Ian Anderson and the Beatles |
Post Reply | Page <1 4567> |
Author | ||
Icarium
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34050 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I believe Ian Anderson is proof that a band can have a progressive development from a counterreaction to beatle-mania, that the early development of prog even in britain can have a origin from a counter-reaction or affected by the Beatles.
Edited by Icarium - September 04 2018 at 09:18 |
||
|
||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20503 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ I believe so. I don't think that Robert Fripp liked the Beatles (I could be wrong) but KC did the prog thing pretty well.
|
||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||
Icarium
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34050 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Though i respect and admire the way the Beatles and Srg Pepper opend up in terms of sounds and bands whom in their timeperiod were directly and indirectly influenced ć, effected, mooved by their music. Yet bands like Cream, Jethro Tull and Crimson perhaps were not as much
|
||
|
||
The.Crimson.King
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 29 2013 Location: WA Status: Offline Points: 4591 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yet Zappa covered I am the Walrus on his '88 tour...don't recall him ever covering the Shaggs
|
||
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 22 2010 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 20468 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That's interesting, since....I have read that Fripp thought Pepper was groundbreaking and that the Beatles influenced many musicians and also I have read that Anderson said certain albums like Pepper influenced him and other musicians. |
||
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin |
||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20503 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ I don't set great store on the sayings of Mr. Fripp. Perhaps he personally didn't like the Beatles. Except for Yoko. ;)
|
||
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 22 2010 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 20468 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ Well...apparently Fripp has said in print and interview that The Beatles and Pepper was a big influence to him....and as I said above Anderson has said the same about Pepper....so if they have changed their minds then that's news.
The Beatles are not the be all and end all of what happened with music then but they certainly were influential when they started adding orchestration and studio effects and expanding the possibilities of music.
|
||
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin |
||
Tero1
Forum Groupie Joined: August 24 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 64 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Curious that the 60s rockers were not affected by the ”hand holding” era of the Beatles. Though the hip young musicians listened to the blues and went more the John Mayall route, still, the Beatles were a huge leap from anything coming from Europe at the time. There was the Shadows and that was about it.
|
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 16163 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm not sure that this is quite right, although I like the joke and the laugh it gave me! RF, more than likely will have appreciated a lot of the compositional side of things in some of the Beatles material, however, RF's musical design and abilities tend to come a lot more from experimentation and development of themes, than they would from a rock music context. In this sense, a lot of KC is quite "classical" in its music design. RF is more into the textures in the music itself and their ability to interplay, which as a music design, is very progressive, and not the same as setting up a riff and then making a 5minute song out of it, and call it progressive! Not to mention that the song design is the same most of the time! The strange side of it, is that RF has stated that KC is not progressive, and I tend to agree with him some and also to disagree on the same sentence. It is "progressive" when compared to most "popular" music, that is less designed as a composition, and more into something else that has a lot less "music" (in the academic context) in it, than simply a following of a riff with a solo over it. Most classical music did that in the days of MOZART, and got bored with it since. Thus, seeing this revival in popular music is kinda interesting, but also scary, and then calling it "progressive" because of a different looking bass guitar, and a classical handset playing of notes, done on a synthesizer so it is not recognizable as an orchestral instrument ... this is where it gets really scary. I'm not sure that the SOUND, should be defined as MUSIC, but in the 20th century this separation has been blurred badly! I like to say, here ... UNPLUG IT ... and you and I know that KC will stand out, as will most of ELP (witness Rachel Flowers) ... but a lot of bands, would not stand up at all in this area, and in fact might sound/look really bad!
Edited by moshkito - September 04 2018 at 19:12 |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
Tero1
Forum Groupie Joined: August 24 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 64 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
There is actually nothing different in KC, Tull or The Beatles as far as form goes. The sections are rather few and the main part of the song is verse, chorus and middle 8. Solos extend a song to 10 min or more.
