Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog News, Press Releases
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - King Crimson album remixes to be continued
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedKing Crimson album remixes to be continued

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 03 2010 at 10:18
Just like my airplane. They're replacing it with Super Hornets. Bitchy at low altitude. Bitchy bitchy bitchy. Ask any Pig driver who has flown an F-18. F-111 = Rolls Royce of the skies. Gave the Indonesions nightmares.

I don't understand why Fripp has to f**k with the tapes.
Back to Top
Bonnek View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 01 2009
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 4515
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 03 2010 at 10:53
Originally posted by Eapo_q42 Eapo_q42 wrote:

For anyone who bothered with the 40th anniversary edition remix of In The Court...

Is there any point? I have the 35th anniversary remaster, and the original master from before that, and I am really wondering just what exactly Steven Wilson could possibly do to make me spend my money again.

Any opinions?


As a prog fan you need at least 3 editions of this one right?
So I bought the 40th edition because I only had the LP and the agonizing first CD issue.
Besides I adore good 5.1 mixes and in that respect it sure does not disappoint.

I hardly hear a difference between the new stereo mix and the 35th anniversary edition though, so if you're not into 5.1 surround, save your money.
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 03 2010 at 18:15
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

I like to hear the music the way it was meant to be heard. He likes to hear it the way it was not meant to be heard.



The way that the early KC music was supposed to be heard was that which can be found on these remixes. The fact that you keep posting this kind of remarks only shows that you didn't even bother to read something about what's happening. Thumbs Down

I'll say it in a few words: the music of KC was supposed to be a very rich, layered music. There were a lot of instruments but mixers only had 8 tracks at the time. So because there were a lot more sounds happening than 8 tracks could receive, what they did during the mixing was to record the content of two original tapes together on one new tape. That meant that two different sounds from two different tapes were now on the same tape, occupying only one channel instead of two. After that, they put two of these new tapes and recorded them together, obtaining one tape that had the contents of four original master tapes. Each of these processes was a downgrade in sound quality. The music of KC was supposed to be rich, but because of the current state of technology, they had to choose between a simple music with less instruments (but captured in it's full sound) or keeping all those instruments and layers but with a compromise on quality. They chose the second version. Soon new mixers were invented, with more than 8 tracks (now, with digital mixers, the number of tracks to be mixed can be infinite), but the master tapes weren't found. They thought they lost the master tapes. So after 30 years of so someone accidentally finds the master tapes and the mixing can be re-done, with a channel for each sound. The way that it supposed to.


Edited by harmonium.ro - March 03 2010 at 18:17
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 03 2010 at 18:47
I don't have a 5.1 system, does anybody know if the new Lizard mix is worth the little extra money over the 2004 version? I remember reading Fripp talking about how impressed he was with what SW had done (and maybe they found some master tapes?), but Fripp seems to be very bitter about that album so I don't know.
 
Also, I understand the difference between 24 bit and 16 bit, but I'm not sure how it works: I have just a normal laptop with what I'm pretty sure is an integrated sound card, is it possible to get the 24 bit mix off of the DVD and into AAC form? And would the compression ruin any difference between the 16 and 24 bit versions?


Edited by Henry Plainview - March 03 2010 at 18:51
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 03 2010 at 18:51
^ Your second paragraph needs some real experts... As for the first paragraph, yes, they found the original master tapes and remixed them without downgrading, and if you already have the previous Lizard remaster and a simple stereo system, then you should most likely stick to it. 
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 03 2010 at 22:58
I, fortunately, refrained from buying the 2004, so the question is whether it's worth the extra $7. I don't buy new remasters of albums I already own. And I use headphones--stereos are way too expensive. But the headphones are killing my tinnitus. :(
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 04 2010 at 07:00
^ My stereos cost me about 30 bucks and I'm very happy with them. However they wouldn't provide a better experience if I had the new remixes, or at least that's what I've been said by more knowledgeable people. I am still interested in the remixes as a long-term investment (I will have a decent system sometime) and also because of the bonus material (I have no idea what kind of bonus stuff does Lizard have).
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 04 2010 at 09:54
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

I like to hear the music the way it was meant to be heard. He likes to hear it the way it was not meant to be heard.



