Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - UK: AV Referendum, your vote?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedUK: AV Referendum, your vote?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 10>
Author
Message
Kilgannon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2011
Location: Cider Country!
Status: Offline
Points: 158
Direct Link To This Post Topic: UK: AV Referendum, your vote?
    Posted: May 01 2011 at 17:27
So, who in the UK is turning out for the vote on AV and what, if you aren't opposed to revealing your choice, are you voting?
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32587
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2011 at 17:29
AV stands for American what now?
Back to Top
topographicbroadways View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2011 at 17:32
Wondered when this would show up here. It'll be the first vote i'm eligible for so I may turn out. 
If I do vote it'll be No. The campaigns have been incredibly off putting though, especially as my opinion is against AV I don't particularly want to be associated with the ridiculous No Campaign.
Back to Top
Kilgannon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2011
Location: Cider Country!
Status: Offline
Points: 158
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2011 at 17:47
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

AV stands for American what now?

Unfortunately nothing American Tongue, 'tis the 'Alternative Vote' potentially to replace the First Past The Post system, with ranking your choice of party/candidate 1,2,3 etc and your vote gets re-allocated as the voting goes on should your first choice be eliminated (by being the lowest voted for party), subsequent rounds only occuring should no party achieve 50%+ of the vote.

^ As for ridiculous campaigning: +1
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2011 at 17:54

AV is a crap idea, it's not PR, but it's marginally better than what we've got at the moment. The No campaign is being less than honest and that's what's wrong with politics in this country. When they stoop this low you do have to wonder what it is they are affraid of exactly.

I'm voting Yes because I have little choice in the matter - voting No will be taken as a vindication of the First Past the Post system and I cannot allow that. First Past The Post means that whoever gets elected has the support of just over 1/3rd of the country, just under 1/3rd of the country votes for the opposition and about 1/3rd of country votes for people who have no say in how the country is run, and that's a really really crap system no matter how you look at it.
What?
Back to Top
Kilgannon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2011
Location: Cider Country!
Status: Offline
Points: 158
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2011 at 17:56
^ Couldn't agree more, felt the need to wash my hands after reading David Cameron's 'Why I'll be voting No' leaflet that came through the door this morning. So much misinformation and propaganda.
Back to Top
Ozexpat View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: February 09 2009
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 57
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2011 at 18:29
As an Australian living in the UK, I understand more than many in this country how the Preferential Voting system works. In Oz it is compulsory from your 18th birthday to vote. Australia uses this system and there is nothing to be scared of.

The basic premise is that you vote for who you want to win. Then, if they don't gain enough votes to win, your next preference goes to the one you want to win more than the others. It is more representative because, while your first choice might not have enough votes, your next choice may have. It's not a black and white decision between winning and losing. If there are two parties that have similar views to yours, then you can vote for both without compromise. You simply decide between them which you prefer to other parties' policies. Thus you never "waste" a vote ie. voting for the Greens (because you believe their policies) in a solid Conservative seat.

Under the current system if you live in a solid Conservative, LibDem or Labour seat, and you don't agree with them, your vote for any other party would be wasted.

However, under the AV, your vote for the party of your choice would count. It hands back power to the individual. How many times have you said/heard "well I didn't vote for 'em" ?

It doesn't automatically mean that minority parties win but it does send a clearer measage to the major parties as to what the public are thinking. This then effects policy.

It's a win-win. 


And for a moment when our world had filled the skies, Magic turned our eyes,
To feast on the treasure set for our strange device
Back to Top
Kilgannon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2011
Location: Cider Country!
Status: Offline
Points: 158
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2011 at 18:33
Agreed, my problem with a lot of the leaflets going round is that they claim it's confusing and unfair; which I feel gives very little credit to the British public. As you say, if I vote Lib Dem (hypothetically) but they come in last place, my vote doesn't then disappear into un-countable oblivion, it gets to be used in a meaningful way between the final two parties deemed most popular by EVERYONE.
Back to Top
Ozexpat View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: February 09 2009
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 57
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2011 at 18:42
Exactly. Nobodies vote is wasted. The main parties may win but it is very clear where the publics preferences lie.

