Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Are proghead nerds?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Are proghead nerds?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
Hrychu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2013
Location: poland?
Status: Offline
Points: 5957
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hrychu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 06:40
Now I'm a bit confused about the semantics. To tell you the truth, I've never encountered the term proghead outside of Progarchives.com

How do *you* define "proghead", guys? Does such person in any way differ from a normal progressive rock fan? Or a progressive rock geek?

Edited by Hrychu - Yesterday at 06:43
Back to Top
Gnik Nosmirc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 28 2024
Location: Canada
Status: Online
Points: 347
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gnik Nosmirc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 09:36
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

^ I'm not wrong. Actually I know I'm right. My jazz collection and obsession is positive social cultural capital/currency, while in a normie context - Prog is the complete opposite. Selecting my Sunday at the Village Vanguard LP over... Aquiring the Taste is crucial to whether a woman stays or leaves. We obviously have different experiences, and I'm not talking about a 12 year old into jazz - which obviously made you a complete weirdo.

-What I write about progheads is not an opinion, but an observation. I've already stated that I usually enjoy their company (up to a point), although I don't count myself as being one of them. You (and Sean) are the one that seemingly can't stand them. I hang out with nerds of all sorts "all the time" - until I tire of listening to whatever the one-or two things they go on about are. I personally listen to Progarchives-related music maybe 25% of music my listening time, and it's usually artists not normally associated with Prog Rock. I know who I am and I'm far form a "prog dork". But I bump into them every one in a while. As far as I'm concerned, the average progger is one track minded and doesn't really have eclectic tastes. I have. If I introduce them to say some rhytmically complex Avantgarde Jazz or Eastern European folk music - suddenly odd time signatures or whatever isn't all that interesting anymore. It's like it has to sound like Gentle Giant for them to count.


I want to apologize for my earlier comment. That wasn’t meant as a dig at the members of ProgArchives — in fact, I’ve always found this community to be refreshingly open-minded, which goes against the stereotype often associated with prog fans.

The reason I brought this up stems from stumbling upon a subreddit where nearly every post came from self-proclaimed “proud dorks” who spoke in a rigid, almost dogmatic way about what prog is — as if there’s one definitive version of it — and insisted that being into prog automatically makes you a massive nerd, no exceptions.

When I read your comment, I initially lumped you in with that crowd, and I reacted poorly because I really don’t like being reduced to a label. That said, I understand where you're coming from now. I’m not convinced a girl would literally run for the hills if she heard Gentle Giant, but I agree — it’s probably not the best idea to start a conversation about them with someone who isn’t already into prog.

Which is why I’ve made a point of keeping my musical taste diverse — from the funk and soul of Earth, Wind & Fire, to the Nordic psychedelia of Tusmørke, all the way to the experimental alt-rock of Radiohead.

Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Gnik/King, apparently, you're a late 30's "dude" , who barely knows what went on before you, including 70's prog bands and general public perception.


I am actually in my mid 20's.

You're absolutely right — I only got into prog a few years ago. My roots are actually in jazz, and I’ve also always had a soft spot for yacht rock. Back in high school, my playlist was dominated by bands like The Doobie Brothers, Steely Dan, and Byrne & Barnes. That sound — the smooth, polished vibe of the late ’70s and early ’80s — was surprisingly popular among my friends at the time, and it definitely helped me connect with people. Maybe it still holds up today?

Over time, my musical tastes have become increasingly eclectic. My library is a mix of progressive rock, fusion subgenres, and a solid foundation of classic jazz. I’ve come to see prog as a natural extension of blues and jazz — branching into classical, folk, electronic, and beyond. For me, it felt like the next logical step after diving deep into jazz and fusion. That progression is clearly reflected in my collection, much of which comes from albums listed on ProgArchives and JazzMusicArchives.

I don’t really identify as someone confined to a niche. I see myself more as a traveler exploring the vast and varied landscape of experimental music. That’s partly why I clash with gatekeepers or the kind of “nerds” who lock themselves into narrow definitions of what prog should be. Music — especially progressive music — should be about discovery, not limitation.

