Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
bryantm3
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 25 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 16
|
Topic: Underworld Posted: October 22 2006 at 13:15 |
I sent a band submission to the given email address with all the requirements on Friday, and I'd just like your opinion on whether this band is prog or not. I think they're very progressive, as in detail below. If they're not, why would the forum poll last year show that of the top three favourite other artists, one is Genesis?
Anyway, here's my email:
Hello,
I would like to submit a new artist to ProgArchives. The information is listed below.
Artist Name: Underworld I
believe Underworld should be added to Prog Archives because they are a
truly progressive band. They are expanding music and treading new
ground as we speak. They have combined the symphonic elements of
Classic Prog such as Yes, Genesis, and Emerson, Lake & Palmer by
creating long compositions with several different movements, and albums
with common threads all the way through, with Krautrock with their
electronic instrumentation, and finally with House music with their
distinctive beats. Their 1996 album 'Second Toughest In The Infants',
and their 1999 album 'Beaucoup Fish' showcase this the best.
Biography: In
1979, Karl Hyde met Rick Smith working at a restaurant, and invited him
to join a band he was in, 'The Screen Gemz', who released one single,
and then turned into a band known only as a squiggle for a few years,
and radio DJs became frustrated, so CBS Records convinced them to make
a pronunciation, and they came up with 'Freur'. They released two
albums under this name, 'Doot Doot' (1983) and 'Get Us Out Of Here'
(1985) mostly recording slightly Krautrock influenced europop, and then
went through some line-up changes, and became Underworld. In 1987 they
released 'Underneath The Radar', followed by 'Change The Weather' in
1988. These two albums were mostly funk and europop influenced. They
toured with the Eurythmics in 1989. By 1989, all of the members had
left for other projects except for Karl Hyde and Rick Smith. Karl and
Rick decided to take a new experimental direction, and in 1990, became
a trio with the addition of Darren Emerson. From here on out, this is
the progressive Underworld that is called MKII by most fans. After a
myriad of extremely odd progressive and experimental singles, they
released what is considered their true debut album by Underworld fans
in 1994, entitled 'Dubnobasswithmyheadman', a mostly techno-oriented
album with a long composition in two sections, 'mmm skyscraper i love
you'. In 1995 they made a radio hit with a remix of one of their songs
called 'Born Slippy (NUXX), and recieved much applaud from DJs. In
1996, they followed up with 'Second Toughest In The Infants', which
took a more progressive direction than before, featuring two 15+ minute
songs in sections. In 1999 they released 'Beaucoup Fish', their most
accessible album in their MKII period, but also one of their more
progressive. This album carries a theme of love and a relationship with
a woman throughout it, and features three long compositions, 'Cups',
'Kittens', and 'Moaner'. In 2000, after their 'Everything, Everything'
tour, Darren Emerson left the band to pursue other projects. Karl Hyde
and Rick Smith wanted to try an even newer direction, so they used many
different instruments and tried to incorporate a world element to their
music with their 2002 album 'A Hundred Days Off'. This year, they have
completed the soundtrack to the film 'Breaking & Entering', and are
currently working on a new album with new member Darren Price.
Country: UK
Prog Genre: Krautrock / Prog Related / Art Rock
Band picture: http://myspace-760.vo.llnwd.net/01240/06/72/1240032760_l.jpg
Official Website: http://www.underworldlive.com http://www.dirty.org
Discography
(I'll only include the ones in the MKII era, relavent to Prog Archives.
If you'd like the other releases, please respond)
-Dubnobasswithmyheadman (Album, 1994, Darren Emerson, Karl Hyde, Rick Smith) -Born Slippy (Single, 1995, Darren Emerson, Karl Hyde, Rick Smith) -Second Toughest In The Infants (Album, 1996, Darren Emerson, Karl Hyde, Rick Smith) -Pearls Girl (Single, 1996, Darren Emerson, Karl Hyde, Rick Smith) -Beaucoup Fish (Album, 1999, Darren Emerson, Karl Hyde, Rick Smith) -Everything, Everything (Live
Album, 2000, Darren Emerson, Karl Hyde, Rick Smith) -A Hundred Days Off (Album, 2002, Karl Hyde, Rick Smith) -Breaking & Entering Soundtrack (Soundtrack, 2002, Karl Hyde, Rick Smith, collaboration with Gabriel Yared)
Examples of their work:
-'Second
Toughest In The Infants' starts with a 17 minute epic in three pieces:
'Juanita / Kiteless / To Dream Of Love'. It begins with a techno beat
and distorted vocals, and goes into a keyboard solo, followed by a
quiet section, a reprise of the beginning, and finally the end.