Policy is then structured around this.
And for a moment when our world had filled the skies, Magic turned our eyes,
To feast on the treasure set for our strange device
Back to Top
topographicbroadways View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2011 at 19:18
I would be more in favour of them bring Compulsory Voting to this country
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2011 at 04:30
Am voting No.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2011 at 04:44
I am against this 100%!

I will be mailing in my vote tomorrow.


Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2011 at 04:52
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

I am against this 100%!

I will be mailing in my vote tomorrow.


And the No campaigners will gladly count it.
What?
Back to Top
Badabing666 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 30 2008
Location: Devon, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 248
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2011 at 04:53
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

AV is a crap idea, it's not PR, but it's marginally better than what we've got at the moment. The No campaign is being less than honest and that's what's wrong with politics in this country. When they stoop this low you do have to wonder what it is they are affraid of exactly.


I'm voting Yes because I have little choice in the matter - voting No will be taken as a vindication of the First Past the Post system and I cannot allow that. First Past The Post means that whoever gets elected has the support of just over 1/3rd of the country, just under 1/3rd of the country votes for the opposition and about 1/3rd of country votes for people who have no say in how the country is run, and that's a really really crap system no matter how you look at it.
I've already said Yes on my postal vote. Agree entirely with Dean perspective on this subject.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2011 at 04:56
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

I am against this 100%!

I will be mailing in my vote tomorrow.


And the No campaigners will gladly count it.


Good.

For the mailing address I can just send it to "England" right?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2011 at 04:59
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

I am against this 100%!

I will be mailing in my vote tomorrow.


And the No campaigners will gladly count it.


Good.

For the mailing address I can just send it to "England" right?
Better follow instructions and address it to President Clegg just to be sure.
 


Edited by Dean - May 02 2011 at 05:00
What?
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2011 at 05:03
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

I am against this 100%!

I will be mailing in my vote tomorrow.


And the No campaigners will gladly count it.


Good.

For the mailing address I can just send it to "England" right?
Better follow instructions and address it to President Clegg just to be sure.
 


LOL
Back to Top
akamaisondufromage View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2011 at 05:22
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

AV is a crap idea, it's not PR, but it's marginally better than what we've got at the moment. The No campaign is being less than honest and that's what's wrong with politics in this country. When they stoop this low you do have to wonder what it is they are affraid of exactly.

I'm voting Yes because I have little choice in the matter - voting No will be taken as a vindication of the First Past the Post system and I cannot allow that. First Past The Post means that whoever gets elected has the support of just over 1/3rd of the country, just under 1/3rd of the country votes for the opposition and about 1/3rd of country votes for people who have no say in how the country is run, and that's a really really crap system no matter how you look at it.
 
Most part ageed.  This is no choice at all.  Trouble is if you vote for AV and it changes there will never be another vote again in my life time!! aggh!  Who was it who decided that the only choice was to be this?  At the moment I am tempted to spoil my vote Angry
 
 
Help me I'm falling!
Back to Top
Syzygy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 16 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 7168
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2011 at 07:15
I'm voting 'no'. I'm not opposed to electoral reform per se, but this is an unwieldy system that is not a real alternative to what we have at the moment. I would be happy with a single transferable vote (which would make a real difference in marginal constituencies) but under the AV system my vote could (unlikely but possible) go towards the BNP or UKIP, which I'm really not comfortable with.
'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute
to the already rich among us...'

Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom


Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13891
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 02 2011 at 07:53
I will be voting yes, an absolute no-brainer as far as I am concerned.

BTW - votes will not go to UKIP, BNP etc. In fact, this system makes it harder for them to make inroads - that's why they are opposing it.
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.