Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - David Gilmour > Jimi Hendrix
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDavid Gilmour > Jimi Hendrix

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 6>
Author
Message
sinistas View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Worcester, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 7
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 25 2009 at 20:41
I thought there was a fair amount of departure shown on Gilmour's last solo album - stuff like "This Heaven", "Smile", or "Red Sky At Night" are branching out, at least in some way.
Dreaded Silence - Boston Progressive / Melodic Metal
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2009 at 06:29
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Originally posted by HughesJB4 HughesJB4 wrote:

Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

I have all due respect for Gilmour, but please...


But please........?
I'd love to actually know why you feel the way you do.
That short statement doesn't tell me a whole lot if I must be honest.
 
Sorry, I should not have been quite so terse.
 
My opinion, in a nutshell:
 
Technical skill as a guitarist:  Hendrix > Gilmour
Innovator in terms of introducing new musical vocabulary to rock:  Hendrix > Gilmour
Innovator in terms of introducing new sonic vocabulary to rock:  Hendrix > Gilmour
Studio wizardy:  Hendrix = Gilmour, but Hendrix got there first
Songwriter:  Hendrix = Gilmour
Interpreter of others' music:  Hendrix > Gilmour
 
 
 

Technical Skill as a guitarist, and you say Hendrix is better.
You're kidding right?

Sorry, but sloppy and good technique are mutually exclusive.
Some aspects technique means being able to play cleanly, with good intonation and control.
Gilmour had this down very well.
Hendrix did not. There are first hand accounts from people that went to his gigs, and even recordings where he wasn't able to play in tune, wasn't able to play without hideous slop and couldn't even play in time at certain points.
Allan Holdsworth has good technique.
Mikael Akerfeldt has good technique.
Steve Hackett has good technique.
David Gilmour has good technique.

What links these 4 guys is their ability to play in time consistently, play in tune consistently and not having particularly noticeable amounts of extraneous string noise as they play.
When they fluff up, they make honest mistakes as all humans do, which is a severe contrast to just being downright sloppy like Hendrix and Page were.
I've heard recordings of Hendrix where you can just hear heaps of extraneous string noise and hardly even any of the notes he was trying to hit.
That is shockingly poor technique.
Whether someone has good or poor technique is not entirely subjective, their are defined rules as to whether one has good or bad technique.

My father is (well, not anymore since he quit playing) a classical guitarist and I have given lessons in the past and am about to start giving actual paid lessons relatively soon. To be able to play classical guitar or to teach guitar effectively, there are certain concrete rules (yes, concrete rules, not subjective opinions) which need to be understood in order to have good technique. Gilmour's playing comes under the defined boundaries of what constitutes good technique, even if he is no virtuoso.


Edited by Petrovsk Mizinski - April 11 2009 at 06:33
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2009 at 07:01
^ Interpretation of others' music is also open to question - there are very few examples of Gilmour playing other peoples' music, (other than Barrett's in the Floyd early days and no one can deny he improved on all of those pieces), let alone interpretation (his interpretation of Bizet's Je Crois Entendre Encore was pretty fair and not something I could imagine Hendrix doing) - neither Glimour or Floyd were into "covers" as such. He was in Bryan Ferry's backing band at Live Aid and at an open-air concert at Petworth House, but playing Phil Manz's guitar parts doesn't count as interpretation.
 
The well known examples of Hendrix interpreting others' music are All Along The Watch Tower and Johnnie B Goode - the first is a classic, but far from great, and the second is plain dreadful to my ears. Oh, and Star Spangled Banner - not so much an interpretation as a political comment on the Vietnam War.
 
What?
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10336
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2009 at 07:18
^ Johnny B Goode is alway awful, as a veteran cheezy music pro hack I truly hate playing that awful song, it get's my special ultra-disonant chord 'replacement' theory whenever I have to play it. Usually by the time a song like that is requested everyone is too drunk to notice, care or they think I'm funny, ha ha.

If anyone wants to read some long-winded drivel about Hendrix you can check my intro/bio on our new Hendrix page.

Edited by Easy Money - April 11 2009 at 07:20
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2009 at 08:44
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

^ Interpretation of others' music is also open to question - there are very few examples of Gilmour playing other peoples' music, (other than Barrett's in the Floyd early days and no one can deny he improved on all of those pieces), let alone interpretation (his interpretation of Bizet's Je Crois Entendre Encore was pretty fair and not something I could imagine Hendrix doing) - neither Glimour or Floyd were into "covers" as such. He was in Bryan Ferry's backing band at Live Aid and at an open-air concert at Petworth House, but playing Phil Manz's guitar parts doesn't count as interpretation.
 