That said, I’ve got nothing against the users on PA. I know many of them have completely different tastes and approaches, and I respect that diversity.
Eclectic/RIO/RPI/Canterbury
Back to Top
Hrychu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2013
Location: poland?
Status: Offline
Points: 5957
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hrychu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 10:38
Originally posted by Gnik Nosmirc Gnik Nosmirc wrote:


I am actually in my mid 20's.
You're not alone. I'm 29 (born in 1996). 😎

Originally posted by Gnik Nosmirc Gnik Nosmirc wrote:

I don’t really identify as someone confined to a niche. I see myself more as a traveler exploring the vast and varied landscape of experimental music. That’s partly why I clash with gatekeepers or the kind of “nerds” who lock themselves into narrow definitions of what prog should be. Music — especially progressive music — should be about discovery, not limitation.

That said, I’ve got nothing against the users on PA. I know many of them have completely different tastes and approaches, and I respect that diversity.
That's fantastic. <3

One of the reasons I see myself as a nerd is because I'm too young to have experienced the heyday of prog rock naturally. I discovered the genre back when it was already a lingering niche, completely on my own, thanks to Progarchives and YouTube. :P As a largely hip-hop and chiptune focused musician at the time, I was immediately drawn by the complex and rich structures of 70s prog music. Moving onto prog from the repetitive and formulaic conventions of the so called beats felt like an epic adventure. A challenge. Intimidating yet rewarding. Studying the classics helped me push the boundaries of my comfort zone and continue the journey to improve my craft. I still have a long way to go.

Edited by Hrychu - Yesterday at 10:52
Back to Top
Gnik Nosmirc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 28 2024
Location: Canada
Status: Online
Points: 347
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gnik Nosmirc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 12:29
Originally posted by Hrychu Hrychu wrote:


Originally posted by Gnik Nosmirc Gnik Nosmirc wrote:


I am actually in my mid 20's.

You're not alone. I'm 29 (born in 1996). 😎


Another young boy! I was born in 1999. I'm a bit younger.
Eclectic/RIO/RPI/Canterbury
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20613
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 16:18
Originally posted by Gnik Nosmirc Gnik Nosmirc wrote:


The reason I brought this up stems from stumbling upon a subreddit where nearly every post came from self-proclaimed “proud dorks” who spoke in a rigid, almost dogmatic way about what prog is — as if there’s one definitive version of it — and insisted that being into prog automatically makes you a massive nerd, no exceptions.

....

Which is why I’ve made a point of keeping my musical taste diverse — from the funk and soul of Earth, Wind & Fire, to the Nordic psychedelia of Tusmørke, all the way to the experimental alt-rock of Radiohead.

.....

Over time, my musical tastes have become increasingly eclectic. My library is a mix of progressive rock, fusion subgenres, and a solid foundation of classic jazz. I’ve come to see prog as a natural extension of blues and jazz — branching into classical, folk, electronic, and beyond. For me, it felt like the next logical step after diving deep into jazz and fusion. That progression is clearly reflected in my collection, much of which comes from albums listed on ProgArchives and JazzMusicArchives.


Dorks are definitely a nasty form of nerds, precisely because they go out of their way to be dorks. Nerds are +/- their own victims and can't help themselves being losers. Then again, you've got the rare Prog Jerk (there is one on this forum)

I've never made a point of widening my musical tastes. It happened right from the start and increased as time went on.

TBH, I'm not a big fan of what is called "classic jazz", because it encopasses too many styles I don't really care for. Not just the different Bops, Cool, Swing, Big Band, Soft (the worst kind), Acid, etc.... What I really like is the Modal jazz "new thing" from the Impulse! label (Coltrane, Mingus) and what ensued in the 70's (Tyner, Alice, Pharoah, etc...), Mwandishi, RTF, WR, MO etc... I'm also into the LDN scene that calls itself "spiritual jazz" and other stuff.


.

Edited by Sean Trane - 14 hours 44 minutes ago at 02:48
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Gnik Nosmirc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 28 2024
Location: Canada
Status: Online
Points: 347
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Gnik Nosmirc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 17:55
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:


Dorks are definitely a nasty form of nerds, precisely because they go out of their way to be dorks. Nerds are +/- their own victims and can't help themselves being losers.


I don't really care about them. I just get the sense that they label you that way because they want you to be like them—just because you might share some of the same tastes. Then they act like they own those tastes, as if they're the gatekeepers.

