Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Jazz Fusion or Jazz Prog Fusion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedJazz Fusion or Jazz Prog Fusion

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 22 2008 at 12:31
Originally posted by Dick Heath Dick Heath wrote:

'Jazz rock' has always been about the fusion of 'jazz' elements and 'rock' elements into the hybrid. 'Progressive music' was originally the fusion of 'rock' with any one or more types of music, in the 60's often for the first time - whether folk, jazz, classical (here  including either use of classical compositions or classical music structures to a new composition), folk, various world (folk) musics, etc.  In other words 'jazz rock 'was both a sub-division of 'progressive music' and 'jazz'. . Around 1970 there was a parting of the ways of 'progressive music', into the more familar commonplace 'progressive rock', 'folk rock', 'heavy rock', etc. - and certainly MO, RTF, WR released albums afterwards which still retained creditability as 'progressive rock'. To a large extent is is the slow loss of much and often all of the rock elements, (apart from the element of amplification) moved 'jazz rock' into 'jazz fusion' (to added confusion since 'jazz rock' was literally a fusion of genres...... hence the better term  'jazz-rock-fusion') . But then a lot of Soft Machine's recording catalogue into the 70's has less rock than most other examples of the "'jazz-rock' fraternity.... (BTW I'm remain confused as to where 'Art -Rock' fits in here???)
 
Until there I follow you Dick, that's what I thought, as a fact as few know I'm a fan of Jazz and Fusion since I inherited my whole gradfather's Jazz and Fusion collection when he died in 1981, more than 300 original LP's.
 
I remember all then problems I had to add Jean Luc Ponty to the Archives about two years ago, but I believe his post Mahavishnu works are 100% Prog.
 
 
I think see where you're coming from Ivan, but I am sticking with the 60's original useage of 'jazz rock', rather the useage corrupted by the rethink of what/who defined 'progressive rock' circa 1972-3, when the big players were becoming established, e.g. Yes, KC, GG, Genesis, VdGG, and definitions got really narrowed down. Hence, I'm looking/listening for a  fusion of jazz and rock, not more specifically jazz and progressive rock. One problem is many of the jazz rock musicians shifted into jazz-fusion sans rock late 70's early 80's to retain their jazz creditials - and we are stuck with that policy: the complete discography - which means very strangely Kind Of Blue greets you on the opening page to this site this week????????????????????????????????????????????????? Fortunately we have had musicians whohaven't bowed down to fashions, and jazz rock has continued to progress to this very day. BTW I would feel very unhappy if prog fusion became dominant, since since too often this is no more than instrumental progressive rock, lacking jazz..
 
 
But my main question (which you obviously get) is:
 
  1. Is it enough for a Jazz band to blend Jazz and Rock to be here?
  2. Do we need a special and additional Prog element to add a band-

Iván

 
            
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10336
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 22 2008 at 12:16
Edit : Not all jazz fusion is progressive, I've been playing and listening to jazz fusion since the stuff was invented. In the 'business' we call lame fusion 'fuzak' after the background music company muzak.

Herbie and Miles are excellent examples of progressive jazz fusion. All that commercial crap that came out in the late 70s early 80s is a good example of fuzak.

Thank goodness for the Knitting Factory scene (John Zorn, Steve Coleman etc) in the mid-80s which reintroduced progressive jazz fusion.

Edited by Easy Money - August 23 2008 at 09:13
Back to Top
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12799
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 22 2008 at 12:10
'Jazz rock' has always been about the fusion of 'jazz' elements and 'rock' elements into the hybrid. 'Progressive music' was originally the fusion of 'rock' with any one or more types of music, in the 60's often for the first time - whether folk, jazz, classical (here  including either use of classical compositions or classical music structures to a new composition), folk, various world (folk) musics, etc.  In other words 'jazz rock 'was both a sub-division of 'progressive music' and 'jazz'. . Around 1970 there was a parting of the ways of 'progressive music', into the more familar commonplace 'progressive rock', 'folk rock', 'heavy rock', etc. - and certainly MO, RTF, WR released albums afterwards which still retained creditability as 'progressive rock'. To a large extent is is the slow loss of much and often all of the rock elements, (apart from the element of amplification) moved 'jazz rock' into 'jazz fusion' (to added confusion since 'jazz rock' was literally a fusion of genres...... hence the better term  'jazz-rock-fusion') . But then a lot of Soft Machine's recording catalogue into the 70's has less rock than most other examples of the "'jazz-rock' fraternity.... (BTW I'm remain confused as to where 'Art -Rock' fits in here???)
 
I think see where you're coming from Ivan, but I am sticking with the 60's original useage of 'jazz rock', rather the useage corrupted by the rethink of what/who defined 'progressive rock' circa 1972-3, when the big players were becoming established, e.g. Yes, KC, GG, Genesis, VdGG, and definitions got really narrowed down. Hence, I'm looking/listening for a  fusion of jazz and rock, not more specifically jazz and progressive rock. One problem is many of the jazz rock musicians shifted into jazz-fusion sans rock late 70's early 80's to retain their jazz creditials - and we are stuck with that policy: the complete discography - which means very strangely Kind Of Blue greets you on the opening page to this site this week????????????????????????????????????????????????? Fortunately we have had musicians whohaven't bowed down to fashions, and jazz rock has continued to progress to this very day. BTW I would feel very unhappy if prog fusion became dominant, since since too often this is no more than instrumental progressive rock, lacking jazz..
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.

Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 22 2008 at 09:57
This is a doubt I always had and would love some expert in the issue to explain me.
 
 
Is it enough for a band to have blend Jazz and Rock in order to be added to Prog Archives or do we need the band to blend Jazz, Rock and Prog Elements like Mahavishnu or Jean Luc Ponty for example?
 
If the first case, then we should modify our addition policy and add for example Dylan and Steelee Span to Folk, despite they don't have a single Prog element, because they already blended Folk and Rock.
 
I honestly believe we are going too far with our desire to add some Jazz-Rock artists when they should have somethinhg more to be considered Prog.....But I leave this to the experts, because I'm not one of them.
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.122 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.