Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Has Prog achieved 'inmortality'?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHas Prog achieved 'inmortality'?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Author
Message
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5093
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 13:55
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

 
 
So yes, I believe that prog has reached 'immortality' but not the same level as metal, country, hip hop and others genres.
Do You really think that within 45 years Hip-Hop will be as alive as Prog is today? (45 years after its infancy).
You may be right but let me doubt it.
Metal and Country are something else, I see them as more perennial genres.
Back to Top
Walton Street View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 24 2014
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 872
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 14:01
i'm probably not going to articulate this the way I'd like - but I think that one reason prog endures (among others) is the combination of musicianship and accessibility.
 
There is a lot of work, thought, changes, etc in prog - even the folks that think it's ponderous or depressing or 'you cant dance to it' have to admit there was a lot of substance there.
(almost everyone liked Pink Floyd)
 
Many of the bands themselves endured for years creating sizeable catalogues (I hesitate to say 'collectable' but I think there's something to that)
 
I don't want to sound like the old fart that I am - but the last few decades produced a lot of disposable bands.  (I know - every decade has - but it feels different now - like they aren't even trying) 


Edited by Walton Street - November 24 2014 at 14:03
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 16164
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 14:13
Hi,
 
I think the internet is performing a function that will make any style fall out of bed and disappear into the bedpans!
 
All in all, this is one of the best parts of the Internet that helps bring to any of us, all the types of music and all of the different and cultural styles out there. I am not sure that we can make a determination today, as to how this will affect music (and its history!!!), but I think that what we know as "progressive" will probably be better remembered than not.
 
One funny thing ... The Beatles, recent releases. i don't know a single person that bought it, and the whole thing was probably a media hype and likely failed to achieve the big/huge numbers that a couple of music companies were hoping for. So, yeah, things can die out, but in many ways The Beatles stuff that will survive will be the odd stuff towards their last year and not the hits in the first 4 years! Why? It was just pop music! And there is TOO MUCH of it, so single out one or two pieces!
 
All in all, in 50 years there will likely be a better determination as to what/how/why is the result of your question.
 
As for RIGHT NOW, I would say that all styles and everything out there is doing very well regardless of what/who they are!


Edited by moshkito - November 24 2014 at 14:15
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Kati View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 14:19
Gerinski :) mhwoaaahhxxx hello! HugMany bands who are considered prog have reached immortality for sure, not sure if the term prog has tho' Ermm more hugs Hug
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 26171
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 14:19
Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

The thing is who is buying it? Those same fans that bought anything ELP,Genesis, Yes and Pink Floyd released are still (mostly) alive and well and in many cases with spare cash to spend. That's what keeps it going. In 30 years it will be gone as will most of us.
Progressive rock is entertainment but it's also Art. The fact is that Art business is bulls*it business. However, Art will never stop because it does not make a good business for all of those who want to express themselves artistically.
Its that usual thing - 'prog' or 'progressive'? Progressive music will always exist but it will be hardly recognisable to most of us. The OP is talking about something that is less about art and more about a style or formula that will just continue to be and that's what I take issue with. The fact is that 'prog' is business. CD's are put out and they sell. I doubt that anyone is going to just fund some hobby.
 
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20503
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 14:48
Originally posted by Gerinski Gerinski wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

 
 
So yes, I believe that prog has reached 'immortality' but not the same level as metal, country, hip hop and others genres.
Do You really think that within 45 years Hip-Hop will be as alive as Prog is today? (45 years after its infancy).
You may be right but let me doubt it.
Metal and Country are something else, I see them as more perennial genres.
This is an excellent question, Gerry, that may not be easy to answer for non Americans, but I'll try to do it without offense to anyone. I am a 60 something white male American that right now is in what is considered to be the majority race in my country. The minority races of Black Americans and Latinos is growing by leaps and bounds and will eventually overtake that of White Americans.  This is pretty much a fact. I do not the have statistical proof on hand, but please look at my countries' president and his race.
 
I think Hip Hop will be around for a long time. At least in America.


Edited by SteveG - November 24 2014 at 14:53
Back to Top
Svetonio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 15:10
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

The thing is who is buying it? Those same fans that bought anything ELP,Genesis, Yes and Pink Floyd released are still (mostly) alive and well and in many cases with spare cash to spend. That's what keeps it going. In 30 years it will be gone as will most of us.
Progressive rock is entertainment but it's also Art. The fact is that Art business is bulls*it business. However, Art will never stop because it does not make a good business for all of those who want to express themselves artistically.
Its that usual thing - 'prog' or 'progressive'? Progressive music will always exist but it will be hardly recognisable to most of us. The OP is talking about something that is less about art and more about a style or formula that will just continue to be and that's what I take issue with. The fact is that 'prog' is business. CD's are put out and they sell. I doubt that anyone is going to just fund some hobby.
 
*Prog* for me was / is a short of Progressive rock with all of its sub-genres.
 
The most of young prog bands & solo artists are "hobbyists", because they can not living by their Art, but they are happy that they are able to express themselfs. And sometimes even to record a prog masterpiece and to put that on Bandcamp for free download - in spite of all the old conservatives who want to capture the progressive rock into their scrapbooks from a junior high school, lol.


Edited by Svetonio - November 24 2014 at 15:13
Back to Top
bj_waters View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 37
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 17:22
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

The thing is who is buying it? Those same fans that bought anything ELP,Genesis, Yes and Pink Floyd released are still (mostly) alive and well and in many cases with spare cash to spend. That's what keeps it going. In 30 years it will be gone as will most of us.

Maybe in the future, no one will buy music.  Maybe they will be inspired by U2's latest idea (except forcing it on everyone, of course), and musicians will make their money on live shows and merch.  I could see prog rock living in that kind of environment, with their emphasis on live technical wizardy and visual spectacle.  Basically, be KISS, but with much better music.

Let me give an example that's probably working today.  Say what you will about the band, but the sheer stage presence of Umphrey's McGee is undeniable, and I bet they don't make all that much money from the sales of studio albums.  I could see a lot of younger prog rock bands following in their shoes.

Here's another thought.  Right now, not only are in an era of perpetual piracy and bootleg swapping, but streaming services like Pandora and Spotify are starting to really explode.  Maybe, in the future, people won't bother with "owning" music, per se, but streaming it to their devices, so they don't have to bother with owning.

Now, I bet that probably rankles a number of you, as you have great pride in your album collections, and you're not wrong to feel that way (I'm that way with my video games and anime), but maybe owning music will become a generational thing, and in the future, people will just stream it, with every genre conceivable at their fingertips, the musicians getting pennies per stream (if that) or something.  The internet has become a part of our everyday living (for most of the first world), and as such it has changed a lot of things, including how people listen to music.

Well, that's probably enough idle speculation for one day.  Tongue
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46828
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 17:39
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

To really answer this question, one has to look outside of a genre's history and the current trends of other musical genres to gauge the 'mortality' of those particular genres. Not easy when you're whole world is almost completely dependent or focused on prog.
 
Take electronic dance music for example. An 80/90's phenomenon that has had a renaissance with electronic music groups like Daft Punk and others that are riding this renewed gravy train.
 
So yes, I believe that prog has reached 'immortality' but not the same level as metal, country, hip hop and others genres.
 
These genres are all vampires in one form or another.
 
It's only the ones getting more blood or an unexpected infusion that will always be more noticeable.


interesting post.  Prog is for the most predicated on rock ..and rock as anyone should really recognize is a dying art form. It had its day.. the glory days of which which other boss musical forms.. jazz before rock, and I suppose classical before that could only dream of. However IMO it should be plainly obvious that rock music has been enclipsed as the popular form of music by hip hop. That is what most young people listen to and  relate to, where the Elvis elvated rock music to become to music of the masses it seems it has run its course unless you consider groups like Nickleback or the Foo Fighters to be the standard bearers of rock.   Rock music in general, and progressive rock specifically have receded into the underground which is not a bad thing in itself. It allows the freedom to be creative and artistic without the chance of commerical success which of course can ruin the pursuit of art for its own sake hahah. 

Prog is, IMO, a dying musical genre. Many of the new groups today owe little to Yes or Genesis or ELP but instead have forged ahead making their own musical statements, using such untapped influences as Chinese Folk or Eastern European folk or god forbid.. good old fashioned pop music.  Prog will last as long as the last baby boomers and groups like Yes and their like will go the way of Glen Miller Duke Ellington and Tommy Dorcey but always hold a historical appeal but audiences will move on to music that relates to them. That is the way it will be, it has ALWAYS been the way it has always been.