KC doing Islands (the last song off the album) is no different that A Day In The Life. I also do not "value" any type of music more than some other. I listen to baroque music and selected symphonic era stuff. In a typical Vivaldi concerto, there are parts that show more development (toward sonata form) but basically are similar bits of melody and riffs as is rock music. The final triumph of classical, symphonies etc follows set rules, or at least has some elements of these types of variations, in related keys etc: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonata_form#Introduction
Edited by Tero1 - September 04 2018 at 20:28 |
||
Mortte
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 11 2016 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 5538 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I believe it fully. The Cheerful Insanity Of Giles, Giles & Fripp sounds really much Beatles, but in a very great way! Also, I believe Stand Up and Benefit would have sounded different if the main influence there had been Stones and other brit blues. Edited by Mortte - September 04 2018 at 23:51 |
||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20503 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||
Tero1
Forum Groupie Joined: August 24 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 64 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It's quite remarkable what McCartney has achieved with just an intuitive approach to music. He had some piano lessons once, and immediately showed off with the piano parts of Martha My Dear. He composes stuff like the Liverpool Oratorio on a computer.
Edited by Tero1 - September 05 2018 at 05:33 |
||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20503 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Edited by SteveG - September 05 2018 at 06:34 |
||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||
The.Crimson.King
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 29 2013 Location: WA Status: Offline Points: 4591 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The piano on Martha My Dear is my all time favorite Beatle keyboard part. I've learned it, forgotten it, and relearned it too many times to count While only George Martin could have played the harpsichord break on "In My Life", only Paul could have written Martha's bouncy piano section
|
||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 26171 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Well he stated once that hearing A Day In The Life changed his whole perspective on music.
|
||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20503 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Edited by SteveG - September 06 2018 at 04:28 |
||
TiddK
Forum Groupie Joined: August 08 2018 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 75 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Beatlemania (1963) was a phenomenon that hadn't been seen since the postwar 'bobbysoxers' who screamed at Sinatra, and back then there wasn't much TV in Britain so people took less notice. Pop music took off in a big way after Beatlemania and it was the dire lack of mainstream pop radio (which was not caused by The Beatles of course) which prompted the rise of the pirates. So I think you'd say that Beatlemania was the catalyst, but really it was the non-exiistence of pop radio that really led to the pirates. But then, the pirates helped keep The Beatles in the teenage minds, so it was a kind of 'virtuous circle' I think?
|
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 16163 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I believe this would be incorrect. RF would, and does, appreciate a lot of the composition side of the Beatles material, and while that is not enough to influence what RF/KC did, in the end, even RF has stated that KC is not progressive, and it is very clear why ... they are ... let's say, the best classical music folks around, in that they rehearse and study their work so that it can be developed and worked to a very well thought out and designed piece of music ... most bands, are not that well versed and studied musically to appreciate that and stop at a simple/single riff to get a "song" going. KC, breaks the rock music mold, of the "simple" and repeated concept in design of each and every piece. And this places, RF and KC far and above a lot of bands when it comes to the music design. The Beatles helped define that rock music was not just done by street folks that did not even know A from B or C, or how to count. KC, went much further than that, by working the compositions to a very well developed piece of music ... which we remember so well and vividly today! It will only have to do with the Beatles if we give them some credit for elevating "popular music" above and beyond a simple ditty and song. But even this is something that most folks here do not accept and wish to discuss, as they consider almost everything just another pop song. Not all folks, and musicians, in rock music are, or consider themselves ... "pop musicians". I believe that Ian is bitter and has run out of things to say in his old age. Not to mention that he has ignored a lot of music from the rest of the world!
|
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
Pelata
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2010 Location: NC-USA Status: Offline Points: 364 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm not into the "Beatlemania" era of The Beatles...not as much, anyway. I own the albums and understand the impact they had. It was the artistically adventurous Beatles that hooked me...from Revolver onward...LOVE that stuff.
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1 4567> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |