Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The American Politics Thread
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe American Politics Thread
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 150151152153154 434>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64367 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2019 at 21:05
^ Sounds completely absurd and out of touch is what it sounds like ~
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
progaardvark View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Sea of Peas
Status: Offline
Points: 48752 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 06:25
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

^ The article is not reporting history, but what the number of females he has at that point as compared to the past administrations of same time frame.
I don't see it as a cherry pick........What's the problem with President Trump hiring women for these powerful positions?

Where did I say I have a problem with Trump hiring women? Don't we judge an administration by the time period of its existence rather than by the "beginning of the third year?" Obviously you don't know what cherry-picking is, and based on the source you chose, you don't know what a reliable source is either.
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag
that's a happy bag of lettuce
this car smells like cartilage
nothing beats a good video about fractions
Back to Top
progaardvark View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Sea of Peas
Status: Offline
Points: 48752 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 06:33
Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:


I predict that Trump's next Supreme Court Nominee will be a Woman.  Cherry pick that Mr. Aardvark.Wink

From the master of cherry-picking and typing in bold! LOLLOLLOLLOLLOLLOL

Oh, and I don't want to forget the charming Sarah Palin wink. Wink
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag
that's a happy bag of lettuce
this car smells like cartilage
nothing beats a good video about fractions
Back to Top
progaardvark View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Sea of Peas
Status: Offline
Points: 48752 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 06:41
Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:


Cindy O's Response -   Trump appeals to folks with Bachelors of Science but not to Bachelors of Arts.  Trump appeals to reality-fact based folks.  Trump doesn't appeal to folks ruled by feelings.    You can't have it both ways Easy Money.  Unless you're arguing, millionaires and Billionaires don't go to college.  While, welfare mama's work on master degrees.  


I find this to be a really disgusting comment. 
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag
that's a happy bag of lettuce
this car smells like cartilage
nothing beats a good video about fractions
Back to Top
progaardvark View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Sea of Peas
Status: Offline
Points: 48752 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 06:45
It appears Bob Woodward's book Fear: Trump in the White House is available on the Internet Archive to read:
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag
that's a happy bag of lettuce
this car smells like cartilage
nothing beats a good video about fractions
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 5908 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 06:56
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Re ompha quote: "Trump appeals to folks with Bachelors of Science but not to Bachelors of Arts"

Do you have any statistics to back this up, sounds kind of made up to me.
 

Mr. Money, you didn't back any of your original assertations with Stats. You suffer from projection.  You transfer your feelings of inadequacy on to others. In other words, you accuse others of faults you yourself display.  Case in point- You didn't provide Stats for any of your anti-Trump assertations.  Now you  accuse me of not providing a stat for one of my counter arguments.    I recommend you watch Jordan Peterson videos.  Doctor Peterson will explain how you can overcome your "Projection Issues" and take responsibility for your life.  

I'll give you one stat.  You look up the others. I'm not your personal librarian.  This stat is going to be tricky. It will require you to perform math functions.  Ready?   71% of all adult Americans Don't have a Degree.  31% of all Trump voters have a degree!

To help your research,  Check out what percentage of degreed social workers, English Majors, women's studies, American Indian/Native/Indigenous studies, Dance majors, music,  Film , Fashion Design and Drama majors voted for Trump.  These are """Liberal Arts Majors""".     

Bottom line-  If I'm wrong, than a higher percentage of Degreed dancers, actors, musicians, fashion designers and feminists voted for Trump than degreed biologists, engineers, nurses, doctors, and physicists. 

