo wrote:
But there are some I can't understand the appeal of, namely Kansas and Mike Oldfield, both are insanely popular down in these parts.
'70s Kansas is great; after that, it's a "YMMV" issue. I like Mike's first three albums. After that, things get sketchy.
boo boo wrote:
And a lot of the neo prog stuff from the 80s and early 90s. I'll never get all the Marillion hype, to me they just sound like a poor imitation of late 70s Collins era Genesis but with David Gilmour instead of Steve Hackett.
That's why I always point people to Twelfth Night's Fact & Fiction, for something different!
boo boo wrote:
Dream Theater are in my opinion a complete insult to what prog rock is actually about, talk about a total w**kfest. And I'm saying that as an ELP fan for god's sake.
I agree. I do like DT's first couple albums, because the w**k factor had yet to be cranked to "11" and they wrote a lot of really good honest-to-goodness SONGS on WDaDU and I&W.
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Posted: July 27 2009 at 03:27
It is quite interesting that many people who say they can't get into VdGG also say they can't get into Gentle Giant, and I think there is some reason behind that. Both are very complex (there are not many bands which regularly use true polyphony), and the riff structures of them are very much alike. Just compare the riffs of "Alucard" and "Scorched Earth", and you will know what I mean.
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
Posted: July 27 2009 at 04:26
BaldFriede wrote:
It is quite interesting that many people who say they can't get into VdGG also say they can't get into Gentle Giant, and I think there is some reason behind that. Both are very complex (there are not many bands which regularly use true polyphony), and the riff structures of them are very much alike. Just compare the riffs of "Alucard" and "Scorched Earth", and you will know what I mean.
That's pretty weird since (I get the impression that) Gentle Giant are much more popular.
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Posted: July 27 2009 at 04:49
Toaster Mantis wrote:
BaldFriede wrote:
It is quite interesting that many people who say they can't get into VdGG also say they can't get into Gentle Giant, and I think there is some reason behind that. Both are very complex (there are not many bands which regularly use true polyphony), and the riff structures of them are very much alike. Just compare the riffs of "Alucard" and "Scorched Earth", and you will know what I mean.
That's pretty weird since (I get the impression that) Gentle Giant are much more popular.
Maybe they are, though I actually doubt it; there are a lot of VdGG fans here, and there are several VdGG albums in the top fifty, but none of Gentle Giant (at least none I can recall).. Some people may have problems with Hammill's voice, especially lovers of symphonic thread, who seem to have a tendency to want their voices beautiful all the time, and VdGG certainly is not the band for that, though Hammill can and often does sing absolutely beautifully; the thing with Hammill is that his lyrics are often about anger, fear, hate and other negative emotions, and I'd rather have a singer that can convey these emotions than a singer that sings of them beautifully. But there are a lot of comments in this thread:indeed where people said that both GG and VdGG are bands they can't get into.
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
Posted: July 27 2009 at 04:54
In my experience more people have heard of Gentle Giant than have heard of VdGG, could be that GG just had more "casual fans" at the height of their popularity though.
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
Any idea which album of Gentle Giant is the best to start with ? Which is the best buy. I know that in general, this band has many followers, I've listened few songs on different prog internet radios, and also mp3 stream, but by far, no album. And I wasn't even so captured by their sound.
Are they somehow hard to listen for newcomers ? I caught VDGG wave very soon and "Undercover Man" is one of my most favourite songs. Even his voice is sometimes, well, agressively nailing. No offense though.
Nice Garfield comic by the way. We all love Cthulhu, right ?
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"
Joined: September 27 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2454
Posted: July 30 2009 at 14:38
The Flower Kings - can't explain why, don't think I particularly like the vocals and the music sounds too 'clean' for my liking. Don't dislike them, but can't get into them as much as a lot of other bands.
On a related issue, I definitely think I prefer The Tangent when they're grooving out on a long instrumental break, rather than when listening to their lyrical sections.
Open the gates of the city wide....
Check out my music taste: http://www.last.fm/user/TakeshiKovacs/
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.