Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - UK election televised debate!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedUK election televised debate!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>
Poll Question: Who do you think came out the best?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
9 [75.00%]
1 [8.33%]
2 [16.67%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2010 at 04:51
Originally posted by toroddfuglesteg toroddfuglesteg wrote:

I agree with Trouserpress. If she has sold her story, she is just doing what the rest of the population in UK would had done. That is how the society has become. A Max Clifford driven society. Which is fair enough. 

I think any attack on this lady is hypocritical and a contempt for the working class. Anyone from the working class would had sold their story to the press if given the chance. So Mrs. Duffy has just done the working class thing by aspiring to better her life.   

...and she said nothing that the average British voter wasn't thinking - everybody is naturally xenophobic, (whether the "foreigners" come from the next tribe, hamlet, village, town, city, county, country or the next continent), that doesn't make them racist or bigotted - they have to act on those fears to be that. I hear comments like the ones Mrs Duffy made every day but when you challenge them on specifics, like the foreign workers they've worked alongside for several years all you get is "Well, they're not like the others, they're one of us". I also don't believe that Mr Brown is out of touch, hypocritial or has contempt for the working class any more than any other politician before him, regardless of political party. No politiican or journalist would get what that really means because all politicians and journalists have political agendas. This story lost all meaning the moment Sky News used it for political ends ... after that it didn't matter what either of them said.
 
Mrs Duffy should have told the press she would sell her story on the 7th May.
 
What?
Back to Top
toroddfuglesteg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
Retired

Joined: March 04 2008
Location: Retirement Home
Status: Offline
Points: 3658
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2010 at 03:15

I agree with Trouserpress. If she has sold her story, she is just doing what the rest of the population in UK would had done. That is how the society has become. A Max Clifford driven society. Which is fair enough. 

I think any attack on this lady is hypocritical and a contempt for the working class. Anyone from the working class would had sold their story to the press if given the chance. So Mrs. Duffy has just done the working class thing by aspiring to better her life.   

Back to Top
The Hemulen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2010 at 02:45
Originally posted by James James wrote:

Hmmm, so she's sold her story to the press.

That just shows how silly she is.  Sorry, you don't make money out of something like this if you actually have morals.

Maybe Brown was right all along.


I really wouldn't be so quick to judge her for selling her story. Look at it from her perspective - she was planning to vote Labour (I think I'm right in saying she comes from a 'Labour family' so this was as much out of a sense of tradition as anything) and had the opportunity to run a few of her concerns past Gordon Brown. She just that and thought it had gone rather well, only to be told shortly afterwards by journalists that the PM had just called her a bigot. At that point her faith in politics (and particularly in the Labour Party) is understandably dwindling. Amidst all this, the journalists and publicists flock round her and tell her that she can make a shedload of money just by doing a few interviews in which she can openly share her disappointment in Brown and politics in general. Under those circumstances I think the majority of people would be more than a little tempted to say yes. Suggesting she lacks morals because she sold her story strikes me as a bit like saying it's the fault of a carcass that it's getting devoured by vultures.
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2010 at 22:06
Hmmm, so she's sold her story to the press.

That just shows how silly she is.  Sorry, you don't make money out of something like this if you actually have morals.

Maybe Brown was right all along.
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2010 at 03:11
It seems Rob and I agree on this subject. Big smile

I was actually watching the Gillian Duffy and Gordon Brown conversation live on BBC News 24.  I did feel that she was full of questions, wasn't really fully listening to what he was saying and yet being a Labour Supporter (at the time), sounded more like a Tory with her words.  Surely if she was a genuine Labour supporter, she wouldn't have been quite so vocal?

I know you cannot agree with every policy by the party you follow but if you disagree with too many policies, then surely you have to ask yourself who your allegiance should really be with?

I also do agree with Jim and Andy though.  I don't think she is bigoted.  It's just she was poor in the way she expressed her views and so they may have come across as such.

