| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
CrazyDiamond 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
|
 Topic: Peter Jackson’s LOTR. Which one?
Posted: September 03 2005 at 12:35 |
I was re-watching the trilogy and I noticed that Jackson really did a good job, altough he obscured some "important" characters, figures and objects (where is Tom Bombadil, only to name one !?!?!?!). But it's impossible to put such a big book in a movie, without doing a selection of the most important episodes and parts of the book. He did a good job.
Anyway, what do you think?
What's your favourite chapter? (I go for "The fellowship of the ring", my favourite! )
___BYE___
|
|
|
 |
CrazyDiamond
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
|
Posted: September 03 2005 at 12:38 |
oops, I did a mistake in making the poll ! 
Anyway, write down your favourite! Excuse me.
|
|
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20503
|
Posted: September 03 2005 at 12:47 |
The movies are all great IMO. But generally I prefer the Silmarillion. I'd love to see that as a movie. Maybe with Blind Guardian and Marillion providing the music?
|
|
|
|
CrazyDiamond
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
|
Posted: September 03 2005 at 12:55 |
Oh yes, who can make the best music for a movie called Silmarillion better than Marillion?
Anyway, The Silmarillion is an epic journey through fantasy litterature! 
Do you know that they're making a movie based on The Hobbit?
Hope to see it soon
|
|
|
|
Borealis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Neutral Zone
Status: Offline
Points: 599
|
Posted: September 03 2005 at 23:27 |
I do not like those movie, seriously, unless I'm stoned... then they are great...
|
|
Vive le Québec libre!...
|
|
Nipsey88
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: Kadath
Status: Offline
Points: 706
|
Posted: September 04 2005 at 02:48 |
|
Jackson has created the single greatest movie trilogy ever. Doubters beware!
|
|
|
|
Damen
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 04 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1068
|
Posted: September 04 2005 at 03:39 |
|
All of em, gotta love them, they follow the books just about verbatim
|
|
"It's amazing that we've been able to put up with each other for 35 years. Most marriages don't last that long these days."
-Chris Squire
|
|
SomethingGood
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 31 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 165
|
Posted: September 04 2005 at 05:34 |
 Nipsey88 wrote:
Jackson has created the single greatest movie trilogy ever. Doubters beware!
|
No chance! what about Back to the Future? Indiana Jones? Die Hard? Star Wars?
I've always thought the LOTR films were overatted, there's just too
much boring filler material in them. Jackson's older films were better
by a mile! 
|
 Click the image. CLICK IT!!!
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: September 04 2005 at 05:39 |
The Return Of The King!!!!!! 
|
|
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20503
|
Posted: September 04 2005 at 05:39 |
SomethingGood wrote:
Jackson's older films were better by a mile! |
Now that's Bad Taste!
|
|
|
|
Arsillus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
|
Posted: September 04 2005 at 18:38 |
|
I really enjoyed them all, but The Fellowship of the Ring is my favourite. It follows the book the best.
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: September 04 2005 at 19:03 |
The Fellowship of the Ring: 5/5 (more mystical, earthly and humble. My favorite.)
The Two Towers: 4.5/5 (a great continuation...but a middle chapter, or a bridge between the two greater chapters, IMO)
The Return of the King: 5/5 (the most emotional and epic, with supurb acting and the most emotional ending of any movie i've ever seen)
|
|
|
|
GPFR
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 05 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 760
|
Posted: September 04 2005 at 21:33 |
|
Fellowship of the Ring
|
www.myspace.com/hail_peter 
|
|
Trotsky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
|
Posted: September 05 2005 at 03:02 |
I voted for the purist thing, because that's closest to how I feel, but actually that's too harsh ... I think he it about 70% right ... the movies would have worked if I hadn't been such a big fan of the books ... (and I'll agree that not all the flaws are Jackson's ... any one else find it ridiculous that the "fighting" Uruk-Hai and the Nazgul are just so easily overcome?)
but some things I thought really sucked ... one of which was turning Gimli into comic relief ... I wasn't too thrilled by Aragorn going "let's hunt some Orc" either ...
|
|
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”
"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
|
|
Wolf Spider
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 04 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1617
|
Posted: September 05 2005 at 04:44 |
|
The whole trilogy is breath taking
|
|
|
|
Eetu Pellonpaa
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828
|
Posted: September 05 2005 at 07:34 |
Here come's the social suicide... 
I think Jacson did poor filmatisation of a medicore book. I read it as a kid and liked it. Tried to read it as an adult, but didn't manage to do it. I watched the first film (drunk, it helps), which had some nice element's, like the surroundings, Gandalf cathing the butterfly in the tower and the mines of moria sequence. I watched the second movie and screamed in agony. When Legolas surfed with the shield, I truly wanted to kill myself. I think the movie was total Hollywood crap. I'm sorry, I have no intentions to check the third movie.
For movies, I'm an irritating, elitistic euro trash. Tarkovski and Bunuel for me, thank you.
|
|
Borealis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Neutral Zone
Status: Offline
Points: 599
|
Posted: September 05 2005 at 16:52 |
Eetu Pellonpää wrote:
Here come's the social suicide...
I think Jacson did poor filmatisation of a medicore book. I read it as a kid and liked it. Tried to read it as an adult, but didn't manage to do it. I watched the first film (drunk, it helps), which had some nice element's, like the surroundings, Gandalf cathing the butterfly in the tower and the mines of moria sequence. I watched the second movie and screamed in agony. When Legolas surfed with the shield, I truly wanted to kill myself. I think the movie was total Hollywood crap. I'm sorry, I have no intentions to check the third movie.
For movies, I'm an irritating, elitistic euro trash. Tarkovski and Bunuel for me, thank you.
|
|
|
Vive le Québec libre!...
|
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 05:52 |
Dune,The Hobbit and the LOTR's are the books I read as a kid that totally got me into the fantasy/sci-fi genre and Jackson's movies are the only book to movie adaptation I have ever been really happy with(I even forgive him for leaving out Tom Bombadil),so I chose "the whole trilogy".Hard to pick just one but if I had to I would pick Return of the King.
|
|
|
|
CrazyDiamond
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 15:18 |
Trotsky wrote:
I voted for the purist thing, because that's closest to how I feel, but actually that's too harsh ... I think he it about 70% right ... the movies would have worked if I hadn't been such a big fan of the books ... (and I'll agree that not all the flaws are Jackson's ... any one else find it ridiculous that the "fighting" Uruk-Hai and the Nazgul are just so easily overcome?)
but some things I thought really sucked ... one of which was turning Gimli into comic relief ... I wasn't too thrilled by Aragorn going "let's hunt some Orc" either ...
|
I almost agree with you, but the three movies have something that is really enjoyable, I can't explain.. There is the so called "fluency", and the story goes..
Anyway, I prefer the books..
___BYE___
|
|
|
|
Heptade
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 19 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 427
|
Posted: September 06 2005 at 15:22 |
|
I grew up on those books, and I found the movies hard to take (I mean,
Liv Tyler?). It's a matter of personal opinon and experience, though. I
prefer the BBC radio series, which was beautifully done (and available on
CD!).
|
|
The world keeps spinning, people keep sinning
And all the rest is just bullsh*t
-Steve Kilbey
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Peter Jackson’s LOTR. Which one?
