Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - System of a Down for the archive?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSystem of a Down for the archive?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Poll Question: Should System of a Down be in the archive?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
4 [10.53%]
2 [5.26%]
0 [0.00%]
32 [84.21%]
0 [0.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Notch View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 24 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Direct Link To This Post Topic: System of a Down for the archive?
    Posted: November 24 2005 at 16:53
OK, this was asked back in May, and there was a mixed bag of opinions. However, with the release of the new album (Hypnotize), I think it's time to rethink whether or not the band should be in the archive.

Personally, I'm all for it. I've always considered System of a Down to be progressive metal. For those who know the band, I would suggest listening in particular to the tracks 'Mind', 'Science', 'ATWA', 'Darts', 'Mr. Jack', 'Soil' and 'Needles' for the progressive sound; and from the new album 'Dreaming', 'Kill Rock N' Roll' and especially 'U-Fig'.

System show all the elements for a progressive band, including (from the site's definition of prog):
  • Intricate lyrics with multiple meanings ('Forest' is simultaneously about the story of creation, paedophilia and schizophrenia; 'Suggestions' is both about a battle and subtely symbolises the control of governments)
  • Original album design (their last two albums were essentially the same - they contained similar themes (the Iraq war being one) and the two album covers physically joined together to form one package). Also their most successful album to date, 'Toxicity' concluded with a tribal hymn called 'Arto', performed with only traditional tribal instruments.
  • Unusual vocal styles - 'Vicinity of Obscenity' contains soft, squeaky and distorted vocals; choral vocals are used over a sitar at the end of 'Aerials'; antiharmonies between the two vocalists are used in many tracks; and of course the tribal wails in 'Arto'.
  • Electronic instrumentation - 'Old School Hollywood' heavily uses keyboards and synthesisers; many other System tracks incorporate keyboards.
  • Metamorphic time signatures - This is what System do best and are known for. A few of the most prominent tracks with unusual or multiple time signatures are: 'U-Fig', 'Mind' and 'Vicinity of Obscenity'
  • Links with art - Mezmerize/Hypnotize feature a very continuous aesthetic style, with the same theme running through the cover art of both albums and all related material at that time
The only points from the guide that System of a Down do not conform to are that they have not had any long compositions yet - although apparantly an instrumental piece - called 'Hezze' is due to be released soon and is tipped as being of considerable length; the other 'prog' thing they haven't done is to include non-original classical compositions on their albums. But hey, that'd be plagiarism.

So that's my case for System of a Down being added to the archives. Considering that all of the above points are in comparison to the archive's definition of what a progressive band is, I think they're a strong case to be in the archive.


Edited by Notch
Back to Top
Notch View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 24 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2005 at 17:49
What is the process involved in requesting a band be added to the archive anyway?
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2005 at 18:12

No.

BTW: The second option should be renamed to "maybe ... if they at some point start making progressive music".

Back to Top
KoS View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2005 at 18:20
I like them but i don't know if i would consider them prog
Im kinda confused on the definition of prog anayway
Back to Top
Mikerinos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Planet Gong
Status: Offline
Points: 8890
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2005 at 18:20
Hmm...

NO NO NO NO NO NO HELL NO!!!

Sorry, I don't know how they can be considered progressive in the slightest.  Their music pisses me off too.  The singer has one of the most annoying and bitchy voices of all time and their lyrics... well, look at songs like BYOB and I think that speaks for itself.  Lyrics aren't supposed to matter when it comes to music, but in their case, it actually detracts from the music (which already annoys me).




Edited by Bluesaga
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2005 at 18:24

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Again..............NO



Back to Top
Marc Baum View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 30 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 259
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2005 at 18:38
Well, I like their "Mezmerize" album in some way, but I NEVER would say that they fit into the prog metal outfit, not even a bit
"All you need to do is sit back, and acquire the taste." - GENTLE GIANT
Back to Top
Spanky View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 07 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 389
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2005 at 18:56
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

No.

Coalinga knows how to party.
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2005 at 19:14

Noooooooooooooooooooo

:banghead

Back to Top
Tichy View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Turkey
Status: Offline
Points: 32
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2005 at 19:28

NO!!!!!!!!

And please no more alternative rock group is being added.

Back to Top
BleedingGum View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 257
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2005 at 19:54
No, Thank you. 
...this is called....BleedingGum ... !
Back to Top
cucacola54 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 1729
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2005 at 00:01
^ same
Most listened albums last week

Back to Top
Xymphony View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2005
Location: Turkey
Status: Offline
Points: 211
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2005 at 00:04
 NOOOO!!!!
Back to Top
mortem View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: October 06 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 55
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2005 at 00:07
Although I like SOAD.. I don't think they should be added to PA :\
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2005 at 00:30

Already asked and again NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not remotely Progressive Metal.

Iván

            
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2005 at 00:34

No.

Can't be more clear than that. They aren't making prog music now, and they are just a shade away from being a joke band.

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2005 at 02:46

No.

I like them a great deal, but they don't do prog.

Back to Top
Ultaigh View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 12 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 272
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2005 at 02:58
That'd be a negative.
Back to Top
The Ryan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 16 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2005 at 03:05
I don't much like political propaganda, or people dubbing their new favorite band of the next ten minutes "prog." The poll clearly indicates System of a Down shouldn't be here and by me telling you "I don't like System of a Down because of them shoving political propaganda down my throat," I'm doing exactly what every band-adder seems to be doing now, just in the opposite manner in order to hopefully keep progarchives sounding like what the majority of people here call "prog." I hate mislabeling bands, we all do it. Lets stop now.
Back to Top
Notch View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 24 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2005 at 04:53
Well I'd call that a healthy response...

So how about Robbie Williams?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.130 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.