Likewise, they have this awful tendency to homogenize everything under the banner of geek consumerism. Being interested in mythology, history, and philosophy makes you, in their eyes, a fan of board games and a cringe-worthy collector of figurines (even though there's nothing fundamentally wrong with being into that). That's where I draw the line between what is essentially an intellectual and a nerd/dork.

Edited by Gnik Nosmirc - 23 hours 32 minutes ago at 18:00
Eclectic/RIO/RPI/Canterbury
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20613
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 hours 7 minutes ago at 02:25
Originally posted by Gnik Nosmirc Gnik Nosmirc wrote:

Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:


Dorks are definitely a nasty form of nerds, precisely because they go out of their way to be dorks. Nerds are +/- their own victims and can't help themselves being losers.


I don't really care about them. I just get the sense that they label you that way because they want you to be like them—just because you might share some of the same tastes. Then they act like they own those tastes, as if they're the gatekeepers.

Likewise, they have this awful tendency to homogenize everything under the banner of geek consumerism. Being interested in mythology, history, and philosophy makes you, in their eyes, a fan of board games and a cringe-worthy collector of figurines (even though there's nothing fundamentally wrong with being into that). That's where I draw the line between what is essentially an intellectual and a nerd/dork.


by boardgames, I supose you mean the Dungeons & Dragons stuff, as opposed to Cribbage or Monopoly.

I actually like some of these latest generation of BG, but f**k these people are so geekish that there almost dorks (but harmless ones)

https://boardgamegeek.com/

in some ways , they're scarier than the symph weenies of the 90's.

Edited by Sean Trane - 15 hours 4 minutes ago at 02:28
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 12964
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 hours 25 minutes ago at 07:07
Originally posted by Gnik Nosmirc Gnik Nosmirc wrote:

I want to apologize for my earlier comment. That wasn’t meant as a dig at the members of ProgArchives — in fact, I’ve always found this community to be refreshingly open-minded, which goes against the stereotype often associated with prog fans.
No need to aplogize. I think I understand where you come from, and I never read it as you writing about the members of Progarchives - whom I also agree are refreshingly open-minded. I was just writing about my own experiences and the conlusions drawn from them.

Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

-What I write about progheads is not an opinion, but an observation. I've already stated that I usually enjoy their company (up to a point), although I don't count myself as being one of them. You (and Sean) are the one that seemingly can't stand them.

Please don't include with Gnik (nothing against him, though)
Outside the bracket you put me in, I agree with most of your post.

I'm sorry. But you certainly came across as someone who weren't too much of a fan of these types of nerdy progheads. I don't really see how it could have been interpreted in any other way.
Back to Top
Gnik Nosmirc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 28 2024
Location: Canada
Status: Online
Points: 347
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gnik Nosmirc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 9 minutes ago at 17:23
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by Gnik Nosmirc Gnik Nosmirc wrote:

Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:


Dorks are definitely a nasty form of nerds, precisely because they go out of their way to be dorks. Nerds are +/- their own victims and can't help themselves being losers.


I don't really care about them. I just get the sense that they label you that way because they want you to be like them—just because you might share some of the same tastes. Then they act like they own those tastes, as if they're the gatekeepers.

Likewise, they have this awful tendency to homogenize everything under the banner of geek consumerism. Being interested in mythology, history, and philosophy makes you, in their eyes, a fan of board games and a cringe-worthy collector of figurines (even though there's nothing fundamentally wrong with being into that). That's where I draw the line between what is essentially an intellectual and a nerd/dork.


by boardgames, I supose you mean the Dungeons & Dragons stuff, as opposed to Cribbage or Monopoly.

I actually like some of these latest generation of BG, but f**k these people are so geekish that there almost dorks (but harmless ones)

https://boardgamegeek.com/

in some ways , they're scarier than the symph weenies of the 90's.


I actually enjoy board games, just more in the vein of Monopoly than D&D though.

What bands do symph weenies worship? I'm interested in what you call "symph weenies".

I personally enjoy retro prog, much more than neo-prog. I just think it's not very innovative. But it sounds great. Is it as revolutionary as Kid A or Soundtracks for the Blind though? Absolutely not.

Edited by Gnik Nosmirc - 4 minutes ago at 17:28
Eclectic/RIO/RPI/Canterbury
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.