Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Who are here.....Who?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Who are here.....Who?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
Author
Message
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46828
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 16:26
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:




hahahha.. and just who the hell decides what is prog Ivan... you?  It is a collaborative site, and the site reflects the diverse views here. If people don't agree, they are free to find a site that reflects their narrow view of prog. 

 
Even the supporters of the Who addition agree THE WHO ARE NOT PROG, they are influential to everything, so it's not my point of view.

exactly the point that was made in the collab area....  the Who's importance to the development of prog was deemed the reason they were to be included here, hense the proto not prog related designation.  Rock before the Who was a intellectual wasteland... after the Who ..prog stepped in a brought a further intellectualism to rock. That is exactly what we think the Who did and a specialized (for this site) example of their importance to rock.
 
But who cares, while some people priorize adding their favorite non Prog band to Prog Related and Proto Prog, we´ll keep adding real Prog bands to Symphonic.

Clap ...well at least what you consider symphonic hahahhaha Wink
 
Iván



The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 16:32
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:


Clap ...well at least what you consider symphonic hahahhaha Wink
 
Iván


No Micky, what my team considers Symphonic, a team of which you were part for seven months.
 
And a team that has done an organized work step by step, without ever resigning or leaving behind to join a new project.
 
But again, it's better to forget about Proto Prog and Prog Related for some of us.
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
Dim View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 17 2007
Location: Austin TX
Status: Offline
Points: 6890
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 16:46
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by schizoid_man77 schizoid_man77 wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by schizoid_man77 schizoid_man77 wrote:

Crap, I have always agreed with the admin. here, but this makes no sense! The who, show no influence in any bands and besides concept albums, I really see no prog in them at all!


it makes perfect sense I'm afraid... read the bio.  I make the case... what exactly do you disagree with?
 
How does it make sense?
 
Pete townshend cant solo for his life
 
Daltrey while he is a great singer, he never seems to try and push the limit of his capabilities
 
Keith Moon, a phenominal and grounbraking drummer, but I seriously doubt he could drum in 6/8 because: A) I'm sure every song is in 4/4, so he has no idea what 6/8 is. B) Too drunk to even play 4/4 half the time
 
John Entwistle- Amazing Bass player, probably the most capable an with the most potential, no dirt on himBig%20smile
 
Listen I love the Who, but they are basically anti prog,
 
AND YES, I have 3 albums and quite a few compilations! SO DONT TELL ME TO LISTEN TO ANYTHING!


see you've already had a discussion with David, but let me elaborate a few points...

first off I didn't tell you to LISTEN to anything...I asked you to read the bio and tell me what is wrong with it.

Your viewpoint here, and later on in the thread is one of a narrow view of prog. Prog has never been solely about song length and metric complexity. If that is how you judge prog, you will never agree with The Who or other groups here,  but you are free to see prog as you wish. However  you'll miss the whole point about what prog was about. Those things you mentioned, are byproducts of prog... not what makes prog... prog.
 
Okay, but what makes the who prog in any way?
 
I know what prog is, and the who dont sound anything like any of the prog bands I listen to.
 
Yeah, Pete townshead uses syunthesizers sometimes, big deal. I hear no prog, at all in any way
 
I have already discussed this with actocjkfir, so I rfuse to argue about it anymore!
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 17:01
Ivan, Micky, let's not re-open old wounds. I'm sure you're both big enough to respect each others opinions, and the right to hold them.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 22:05
Ot's just unfair there isn't a category called proto-prog-metal....
 
If we're to find every proto-prog band ever, we'll end with Elvis here... But when THE band that really influenced most prog-metal bands in the planet got mentioned, it was like WWII....
 
Yes, le'ts bring The rolling Stones... what's to lose anyway...
Back to Top
1800iareyay View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 22:08
What ban would that be? I would say Iron Maiden would be THE proto prog metal band since every prog metal interview I've heard features the artist citing Maiden. Do you mean The Who? They certainly influenced heavy prog, but I wouldn't consider them THE band.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64460
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 22:09
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Ot's just unfair there isn't a category called proto-prog-metal....
 

If we're to find every proto-prog band ever, we'll end with Elvis here... But when THE band that really influenced most prog-metal bands in the planet got mentioned, it was like WWII....

 

Yes, le'ts bring The rolling Stones... what's to lose anyway...


the Stones didn't influence prog rock bands in nearly the same way, if at all. The Who composed the first complete rock fable... there's a difference.

Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64460
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 22:11
Originally posted by 1800iareyay 1800iareyay wrote:

What ban would that be? I would say Iron Maiden would be THE proto prog metal band since every prog metal interview I've heard features the artist citing Maiden. Do you mean The Who? They certainly influenced heavy prog, but I wouldn't consider them THE band.


I think he means Dream Theater, but it was indeed Maiden who most significantly influenced progressive metal...