Edited by micky - November 24 2014 at 17:44
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Surrealist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 12 2012
Location: Squonk
Status: Offline
Points: 232
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 19:13
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:


Music needs to be performed by either people, animals or nature.  Spending all day copy and pasting sound files on a computer from a folder filled with sound files is not music.  It's digital collage.  If you like playing video games that simulate car chases or war scenes... good for you.. but it's not driving a car or flying a medivac helicopter into a hot zone in Vietnam.  It's simulation.  Listening to computer electronica is like having sex based upon computer images.  You do that.. not me.  I prefer the real thing.  You like electronica and Prog? Same as you liking internet porn and real sex , but don't confuse the two.  Electronica is NOT music.  It digital collage of sound files.  It's ok to like it.. but you're being dumbed down by non musicians brainwashing you into thinking it's music.  It's not.


Well, i guess the minute someone plugs in their guitar and amplifies it it is no longer music. Who do you think programs the computers and assembles the collages? Do the computers actually assemble the sounds randomly or is there a human involved? Just admit it that you don't like an entire genre based on your prejudice and leave it at that. But to come up with ridiculous blanket statements like this is laughable. On the contrary to being dumbed down i find certain electronica artists hightly progressive with incredibly original ideas but maybe i've been brainwashed into thinking so while i'm watching internet porn! Ha ha ha
[/QUOTE]

That really hurt my feelingsCry

But after thinking about it all day and going through 1/5th of a box of tissue, I realized that the person who wrote this probably is one of those insensitive soulless humans who probably likes mindless soulless music like electronica and has been so dumbed down by peer pressure to conform that they have no idea what they are talking about or are completely unaware of human emotion and the ramifications thereof.

I think when someone plugs in a guitar into an amplifier, they are still playing an instrument.  Unlike the pretentious "DJ" spinning up on the platform who isn't playing anything other than posing as a fake god to the dumbest generation of all time.

You do that.. not me.


Back to Top
Greg W View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
Points: 3904
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 19:21
Popular rock is dead. Good music has gone underground.
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20503
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 19:28
^Funny. I think I said that about 30 years ago! Music is always better underground. LOL
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Polymorphia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 20:19
Originally posted by Surrealist Surrealist wrote:

Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:


Originally posted by Surrealist Surrealist wrote:

Music needs to be performed by either people, animals or nature.  Spending all day copy and pasting sound files on a computer from a folder filled with sound files is not music.  It's digital collage.  If you like playing video games that simulate car chases or war scenes... good for you.. but it's not driving a car or flying a medivac helicopter into a hot zone in Vietnam.  It's simulation.  Listening to computer electronica is like having sex based upon computer images.  You do that.. not me.  I prefer the real thing.  You like electronica and Prog? Same as you liking internet porn and real sex , but don't confuse the two.  Electronica is NOT music.  It digital collage of sound files.  It's ok to like it.. but you're being dumbed down by non musicians brainwashing you into thinking it's music.  It's not.


Well, i guess the minute someone plugs in their guitar and amplifies it it is no longer music. Who do you think programs the computers and assembles the collages? Do the computers actually assemble the sounds randomly or is there a human involved? Just admit it that you don't like an entire genre based on your prejudice and leave it at that. But to come up with ridiculous blanket statements like this is laughable. On the contrary to being dumbed down i find certain electronica artists hightly progressive with incredibly original ideas but maybe i've been brainwashed into thinking so while i'm watching internet porn! Ha ha ha


That really hurt my feelingsCry

But after thinking about it all day and going through 1/5th of a box of tissue, I realized that the person who wrote this probably is one of those insensitive soulless humans who probably likes mindless soulless music like electronica and has been so dumbed down by peer pressure to conform that they have no idea what they are talking about or are completely unaware of human emotion and the ramifications thereof.

I think when someone plugs in a guitar into an amplifier, they are still playing an instrument.  Unlike the pretentious "DJ" spinning up on the platform who isn't playing anything other than posing as a fake god to the dumbest generation of all time.

You do that.. not me.


I don't want to just point out minor details and avoid confronting your main point but you don't seem to have one. You call electronic music "NOT music" and "mindless soulless music." In the case that you mean the former, I don't think even you totally adhere to your prescribed definition of the word as shown to your reference to it in regards to electronic music. So you seem to just be saying "electronic music" is bad, but only by principle and not aesthetically. That, to me, is soulless. Not to mention, your comments seem to be more vitriolic than anything he said.


Edited by Polymorphia - November 24 2014 at 20:20
Back to Top
Surrealist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 12 2012
Location: Squonk
Status: Offline
Points: 232
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 22:40
Explain to me how looping sound files on a computer program is playing an instrument?

If you play an instrument... you are making a sound in real time.  That is what instruments do.
What instrument doesn't do this?  A broken one?

Computer programmers messing with sound files.  Is a DJ a musician?  A DJ is someone who plays pre recorded music.  They are not playing the role of a musician when they are spinning, looping etc. 

