| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
trackstoni 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 23 2008
Location: Lebanon
Status: Offline
Points: 934
|
 Topic: Most Productive Year for prog 1970 - 2010 !
Posted: January 08 2011 at 12:49 |
i know that couple of years left behind , but there was no competition at that time , the real one started at the end of 1969 . as a magazine owner at that time , i use to get all available album released around the globe , from label companies via ordinary mail or by hand from people travelling around , also i still have a lot of copies of Melody Maker , Sound , Bravo ( Germany) , Billboard , Time Out etc ... etc even the copies of my magazine ( 1969 - 75 ) issues . So , i believe that 1972 - 73 was the most productive one in all terms ! what do you think ? 
|
|
Tracking Tracks of Rock
|
 |
Nathaniel607
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 28 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 374
|
Posted: January 08 2011 at 14:09 |
2009 maybe.
To be honest, I think anyone saying anything before 2000 is lying/fanboy/deluded/Walter. The internet has just helped so many more bands and artists get their material out there. There's enough material available in a post-internet (well, since it got popular) year to last me a lifetime.
But yeah, that's in terms of how much material is available to the average music listener. Music actually made is a different story...
|
|
|
|
Andy Webb
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: June 04 2010
Location: Terria
Status: Offline
Points: 13298
|
Posted: January 08 2011 at 15:39 |
|
I think 2007 was a good year. that was also the first year i really got into prog, so i may be a bit biased
|
|
|
|
WalterDigsTunes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
|
Posted: January 08 2011 at 15:46 |
 Nathaniel607 wrote:
2009 maybe.
To be honest, I think anyone saying anything before 2000 is lying/fanboy/deluded/Walter. The internet has just helped so many more bands and artists get their material out there. There's enough material available in a post-internet (well, since it got popular) year to last me a lifetime.
But yeah, that's in terms of how much material is available to the average music listener. Music actually made is a different story... |
All of it is pure trash. Absurd quantity, yet nothing of quality. All these worthless internet bands, with their lousy digital home studios and samples and copped riffs, have added nothing to legacy of the art form once known music. Indeed, all they've done is saturate the information superhighway with dross that impedes people from accessing the real deal.
|
|
octopus-4
Special Collaborator
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13451
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 09:01 |
|
just looking at the tops year by year here on PA, I'd say 1971.
|
|
Curiosity killed a cat, Schroedinger only half.
My poor home recorded stuff at https://yellingxoanon.bandcamp.com
|
|
hobocamp
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 17 2010
Location: Fine Furniture
Status: Offline
Points: 525
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 09:09 |
|
1973
|
|
irrelevant
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 07 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 13382
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 09:29 |
hobocamp wrote:
1973 |
Shhhh.... We're supposed to work around that one. 
|
|
|
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 09:54 |
|
Are you referring only to quality TT, or is quality relevant to your topic too?
|
|
hobocamp
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 17 2010
Location: Fine Furniture
Status: Offline
Points: 525
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 10:20 |
irrelevant wrote:
hobocamp wrote:
1973 |
Shhhh.... We're supposed to work around that one. |
Because of Tales and Play I presume?
|
|
thehallway
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 13 2010
Location: Dorset, England
Status: Offline
Points: 1433
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 13:04 |
No, I think because it's considered the epic, definitive, absolute, undisupted peak of the genre....
....by some.
Probably including me!
|
|
|
|
let prog reign
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 11 2010
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 256
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 14:07 |
|
For the classic age 72 and 73 definitely. But for more recent times I would say 2008. And 2009 were great years.
|
|
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17553
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 14:24 |
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Nathaniel607 wrote:
2009 maybe.
To be honest, I think anyone saying anything before 2000 is lying/fanboy/deluded/Walter. The internet has just helped so many more bands and artists get their material out there. There's enough material available in a post-internet (well, since it got popular) year to last me a lifetime.