The well known examples of Hendrix interpreting others' music are All Along The Watch Tower and Johnnie B Goode - the first is a classic, but far from great, and the second is plain dreadful to my ears. Oh, and Star Spangled Banner - not so much an interpretation as a political comment on the Vietnam War.
 


Excellent point too.
I love Jimi's All Along The Watch Tower too (it's practically cliche to say you like it, but hey, it worked, and it's a fine piece of music), but indeed, I have a Hendrix CD lying around with a rendition of Johnny B Goode, and that was not to my liking (I think it was a live version of it). It just sounded kinda half assed really and not totally genuine and done for the sake of doing a cover version.
I'm not a big fan of the original song, mind you, but at least it's listenable unlike the turd that is the Hendrix rendition I have heard.


Edited by Petrovsk Mizinski - April 11 2009 at 08:46
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10336
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2009 at 09:17
^ I'm no Chuck Berry fan, but nobody plays his songs right except that ugly guy in the Stones. Berry actually uses real nice inventive sparse RnB chords, while your typical local bar band tramples all over that.

Some of Hendrix's covers were satirical as in Wild Thing, that is either a stab at The Troggs or crappy garage bands in general. Listen to the sarcastic vocal delivery and I love that Strangers in the Night guitar solo, brilliant!
Back to Top
A B Negative View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 02 2006
Location: Methil Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2009 at 09:52
Gilmour and Hendrix are both great guitarists but I listen to Gilmour much more often than Hendrix.
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2009 at 10:06
I love these stories about Hendrix playing out of tune as if he was some hack who just messed about, got some interesting sounds and was very lucky. The guy earned a living as a session musician for many years and was certainly in demand in the mid 60's. If he couldnt really play then he wouldnt have lasted 5 minutes! Then there's the stories about all the top guitarists standing open-mouthed in awe when they saw him in concert, including Eric Clapton, they would hardly give props to someone who played out of tune.

Hendrix was the Picasso of the electric guitar and his style transcended blues or pop or even psychedelia. He is unique and if he'd survived I'm damn sure he'd have been a giant of the jazz-fusion scene, as some have mentioned.

Gilmour?  Wonderful guitarist and the right man for Pink Floyd when they needed to move to the next level, but better than Hendrix? He'd be the first to laugh at this I reckon.

Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2009 at 10:47
Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

I love these stories about Hendrix playing out of tune as if he was some hack who just messed about, got some interesting sounds and was very lucky. The guy earned a living as a session musician for many years and was certainly in demand in the mid 60's. If he couldnt really play then he wouldnt have lasted 5 minutes! Then there's the stories about all the top guitarists standing open-mouthed in awe when they saw him in concert, including Eric Clapton, they would hardly give props to someone who played out of tune.

Hendrix was the Picasso of the electric guitar and his style transcended blues or pop or even psychedelia. He is unique and if he'd survived I'm damn sure he'd have been a giant of the jazz-fusion scene, as some have mentioned.

Gilmour?  Wonderful guitarist and the right man for Pink Floyd when they needed to move to the next level, but better than Hendrix? He'd be the first to laugh at this I reckon.



Really, I don't think anyone is accusing Hendrix of ALWAYS having poor intonation and/or being sloppy with other areas of guitar technique, because he wasn't always obviously.
The point is more, in order to have what is considered good technique, you need to be consistent all the time.
Consistency of good technique is what makes people like Allan Holdsworth or Chopin the viruosos they were/are. For someone like Holdsworth, a bad playing day would be a few minor mistakes and even then you almost wouldn't notice the mistakes anyway unless you were a guitarist like myself.
Hendrix was lacking in consistency.
He had great nights from what I hear, where he was on the ball and played tight, but other times he wasn't quite on the boat and his playing was all over the place
David Gilmour, on the other hand, has a reputation for his precise, controlled playing.


Back to Top
crimhead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2009 at 01:39
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

^ I'm no Chuck Berry fan, but nobody plays his songs right except that ugly guy in the Stones. Berry actually uses real nice inventive sparse RnB chords, while your typical local bar band tramples all over that.


We all know that Chuck stole that sound from Marty McFly when he went back in time to play at his mom and dad's prom to get them together. Doesn't anybody remember Back to the Future?
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2009 at 01:58
Originally posted by crimhead crimhead wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

^ I'm no Chuck Berry fan, but nobody plays his songs right except that ugly guy in the Stones. Berry actually uses real nice inventive sparse RnB chords, while your typical local bar band tramples all over that.


