Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
condor
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 24 2005
Location: Norwich
Status: Offline
Points: 1069
|
Topic: Heavy metal Posted: July 05 2006 at 15:08 |
Is the best heavy metal produced by bands not specialising in heavy metal? Put more generally, does specialising in a particular genre (prog metal, prog folk, prog jazz etc) inevitably predispose you towards making songs that sound increasingly like each other over time?
|
|
chopper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 19943
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 15:17 |
Give us an example of "the best heavy metal produced by bands not specialising in heavy metal" then.
|
|
Vompatti
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67381
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 15:34 |
Yes, the best heavy metal is produced by King Crimson.
|
|
condor
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 24 2005
Location: Norwich
Status: Offline
Points: 1069
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 15:36 |
The best example I can give is King Crimson from the 1973-74. Also, to a minor extent Pink Floyd (Post-Barrett, pre-DSOTM period) like the Nile Song and Careful With that Axe, Eugene. Many songs Pink Floyd did wouldn't be considered metal because they don't sound like prog metal or death metal bands of today. I'm not trying to sl*g off prog metal; I like Tool, Dream Theater and Opeth. The problem is, probably stemming from the fact they specialise in metal, riffs and phrases from their songs could fit equally well into lots of other songs equally well. Because they play, Opeth in particular, symphonically and improvisationally, each song does not sound distinct enough. When you hear Red, Fracture and Lark's Tongue, you know instantly which song it is and why phrases from one wouldn't fit in another. That's why they are greats. Prog metal has a huge amount of potential, it's a shame to see it hampered by stylistic cliches like gratuitously dark and over long lyrics.
|
|
AtLossForWords
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 11 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 6699
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 16:06 |
condor wrote:
I'm not trying to sl*g off prog metal; I like Tool, Dream Theater and Opeth. The problem is, probably stemming from the fact they specialise in metal, riffs and phrases from their songs could fit equally well into lots of other songs equally well. Because they play, Opeth in particular, symphonically and improvisationally, each song does not sound distinct enough.
When you hear Red, Fracture and Lark's Tongue, you know instantly which song it is and why phrases from one wouldn't fit in another. That's why they are greats.
Prog metal has a huge amount of potential, it's a shame to see it hampered by stylistic cliches like gratuitously dark and over long lyrics.
|
I don't think so, I think most work from Dream Theater and Opeth is very unique. Maybe you can interchange some Black Sabbath lyrics, but it would be impossible to just go and cut and paste parts of Dream Theater and Opeth songs. The only exception for Dream Theater would be Scenes From a Memory, because much of the music follows the theme of the concept, so it's made to mush togethor.
Why are those albums so distinct when Dream Theater's and Opeth's albums aren't. I might see "Close to the Edge" and "Gates of Delirium" as two very similar songs, but I would never say that Dream Theater and Opeth make more distinct songs than Yes. I think just about any good progressive band makes distinct music.
It has things that you don't enjoy, so it's potential is limited? That's like me saying classic symphonic prog has so much potential, but it's production tends to suck, so it only has potential.
|
"Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls."
|
|
Orion-GER
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 03 2006
Location: Bhutan
Status: Offline
Points: 43
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 17:00 |
I don't think so. There are enough bands out there who manage to invent themselves new with every record.
|
|
Trickster F.
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 17:28 |
Non-Metal bands perform Metal music laughably bad, to my experience, so I would say NO.
-- Ivan
|
sig
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20522
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 17:33 |
Non-Metal bands can sometimes sound very heavy ... then they're sometimes referred to as Metal by people who don't normally like the genre - as an example of how metal *should* sound like. Best example: High Tide. Many people claim that they're the first prog metal band ... IMO that's *very* far fetched. So: I vote for "No" ... leave metal to the metal bands.
|
|
|
Trickster F.
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 17:38 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
Non-Metal bands can sometimes sound very heavy ... then they're sometimes referred to as Metal by people who don't normally like the genre - as an example of how metal *should* sound like.
Best example: High Tide. Many people claim that they're the first prog metal band ... IMO that's *very* far fetched.
So: I vote for "No" ... leave metal to the metal bands.
|
Jean & Friede?
-- Ivan
|
sig
|
|
Minkia
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 30 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 174
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 17:55 |
I disagree: COLDPLAY produce the best heavy metal!
|
RELIGION IS HATE, RELIGION IS FEAR, RELIGION IS WAR,RELIGION IS RAPE, RELIGION'S OBSCENE,RELIGION'S A WHORE
|
|
el böthy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 27 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 6336
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 21:05 |
Vompatti wrote:
Yes, the best heavy metal is produced by King Crimson.
| Yep yep yep, hands down...
I still voted no
|
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
|
fungusucantkill
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2005
Location: New Orleans
Status: Offline
Points: 618
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 22:58 |
|
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46828
|
Posted: July 05 2006 at 23:03 |
hahahaa... call me a fuddy duddie but just what in the hell IS heavy metal...any of you all cook me a definition of it.
