Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Deep Purple is here to stay!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDeep Purple is here to stay!
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20527 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 06:24
Originally posted by pero pero wrote:

Did you mention Queen II or Queer II  ?

I unfortunately have most of their albums because my two sons love them

You can read my post ... why would anyone mention "Queer II"? Is this a strange attempt of humor involving gay people?
Recently listened to:
Back to Top
pero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 06:46

You are on fire.

Drink a beer and relax.

Does humor belongs in music,  asked Frank Zappa
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20527 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 06:55

I'm fine ... avoid answering my questions if you have to. Just don't expect me to take you seriously.
Recently listened to:
Back to Top
pero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 07:03
Ok masa, yes massa
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20527 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 07:09
^ I'm still interested in your opinion on Queen II ...
Recently listened to:
Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 07:18
Here we go again.....

***sound of head being beaten against desk repeatedly***

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
gulliman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 02 2005
Location: Estonia
Status: Offline
Points: 126 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 07:33

Originally posted by Bilek Bilek wrote:

1- I still believe Deep Purple should be included in a new subcategory such as "Heavy Prog Rock", or "Hard-Prog Rock", along with Uriah Heep, Kansas and Rush

 

Deep Purple and Uriah Heep are hard-rock bands in their hearts and roots (though the latest Purple is a bit closer to prog, imo, simply because of its latest incarnation with Steve Morse on board).

Kansas and Rush are prog-bands.

Simple as that.



Edited by gulliman
Back to Top
pero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 07:37
Yes they are prog but bad one
Back to Top
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12799 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 07:38
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Deep Purple are not a prog band, and their albums will be categorized as Proto-Prog (early albums) and Prog-Related (starting from In Rock).

 

 

And labelling Deep Purple as  'proto-prog'  is bloody daft, and made me seriously wonder about this site. I can live with them on the Archives, but categorising them that way makes us look stupid. Look up 'proto-' in your dictionary.
Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 07:41
Originally posted by Dick Heath Dick Heath wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Deep Purple are not a prog band, and their albums will be categorized as Proto-Prog (early albums) and Prog-Related (starting from In Rock).

 

 

And labelling Deep Purple as  'proto-prog'  is bloody daft, and made me seriously wonder about this site. I can live with them on the Archives, but categorising them that way makes us look stupid. Look up 'proto-' in your dictionary.

proto-prog? Prototype-prog? Meaning the true defintion of prog?

[IMG">http://imagegen.last.fm/sideRed/recenttracks/Fjuffe.gif">
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20527 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 07:57
Originally posted by Dick Heath Dick Heath wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Deep Purple are not a prog band, and their albums will be categorized as Proto-Prog (early albums) and Prog-Related (starting from In Rock).

 

 

And labelling Deep Purple as  'proto-prog'  is bloody daft, and made me seriously wonder about this site. I can live with them on the Archives, but categorising them that way makes us look stupid. Look up 'proto-' in your dictionary.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=de&lr=&rls=CYBA,CYBA :2005-24,CYBA:en&oi=defmore&q=define:proto

Seems reasonable to me. The early (pre 1970) albums can be called Proto-Prog with some imagination ... although personally I'd place all of the DP albums in Prog Related. But then again I am not the one who decides this.
Recently listened to:
Back to Top
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12799 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 10:35
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by Dick Heath Dick Heath wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Deep Purple are not a prog band, and their albums will be categorized as Proto-Prog (early albums) and Prog-Related (starting from In Rock).

 

 

And labelling Deep Purple as  'proto-prog'  is bloody daft, and made me seriously wonder about this site. I can live with them on the Archives, but categorising them that way makes us look stupid. Look up 'proto-' in your dictionary.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=de&lr=&rls=CYBA,CYBA :2005-24,CYBA:en&oi=defmore&q=define:proto

Seems reasonable to me. The early (pre 1970) albums can be called Proto-Prog with some imagination ... although personally I'd place all of the DP albums in Prog Related. But then again I am not the one who decides this.