We all know that Chuck stole that sound from Marty McFly when he went back in time to play at his mom and dad's prom to get them together. Doesn't anybody remember Back to the Future?
 
"Hey, Chuck? Chuck! It's Marvin. You're cousin, Marvin Berry?! Y'know that new sound you're lookin' for? Well listen to this!!!"
Back to Top
toolis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2006
Location: MacedoniaGreece
Status: Offline
Points: 1678
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2009 at 02:06
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Originally posted by crimhead crimhead wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

^ I'm no Chuck Berry fan, but nobody plays his songs right except that ugly guy in the Stones. Berry actually uses real nice inventive sparse RnB chords, while your typical local bar band tramples all over that.
We all know that Chuck stole that sound from Marty McFly when he went back in time to play at his mom and dad's prom to get them together. Doesn't anybody remember Back to the Future?

 

"Hey, Chuck? Chuck! It's Marvin. You're cousin, Marvin Berry?! Y'know that new sound you're lookin' for? Well listen to this!!!"




love this movie....
-music is like pornography...

sometimes amateurs turn us on, even more...



-sometimes you are the pigeon and sometimes you are the statue...
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64353
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2009 at 02:59
actually Hendrix was a stickler for being in tune (no small trick with the way he played, BTW), much of his stuff would've sounded completely wrong had he been out

 
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2009 at 03:05
^ Yeah, but come on, his fingers were always flat on the strings. He played sloppy, it isn;t putting him down as a songwriter, or even as a musician. It's just how it is.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64353
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2009 at 03:12
"he played sloppy" is like saying Charles Bukowski had a rough writing style..it misses the point, doesn't it?  Besides, Hendrix didn't play sloppy, at least no more than Keith Emerson flubbed notes left and right and Robert Plant's voice failed on a regular basis
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10336
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2009 at 05:21
Another thing to look at is solo style. Some people play it safe and stick with what they know won't fail, Rick Wakeman for instance.

While others are more apt to take crazy chances and try to pull off things that they may or may not be able to reach, Miles and Jimi for instance. Chick Corea and Jon McLaughlin were risk takers in their youth, but became more conservative later.

Listen to live Mahavishnu when McLaughlin is young and his solos always have a few glorious train wrecks.
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2009 at 05:43
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

actually Hendrix was a stickler for being in tune (no small trick with the way he played, BTW), much of his stuff would've sounded completely wrong had he been out

 


Again, no one is accusing him of always being out of tune, but come on, there are enough live performances of him that are proof enough he was off as a result of his playing or because his guitar couldn't keep.
Fact is, he didn't have the high quality locking tremolo systems that we have been taking for granted since the 80s that ensure guys like Satch of Vai never go out of tune from their intense whammy bar usage, or even locking tuners and stuff like that.
As a reference point, I had a 2 point non locking system on my recent 6 string I used to play, and this was a high end guitar mind you. Top of the line American made locking tuners, 2 point knife edge tremolo, very very well made and also the design of the headstock and tuners eliminated string trees which further aid tuning stability, and no matter how much set up time I put into the thing, no matter how much pencil graphite I put into the saddles, within about half an hour of serious whammy bar abuse I would have to retune at least one of the strings.
Now imagine you have a vintage 6 screw trem like the one Hendrix, (which is inherently less stable than a 2 point knife edge modern tremolo like the one I have)  with no locking tuners. There is only so much it can take before every string is going to to bind in the nut and/or bridge saddles. Hendrix had more than his fair share of tuning stability problems because of the inherent weaknesses in the tremolo design.
Spend as much time setting up and maintaining a 6 screw trem as you like, but it's not fail proof and there is a point where it just doesn't hold in tune anymore.
EVH himself used 6 screw trems before he went to locking systems, and even then, he had to spend ages working on getting the set up as absolutely perfect as possible to make sure it stayed in tune, because you have to remember at the time the Van Halen debut was released, there was no such thing as being able to buy a Floyd Rose and putting it into your guitar. In the end, he switched to Floyd Rose systems because 6 screws vintage designs couldn't keep up with the abuse he gave it.