Edited by Atavachron - July 22 2007 at 22:11
Back to Top
1800iareyay View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 22:12
but DT IS prog metal. Even if they helped make it popular, it was Queensryche, Watchtower, and Maiden that really laid the foundations
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 22:18
No... I meant Metallica... When I started the thread in the "Suggest bands" section, we got like 15 pages or replies, most of them against the inclusion, but a few (and, I have to say it, the most musical opinions) in favor... I just mention this because I think that band's influence in prog-metal bands is greater than The Who's in prog-rock bands... But anyway, the site Owners rejected Metallica, so that's case closed... I just mentioned this because it seems to me it's just unfair that prog-metal, probably today's most successful prog genre (in terms of amount of bands specially, some of them great, but also in popularity...le'ts not argue about this, please, I'm ready to accept this not to be 100% true but it's not my point) has only ONE band listed in the site (Iron Maiden) which can be called proto-prog-metal....
 
Anyway, no problem. I don't lose anything with The Who being here...
Back to Top
1800iareyay View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 22:19

Ah. I thought it would be wither Maiden or the Bay Area boys. I support Metallica's inclusion, but why discuss it in the Who thread?

Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 22:25
Originally posted by 1800iareyay 1800iareyay wrote:

Ah. I thought it would be wither Maiden or the Bay Area boys. I support Metallica's inclusion, but why discuss it in the Who thread?

 
You're right... But it's just a point about the unfairness with prog-metal, the overwhelming amount of non-prog proto-prog bands that get included, meanwhile prog-metal, I insist, has ONE proto band...
 
Let's not discuss the matter then...Smile
 
 
Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 22:25
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

No... I meant Metallica... When I started the thread in the "Suggest bands" section, we got like 15 pages or replies, most of them against the inclusion, but a few (and, I have to say it, the most musical opinions) in favor... I just mention this because I think that band's influence in prog-metal bands is greater than The Who's in prog-rock bands... But anyway, the site Owners rejected Metallica, so that's case closed... I just mentioned this because it seems to me it's just unfair that prog-metal, probably today's most successful prog genre (in terms of amount of bands specially, some of them great, but also in popularity...le'ts not argue about this, please, I'm ready to accept this not to be 100% true but it's not my point) has only ONE band listed in the site (Iron Maiden) which can be called proto-prog-metal....
 
Anyway, no problem. I don't lose anything with The Who being here...
there need not be proto prog metal there is prog and there is metal together they combine into prog metal. the prog influence is prog, the metal influence is metal. If any metal band deserves a spot it is motorhead, after all lemmy was in hawkwind.
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64460
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 22:30
Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

If any metal band deserves a spot it is motorhead, after all lemmy was in hawkwind.


interesting point, though I don't recall any Motorhead material that was influential on ProgMetal.. more a candidate for Prog Related.

Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A˛ Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 22:49
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:


Originally posted by bhikkhu bhikkhu wrote:

This may be the lat time I ever post about a proto, or related addition. I would like to say it will be the last, but the future hasn't happened yet.

We spend way too much time over these bands that everyone has heard so much, they can recite every lyric. Maybe they belong here, maybe not. That's not the point. As Ivan said, there are those of us that work very hard on actual prog bands. The list of new submissions never disappears. What happened to the element of discovery? I love the Who, but I've been inundated by them since I was a kid. There are great new artists, and old undiscovered gems to be found. However, we who work with these seem to be in a very small club. While the bulk of the membership argues about The Who being here, and getting Cream in next, we are looking at someone like Laurent Thibault (former member of Magma), or Anton Roolaart (who happens to be a member).

Let's get back to the true purpose of the site, promoting the genre we love.

that is the funny thing I don't understand HT... just who spends just how much time on these bands.  The Who for example were proposed months ago by me, and not pushed until the admins asked whether they should take a vote on it.  That kind of talk is what burns peoples asses....   look at how many prog groups Raff added to this site, yet she adds some groups that are are PR and she gets accused of doing nothing but pushing her favorite bands. Honestly HT the other thing that is wasted here is all the bitching about the PP/PR  addtions....  the last one was months ago.. when BOC was added.  How many prog bands have been added since then....


Plenty of prog bands have been added, but how much discussion about them has there been? That is my point. There is way too much energy spent on discussions about proto and related additions.


Back to Top
ghost_of_morphy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 23:22
I for one applaud the addition of The Who as a proto-prog band.  Were The Who prog?
Of course not.   But they were an important influence upon the development of prog., and that should be plenty of reason to get them listed.
 
When I look at the bands that are listed in the proto-prog category, I only have a problem with one of them that I familiar with being listed, because I can't for the life of me think of anybody they influenced.   That's ok.  We'll chalk that down to a difference of opinion.
 