The way that the early KC music was supposed to be heard was that which can be found on these remixes. The fact that you keep posting this kind of remarks only shows that you didn't even bother to read something about what's happening. Thumbs Down

I'll say it in a few words: the music of KC was supposed to be a very rich, layered music. There were a lot of instruments but mixers only had 8 tracks at the time. So because there were a lot more sounds happening than 8 tracks could receive, what they did during the mixing was to record the content of two original tapes together on one new tape. That meant that two different sounds from two different tapes were now on the same tape, occupying only one channel instead of two. After that, they put two of these new tapes and recorded them together, obtaining one tape that had the contents of four original master tapes. Each of these processes was a downgrade in sound quality. The music of KC was supposed to be rich, but because of the current state of technology, they had to choose between a simple music with less instruments (but captured in it's full sound) or keeping all those instruments and layers but with a compromise on quality. They chose the second version. Soon new mixers were invented, with more than 8 tracks (now, with digital mixers, the number of tracks to be mixed can be infinite), but the master tapes weren't found. They thought they lost the master tapes. So after 30 years of so someone accidentally finds the master tapes and the mixing can be re-done, with a channel for each sound. The way that it supposed to.
Actually I do keep up. I'm on the DGM list so I can't help it!. Don't care very much for Fripp's wife's band The Humans.

You don't get my point.
My point is that I was around at least a few years after the originals and basically that's all I know. It was good anough for me then iT's still good enough for me. I actually went out and bought ITCOTCK when it first came out and as you know it was pretty dssapointing. I think this was even before Fripp won his legal battles with EG and was able to have final say on things Crimson. I have heard the first remixes of ITCOTCK done with the found tapes and seven then still didn't really make a difference to me. I've even heard some of the other stuff my friend the audio junkie has. It's funny this guy will go out and buy remastered sh*t just for the bloody sound. Even if he doesn't like the music.

My point is, as I said earlier, is the fact that everything wasn't always to scratch back in the old days. For me  all the anomalies and difficulties of the day gives the music another dimension and personality. My record collection drives my friend Marco the audio junkie nuts. He can't beleive that I can listen to an original pressing of something like Tubular Bells which was one of the first albums avialable in the Audiophile editions that started come out in '77 or  '78. He can't understand how I can even listen to the ticks and scratches. I just tell him I'm listening to the music. There's even music  that doesn't sound right to me without the ticks & scratches! I'm just nostalgic. An incurable romantic. Whoa! there goes my rotary phone ringing!
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 06 2010 at 06:05
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

I like to hear the music the way it was meant to be heard. He likes to hear it the way it was not meant to be heard.



The way that the early KC music was supposed to be heard was that which can be found on these remixes. The fact that you keep posting this kind of remarks only shows that you didn't even bother to read something about what's happening. Thumbs Down

I'll say it in a few words: the music of KC was supposed to be a very rich, layered music. There were a lot of instruments but mixers only had 8 tracks at the time. So because there were a lot more sounds happening than 8 tracks could receive, what they did during the mixing was to record the content of two original tapes together on one new tape. That meant that two different sounds from two different tapes were now on the same tape, occupying only one channel instead of two. After that, they put two of these new tapes and recorded them together, obtaining one tape that had the contents of four original master tapes. Each of these processes was a downgrade in sound quality. The music of KC was supposed to be rich, but because of the current state of technology, they had to choose between a simple music with less instruments (but captured in it's full sound) or keeping all those instruments and layers but with a compromise on quality. They chose the second version. Soon new mixers were invented, with more than 8 tracks (now, with digital mixers, the number of tracks to be mixed can be infinite), but the master tapes weren't found. They thought they lost the master tapes. So after 30 years of so someone accidentally finds the master tapes and the mixing can be re-done, with a channel for each sound. The way that it supposed to.
Actually I do keep up. I'm on the DGM list so I can't help it!. Don't care very much for Fripp's wife's band The Humans.

