Should number of reviews be capped ?

I just scanned down the thread and get the initial point and have brought this issue up many times before. I fully agree there is a point where too many reviews for a single album becomes redundant. Just for fun I`ve reviewed some classics just to see what I would come up with.

I have well opver 4,500 albums  that I`ve accumulated over the years and nowadays I`m reluctant to even review an album that has been reviewed 25 times or more here not to mention the whole bloody internet. Last week I decided to review a Larry Coryell album and Mahavishnu Project album that had never been reviewed and I said to myself that this is  the policy I`m going to stick with in the near future at least.

One thing I`ve never understood is the number of members on the site who have fancy titles who have so few reviews and there are some who are just members that  have reviews numbering in the hundreds.

So here I go with another Larry Coryell review.




Edited by Vibrationbaby - May 19 2009 at 10:59

Vibrationbaby wrote:   ... I have well opver 4,500 albums  that I`ve accumulated over the years and nowadays I`m reluctant to even review an album that has been reviewed 25 times or more here not to mention the whole bloody internet. Last week I decided to review a Larry Coryell album and Mahavishnu Project album that had never been reviewed and I said to myself that this is  the policy I`m going to stick with in the near future at least. ...