Reviews reporting thread

I have lurked here for information for over a decade, which is irrelevant, but I did finally make an account to point out these two reviews. The main concern here is that the two writers are really just having a personal tussle in the member reviews section. Both of them could maybe just cut the pettiness out and leave the rest of the review serviceable, but as is, I don't think that kind of slapfight belongs in reviews.

The first one is more clearly a problem than the second, in terms of the degree to which it's just calling out another user. (As well as irrelevant other musicians?? And a quick glance through that user's profile shows they have a larger problem with writing this way often.) But I'd argue the second one is no less a problem, for two reasons:

1. With just a few seconds of reading between the lines, it's no less eye-rollingly catty. It's just manifesting that in a cagier way which is more likely to get around admin review. Maybe intentionally.

2. The only specific it mentions, and almost the review's only real takeaway, is a track called "Stony Days" which... isn't on the album. In fact it's a Derek Sherinian track, who the author clearly also knows of. Hard to tell quite what's going on there, but at base it's unclear whether the reviewer actually listened to the album in question; and if they did, even in part, there still wasn't enough attention paid to just scroll up the page and note that "Stony Days" is nowhere on the track listing.

Seems like a grey area in some ways, and things get tougher in that neither reviewer seems to have popped up in the last three or more years. But I thought I'd mention them.

Basically just adding the song titles and musician credits to up the word count, I guess?

that would be rating abuse, may be an admin need to get in touch with him.