Progarchives.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Reviews discussion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum SearchSearch  Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Reviews discussion

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 159>
Author
Message
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 11493
Post Options Post Options   Quote Angelo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Reviews discussion
    Posted: September 10 2006 at 12:02
It does suggest so, it doesn't warn or enforce it when you submit.
Even prog is rooted in the blues, at some point...
Back to Top
Progarchives.com
Advertisement
Sponsored links (registered users, log in to remove)
 
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 11662
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2006 at 08:20
Originally posted by TheProgtologist

Originally posted by Atkingani

Next step should be perhaps consider valid a review with 100 words minimum instead of the present 50 words. Below 100 words reviews should not appear in the homepage and be counted as a single rating. Just an idea! Lamp
 
That sounds like a good idea Guigo.Clap

Hang on here! This kind of decision belongs to M@X as far as I know and the man does not want to delete ratings without reviews for reasons that everyone should be able to express his/her opinions regardless of the English possibilities. And extending the reviews to 100 words will make it even tougher, than!!
 
 
Note that my reviews should hover betwenn the 200 and 400 words, so I do not feel threatened by this.


Edited by Sean Trane - September 13 2006 at 11:10
Back to Top
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Brasil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9915
Post Options Post Options   Quote Atkingani Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2006 at 10:43
Originally posted by Easy Livin

I think the submit a review page suggests 75 words now.
 
Still showing 50 words minimum, Bob. However, 75 words minimum could be a good step.Smile
 
In any situation, the final decision belongs to M@x and Rony... Wink
Guigo
~~~~~~
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin & Moderator

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15514
Post Options Post Options   Quote Easy Livin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2006 at 11:51
I knew I'd seen it somewhere.
 
Just above the submit review text box it says:
THE MARS VOLTA De-loused in the Comatorium review (your text here, 75+ words suggested)
 
ProgArchives.com
The Ultimate Progressive Rock Music Discography, Reviews database and Forum.
Back to Top
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Brasil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9915
Post Options Post Options   Quote Atkingani Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2006 at 12:22
Originally posted by Easy Livin

I knew I'd seen it somewhere.
 
Just above the submit review text box it says:
THE MARS VOLTA De-loused in the Comatorium review (your text here, 75+ words suggested)
 
 
ShockedBig smile
 
 
 
 
 
Guigo
~~~~~~
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 46728
Post Options Post Options   Quote Ricochet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2006 at 14:57
75 words! OMG...I'm like in a difficult situation. CryWink
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 11662
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2006 at 05:53
Originally posted by Ricochet

75 words! OMG...I'm like in a difficult situation. CryWink
 
Actually I disagree with this change or increase of minimal count of words. This time 75 and next year 100.Thumbs DownOuch
 
I dio not think it is fair to ask me to go back on all my reviews that have 50 or 55 words, add more text just in order to reach a new amount just so that the reviews stays visible.
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Krautrock Specialist

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6139
Post Options Post Options   Quote oliverstoned Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2006 at 06:01


Yes, we should better be demanding about quality, not quantity.
Music   In heavy rotation - Quintessence live Elizabeth hall 1971

Hifi        Currently testing many NOS vintage valves
Back to Top
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Brasil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9915
Post Options Post Options   Quote Atkingani Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2006 at 12:09
Originally posted by Sean Trane

Originally posted by Ricochet

75 words! OMG...I'm like in a difficult situation. CryWink
 
Actually I disagree with this change or increase of minimal count of words. This time 75 and next year 100.Thumbs DownOuch
 
I dio not think it is fair to ask me to go back on all my reviews that have 50 or 55 words, add more text just in order to reach a new amount just so that the reviews stays visible.
 