-The
second song, 'Banstyle / Sappys Curry', starts out with a soft keyboard
melody and some nice lyrics, but then evolves into an acoustic guitar
piece.
-'Cups', on their 1999 Beaucoup Fish, starts as a jazzy
soft tune with smooth lyrics, but it quickly evolves into a rapid
keyboard solo at the end, and clocking at 11 minutes, the longest on
the album.
-A further example is 'Cherry Pie', a B side
which starts out with a mesmerising synth pattern, and fades into a very elabourate instrumental.
-Finally,
their latest example is from 2002's 'A Hundred Days Off', a song called
'Little Speaker', which evolves from a vocal piece into a keyboard bit.
Since my mail account cannot handle such large attachments, I
will upload the zip file with the above songs to BigUpload.com, in the
format specified (Band-Album-Track Number-Title).
Here is the link: http://www.bigupload.com/d=A032D832
If the link is expired by the time this reaches you, please mail me back.
Thank you, Daniel
|
|
chopper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 19944
|
Posted: October 22 2006 at 14:49 |
I have passed the details on to Philippe and his team. I'll leave the decision to people who know more about this type of music than me - it just sounds like techno to me.
Edited by chopper - October 22 2006 at 14:50
|
|
bryantm3
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 25 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 16
|
Posted: October 22 2006 at 20:10 |
Well, it is techno, but it's also progressive, similar to Progressive Jazz (ie: Brand X). You can't say that Brand X is rock, but you can say it's prog. In a similar way, you can't really say Underworld is rock, but you can say it's prog. I would say that they meet the requirements for prog: -
Long compositions, sometimes running over 20 minutes, with intricate
melodies and harmonies that require repeated listening to grasp. These
are often described as epics and are the genre's clearest nod to
classical music. An early example is the 23-minute "Echoes" by Pink
Floyd. Other famous examples include Jethro Tull's "Thick as a Brick"
(43 minutes), Yes' "Close to the Edge" (18 minutes) and Genesis'
"Supper's Ready" (23 minutes). More recent extreme examples are the
60-minute "Light of Day, Day of Darkness" by Green Carnation and
"Garden of Dreams" by The Flower Kings. check
- Lyrics that convey intricate and sometimes impenetrable narratives,
covering such themes as science fiction, fantasy, history, religion,
war, love, and madness. Many early 1970s progressive rock bands
(especially German ones) featured lyrics concerned with left-wing
politics and social issues. no check
-
Concept albums, in which a theme or storyline is explored throughout an
entire album in a manner similar to a film or a play. In the days of
vinyl, these were usually two-record sets with strikingly designed
gatefold sleeves. Famous examples include The Lamb Lies Down on
Broadway by Genesis, Tales from Topographic Oceans by Yes, 2112 by
Rush, Dark Side of the Moon and The Wall by Pink Floyd, and the more
recent Metropolis Part II: Scenes from a Memory by Dream Theater and
Snow by Spock's Beard. Aqualung, perhaps the best-known record by
Jethro Tull, is often regarded as a concept album due to its recurring
themes, but songwriter Ian Anderson has always claimed that the album
is just "a bunch of songs". check
-
Unusual vocal styles and use of multi-part vocal harmonies. See Magma, Robert Wyatt, and Gentle Giant. check
-
Prominent use of electronic instrumentation — particularly keyboard
instruments such as the organ, piano, Mellotron, and Moog synthesizer,
in addition to the usual rock combination of electric guitar, bass and
drums. check
-
Use of unusual time signatures, scales, or tunings. Many pieces use
multiple time signatures and/or tempi, sometimes concurrently. Solo
passages for virtually every instrument, designed to showcase the
virtuosity of the player. This is the sort of thing that contributed to
the fame of such performers as keyboardist Rick Wakeman and drummer
Neil Peart. check- there are keyboard/guitar/electronic choir solos (don't believe it's mellotron but not sure)
-
Inclusion of classical pieces on albums. For example, Yes start their
concerts with a taped extract of Stravinsky's Firebird suite, and
Emerson Lake and Palmer have performed arrangements of pieces by