It's the prog-related category that really gets to me.
Back to Top
Dim View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 17 2007
Location: Austin TX
Status: Offline
Points: 6890
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2007 at 23:30
I think calling the who more progressive than peter gabriel solo is a crime and will be a major deciding factor in purgatory!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Ok I'm done with this thread plz dont throw any rocks!
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2007 at 00:33
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by The Whistler The Whistler wrote:

Schizo, might I suggest that you screw Tommy and go straight for the Quad? The songs tend to be longer (barring the over-and-underture), and they're fairly layered. Sometimes complex even. And I think you need to remember that Townshead is just as pretentious as all the young dudes who play "real" prog.

 
I agree and that's my main problem, in their early stages The Who were a Mod band, aggressive, close to the roots of Rock & Roll, etc, if they were something they were Proto Punk.
 
Pete Townshend in "The Kids are Alright" says clearly that when they added Pinball Wizard to Tommy, the album ceased to be a Rock Opera and more a Pop Opera".
 
If we are going to add bands that influenced Prog but not exclusively, lets add Chuck Berry or Little Richard,...Who can deny this two musicians influenced EVRYTHING after them much more than The Who?
 
What about The Rolling Stones? Who can deny they influenced later bands or that Their Satanic majesties Request is a cornerstone of Prog Psyche?
 
The list of barely Prog bands mentioned is endless, but in the meanwhile the Art Rock team is strugling to check really Prog bands and find them a new home because nobody wants them, while we try to help them but of course it's not much we can do because we have our own business.
 
We know that is hard, tedious and very tiresome because we did it, and they will receive critics as we did in our moment, but they are doing a real work for Prog.
 
So while a group of members break their b@lls checking hundreed of Prog bands with a bit of help, the site keeps adding non Prog bands as if it was the main goal.
 
Then we will have to ask all Punk pages to retire The Who because they claim this band is the greatest influence for Punk.
 
Another contradiction, the closest The Who came to Prog was in Quadrophenia nad that's in October 19, 1973, so they can't be in Proto Prog, they should be in Prog Related, despite calling The Whi}o related to anything is almost a discredit for them who are icons of Classic Rock.
 
But they are here, we can't do a thing, hope we start to care more about real Prog bands than about bands that could or could not have influenced Prog, because if we open the gates we could have a flood of POP.
 
Now I have another problem, I'm a fan of The Who and IMHO "Who''s Next" is one of the top 10 albums of all times, but I can't rate it with more than 3 stars. because as everybody has posted before, they are not a Prog band, and for that reason they can't be an:  ESSENTIAL MASTERPIECE OF PROGRESSIVE MUSIC NEITHER AN EXCELLENT ADDITION TO ANY PROG MUSIC COLLECTION.
 
In a classic Rock site I will give this album 5 or 10 stars if possible, here I'm restrained to 3 stars Good but not Essential, because nobody sane can claim this album is essential for Prog.
 
But they are here, sadly the sky is not the limit, only three weak stars.
 
Iván
 
 
 
ClapClapClap
 
I'm glad you are on my side. TongueBig%20smile
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2007 at 00:37
Originally posted by schizoid_man77 schizoid_man77 wrote:

I think calling the who more progressive than peter gabriel solo is a crime and will be a major deciding factor in purgatory!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Ok I'm done with this thread plz dont throw any rocks!
 
You know you have a point there.
 
I think PG should at least be in Art Rock...although I guess with the sites new guidelines for such things he wouldn't fit...Ermm
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
Eetu Pellonpaa View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2007 at 02:44
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

If any metal band deserves a spot it is motorhead, after all lemmy was in hawkwind.


interesting point, though I don't recall any Motorhead material that was influential on ProgMetal.. more a candidate for Prog Related.

 
IMO Motörhead are are a really fabulous heavy rock'n'roll group, but I don't think there are much more realtions with prog by them, except Lemmy being a influental ex-member in Hawkwind. I actually saw a nice concert from the Hawkies few years ago in Ruisrock, and as Motörs were playing there too, they had a encore song when Lemmy rejoined them and the played "Silver Machine" together for a long time. Great show! Clap
 
Sorry for wandering bit offtopic, but thought to ask about the essence of prog related artists. Should ex-prog band artistis (like Phil Collins), now doing non-prog music, be included in prog related? Smile
 
The current genre definition:
 
Rock and Pop Bands and Artists after 1970 who were not truly “prog” (as that term is generally and broadly defined, even by the site), but who were clearly not “mainstream” or simply “rock” bands.

A wide subgenre that encompasses two kinds of bands/artist, that either consist of progressive artist that strayed away from their progressive roots into mainstream rock or were influenced by progressive rock.

Even though the music by these artists is sometimes unrelated it had things in common with prog music in that it was very structured and even adventurous, sometimes hard or heavy, sometimes mellow, strong melodies, good hooks are an integral part of most of the material. Sometimes these artists pioneered other rock genres.

Though most of these artist can't really be considered progressive themselves, their relation to progressive music is not to be underestimated.

Garion81
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.129 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.