I hear people all the time say King Crimson is heavy metal... huh... never saw that at all.
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
aspinosa
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 16 2006
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 153
|
Posted: July 06 2006 at 00:10 |
best heavy metal Iron MaIDEN
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20522
|
Posted: July 06 2006 at 01:44 |
ivansfr0st wrote:
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
Non-Metal bands can sometimes sound very heavy ... then they're sometimes referred to as Metal by people who don't normally like the genre - as an example of how metal *should* sound like.
Best example: High Tide. Many people claim that they're the first prog metal band ... IMO that's *very* far fetched.
So: I vote for "No" ... leave metal to the metal bands.
|
Jean & Friede?
-- Ivan |
Not only them ... half a dozen people mentioned High Tide as some form of early prog metal.
|
|
|
Dee Dee Ramone
Forum Groupie
Joined: June 03 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 40
|
Posted: July 27 2006 at 16:25 |
chopper wrote:
Give us an example of "the best heavy metal produced by bands not specialising in heavy metal" then. |
T. Rex - 20th Century Boy
Sex Pistols - Satellite (most of the rest too)
Generation X - 1st Album
King Crimson - the loud bits of Larks Tongues, Starless & Bible Black, Red, Thrak etc.
Ramones - Go Mental, Bad Brain and most stuff onwards from Subterranean Jungle
I love 'em all.
|
|
Dream Theater
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 14 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 2188
|
Posted: July 27 2006 at 23:40 |
Dee Dee Ramone wrote:
chopper wrote:
Give us an example of "the best heavy metal produced by bands not specialising in heavy metal" then. |
King Crimson - Red
|
Do you consider Red as a heavy metal song?
|
[IMG]http://www.travelwithachallenge.com/Images/Travel_Article_Library/Sacred-Travel/Machu-Picchu-350.jpg"> [IMG]http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a63/panchopc1/machupicchu-1.jpg">
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: July 28 2006 at 08:12 |
Dee Dee Ramone wrote:
chopper wrote:
Give us an example of "the best heavy metal produced by bands not specialising in heavy metal" then. | T. Rex - 20th Century Boy Sex Pistols - Satellite (most of the rest too)Generation X - 1st Album King Crimson - the loud bits of Larks Tongues, Starless & Bible Black, Red, Thrak etc. Ramones - Go Mental, Bad Brain and most stuff onwards from Subterranean JungleI love 'em all. | None of this is really heavy metal, though. Punk influenced the NWOBHM sound through its aggression and energy, so that effectively rules out the Pistols, the Ramones and Gen X. "Satellite" is all about winding up a girl from the suburbs - not a metal lyric theme at all. "King Crimson took sonic metal influences and incorporated them into their ever-changing Prog Rock, and neither "Twentieth Century Boy" or "Careful With That Axe Eugene" are related to metal in any way other than the former's riffs and the latter's distortion and screaming. "You Really Got Me" by the Kinks is much closer to metal than either, as are the first two Blue Cheer albums. Metal isn't simply a bunch of repeating riffs, or a particular sound, it's essentially what used to be known as heavy blues or heavy rock, but with an attitude and stylisation that makes the distinction clearer. This attitude comprises a prentension to being able to play almost at a Prog Rock level, with "virtuosic" displays, normally of guitar soloing that often alludes to classical music - but equally often reverts to a stylised form of Rock and Roll. There is also a predisposition for lyrics that address matters pertaining either to the culture immediately around the music, including a highly misogynistic attitude to women or esoteric matters, usually of a "dark" nature. The stylisation aspect of Metal vs Heavy Rock or Punk Rock is the almost complete absence of "swing" or "bounce" in the dominant riff-based style of the music. Of course, Metallica absorbed far more Punk energy than previous metal bands, with the possible exception of Motorhead, from whom I would argue Punk got its energy in the first place, and the "bounce" of punk is especially noticeable on "Kill 'Em All", an album that you could choose to headbang or pogo to, depending on the track. Judas Priest pretty much define what metal is all about - and their style constantly evolved. The Scorpions are another great example, and both underline what I've often said: Metal is Prog Rock's less educated and refined, rather more instinctive and rebellious brother.
Edited by Certif1ed - July 28 2006 at 08:16
|
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|
Open-Mind
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 21 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1800
|
Posted: July 28 2006 at 08:14 |
ivansfr0st wrote:
Non-Metal bands perform Metal music laughably bad, to my experience, so I would say NO.
-- Ivan |
Agree
|
"I'm on a roll, I'm on a roll this time, I feel my luck could change.. "
|
|
aapatsos
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 11 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9226
|
Posted: July 28 2006 at 09:33 |
Open-Mind wrote:
ivansfr0st wrote:
Non-Metal bands perform Metal music laughably bad, to my experience, so I would say NO.
-- Ivan |
Agree
|
me too
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.