You don't get my point.
My point is that I was around at least a few years after the originals and basically that's all I know. It was good anough for me then iT's still good enough for me. I actually went out and bought ITCOTCK when it first came out and as you know it was pretty dssapointing. I think this was even before Fripp won his legal battles with EG and was able to have final say on things Crimson. I have heard the first remixes of ITCOTCK done with the found tapes and seven then still didn't really make a difference to me. I've even heard some of the other stuff my friend the audio junkie has. It's funny this guy will go out and buy remastered sh*t just for the bloody sound. Even if he doesn't like the music.

My point is, as I said earlier, is the fact that everything wasn't always to scratch back in the old days. For me  all the anomalies and difficulties of the day gives the music another dimension and personality. My record collection drives my friend Marco the audio junkie nuts. He can't beleive that I can listen to an original pressing of something like Tubular Bells which was one of the first albums avialable in the Audiophile editions that started come out in '77 or  '78. He can't understand how I can even listen to the ticks and scratches. I just tell him I'm listening to the music. There's even music  that doesn't sound right to me without the ticks & scratches! I'm just nostalgic. An incurable romantic. Whoa! there goes my rotary phone ringing!


Now there's a well reasoned, thoughtful post, that I can handle. How about keeping this attitude and losing the short derogatory remarks? LOLSmile
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 17 2010 at 05:45
The work progresses...

First pass through Formentera Lady. This is a rock group?!! More air is now being added to the left channel, 20k up from 17k. Not of itself audible to most adult ears, this has effect on the higher harmonics of lower tones. More, we sense that something has changed, rather than hearing a change.


....
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 17 2010 at 05:55
And speaking of how the music was supposed to be:


The above only a small part of the associations & resonances that King Crimson – the band/s – and its catalogue hold for me, returning to life whenever I return to hands-on such as this. Fortunately, in this most recent work with Steven Wilson, remixing in stereo & mixing in surround, accessing original tapes, the music has escaped from the conditions of its playing & recording, and has become available as if for the first time. Freedom from associations apart, at no time, even in the studio/s during the recording sessions, has the sound quality matched this. I am hearing the music.

The period is being redeemed.


http://www.dgmlive.com/diaries.htm?entry=16972
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 29 2010 at 21:16
How is the remixing of In The Wake Of Poseidon coming:



A morning through-listen to ITWOP  – the album.

Pictures Of A City, Cadence & Cascade, Peace A Theme, Cat Food & Groon are superb, and have never sounded better at any time I have listened to them, including in the studio when they were recorded. Taken together, these are half of the wonderful second KC album that didn’t. ITWOP – the song is now listenable, even enjoyable, but not classic.

The Devil’s Triangle: a suite in 3 parts. The first part is now listenable, and not bad. The second is barely listenable, but I would rather not. The third is listenable & begins well, but I am then grateful when it goes away. I would happily delete this from the album. But, while this is acceptable on a compilation, it’s not acceptable when re-presenting the album.

http://www.dgmlive.com/diaries.htm?entry=16996



ITWOP – the stereo Wilson-Fripp remixed album. Significant moves forward from last week. Now, it is listenable throughout with stunning musicianship from Michael Giles, Mel Collins & Keith Tippet. Even The Devil’s Triangle  works. We have inserted PQ points for each of the three parts of the DT suite, to aid those who might like to move it along to the third part; where popular music forms drop into the black hole & disappear with 1969, which never quite got into 1970, along with a pile of sea-going vessels.

Fine-tuning continues & incremental advances have significant effect, even to a surprising degree.

11.51    Simon: This is the first time I’ve listened through to this album right. Simon has listened through to this album on several occasions for some years. This value-judgment is also true for me, and I’ve been listening to it for a lot longer.

13.02    We have also mastered some added-value tracks, not all of which add personal value. But then, I am not much interested in the gory history of alternative versions. Neverthless, if I were, I would be thrilled by an early trio Devil’s Triangle prior to multi mellotron-overdubs. In some ways it is stronger than the final mix I…

http://www.dgmlive.com/diaries.htm?entry=17020



Today’s work: ITWOP - the album in 5.1. The problem we have faced with The Devil’s Triangle is our inability to find the original multi-tracks, leaving us with the original stereo mix. Simon’s masterly touch, along with Penteo has polished the job. DT I, II & III are now tickled. If allowed a radical option, I would delete DT II & move from I straight to III. But probably that would be too much for most of those who continue to fondle vinyl sleeves in private rooms. An earlier attempt by Simon & Robert is recounted in the Diary for Tuesday, 7th September 1999.