So you won't be triggered, I'll provide you with a safe-space, liberal newspaper account, explaining the 71%-31% stat.  Simple logic will be required. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/06/05/its-time-to-bust-the-myth-most-trump-voters

PS. This is the last time I hold your hand Easy Money.  It's time for you to leave the nest and research your own arguments and stats.Wink


Edited by omphaloskepsis - May 14 2019 at 07:11
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10336 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 07:40
Here are the stats without all the imaginative spinning. No one has ever tabulated stats by type of degrees, that never happened.
But here are the real stats, you can see its quite obvious trump is popular with the under-educated

Pew Research Center:
"Overall, whites with a four-year college degree or more education made up 30% of all validated voters. Among these voters, far more (55%) said they voted for Clinton than for Trump (38%). Among the much larger group of white voters who had not completed college (44% of all voters), Trump won by more than two-to-one (64% to 28%)."

But you don't have to be defensive, that isn't necessarily bad is it?

Edited by Easy Money - May 14 2019 at 07:46
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 5908 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 07:44
Originally posted by progaardvark progaardvark wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

^ The article is not reporting history, but what the number of females he has at that point as compared to the past administrations of same time frame.
I don't see it as a cherry pick........What's the problem with President Trump hiring women for these powerful positions?

Where did I say I have a problem with Trump hiring women? Don't we judge an administration by the time period of its existence rather than by the "beginning of the third year?" Obviously you don't know what cherry-picking is, and based on the source you chose, you don't know what a reliable source is either.
 

Mr. Aardvark said, " Don't we judge an administration by the time period of its existence rather than by the "beginning of the third year?" 

What is Aardvark really saying?   I'll translate-

  " You Catcher10, can't judge an administration...EVER!  Because you disagree with me.  I'm the only one worthy to judge! And, this thread is strewn with my judgements...Judgements at the beginning of the 1st year of Trump's presidency and the beginning of the 2nd year of Trump's Presidency.  Heck, I judged Trump's Presidency a few days ago!LOL"

Hey Catcher! Noticed how I cherrypicked Aardvark's post. Actually, I plucked low-hanging fruit. It's all low-hanging...  


Edited by omphaloskepsis - May 14 2019 at 07:50
Back to Top
progaardvark View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Sea of Peas
Status: Offline
Points: 48752 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 08:04
Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

Originally posted by progaardvark progaardvark wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

^ The article is not reporting history, but what the number of females he has at that point as compared to the past administrations of same time frame.
I don't see it as a cherry pick........What's the problem with President Trump hiring women for these powerful positions?

Where did I say I have a problem with Trump hiring women? Don't we judge an administration by the time period of its existence rather than by the "beginning of the third year?" Obviously you don't know what cherry-picking is, and based on the source you chose, you don't know what a reliable source is either.
 

Mr. Aardvark said, " Don't we judge an administration by the time period of its existence rather than by the "beginning of the third year?" 

What is Aardvark really saying?   I'll translate-

  " You Catcher10, can't judge an administration...EVER!  Because you disagree with me.  I'm the only one worthy to judge! And, this thread is strewn with my judgements...Judgements at the beginning of the 1st year of Trump's presidency and the beginning of the 2nd year of Trump's Presidency.  Heck, I judged Trump's Presidency a few days ago!LOL"

Hey Catcher! Noticed how I cherrypicked Aardvark's post. Actually, I plucked low-hanging fruit. It's all low-hanging fruit.  

This is pretty good evidence that you don't even know what cherry-picking is, even though you do it all the time. And if that's how you translate a simple question from me, it's obvious that you are trapped in your own little bubble. If you can't make the logical leap to understand what the difference is between three years of data and "beginning of the third year," I don't know how else I can make it simpler for you. Would you prefer that I type everything in bold?

I'm actually curious about your thoughts on climate change now, though I think I might come to regret saying that.
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag
that's a happy bag of lettuce
this car smells like cartilage
nothing beats a good video about fractions
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 5908 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 08:13
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:


But you don't have to be defensive, that isn't necessarily bad is it?
 

    Defensive?   You're projecting your issues on me again.   In the process, you change my original counter claim to fit your stat. 

