Can this be considered progressive rock/metal?

Welcome to the site! I see that you have two singles out, and it takes at least one album to be evaluated by a team. When you do, you go on the suggestion bands thread and give some links where we can hear some songs. Listening to the 2 singles right now, this one may qualify for Progressive Metal, but not the song "Reaper".  We'll wait for the album.

Wanting to compare this song to another band, I'd say Riverside. Anyway I could buy an album of this kind.

I found it a very enjoyable song.  The singing was quite good, as well as the music.

Hey, man! Thanks for commenting. I wholeheartedly agree. The motive behind the thread title and original post was really to get feedback on what people thought about the song. But since I'm new to this forum, I reasoned that "hey, check out my band" threads were unpopular, and I didn't want this thread to be buried in some "original recordings" sub-forum. Overall, I'm pleased with this thread as I got some replies that were really nice to get.

moshkito wrote: Hi, I realize I am the odd one out here sometimes, but in all honesty, I would like to suggest that you worry less about it being "progressive", "rock" or "metal", and concentrate on the continuity and the design and performance of your own work.

Fine. Those are just labels that are tagged on music in order to pigeonhole it. That, by itself, is a useful practice, but there are plenty of examples of such tags being used in ways that they lead to nothing because things that are just too different are summed up under them. One of them is "progressive metal", which can mean anything from Dream Theater to Meshuggah to Tool. There will be many people who'd consider the posted song as "progressive metal", and others who won't (I'm with the latter, but I am notorious for excluding music such as that of Tool - which the posted song gets quite close to - from "prog"; yet, I have no good alternative term for this kind of music at hand).