job discrimination

goose wrote: Cygnus X-2 wrote: I accept your offer, Mr. Lover. Oo-err

Heheheheeheeeeee... I just got it.

I didnt seem to have much of a problem with
hopelevre. think we may have got off on the wrong
foot initially, would assume that was due to the
beatings.

think I remember those days!

Edited by DallasBryan

Cygnus X-2 wrote: Reed Lover wrote: Cygnus X-2 wrote: Reed Lover wrote: Fine,I bet you dont last 1 more week on this forum. What kind of odds will you give me? Well,if he posts regularly for 7 days without upsetting anyone,Reed Lover will go forever!! I always keep my word.... But what is the forfeit if he does continue? That's a ballsy bet. I'm sure you're an honest man in these situations. How about the forfeit is... hmmm.... uhhhhhh... I'll give up and go on to bigger and better things? Maybe?

Nah.

The forfeit is that you wont allow yourself to be coerced by bullies on either side in future....

Cygnus X-2 wrote: Reed Lover wrote: Fine,I bet you dont last 1 more week on this forum. What kind of odds will you give me?

Well,if he posts regularly for 7 days without upsetting anyone,Reed Lover will go forever!!

I always keep my word....

But what is the forfeit if he does continue?

Reed Lover wrote: Fine,I bet you dont last 1 more week on this forum.

What kind of odds will you give me?

here you are reed attacking me again and complaining about how i am abusing everyone....why dotn you go respond to my post on "key transpositions" if you are "fed up with the crap" and quit perpetuating "the crap"?your such a hypocrite ....you tell everyone to ignore my posts, yet you only ignore the ones that have soemthing to do with music, and are fain to scribble your self-indulgent chimeras all across anything on the non music page

Edited by hopelevre

reed why am i not allowed to discuss with someone without you interrupting? i didnt mean any disrespect in your viewpoint, infact when expounded upon the way you just did it makes alot more sense to me...thank you for sharing that, that is the point of a conversation i thought....we talk these things out to come to a sound understanding of the issue, and by questioning we are sometimes led into a deeper explanation ,hence understanding....you are right about the post as i obviously had that preconception, but your response(after my questioning of your initial response) is waht allowed me the greater understanding to walk away from the conversation with some of the previous MISconceptions exposed and a more elevated viewpoint....thank you....this doesnt mean that i agree with the laws 100% but i can attempt to justify them with much more facility

hopelevre wrote: why is it always about me? you dotn think its a problem that our minorities are underreducated and underqualified?

it is you who offers the debate. im assuming your
fielding the question in the manner you did that this
was a feeling that you had.

did I say its not a problem, by offering jobs to minority
parents they are able to help with their childrens,
childrens, children to get a better education and be
better qualified. you offered a different viewpoint, I
offered mine.

many other reasons can be sited for the problems
with American productivity than under qualified
minorities. this seems to be a narrow viewpoint you
are representing.
reverse discrimination doesnt have much of a leg to
stand on yet! maybe you are young and facing
adversity and blaming it on lack of opportunity?

ADVERSITY BREEDS CHARACTER

Edited by DallasBryan

I think the current system is the fairest for all!. If you
want to have freedom for all then if one race is
coming from a lesser opportunity you should
balance the scales. Bringing opportunity to those
who have less of a chance. Why should a certain
race or class represent the outcast. Easy to point
your finger at races or groups when you put them all
in the same box, a better test is to see how you wear
his shoes.

The major problem that I see is that corporate
America fills all the minority jobs(90%) at the
workforce level, leaving the trouble of working
together through differences at the worker level. The
old we'll hire em but they arent working with me
attitude. If you are going to proclaim equal rights it
should be at all levels.

Edited by DallasBryan