Deep Purple vs Uriah Heep (2) |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | |||
Frosted Celt
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 08 2015 Location: Mars Status: Offline Points: 132 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
In Rock but Look At Yourself is also awesome.
|
|||
|
|||
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 22 2010 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 20477 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Zep did have some 'progginess' in some of their songs....but Micky says we can't say 'proggy' anymore.
|
|||
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin |
|||
Svetonio
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 20 2010 Location: Serbia Status: Offline Points: 10213 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Exactly, though I do prefer Houses of the Holy over Led Zep4. |
|||
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: June 18 2009 Location: Mexico Status: Offline Points: 12608 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Led Zeppelin completley lacked progginess? So what about "No Quarter" and "Achilles last Stand", at the very least this two songs... |
|||
sublime220
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 21 2015 Location: Willow Farm Status: Offline Points: 1563 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Look At Yourself in the mirror if you dare vote for that album. INNNNNN ROCK!
|
|||
There is no dark side in the moon, really... Matter of fact, it's all dark...
|
|||
Libor10
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 19 2005 Location: Czech republic Status: Offline Points: 692 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
In Rock wins hands down.
|
|||
|
|||
akaBona
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 15 2010 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 2082 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Look at Yourself
|
|||
Raff
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 29 2005 Location: None Status: Offline Points: 24391 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I actually love DP (and also The Who, Led Zep and lots of other bands) independently from their being "proggy" (that word again!) or not. I was into hard rock and classic metal before I got into prog, and don't need any associations with prog in order to enjoy a band. If others do, their loss.
|
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Look at Yourself, my first an still favorite Heavy Prog album.
July Morning is a masterpiece and Tears in my Eyes is simply breathtaking.
|
|||
|
|||
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 22 2010 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 20477 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Well...the term classic rock came up so I responded accordingly. As the 'kids' like to say....'my bad'.
|
|||
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin |
|||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 12702 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Silly Wu! That's because Deep Purple has been crowned (or crown-ed if you're feeling Shakespearean) with the laurels of secret pseudo-semi-progdom. Not fully prog, mind, but a few of their songs seem indicative - on a limited basis and completely conjecturally - of a proggishness that The Who and Led Zeppelin completely lacked.
|
|||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|||
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 22 2010 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 20477 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
^ Seriously?.......both Who's Next and Led Zep 4 completely blow away anything Purple ever did...and if you give me a few minutes I can probably think of some more.
|
|||
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin |
|||
addictedtoprog
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 16 2014 Location: india Status: Offline Points: 1422 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Edited by addictedtoprog - December 06 2015 at 09:32 |
|||
addictedtoprog
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 16 2014 Location: india Status: Offline Points: 1422 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Nothing much in classic rock beats In Rock for me..
|
|||
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 22 2010 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 20477 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The well known comment was in an old Rolling Stone Record Guide (the first one with the red cover) , and the reviewer said that, ' Uriah Heep was a mutant version of Deep Purple'.
RS RG, Marsh with Swenson, 1979, Rolling Stone Press, page 395, "A mutant version of Deep Purple, Uriah Heep has to be considered one of the worst commercially successful bands of the Seventies. Good points: sincerity and an organist (Ken Hensley) far more intelligent and capable than the group. Bad points: one of the most strident and annoying singers (David Byron) in rock history. The problem is that Byron gets the material he deserves." -John Swenson I think overall In Rock is a slightly better album, but I'll say this in that I would rather listen to old Heep than old Purple for pure fun and listening pleasure even if they are mutants. btw....if anyone has a copy or can get one, some of the reviews are priceless in that old RS record guide.... makes for entertaining reading. For instance there is an interesting review of 'VDGG- H To He'...3 stars. Edited by dr wu23 - December 06 2015 at 08:56 |
|||
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin |
|||
Svetonio
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 20 2010 Location: Serbia Status: Offline Points: 10213 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
In Rock is an exception, other early Deep Purple albums, although recorded with an obvious intention of being progressive and unusual, aren't even close to the truly magical atmosphere and eccentricities of Byron's Uriah Heep; and after In Rock, Deep Purple had kept the beaten track of the classic heavy rock - there is nothing progressive at Deep Purple's albums that followed In Rock.
Edited by Svetonio - December 06 2015 at 08:26 |
|||
Cristi
Special Collaborator Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Online Points: 41357 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
you're taking this way too seriously, why shouldn't I compare two early 70s heavy-rock albums? Some will vote for Heep, some for Purple. I can compare anything as long as they have a common point. Edited by Cristi - December 06 2015 at 08:25 |
|||
TeleStrat
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 27 2014 Location: Norwalk, CA Status: Offline Points: 9319 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Uriah Heep...never cared much for DP or Blackmore.
|
|||
Raff
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 29 2005 Location: None Status: Offline Points: 24391 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I can't believe you're even comparing those two albums... In Rock is a genre-defining hard rock album. Uriah Heep are a very good band, but no one could touch Deep Purple in their heyday.
|
|||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46828 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
let's just say no one calls Deep Purple a Uriah Heep knock-off
|
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |