Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20477
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 25 2020 at 13:59 |
Could points by Dark Elf....... 'Songs' not on that list and I love Red but.....I could have easily voted 'Songs'....imho an amazing lp.
|
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
|
|
verslibre
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 01 2004
Location: CA
Status: Offline
Points: 15015
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 25 2020 at 14:28 |
The Dark Elf wrote:
Rick1 wrote:
The Dark Elf wrote:
Rick1 wrote:
As the poll has now 'peaked' some reflections:3. In 1977, two bands arguably continued to transcend the genre: ELP and Yes (Genesis exited the genre - more or less - with Hackett's departure - another moot point) |
I would suggest That Tull's Songs from the Wood (1977) and Heavy Horses (1978) surpassed what ELP (Works and Love Beach) and Yes (Going for the One and Tormato) did in the same time-frame. Your list is incomplete and doesn't do justice to the era. |
When considering transcending the genre, during this period I still contend that both ELP and Yes continued to do so (ELP had a UK hit written by a modern classical composer with a modal jazz solo in it...) I repeat, I am a huge Tull fan but never considered them prog; rather a sophisticated rock band and those albums were brilliant (and yes, surpassed both Tormato and Love Beach if you want to throw those albums into the mix). I also mentioned that over-populated polls tend to get dissipated - apologies if my little conversation starter appears to lack the substance you crave. |
I am wondering how anyone would think Yes or ELP were "transcendent" in 1977 and 1978; if anything, the opposite would be the case. Yes actually devolved from the progressivity of Tales From Topographic Oceans and Relayer to a more stripped down commercial sound on Going for the One. Nothing incredibly "transcendent" there -- it was more, "hey, we have to sell more albums". As far as ELP, there is nothing incredibly progressive or "transcendent" about going back to the old well and rehashing an Aaron Copeland composition. Even the name of the album "Works" is as bloated and pretentious as a double album that would have served the band better edited down to a single record -- but one can't edit egos, it would seem.
As far as Songs from the Wood, again, I am wondering how one wouldn't consider it "progressive" or "transcendent", when you consider that Tull married classical music and English folkloric motifs and made a thoroughly progressive British folk rock album -- a defining moment for the movement itself -- going beyond the folk electrification of previous efforts by Fairport Convention and Steeleye Span. And classical motifs run through out the album as much as folk -- the antithesis of the "simplification" your poll allegedly sought. At least one song on the album leaves the rock genre altogether.... |
Tull's finest hour.
|
|
|
Rick1
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 14 2020
Location: Loughborough UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2792
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 26 2020 at 01:32 |
verslibre wrote:
The Dark Elf wrote:
Rick1 wrote:
The Dark Elf wrote:
Rick1 wrote:
As the poll has now 'peaked' some reflections:3. In 1977, two bands arguably continued to transcend the genre: ELP and Yes (Genesis exited the genre - more or less - with Hackett's departure - another moot point) |
I would suggest That Tull's Songs from the Wood (1977) and Heavy Horses (1978) surpassed what ELP (Works and Love Beach) and Yes (Going for the One and Tormato) did in the same time-frame. Your list is incomplete and doesn't do justice to the era. |
When considering transcending the genre, during this period I still contend that both ELP and Yes continued to do so (ELP had a UK hit written by a modern classical composer with a modal jazz solo in it...) I repeat, I am a huge Tull fan but never considered them prog; rather a sophisticated rock band and those albums were brilliant (and yes, surpassed both Tormato and Love Beach if you want to throw those albums into the mix). I also mentioned that over-populated polls tend to get dissipated - apologies if my little conversation starter appears to lack the substance you crave. |
I am wondering how anyone would think Yes or ELP were "transcendent" in 1977 and 1978; if anything, the opposite would be the case. Yes actually devolved from the progressivity of Tales From Topographic Oceans and Relayer to a more stripped down commercial sound on Going for the One. Nothing incredibly "transcendent" there -- it was more, "hey, we have to sell more albums". As far as ELP, there is nothing incredibly progressive or "transcendent" about going back to the old well and rehashing an Aaron Copeland composition. Even the name of the album "Works" is as bloated and pretentious as a double album that would have served the band better edited down to a single record -- but one can't edit egos, it would seem.
As far as Songs from the Wood, again, I am wondering how one wouldn't consider it "progressive" or "transcendent", when you consider that Tull married classical music and English folkloric motifs and made a thoroughly progressive British folk rock album -- a defining moment for the movement itself -- going beyond the folk electrification of previous efforts by Fairport Convention and Steeleye Span. And classical motifs run through out the album as much as folk -- the antithesis of the "simplification" your poll allegedly sought. At least one song on the album leaves the rock genre altogether.... |
Tull's finest hour. |
Forsooth! I am a Tull fan: Songs From The Wood was the first album I bought by them and thus it has a special place for me and I accept, totally, its complexity and invention. Tull are also in my top 10 of bands I have seen live- starting with the 'Stormwatch' tour of 1980. So....until the music press started labelling Tull as 'prog' in the early 2000s, it never occurred to me they were part of the genre (as the label was retrospective anyway). Old habits die hard. I always considered 'Under Wraps' as their most 'out there' album anyway (which they got lambasted for). Anyway...to my mind ELP and Yes were still pushing out the boundaries with those albums but ELP more so. The live material from the Work tours showed they were still a force to be reckoned with. 'Bloated and pretentious' sounds like something from the high priests of punk...good.
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 26 2020 at 02:20 |
For Genesis I would say the last great album, before the 'simplification' was Wind & Wuthering. It wasn't their last 'great' album, but it was their last full on prog album, complete with epic etc..
I've not heard everything on that list, but I would agree with Animals by Floyd. That was their last true prog album (and great album IMO)
As for Yes, I'm a bit torn. GFTO is more prog than Tormato, but there was a partial return to prog form with Drama, before the first leg of the Rabin era saw them 'simplify' That said, I love 90125.
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
Enchant X
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 31 2014
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 867
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 26 2020 at 04:56 |
verslibre wrote:
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
As far as popular acts go that symbolize the end of the prog scene, i'd agree with ANIMALS. |
No, there were some after that imo such as:
Camel -nude (81) Yes - Drama (80) Happy the Man- Crafty Hands (78)(their first proper album was in 77) Rush-Permanent Waves(80), Moving Pictures(81) UK- same (78), Danger Money(79) Genesis- Duke(80)(well, it's about half prog anyway) Kansas - Monolith(79) (about the same as above)
Those are just some of the more well known ones. |
Camel was past their prime at that point (and I like Stationary Traveler better).
Monolith was the first Kansas album to disappoint. It's definitely a step down when you compare it to what came before.
If we can't include Tull's A (which I wouldn't, and it was meant to be Ian solo), I wouldn't include Duke. |
I enjoy Monolith by Kansas I see it as their last classic album. Sure its got some average songs but there's some real good material as well on it.
|
|
Rick1
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 14 2020
Location: Loughborough UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2792
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2020 at 01:07 |
micky wrote:
Soft Machine III... never was the same.. or as good afterward. Just became yet another generic meandering fusion band which plagued the mid to late 70's...
|
Ah, a discussion for another day. Wyatt's book (Different Every Time) is revelatory on this and arguably it was Wyatt's marginalisation and subsequent departure that precipitated the decline after 'Fourth'. What happened next depends on your taste for jazz fusion but after 'Bundles' (and the reinstatement of a guitar player: Holdsworth then Etheridge) moved them back into prog rock territory, hence the inclusion of 'Softs'. Afterwards, they famously caught some flak for the disco influenced 'Soft Space', but I like that as much as Can's 'I Want More' and Oldfield's 'Guilty'!
|
|
thief
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 21 2015
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1546
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2020 at 01:41 |
Animals and Going for the One are fantastic and definitely fill the bill.
But if I were to pick one band who rolled up the tent and turned off the light, it would be Jethro Tull with its "folk trilogy", 1977-79.
|
|
Squonk19
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2015
Location: Darlington, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 4706
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2020 at 02:01 |
Animals > Red > Going for the One. Genesis's Duke was well into the 'simplification' phase by then. The last gasp was Wind and Wuthering.
|
“Living in their pools, they soon forget about the sea.”
|
|
Rick1
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 14 2020
Location: Loughborough UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2792
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 28 2020 at 04:15 |
Squonk19 wrote:
Animals > Red > Going for the One. Genesis's Duke was well into the 'simplification' phase by then. The last gasp was Wind and Wuthering. |
I really toyed with putting Wind and Wuthering up instead...in retrospect I should have done.
|
|
Braka1
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2019
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1171
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 29 2020 at 01:09 |
There is a satisfying symmetry to giving that gong to 'Animals', as it was also marketed and packaged as a response to punk (I won't say it was written as one, since the songs were essentially 18-24 months old by the time it was recorded).
But I'm not voting for it, if only because I haven't had long to think about it. Nor have I read all the responses. First thing that came to mind was that Van Der Graaf didn't give up a lot to punk, other than tapping into its rawness to deliver some of the most crushing live performances of the era.
Edited by Braka1 - May 29 2020 at 01:12
|
Believe me Pope Paul, my toes are clean
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.