Copland, Bartók, Moussorgsky, Prokofiev, Janacek, Alberto Ginastera,
and often feature quotes from J. S. Bach in lead breaks. Jethro Tull
recorded a famous cover of J. S. Bach's "Bouree", in which they turned
the classical piece into a "sleazy jazzy night-club song", according to
Ian Anderson. Marillion started concerts with Rossini's La Gazza Ladra
(The Thieving Magpie). Symphony X has included parts by, or inspired
by, Beethoven, Holst and Mozart. no check
- An aesthetic linking the music with visual art, a trend started by
The Beatles with Sgt. Pepper's and enthusiastically embraced during the
prog heyday. Some bands became as well-known for the art direction of
their albums as for their sound, with the "look" integrated into the
band's overall musical identity. This led to fame for particular
artists and design studios, most notably Roger Dean, whose paintings
and logo design for Yes are so essential to the band's identity they
could be said to serve the same function as corporate branding.
Hipgnosis became equally famous for their unusual sleeves for Pink
Floyd, often featuring experimental photography quite innovative for
the time (two men shaking hands, one of whom is in flames, on the cover
of Wish You Were Here). H.R. Giger's painting for Emerson Lake and
Palmer's Brain Salad Surgery is one of the most famous album sleeves
ever produced. check- they intricately design their album covers to match the albums with a design collective called tomato, of which they are prominent members
Progressive rock compositions sometimes take the following forms:
- A piece that is subdivided into movements in the manner of a
classical suite. Examples are the four-part "Close to the Edge" by Yes,
six-part "Hemispheres" by Rush, and the seven-part "A Change of
Seasons" by Dream Theater. All of TransAtlantic's epics are multipart. check- juanita - kiteless - to dream of love
-
A piece that is composed of a patchwork of musical themes that could
conceivably stand as individual songs, but together serve to relate a
complete narrative through music. Examples are "Supper's Ready" on
Genesis' Foxtrot (the "Willow Farm" section of which was played as a
single), "A Day in the Life" on Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
by The Beatles, Jethro Tull's Aqualung from the album of the same name,
and "The Gates of Delirium" on Yes's album Relayer (from which the
single "Soon" was taken). check- the second half of 'mmm skyscraper i love you' could stand as a song on its own
- A piece that allows the development of musical ideas via
progressions or variations in the manner of a bolero or a canon. "King
Kong" on Frank Zappa's Uncle Meat is an example. not sure what this means, unless it means that they make music that doesn't sound like anything made before them, which they do. i won't count this one.
that's 8/10 requirements met (9/11 if you count the last one), and some bands on this site meet less of those. frankly, i'm not sure how you could argue that it's not prog. that's y'all's definition, by the way.
Edited by bryantm3 - October 22 2006 at 20:11
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: October 23 2006 at 16:39 |
I agree it is progressive, but when you take a listen at end 70's trance and house music, you'll find a great number of progressive bands there, off course in those days house/dance was largely underground music, and in anexperimental stage, so naturally you'll have progressive elements in there aswell (most electronic music from early till end seventies is generally progressive (Tangerine Dream, Brian Eno, the mentioned trance.house scene which was rather popular in New York)
On the whole I don't think it fi\ts in this site, but maybe the fans of electronic music will consider it for inclusion, but for me it''s progressive trance, and stands well away from the confines of this site.
had this site been about progressive music in general i wouldn't hesitate to add it.
Edited by tuxon - October 23 2006 at 16:50
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
PROGMAN
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 03 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 2661
|
Posted: October 23 2006 at 18:27 |
"Pearl's Girl" recorded in 1996 is definetely a spacey/electronic Prog track, I remember it when I was younger, I found it very trippy sounding.