Of course, Gilmour uses the same trem (since there was only one opion available at the time, unlike today where Fender offer 6 screw, 2 point knife edge and Floyd Rose locking systems), but it seems clear to me he abused the tremolo a lot less and hence, didn't run into the same tuning stability problems Hendrix did.
Back to Top
mr.cub View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 06 2009
Location: Lexington, VA
Status: Offline
Points: 971
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2009 at 11:24
Originally posted by Petrovsk Mizinski Petrovsk Mizinski wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

actually Hendrix was a stickler for being in tune (no small trick with the way he played, BTW), much of his stuff would've sounded completely wrong had he been out

 


Again, no one is accusing him of always being out of tune, but come on, there are enough live performances of him that are proof enough he was off as a result of his playing or because his guitar couldn't keep.
Fact is, he didn't have the high quality locking tremolo systems that we have been taking for granted since the 80s that ensure guys like Satch of Vai never go out of tune from their intense whammy bar usage, or even locking tuners and stuff like that.
As a reference point, I had a 2 point non locking system on my recent 6 string I used to play, and this was a high end guitar mind you. Top of the line American made locking tuners, 2 point knife edge tremolo, very very well made and also the design of the headstock and tuners eliminated string trees which further aid tuning stability, and no matter how much set up time I put into the thing, no matter how much pencil graphite I put into the saddles, within about half an hour of serious whammy bar abuse I would have to retune at least one of the strings.
Now imagine you have a vintage 6 screw trem like the one Hendrix, (which is inherently less stable than a 2 point knife edge modern tremolo like the one I have)  with no locking tuners. There is only so much it can take before every string is going to to bind in the nut and/or bridge saddles. Hendrix had more than his fair share of tuning stability problems because of the inherent weaknesses in the tremolo design.
Spend as much time setting up and maintaining a 6 screw trem as you like, but it's not fail proof and there is a point where it just doesn't hold in tune anymore.
EVH himself used 6 screw trems before he went to locking systems, and even then, he had to spend ages working on getting the set up as absolutely perfect as possible to make sure it stayed in tune, because you have to remember at the time the Van Halen debut was released, there was no such thing as being able to buy a Floyd Rose and putting it into your guitar. In the end, he switched to Floyd Rose systems because 6 screws vintage designs couldn't keep up with the abuse he gave it.

Of course, Gilmour uses the same trem (since there was only one opion available at the time, unlike today where Fender offer 6 screw, 2 point knife edge and Floyd Rose locking systems), but it seems clear to me he abused the tremolo a lot less and hence, didn't run into the same tuning stability problems Hendrix did.
 
It's times like these I am glad I chose the drums. You seem incredibly knowledgable about guitar and all the intricacies of the instrument I never imagined existed. For that I give you extreme props. Also, your defense of Gilmour is equally well defended, and your knowledge of guitar certainly helps you in this case. I would hate to see you break down Pete Townsend Confused
 
As for me, well I enjoy both Gilmour and Hendrix, but they are not exactly favorites of mine; I do not listen to Pink Floyd and The Experience as much as I once did. But when I did listen to them with much frequency, there was something about Pink Floyd's music that attracted me more. Hendrix was groudbreaking, but I never understood the exact adulation the man gets to this day; I simply saw him as a very good guitarist, but thought Jerry Garcia was much better.
 
With Gilmour, I do agree with other comments that he could seem mechanical at times...I would say I like Gilmour and Hendrix equally and feel they are both adept at what they do. Apologies for my inability to delve any further LOL

Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2009 at 11:39
As a non-guitarist, I have to keep the scope of discussion limited to my personal enjoyment. Well...Hendrix is kickass, bigtime, but for some reason I have always associated him with riffs...like Purple Haze or Voodoo Child, didn't ever dig his solos particularly, they were great but they didn't blow me away.  Gilmour at his best is sublime and leaves an everlasting impression.  I listen to at least one Steve Hackett track either solo or with Genesis one way or the other at least once every week but I haven't heard AC DC in more than a year.  I know what my answer is though I love both Gilmour and Hendrix (or both Hackett and Young for that matter).
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2009 at 11:39
^Well I do spend heaps of time on guitar forums and play guitar 2-5 hours a day, that explains it partly, that and not exactly having much of a social life ( I tend to just work, spend time on internet forums, play guitar and occasionally go to a party on the odd weekend, but otherwise I don't enjoy socializing much anymore........ before I joined PA in 2007 all I did was drink, go to parties/take substances that I cannot elaborate on within the boundaries of PA rules, did this stuff 3-5 days a week, and after a while socializing that much and being off my nut so often really burnt me out, so I became pretty reclusive, heh).
But trust me, compared to a  serious guitar luthier, my knowledge of guitars is actually pretty limited, a fair bit of what I know is actually because I ask luthiers questions about guitars, as well as chat to professional level guys that gig and endorse stuff since they know their stuff.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.272 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.