I watched Gordon Brown being interviewed by Jeremy Paxman (I saw the end, not all of it) and he came across surprisingly well.  He wasn't unnerved by him.  Plus he really does know his stuff.  That's a lot of information to remember.

Much kudos to him for that!
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2010 at 03:01
Originally posted by toroddfuglesteg toroddfuglesteg wrote:

Originally posted by James James wrote:

As Jim said, Dave or Nick could have also suffered the same fate so easily.  Would you (Torodfuglestag) have therefore felt like you had been stabbed in the back by them as well?

Not really although I cannot stand the type of backstabbing and contempt Gordon Brown has shown here. It is morally repugnant. But if David Cameron had done it, I would had understood it. The Tories has never been a friend of the council estates in Rochdale. I suspect if some black death had wiped them out, no tears would had been shed in their homes in the Home Counties. Nick Clegg has no business in those council estates too. They are Labour homelands.

The reason why I am angry is that up to that point, I warmly defended Gordon Brown. And as you know; there is no rage like the rage from the ones who has been betrayed. 

 



I wasn't saying Cameron and Clegg would have a gaffe in Rochdale.  They could have had a gaffe in any place and could have said anything about anyone from any background.
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 21:09
Originally posted by TGM: Orb TGM: Orb wrote:

 

Either way, 'bigotgate'... I really, really wish we had some journalists with the creativity to come up with a new catch-all for scandals... I mean, 'climategate', 'bigotgate' etc. are just embarrassing.

It's even worse in the US. As far as I'm concerned, getting -gate added to everything was the worst thing Nixon did. People complain about Republicans complaining about the "liberal media", but, in fairness, the media is astoundingly stupid.

I don't think Sky did anything wrong. Hot mike candor is one of the best and funniest things about politics. But I like chaos.
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
TGM: Orb View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 13:58
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Originally posted by TGM: Orb TGM: Orb wrote:

The woman sounded bigoted to me.


I disagree - she expressed concern at an issue which is in many peoples' minds; the problem was she wasn't the most articulate of people, so the way she expressed the concerns could have come across that way.


Indeed. 100%


GD: But there's too many people now who aren't vulnerable but they can claim and people who are vulnerable can't get claim, can't get it.

PM: But they shouldn't be doing that. There's no life on the dole for people any more. If you're unemployed you've got to go back to work. It's six months...

GD: You can't say anything about the immigrants because you're saying that you're... all these Eastern Europeans what are coming in, where are they flocking from?

---

Personally, I can't see exactly what concerns she's supposedly trying to express? Particularly in the light of the trailing off first half of the sentence and the context of the previous conversation. Regardless, the way she expresses it is very easily interpreted as bigoted. I mean, imagine if Mr. Brown had said 'You can't say anything about the immigrants because you're saying that you're... all these Eastern Europeans what are coming in, where are they flocking from?' in one of the televised debates... the media would be swarming on his still-warm political corpse.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 11:15
Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Originally posted by TGM: Orb TGM: Orb wrote:

The woman sounded bigoted to me.


I disagree - she expressed concern at an issue which is in many peoples' minds; the problem was she wasn't the most articulate of people, so the way she expressed the concerns could have come across that way.


Indeed. 100%
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 10:01
Originally posted by TGM: Orb TGM: Orb wrote:

The woman sounded bigoted to me.


I disagree - she expressed concern at an issue which is in many peoples' minds; the problem was she wasn't the most articulate of people, so the way she expressed the concerns could have come across that way.

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
TGM: Orb View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 09:25
Originally posted by toroddfuglesteg toroddfuglesteg wrote:

When you are wired up to a TV station and have agreed that what goes in there is the intellectual property of that TV station, you have, literary speaking, signed away your privacy. 

As an immigrant myself and probably one of those who this lady from Rochdale does not approve off, I did not feel her concerns was bigoted. If we are calling her comments bigoted, we are opening the door to the parliament for the likes of BNP. It is better to discuss matters in the open than suppress these matters.



That's true, nevertheless, he was unaware he was wired up, and I still feel it's a very cheap move on the part of the TV station to publicise comments that are obviously meant as private. Honestly, would that woman have had to leave her home if Sky hadn't run with the story? Blaming Brown for that certainly unintended consequence seems to miss the point.

Bigoted is bigoted, whether the BNP says it, or this woman says it, or I say it. It perhaps is better to discuss these matters in the open, though I think it's also, in that case, better to honestly condemn what deserves honest condemnation. Don't feel the conservative posturing towards immigration caps is either honest or rational.

Either way, 'bigotgate'... I really, really wish we had some journalists with the creativity to come up with a new catch-all for scandals... I mean, 'climategate', 'bigotgate' etc. are just embarrassing.

Back to Top
TGM: Orb View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 09:16
And in terms of unscrupulous behaviour, I am quite angry about this and the general tone which Alec Salmond and Ieuan Wyn Jones have approached the parliamentary debates. Does Salmond really think that someone with no interest whatsoever in representing the entire country (indeed, whose main appeal to voters appears to be a lack of interest in representing the entire country) has any place on there?

Personally, thought Brown performed best in the first debate by far, and since both he and Cameron said a lot of nothing in the economy debate, I might suggest the Lib Dems were strongest in that one. Concerning foreign policy, I'm as yet unsure. Don't think Cameron's lived up to expectations.

Probably voting Lib Dems, partly because I'm in a marginal with them and the conservatives and the constituency MP is excellent, partly because I think if the Tories get an absolute majority, the delay to any sort of meaningful democratic reform is an enormous wasted opportunity.
Back to Top
toroddfuglesteg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
Retired

Joined: March 04 2008
Location: Retirement Home
Status: Offline
Points: 3658
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 09:11

When you are wired up to a TV station and have agreed that what goes in there is the intellectual property of that TV station, you have, literary speaking, signed away your privacy. 

As an immigrant myself and probably one of those who this lady from Rochdale does not approve off, I did not feel her concerns was bigoted. If we are calling her comments bigoted, we are opening the door to the parliament for the likes of BNP. It is better to discuss matters in the open than suppress these matters.  





Edited by toroddfuglesteg - April 30 2010 at 09:15
Back to Top
TGM: Orb View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 09:00
Originally posted by toroddfuglesteg toroddfuglesteg wrote:

It never fails to shock me how much those working class parties (stalinists, leninist, socialists or social-democratics) really detest working class people. I think Gordon Brown proved me right yesterday.

Me too was a social democrat until yesterday and a Labour voter if I had managed to sort out my nationality this year. But not any longer.   

Mrs. Duffy, the lady slurred and back-stabbed by Gordon Brown, have now been forced to leave her home because of this incident. And that is the tragedy here. She did not deserve this.   



The woman sounded bigoted to me.

I agree that she didn't deserve to be forced to leave her home. Would hardly use the word 'back-stab', pretty sure Brown was stressed and didn't know the mic was on? If it's anyone's fault, it's sky news for following Murdoch's huge conservative bias and running with a conversation that was believed to be private. Certainly, it should hardly be on the radar compared to one borderline homophobic comment by the shadow home secretary under similar circumstances.
Back to Top
toroddfuglesteg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
Retired

Joined: March 04 2008
Location: Retirement Home
Status: Offline
Points: 3658
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 07:10
Originally posted by James James wrote:

As Jim said, Dave or Nick could have also suffered the same fate so easily.  Would you (Torodfuglestag) have therefore felt like you had been stabbed in the back by them as well?

Not really although I cannot stand the type of backstabbing and contempt Gordon Brown has shown here. It is morally repugnant. But if David Cameron had done it, I would had understood it. The Tories has never been a friend of the council estates in Rochdale. I suspect if some black death had wiped them out, no tears would had been shed in their homes in the Home Counties. Nick Clegg has no business in those council estates too. They are Labour homelands.

The reason why I am angry is that up to that point, I warmly defended Gordon Brown. And as you know; there is no rage like the rage from the ones who has been betrayed. 