The core ingredient particularly in Prog Rock is quality musicianship.  Musicians playing instruments that make music.

A few wannabee's banging on over the top of pre recorded looping sound files doesn't qualify.




Edited by Surrealist - November 24 2014 at 22:41
Back to Top
Polymorphia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 23:25
1. What is the purpose of an instrument? To make sound. A computer does the same. 

2. What does playing an instrument have to do with the definition of music? You may be trying to derive the definition of "music" by "musician" but the word "musician" comes from "music." Not the other way around. You can't redefine a word by a derivative. Sorry. Same thing applies to "musical instrument." I believe you instinctively know that electronic music is music because its presented with the same intent that John Coltrane presents his music, or Yes, or Genesis— to express, and to be listened to, enjoyed, and scrutinized. The definition of music need not be more complicated than its lingual equivalents in previous ages, which paid no heed to concepts of "instruments" and "real time." It was simply sound with the intents described above. Nothing more.

3. A computer can make sounds in real time actually, and it has been used to do so. Not all electronic music is sample based. Or you may be referring to live shows where many electronic acts simply play and manipulate the recorded loops, but some electronic acts actually recreate the music from scratch and others still play non-electronic instruments. The reason why there are artists who do the first of these is because electronic sounds can be very hard to recreate. It can be difficult for a primarily recorded medium to be transferred to a live setting, but it can and has been done.

4. When you listen to your favorite records, you are not listening to music in real time, therefore it doesn't matter whether the music is being made in real time or not. Unless it was recorded live, it wasn't even played in real time and, even if it is, many instruments are added out of real time, so if you think that being able to disqualify music that wasn't made in real time from a non-real time medium that you consider music along with live shows, you are sorely mistaken.

5. I can always pull out Squarepusher. His recorded material is electronic yet in his live shows, he rips up on bass. Wannabe? Nope. Proof that some electronic musician sometimes have the skills to succeed in other kinds of music, but make the music they want to make— electronic.
And he certainly isn't the only one.


Edited by Polymorphia - November 24 2014 at 23:26
Back to Top
Svetonio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2014 at 23:42
Originally posted by Toaster Mantis Toaster Mantis wrote:

Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

Originally posted by Toaster Mantis Toaster Mantis wrote:

Well, most fans of modern electronic music I've met find Schulze and TD either too technologically primitive or too close to Krautrock and modern classical to be "real electronic music". The latter basically starts with Kraftwerk.
I respect your opinion, but in my opinion the Berlin School of electronic music is *in* again, and there's more and more Neo Berlin School artists and albums. For example, I find today this Neo Berlin School masterpiece that is released a three weeks ago by Spanish artist Javi Cánovas.


I can only speak from my own personal experience, in which people into Berlin School electronic music and similar styles usually tend to be more into classic psychedelic rock with their listening background informed by that genre.
My own personal experience is that people who make, say, a "core" of the audience that now are listening to the Neo Berlin School artists, and also discover the great pioneers of the genre, has nothing to do with the audience who are listening to the "modern electronic music" whatever it means. 
That audience, who are listening to the recent album of e.g. Neo Berlin School artist Rene de Bakker, they are now, say, 30 - 50 years old, and who are listening to the New Age electronic music as their the most beloved genre, and also enjoyed very much in that "sunset" chill-out music, e.g. Cafe del Mar
So that crowd did not reveal the Berlin School because of freak-out with Kraftwerk and (or) to monitor trends in "modern electronic music".
 Actually they are listening now to the albums of the Neo Berlin school of electronic music and also to the selected albums by the pioneers of the Progressive electronic as relaxing music as well.


Edited by Svetonio - November 25 2014 at 01:39
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 26171
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2014 at 01:38
Originally posted by bj_waters bj_waters wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

The thing is who is buying it? Those same fans that bought anything ELP,Genesis, Yes and Pink Floyd released are still (mostly) alive and well and in many cases with spare cash to spend. That's what keeps it going. In 30 years it will be gone as will most of us.

Maybe in the future, no one will buy music.  Maybe they will be inspired by U2's latest idea (except forcing it on everyone, of course), and musicians will make their money on live shows and merch.  I could see prog rock living in that kind of environment, with their emphasis on live technical wizardy and visual spectacle.  Basically, be KISS, but with much better music.

Let me give an example that's probably working today.  Say what you will about the band, but the sheer stage presence of Umphrey's McGee is undeniable, and I bet they don't make all that much money from the sales of studio albums.  I could see a lot of younger prog rock bands following in their shoes.

Here's another thought.  Right now, not only are in an era of perpetual piracy and bootleg swapping, but streaming services like Pandora and Spotify are starting to really explode.  Maybe, in the future, people won't bother with "owning" music, per se, but streaming it to their devices, so they don't have to bother with owning.

Now, I bet that probably rankles a number of you, as you have great pride in your album collections, and you're not wrong to feel that way (I'm that way with my video games and anime), but maybe owning music will become a generational thing, and in the future, people will just stream it, with every genre conceivable at their fingertips, the musicians getting pennies per stream (if that) or something.  The internet has become a part of our everyday living (for most of the first world), and as such it has changed a lot of things, including how people listen to music.

Well, that's probably enough idle speculation for one day.  Tongue
 
The internet is of course a powerful tool but then I expect in the future a lot of this new music will be mass produced shyte and easily avoidable. The CD I think is still important to prog as I believe you are creating your own trademark product and therefore you are more invested in trying to create something special which is what prog is about imo.
 
The live event being the way to 'liberate' musicians/music is something I have often mused over myself but people have to want to get off their arses and go out and congregate with others. I'm not sure the X-Box generation is up for that but I could be wrong. Also not convinced that the small venues are up for it either. U2 can do what they like but it has little bearing on some small enterprise/group who want to get their stuff out there. 
 
For my own part I have found myself streaming TV and films over the last 6 months for the first time and I have to admit I like it. But that is TV and we are talking about something that comes and goes and is quickly  forgotten. The point of prog is that it sticks around and makes a place in your life not just something that flies by and then its onto the next thing. Streaming lends itself to the production line and that is not what is good for it imo. 
Back to Top
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5093
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2014 at 02:07
We can not generalise about electronic music as Surrealist does. But there are many kinds of electronic music and there is a small sub-set of it for which I agree to a certain point. The problem is in the definition of music itself, and in appreciating the difference between music as the noun, the end product, and the action of creating music as an artistic technique. An analogy could be made with graphic art. Painting is an artistic technique which results in a graphic work which can be looked at and appreciated by other humans. Making a collage with photoshop results also in the same kind of end product. Depending on the style and if you look at it from far enough, you may not be able to tell if the image was painted or assembled from existing image and colours - shapes files with photoshop. But you will never say that mastering photshop is painting. It is in this sense that Surrealist may say that assembling samples and loops on a computer is not the same craft as creating music in the traditional way. But while in graphical art with have the different words "painting" and "digital graphic art", in sonic art we only have one word, "music" or "crating music" which creates this sort of discussion.

Whether the end result is soulless or not is another thing, a digitally created product may been created with emotion and soul too, but the artistic craft is definitely a different one. In the same way as we do not call a digital graphic art product "a painting", we should have two different words for music, created traditionally (here I include using electronic means for creating the sounds) or by a process of digital assembly. 
Back to Top
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5093
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2014 at 02:13
^^ With the coming 3D immersive virtual reality technologies, bands may be able to just record a single concert with all their repertoire and you will be able to experience it from home as if you were there in the audience, choose where in the audience you want to be and which set list you want to hear. No need for touring the world carrying tons of equipment anymore.
Back to Top
Surrealist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 12 2012
Location: Squonk
Status: Offline
Points: 232
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2014 at 02:45
Ok,

So you have a Nintendo game console and you play Race Car 500.  Are you a race car driver? NO YOU ARE NOT...

but you can be an idiot and argue that you are! 

You play Playstation Golf Tiger Woods 4000... and you win a competition verses 30,000 online competitors.
Are you a champion golfer? NO YOU ARE NOT!!!

But you can be an idiot and argue that it's a skill and you beat 30K people and you are a golden golfing god!


You can be a techno electronica Mozart and compose and DJ music that makes people from London to Las Vegas think you are a digital messiah of the hipster modern molly culture... but are you a musician?

NO, YOU ARE NOT A MUSICIAN...

But you can defend and pretend that you are a modern musical genius like Rick Wakeman or Mahavishnu John McLaughlin.  Maybe you are Miles Davis or Jelly Roll Morton in your digital dreamy illusion. 

But don't confuse yourself to the point that you think electronica is music.

It's the playstation Nintendo version of music for the dumbed down, head down ipod generation.

The good news is that there are some truly transcendent rebel youths who see beyond the big lie and refuse to take part in the madness.

There are more than a couple of them on this site.  Take the blue pill or the red pill? 
Your choice.






Edited by Surrealist - November 25 2014 at 02:47
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.227 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.