 

I hate to remind you, 1967 is usually taken as prog music/rock start date, but certainly not 1970. But I would agree with DP being taken as heavy prog - goodness they were certainly counted as a progressive music band pre-In Rock, and one reason EMI shifted them onto the then new Harvest Records label, their home for underground and progressive music bands.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20527 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 10:43

^ as I said, I would place them in Prog Related ... but I'm no expert on pre 1970 music, so I leave it to more knowledgeable people.

BTW: There may also be Proto-Prog bands/albums after 1970. For instance, Metallica's Master of Puppets might be Proto-Prog Metal. Similar Proto-... situations might exist for other genres.
Recently listened to:
Back to Top
Bob Greece View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1823 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 10:45
Originally posted by Trouserpress Trouserpress wrote:

Originally posted by Bob Greece Bob Greece wrote:

I agree with what you say about the Art Rock category. It seems like a dumping ground to me. Surely Rush deserve better than that!



Damned if you do...

Do what?



Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 11:00
Originally posted by Bilek Bilek wrote:

 

I also reviewed Machine Head, along with their eponymous 3rd album with 5 stars. (my review nick is black). I will definitely keep on writing new 5 stars reviews, at least for Taliesyn, Fireball, and In Rock!

Now comes the concerns:

 

5 stars means "Essential to any prog collection" and I truly don't believe that any DP album is!
Back to Top
thrang theng View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: September 09 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 74 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 11:15
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Bilek Bilek wrote:

 

I also reviewed Machine Head, along with their eponymous 3rd album with 5 stars. (my review nick is black). I will definitely keep on writing new 5 stars reviews, at least for Taliesyn, Fireball, and In Rock!

Now comes the concerns:

 

5 stars means "Essential to any prog collection"

I agree with that. I consider that a responsable review has to evaluate an album in order to be guide to people searching good prog music. Therefore 5 stars shouldn't mean "I really like this album and is essential to MY personal collection" which doesn't mean that somebody's collection isn't good, no offence. Well that's what I think makes cool this site. I already found so much good music from advices of yours that I invite to keep healthy criticism on reviews.

What do you all think about that? What's a masterpiece?

About the quote of the albums ,never I would consider Book of Taliesyn a Essential Masterpeace... compared to other for instance! Does it stand by is own between DP production? Consider this: if KC would have made in its whole history only ITCOTCK, Genesis Selling England Yes Close to the Edge PF Dark side of the moon, just to mention some widely recognized MASTERPIECE they would be all remembered in the Prog history as outstending groups and albums. If DP would not have made Taliesyn would we miss it???



Edited by thrang theng
Take my fire
Take my food and water
Forget about those promises
Of social good and social order...
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20527 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 11:15

^ If you interpret it this way:

5 stars means "Essential to any prog collection which includes the genre of the album "

Then it would be possible.
Recently listened to:
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 11:21
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ If you interpret it this way:

5 stars means "Essential to any prog collection which includes the genre of the album "

Then it would be possible.

Is this true? Is the new guideline? If so ok!
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20527 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 11:23
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ If you interpret it this way:

5 stars means "Essential to any prog collection which includes the genre of the album "

Then it would be possible.

Is this true? Is the new guideline? If so ok!

 no, but without this amendment it wouldn't make much sense to me. How could any Prog Metal album be rated 5 stars if it has to be "Essential to any prog collection which doesn't includes prog metal "?



Edited by MikeEnRegalia
Recently listened to:
Back to Top
Eetu Pellonpaa View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 11:29

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

BTW: There may also be Proto-Prog bands/albums after 1970. For instance, Metallica's Master of Puppets might be Proto-Prog Metal. Similar Proto-... situations might exist for other genres.

That is true, but I think there should be restricted number of albums from these bands... That would mean, there shouldn't be a possibility for people to directly add new albums for them. I think the early works of Purple are OK when listed here, and defined to something else that "pure prog". But I don't see actualy any progressive element's f.ex. in their "Machine Head" album...  And there are only two tunes on "Fireball", which sound a bit proggish to my ear, "Fools" and "The Mule". It's a good album still!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.165 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.