 



Edited by toroddfuglesteg - April 30 2010 at 07:15
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 06:38
As Jim said, Dave or Nick could have also suffered the same fate so easily.  Would you (Torodfuglestag) have therefore felt like you had been stabbed in the back by them as well?

It seems the incident hasn't affected the opinion polls to much anyhow.  Yes, he's still polling third but he the percentage hasn't dropped much.

Unfortunately it seems people are still falling for the Conservatives.

I can understand why the Lib Dems have picked up votes, due to Nick Clegg but David Cameron hasn't really been that great in the three debates (and I'm not saying that because I am biased -- Clegg won the debates and not solely on policies either).  Having said that, he's probably about even, perhaps a bit better than Brown in terms of the 3 debates (and not because I agree with the Tory policies).
Back to Top
Zebedee View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 02 2009
Location: The Woods
Status: Offline
Points: 1588
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 05:07
^Yeah that's what i thought. The immense amount of stress and the negative public perception haunting Brown must have driven him to despair. It's easy to make a blunder like Brown did during such a stressful campaign.

Besides that, it's usually in the nature of a shy man (which Brown, according to himself, is) to not show his real feelings directly to strangers like Mrs. Duffy.

All in all, it was an understandable but unfortunate accident.


Friendship is like wetting your pants: everyone can see it, but only you can feel its warmth.
Back to Top
Cactus Choir View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2008
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1035
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 04:48
Originally posted by James James wrote:

He seemed quite relaxed when talking to her, Jim.  Obviously he wasn't though.

He also came across well and didn't alienate her (until afterwards, of course).  I just think he felt it was "a disaster", when it wasn't.  He personally wasn't expecting to speak to her and it was his advisers that threw her at him.



Yes, Brown's reaction to the incident was bizarre. It seemed a perfectly reasonable encounter - she asked some pointed questions and he answered them in a polite and informative way. I don't know how he could judge that  "a disaster" and as you say he came out of it rather favourably if anything. The man must be paranoid about how he's perceived.
"And now...on the drums...Mick Underwooooooooood!!!"

"He's up the pub"
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 04:37
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Wasn't the last time Tories came to power a time of great recession, and they stayed in power for 18 years? Tongue


Depends on your political perspective. Britain spent most of the 70's in the poor house, from what I remember. We were regarded as the 'sick man of Europe' We had three day working weeks and frequent powercuts under the tories, and years of strikes under Labour. The unions basically had the Labour party by the nuts, and their actions landed us with 17 years of Tory rule. I remember my father and his Conservative club friends raising their glasses in a toast to the trade unions at a Con party fund raising event....

We were in recession in the early 80's under Thatcher, then again under John Major in the early 90's.
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
toroddfuglesteg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
Retired

Joined: March 04 2008
Location: Retirement Home
Status: Offline
Points: 3658
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2010 at 03:39
Originally posted by James James wrote:

Besides, she's "some sort of bigot", which isn't strictly a proper bigot. Wink

And I must clarify, she's not a bigot.

And there really is no conspiracy against the Working Class.  Don't be daft!  The Tories don't like them but Labour (yes, even New Labour who aren't true to Socialism) have far more empathy than the silly Tory Toffs.

Yes, off course she was hounded out of her home by the press. But she entered into a conversation with the PM in the belief that this was a conversation and it ended there. Due to the dishonesty and two-faced nature of Gordon Brown; it did not. I have no gripes with the Labour Party, the other victim of this dishonesty. But I have issues with backstabbing, two-faced individuals.   

The conspiracy against the working class (in his own world, ie the Labour Party) is an idea expressed by John Prescott * in his blog/twitter feed that same day. But it never fails to amuse me that all the parties who are set up to represent the working class, more or less have their origins among the middle classes and mostly at the universities. I am mostly referring to the extreme leftist parties here.   

* = The microphone was placed on Gordon Brown with his permission and in the understanding that all he said was the intellectual property of Sky News which they could use to their discretion. Neither the Labour Party or Gordon Brown has disputed this.   


 


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.