Onto the 5.1 of Beat. Neal & Jack & MeAbsent Lovers. This belongs to utterly different time & space than Poseidon & Islands.

Much werning & twerning continues as Beat moves through Heartbeat, Turkish D (original name), Waiting Man & now Neurotica.

Onto added-value tracks for the Islands DVD & CD. Taken together, these are somewhere between added-value, historic-interest, and cruel-and-unnatural punishment.

http://www.dgmlive.com/diaries.htm?entry=17021


Edited by harmonium.ro - March 29 2010 at 21:28
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2010 at 09:37
Why doesn't Fripp just get the band back together and make a new album? I still don't understand what the point is behind all these remasters. If you're familiar with any of Larry Coryell's work you'll find literally tons of musical mistakes and glitches in the recordings. He just shrugs it off and says oh well, I f**ked up. I would like to see one of those so and so vs so and so threads with Coryell vs Fripp. Coryell is one guitarist that can hold his own with anyone bar none. warning! warning! off topic! off topic!

As much as I love King Crimson's music I just think all this remastering is just getting well... stupid.
Back to Top
sparkslive View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: February 16 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 27
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 01 2010 at 05:34
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

Why doesn't Fripp just get the band back together and make a new album? I still don't understand what the point is behind all these remasters. If you're familiar with any of Larry Coryell's work you'll find literally tons of musical mistakes and glitches in the recordings. He just shrugs it off and says oh well, I f**ked up. I would like to see one of those so and so vs so and so threads with Coryell vs Fripp. Coryell is one guitarist that can hold his own with anyone bar none. warning! warning! off topic! off topic!

As much as I love King Crimson's music I just think all this remastering is just getting well... stupid.
How do you know what Larry said; besides this remixing isn't about fixing mistakes or Glitches.
 
Have you even heard the Starless 5.1 re-mix?
 
 
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 01 2010 at 09:19
I've talked with Larry on three occasions and have a good portion of his output both as a sideman and solo. I also did some research in order to write his bio here on PA. ( I also wrote the KC bio here as well ).

With all this technology at work I think people lose appreciation for the music itself. I hate repeating myself but as I said earlier in the thread all the misgivings of the original recordings whether it be of a technical or artistic nature is what gave them another dimension. I remember complaining about the crappy recording quality of  Earthbound back in the seventies which Fripp swore would never be released on CD. But when it wasfinally released on CD I started saying" what? That's not the way the goddam thing is  supposed to sound!". So now I'm much happier with my original vinyl copy with the pink label. Wonder what it sells for on these vinyl trading sites?
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 01 2010 at 12:22
Fripp also talks a lot on his blog about his albums, quite often noting errors or things he doesn't like any more. Some are even granted the "unbearable" epithet. LOL
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 01 2010 at 12:36
I might get the Islands remaster, because I actually don't have that album yet, but I have no wish to replace my 35th anniversary versions.
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 01 2010 at 15:56
I mean, did leonardo go back and change the Mona Lisa because the background was too uneven. "Unbearable" LOL Sometimes I think Bob is losing his marbles with old age.
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 01 2010 at 16:17
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

I mean, did leonardo go back and change the Mona Lisa because the background was too uneven. "Unbearable" LOL Sometimes I think Bob is losing his marbles with old age.


Visual artists are the most obnoxious in this regard - some keep their best works hidden for decades because "they need to work this a bit more", or "it's unfinished, really" or other such crap LOL I even personally know a painter who took back a painting from the collector who bought it because he wanted to "make a couple of slight retouches". The collector is still waiting for his painting back after several years LOLLOLLOL
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2010 at 11:23
Look at Francis Bacon. He destroyed most of his works he did in the 40s. Maybe Fripp should just destroy everything Crimson then he wouldn't have to be worried about it being "unbearable". 

I was reading an article with Jimmy Page in the latest Classic Rock and he says he left in tons of mistakes on Zeppelin recordings. But how many Zeppelin remasters have we hadConfused???? Duh.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.119 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.