Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog News, Press Releases
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Floyd Finito
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedFloyd Finito

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Floyd Finito
    Posted: March 08 2006 at 03:36
Just received this month's issue of 'Classic Rock' and they report an interview by David Gilmour in which he states categorically that last year's Live8 appearance by Pink Floyd will be the last time Pink Floyd appear in any way, shape or form.

To paraphrase.. He say's he's 60 years old now, it was good while it lasted, playing with Waters last year put to bed some old demons, but that's it - the end, finito, all gone, no more, adios amigos.











Probably means they'll announce dates next year, then

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67381
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 08 2006 at 04:06
At least they won't be making a mediocre comeback album. I think the last year's performance was a great way to end their career.
Back to Top
aprusso View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 16 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 312
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 08 2006 at 08:47

I agree. Anyway news is that Waters is touring with Mason and maybe Wright next summer, so after all some Floyd thing is happening again.

p

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 08 2006 at 11:42
 why pay to see PF without Gilmour ,doesnt make sense....
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 08 2006 at 12:04

Originally posted by yankeerose yankeerose wrote:

 why pay to see PF without Gilmour ,doesnt make sense....

A lot of people payed big money to see Floyd without Waters(I was one of them),who is just as integral to Floyd's sound as Gilmour is.



Back to Top
memowakeman View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 19 2005
Location: Mexico City
Status: Offline
Points: 13032
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 08 2006 at 12:31
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

Originally posted by yankeerose yankeerose wrote:

 why pay to see PF without Gilmour ,doesnt make sense....

A lot of people payed big money to see Floyd without Waters(I was one of them),who is just as integral to Floyd's sound as Gilmour is.

i payed to see Roger !!, and i will pay if they playe without Roger...

in fact i payed to see The Doors without Jim


Follow me on twitter @memowakeman
Back to Top
Moogtron III View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 08 2006 at 13:00
A few days ago, there was an interview with Gilmour in my newspaper (De Standaard) where he said that that it's an enormous enterprise to make a PF album and organize a tour. He said that he only wanted to do it once in every 15 years! That already made me suspicious if there was going to be some other Floyd album + tour.
Back to Top
SirPsycho388 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 09 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 697
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 08 2006 at 23:20
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

Originally posted by yankeerose yankeerose wrote:

 why pay to see PF without Gilmour ,doesnt make sense....

A lot of people payed big money to see Floyd without Waters(I was one of them),who is just as integral to Floyd's sound as Gilmour is.

TONS of people did this in the Syd Barrett days... haha

Strangers passing in the street by chance two separate glances meet and I am you and what I see is me. And do I take you by the hand and lead you through the land and help me understand the best I can
Back to Top
Witchwoodhermit View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 23 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 871
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2006 at 00:01

[QUOTE=Vompatti]At least they won't be making a mediocre comeback album. I think the last year's performance was a great way to end their career.

 

I couldn't have said it better myself!

Here I'm shadowed by a dragon fig tree's fan
ringed by ants and musing over man.
Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2006 at 03:08
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

Originally posted by yankeerose yankeerose wrote:

 why pay to see PF without Gilmour ,doesnt make sense....


A lot of people payed big money to see Floyd without Waters(I was one of them),who is just as integral to Floyd's sound as Gilmour is.



If you listen to Waters's live album 'In The Flesh', it's just like a Floyd album anyway (and at least Waters plays songs from 'Animals', which Gilmour always avoided post Waters).

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
RaphaelT View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1451
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2006 at 06:02

 

Very good, Waters has already proved that he is great musician and not a popper as Gilmour, so no harm done to Floyd with David's absence (I am joking of course) - the trouble is that Waters Wright and Mason can't tour under the name of Pink Floyd, cause this name belongs legally to Gilmour, but I think he would not mind.

yet you still have time!
Back to Top
edible_buddha View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 16 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2006 at 03:20
Originally posted by RaphaelT RaphaelT wrote:

 

Very good, Waters has already proved that he is great musician and not a popper as Gilmour, so no harm done to Floyd with David's absence (I am joking of course) - the trouble is that Waters Wright and Mason can't tour under the name of Pink Floyd, cause this name belongs legally to Gilmour, but I think he would not mind.

Hang on... I thought the name 'pink floyd' belonged to Waters.  Wasn't there some sort of legal battle about the ownership of the name in the mid 80's just after Roger split from the band and made it public that he wanted to put the band to bed?????????

Hey, I might be wrong, as the remainder of Floyd at the time won the case... (could some one clarify that for me????)... Anyhow... didnt Syd name the band in the first place??

I really like this jacket, but the sleeves are much too long.
Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2006 at 03:26
Originally posted by aprusso aprusso wrote:

Anyway, news is that Waters is touring with Mason and maybe Wright next summer, so after all some Floyd thing is happening again.


Last time Waters played, Mason turned up on drums so there's obviously still a connection there, but Wright? I seem to remember it was Waters who sacked Wright from Floyd during the recording of 'The Wall' (most of the keyboards on that album were eventually played by Bob Ezrin), so unless there's been some sort of reconciliation between the two...

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
PROGMAN View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 03 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 2661
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2006 at 06:44

Originally posted by edible_buddha edible_buddha wrote:

Anyhow... didnt Syd name the band in the first place??

Not sure about that, but a good point, in the late 1980s if Barrett in any shape or form had turned round and said "Guy's what about me, I should have that name, you're welcome to use the name Pink Floyd, but don't get childish over it, I was a founder as well and I want some ownership of the band name as well, despite I ain't in Floyd no more!!"

If Syd was able to say something, I reckon the legeal battles wouldn't have been so bitter if Syd was allowed some ownership as well.

CYMRU AM BYTH
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67381
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2006 at 08:29
Originally posted by edible_buddha edible_buddha wrote:

Anyhow... didnt Syd name the band in the first place??



Yes he did, he named it after blues musicians Pink Anderson and Floyd Council, or at least that's what I've heard.
Back to Top
edible_buddha View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 16 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2006 at 19:45
Originally posted by PROGMAN PROGMAN wrote:

Originally posted by edible_buddha edible_buddha wrote:

Anyhow... didnt Syd name the band in the first place??

Not sure about that, but a good point, in the late 1980s if Barrett in any shape or form had turned round and said "Guy's what about me, I should have that name, you're welcome to use the name Pink Floyd, but don't get childish over it, I was a founder as well and I want some ownership of the band name as well, despite I ain't in Floyd no more!!"

If Syd was able to say something, I reckon the legeal battles wouldn't have been so bitter if Syd was allowed some ownership as well.

Youve got a good point there progman.  For a moment, i thought there might have been something like a trustee estate in regards to his recordings and legal rights.... I would have loved someone to have said that, at least on his behalf... Oh well... At least now there seems to be some reconciliation.

Only time will tell with more Floyd music (I personally doubt it, thou).

I really like this jacket, but the sleeves are much too long.
Back to Top
Shryker View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: May 30 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 23
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 23:26

Just to clarify, Gilmour is currently touring, Rick Wright is also playing alongside with him. Roger is touring this summer and Nick Mason will be joining him.

I believe I read somewhere that Waters asked Rick if he wanted to tour with him but he hasn't received a reply.

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.309 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.