But yeah, that's in terms of how much material is available to the average music listener. Music actually made is a different story... |
All of it is pure trash. Absurd quantity, yet nothing of quality. All these worthless internet bands, with their lousy digital home studios and samples and copped riffs, have added nothing to legacy of the art form once known music. Indeed, all they've done is saturate the information superhighway with dross that impedes people from accessing the real deal.
|
But Walter I also think about had pre '89 artists had some kind of digital medium to get their music out, how much more would there be? I mean how many potential new artists did we miss out on in the 70's and 80's because they had no means to get their music out to the public? Your right, it does not cost much to put out an album with the internet and home studios on a laptop.......but does that mean its all trash?
|
|
|
|
plpicher
Forum Newbie
Joined: November 13 2010
Location: Québec
Status: Offline
Points: 5
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 14:25 |
1973: The Dark Side of the Moon Selling England by the Pound In a Glass House Birds of Fire Tubular Bells Larks Tongue in Aspic Camel I'm sure I forget a lot '72&'73 were clearly the best years for prog, '74 was also good.
Edited by plpicher - January 09 2011 at 14:35
|
|
friso
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 24 2007
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 2505
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 15:20 |
|
If some-one would ask me, which rarely happens by the way, I'd say 1970 what the year prog got it's momentum. From that year on the course was set for progressive rock, which makes it the main productive moment for the movement for me.
|
|
Nathaniel607
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 28 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 374
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 16:15 |
Catcher10 wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Nathaniel607 wrote:
2009 maybe.
To be honest, I think anyone saying anything before 2000 is lying/fanboy/deluded/Walter. The internet has just helped so many more bands and artists get their material out there. There's enough material available in a post-internet (well, since it got popular) year to last me a lifetime.
But yeah, that's in terms of how much material is available to the average music listener. Music actually made is a different story... |
All of it is pure trash. Absurd quantity, yet nothing of quality. All these worthless internet bands, with their lousy digital home studios and samples and copped riffs, have added nothing to legacy of the art form once known music. Indeed, all they've done is saturate the information superhighway with dross that impedes people from accessing the real deal.
|
But Walter I also think about had pre '89 artists had some kind of digital medium to get their music out, how much more would there be? I mean how many potential new artists did we miss out on in the 70's and 80's because they had no means to get their music out to the public? Your right, it does not cost much to put out an album with the internet and home studios on a laptop.......but does that mean its all trash? |
Exactly. What he seems to be suggesting is that if albums can't be released in the traditional manner, they must be sh*t. How can the number of albums overall go up, but only with the number of bad ones increasing? Not only is it silly, it's downright statistically impossible with numbers as great as they are.
Besides, nothing wrong with home studios in my opinion, but then again, I'm not really an audiophile.
Also, how does there being a lot of bad material stop people getting good material? That's a silly argument. There are loads of 60s' and 70s' bands who have pretty much only got popular once the internet rolled around. Well, I can't prove it, but you know the ones I mean - the obscure, usually one-album-wonder bands.
Edited by Nathaniel607 - January 09 2011 at 20:36
|
|
|
|
trackstoni
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 23 2008
Location: Lebanon
Status: Offline
Points: 934
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 16:25 |
|
to be honest in this , and while still in the beginning of this , what i've meant , was only about Masterpieces & Excellent stuff that we have today !
|
|
Tracking Tracks of Rock
|
|
CCVP
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 15 2007
Location: Vitória, Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 7971
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 18:08 |
|
In the 70's, from 71 to 73 and in recent times from 06 to 09.
|
|
|
|
clarke2001
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 20:21 |
|
It depends of a genre.
Early 70's were great for Symphonic prog, but not so great in the late 70's. But the era was great for jazz rock fusion.
Electronic was great in 70's and first half of the 80's, it became atrocious in mid-late 80's, coming back to form as 90's advanced.
Avant prog has many facets and it's great in all periods: from The Residents to Kayo Dot.
First half of the 90's don't do much for me. But 95-00 period revealed some great prog. 00's too.
There are exceptions, of course.
If I had to pick my favourite prog year (for let's say 1967-2011) I would draw an envelope: a steep slope up in the 60's, high in the 70's, moderately going down, again jumping up in the 1980, steeply falling down almost to zero, remaining low through a chunk of the 90's and then going up in the last quarter, keeping more or less constant line to this day.
|
|
|
|
irrelevant
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 07 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 13382
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 20:31 |
thehallway wrote:
No, I think because it's considered the epic, definitive, absolute, undisupted peak of the genre....
....by some.
Probably including me! |
Yeah, that's what I was getting at.
|
|
|
|
progvortex
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 242
|
Posted: January 09 2011 at 21:46 |
|
1969. Because regardless of the quantity of music subsequently released, none can match the grandeur of our King's debut.
|
|
Life is like a beanstalk... isn't it?
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Most Productive Year for prog 1970 - 2010 !