Only an idea, buddies... don't need to maul me! Cry
 
BTW, in the case, the 75 or 100 words rule is adopted it shall not invalidate reviews done by the old rule. It will be valid for reviews done from the eventual date of adoption.Smile
Guigo
~~~~~~
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin & Moderator

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15514
Post Options Post Options   Quote Easy Livin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2006 at 14:10
As you'll see from the wording, it says 75 words recommended.
 
There has been no change to the parameters for checking review length (which is actually 200 characters), and no current proposal to do so.
ProgArchives.com
The Ultimate Progressive Rock Music Discography, Reviews database and Forum.
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Motorville
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9854
Post Options Post Options   Quote chopper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2006 at 15:18
This one wins the prize for the worst spelling ever (e.g. "Masterpiece! that is a word you culd yuse to describe this 70's classis"

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=89876

Also an almost total lack of punctuation makes it even harder to read.

Back to Top
Fassbinder View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 27 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3495
Post Options Post Options   Quote Fassbinder Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2006 at 15:30
Originally posted by chopper

This one wins the prize for the worst spelling ever (e.g. "Masterpiece! that is a word you culd yuse to describe this 70's classis"

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=89876

Also an almost total lack of punctuation makes it even harder to read.

 
Priceless!!! A challenging reading though... Kind of semi-phonetical style...
 
Seriously, though, why not to check a review before posting? Some misspellings might be avoided...
Back to Top
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Brasil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9915
Post Options Post Options   Quote Atkingani Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2006 at 15:36
Mandy's rival? Tongue 
Guigo
~~~~~~
Back to Top
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 11493
Post Options Post Options   Quote Angelo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 07:06
Originally posted by TheProgtologist

Originally posted by Angelo

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=93566
 
"(Content removed)


It shouldn't even be in the forums,that constitutes illegal activity.
    


Figured that, I even got censored by Bob when quoting the review...Wink
Even prog is rooted in the blues, at some point...
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin & Moderator

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15514
Post Options Post Options   Quote Easy Livin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 11:18
Not so much censored Angelo, I just don't like giving such reviews ongoing publicity once they have been dealt with.Wink
 
Starve them of oxygen and they'll hopefully go away!
ProgArchives.com
The Ultimate Progressive Rock Music Discography, Reviews database and Forum.
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9145
Post Options Post Options   Quote Peter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 15:08
Originally posted by Tony R

RADIOHEAD — Hail to the thief
Review by EMinkovitch (Eliott Minkovitch)
I was curious, so I gave it a spin. I got exactly what I expected - this stuff is totally devoid of any creativity, imagination or songwriting talent. Absolute zero in emotional content as well - it's all flat, boring, grey and whiny. Sounds like soundtrack music to a coma. That pretty much sums up this album, as it does hundreds of other "alternative" rubbish all over the radio these days.

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=33970
 
 
Ermm Actually, I thought that one fell (just) within the bounds of an acceptable review. It describes the music in a vivid (if highly scathing) manner, and Minkovitch's  rating is justified by his saying that the album completely lacks "creativity, imagination, songwriting talent and emotional content."
 
Negative reviews can be useful, and are normally among the most concise -- or even humourous. (I have written one or two similar reviews in my time -- see Renaissance "Camera Camera.") I think that even a fan of "alternative" music (and/or Radiohead) can get a feel of what this disk sounds like, from this review.
 
 
It's a tough call, but I wouldn't have cut this one. What are his other reviews like? 


Edited by Peter Rideout - October 15 2006 at 15:14
Let the monkey drive.

Back to Top
tardis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: Victoria, BC
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 14123
Post Options Post Options   Quote tardis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 15:22
Originally posted by Peter Rideout

 
Really, why bother to review an album if you truly think you have nothing new to add to what's already been written?Confused
 
 
STEVE HACKETT

Voyage Of The Acolyte

1975

Studio Album

Review | Album details | All reviews


Review by EMinkovitch (Eliott Minkovitch)
Posted 5:04:06 PM EST, 1/27/2005

5 stars What more needs to be added? This is an essential part of the Genesis canon.


Agreed. It's lazy and extremely unhelpful. I'm interested in getting the listener's original perspective on an album!
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9145
Post Options Post Options   Quote Peter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 15:29
ConfusedThis is a bit confusing Easy: is this the appropriate thread for reporting questionable reviews? Your first post seems to indicate it is not, but it's now being used that way, nonetheless.
 
(So I'm sorry if I posted/responded in the wrong thread. I have now also posted my prior post in the other reviews thread. Perhaps this thread needs a new title -- something like "Review Writing.") Ermm
Let the monkey drive.

Back to Top
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Brasil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9915
Post Options Post Options   Quote Atkingani Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 15:30
Peter, this review has much less than 50 words or 200 characters, it did not go to the PA homepage and doesn't appear in the album page. It counts as a rating-without-review.Smile
 
EDIT: Anyway, this thread split is new. One for the inappropriate reviews and the other to discuss the content (or not) of some reviews. With time, I guess that people will be used to both.


Edited by Atkingani - October 15 2006 at 15:39
Guigo
~~~~~~
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9145
Post Options Post Options   Quote Peter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 15:32
^ See? Tardis seems to have posted in the "wrong" reviews thread too! (He's quoting my post from the other thread. Is this a technical glitch?)Confused
Let the monkey drive.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 159>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.69
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.219 seconds.