It does sound like trance music, from what I've heard. possibly if most of their music matches up that song, or any thing else progish maybe "Progressive Electronic" would be the genre tahey could fit as???????
I don't know enough about them, but I heard them on radio and television.
Edited by PROGMAN - October 23 2006 at 18:31
|
CYMRU AM BYTH
|
|
bryantm3
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 25 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 16
|
Posted: October 23 2006 at 22:15 |
PROGMAN wrote:
"Pearl's Girl" recorded in 1996 is definetely a spacey/electronic Prog track, I remember it when I was younger, I found it very trippy sounding.
It does sound like trance music, from what I've heard. possibly if most of their music matches up that song, or any thing else progish maybe "Progressive Electronic" would be the genre tahey could fit as???????
I don't know enough about them, but I heard them on radio and television.
|
Pearl's Girl is actually one of their more radio-friendly hits. A lot of their stuff is much more experimental and stretched out into movements and different parts, such as 2005 and 2006's "Lovely Broken Thing", "Pizza For Eggs" and "I'm A Big Sister, And I'm A Girl, And I'm A Princess, And This Is My Horse", all of which are very proggy epics spanning over 25 minutes each, including extended guitar/keyboard soloing.
Edited by bryantm3 - October 23 2006 at 22:15
|
|
bryantm3
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 25 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 16
|
Posted: October 23 2006 at 22:21 |
Underworld was rejected. I sent two emails:
May I ask for some details? I put a lot into that submission, and I
have no idea why you would reject them. They meet most of the
requirements for prog (see my thread in the 'New Artists' forum on your
website). How you can put bands like Radiohead and even the Nine Inch
Nails on your website and reject Underworld, I will never understand.
While Underworld isn't really rock, they are truly prog. Last year they
released a 25 minute epic in seven parts entitled 'Pizza For Eggs'
which features extended guitar and keyboard soloing. If that's not
prog, I guess I just don't know what prog is. Or maybe "prog" is
another word for "pretentious elitists". -Daniel.
Sorry for the abruptness of the last email, but I truly believe that
rejecting Underworld is a disservice to the prog commmunity. Compare
Underworld to Tangerine Dream or Brian Eno, both of whom appear on your
website, and are not rock musicians at all. While Underworld may not be
rock, they certainly deserve a space in the "Progressive Electronic"
section of the website. Please reconsider. -Daniel
I cannot understand why they would reject Underworld but keep Eno and Tangerine Dream. It seems like a double-standard to me.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20522
|
Posted: October 24 2006 at 01:21 |
Underworld ... they are progressive, but their base genre (Modern Electronic/Trance) is just too remote. ^ I know what you mean by "double standard" ... given the definition of prog which is used here, Tangerine Dream should be rejected too, or both be accepted. If you like you can review Underworld on my website - there the base genre doesn't matter at all, be it Progressive Country or Progressive Trance.
|
|
|
chopper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 19944
|
Posted: October 24 2006 at 07:34 |
bryantm3, the decision to reject Underworld was taken by relevant genre team as, after listening to your samples, they felt the style of music belonged in the club, dance and techno arena.
|
|
Bob Greece
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1823
|
Posted: October 24 2006 at 07:49 |
I like Underworld so they must be progressive. If Underworld comes in then there are lots of bands such as The Orb and Orbital that would have to come in. Putting a band like Underworld in the archives would really open a can of worms.
Well, progressive they probably are but progressive rock they are not.
|
|
|
bryantm3
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 25 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 16
|
Posted: October 24 2006 at 16:42 |
chopper wrote:
bryantm3, the decision to reject Underworld was taken by relevant genre team as, after listening to your samples, they felt the style of music belonged in the club, dance and techno arena. |
whatever. it's your loss. however, i would reconsider hosting such bands as tangerine dream on this website. just because they recorded in the 70s doesn't mean they're more prog than underworld. that is, indeed, a double standard, or percieved one-upmanship. in addition, i won't bother submitting any other bands to this website.
Edited by bryantm3 - October 24 2006 at 18:03
|
|