  I said, "more Bachelor of Science folks voted for Trump than Liberal Arts majors". You created a (logic fallacy) straw man argument, insulating that I said more degreed folk voted for Trump. I never said that.  

Meanwhile, a prediction I made days ago is already coming true.  Clap  Barr is appointing a prosecutor to investigate the origins of Trump Russia Investigation. Investigate the InvestiGATOR's. Clap I predict the prosecutor will find that Obama's FBI and DOJ appointees crossed the line, and spied on the Trump Campaign.  Indictments will follow.  Scientific Method states that hypothesis (predictions), that become facts are based in reality.   What do predict Easy Money?  Will Obama FBI officials and DOJ be indicted?  Will Trump be reelected in 2020?    

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/barr-appoints-us-attorney-to-examine-origins-of-trump-russia-investigation-2019-05-13?link=MW_latest_news


Edited by omphaloskepsis - May 14 2019 at 10:39
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10336 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 08:47
I provided the stats that backed up the statement that trump has more appeal to the under educated, that's all. Its just one more of the many things trump has in common with George W.

There is no condemnation in presenting this fact, if you feel defensive about it, that is your choice.

Edited by Easy Money - May 14 2019 at 09:05
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446
Back to Top
dr wu23 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20468 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 12:38
Some actual stats.....

While polling before Election Day showed that voters with less education were flocking to Trump â&amp;#128;&amp;#148; which shows in the exit polls â&amp;#128;&amp;#148; he still saw a good amount of support from voters with higher education.


Edited by dr wu23 - May 14 2019 at 12:39
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin
Back to Top
King of Loss View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16329 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 22:10
In other news, Alabama has now passed a law banning almost all abortions, including those from rape and incest...OuchThumbs Down Thoughts?
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64367 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2019 at 22:20
What is there to think.   One day one of these totalitarian state senators (it passed 25 to 6...ouch!) will have a loved one impregnated by rape and be forced to either have the child or go out of state.

Shame.
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
progaardvark View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Sea of Peas
Status: Offline
Points: 48752 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2019 at 06:16
Now that the Supreme Court leans more right, I think we're going to be seeing more of this down the road. Abortion probably won't be the only thing they challenge.
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag
that's a happy bag of lettuce
this car smells like cartilage
nothing beats a good video about fractions
Back to Top
Snicolette View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 02 2018
Location: OR
Status: Offline
Points: 5972 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2019 at 06:55
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

What is there to think.   One day one of these totalitarian state senators (it passed 25 to 6...ouch!) will have a loved one impregnated by rape and be forced to either have the child or go out of state.

Shame.





Just awful.  A Missouri state rep, Tila Hubrecht, apparently said that "rape pregnancies are a silver lining from God."  Insane.  https://www.riverfronttimes.com/newsblog/2016/05/06/rape-pregnancies-are-a-silver-lining-from-god-says-missouri-lawmaker
"Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 5908 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2019 at 07:44
Why are you guys mansplaining, discussing women's bodies?  Men should check their privilege and let the women hash out the abortion debate.   You need to backtrack your male privliege like my husband and Beto.  

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2019/03/16/white-male-privileged-yes-am-beto-orourke-says-shouldnt-taken-granted
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 5908 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2019 at 07:44
Instead of men mansplaining abortion perhaps you should education yourselves.Smile





Edited by omphaloskepsis - May 15 2019 at 07:47
Back to Top
Argo2112 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2017
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 4452 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2019 at 08:06
Originally posted by progaardvark progaardvark wrote:

Now that the Supreme Court leans more right, I think we're going to be seeing more of this down the road. Abortion probably won't be the only thing they challenge.

 
I afraid your right on this one. Things will probably get a lot worst before they get better.
LGBT rights, contraception, censorship....Who know's what they will go after next?



Edited by Argo2112 - May 15 2019 at 08:08
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10336 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2019 at 08:20
Did someone just call Snicolette a man?
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 150151152153154 434>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 1.070 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.