Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Is 70's prog a nostalgia thing?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIs 70's prog a nostalgia thing?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 11>
Author
Message
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 05:47
One thing I dispise is when people throw around the word "dated", it's a stupid word.
 
There's nothing wrong with music being distinctly of it's time. The Beatles made music that was distinctly of it's time, does that mean it has no appeal 40 years later? Of course not.
 
Music doesnt have an expiration date, I dunno where people get that idea from.
 
Music is music, I don't care what decade it's from. A lot of the hipsters these days really grate on my nerves, they write off just about everything from the 70s that isn't punk, glam or krautrock. On the other side, I hate it when the older folks discriminate against all modern music.
 
I remember reading this comment in response to the story of Flaming Lips covering Pink Floyd's DSOTM and it was some idiot who called Flaming Lips an "example of how bands today have no originality and to hide their lack of talent they have to cover the classics to make some quick cash".
 
UGGGGGGGGGH
 
What a dope. It's like he just heard about this story because he googles the name Pink Floyd at least once a day, found out that some band has the audacity to cover one of the classics and goes on a frothing mouth rampage about a band he most likely hasn't even heard.
 
I don't agree with the accessment that nothing new compares to the music of the 70s, though the 70s is my favorite decade easily.
 
I'd say bands like Radiohead, Flaming Lips and Porcupine Tree are worthy successors to King Crimson, Yes and Pink Floyd.
 
I'd also rate Bjork, My Morning Jacket, Wilco, Josh Homme, The White Stripes, The Mars Volta, Sigur Ros, New Pornographers, Madlib, Buckethead, Ritual, Battles, Mastodon, Gorillaz, Acid Mothers Temple, Boris, Arcade Fire, Melt Banana, Beardfish, Muse and Frost* among the best contemporary music acts.
 
I'm sure not everyone agrees with those but whatev. It's really fustrating to try and compare different generations of music.


Edited by boo boo - April 24 2010 at 05:52
Back to Top
rdtprog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Heavy, RPI, Symph, JR/F Canterbury Teams

Joined: April 04 2009
Location: Mtl, QC
Status: Offline
Points: 5138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 07:20
Originally posted by American Khatru American Khatru wrote:

Originally posted by rdtprog rdtprog wrote:

... Is Genesis better than ... IQ, for example? ...
Sweet stinking b'jeez whiz yes Genesis were better than their pale imitation.


Maybe i am one of the few people who would disagree with this affirmation. I think that IQ have created their own sound despite the Genesis influence. I have heard a lot of "Genesis imitator" and IQ is one top of them if they can be class in the Genesis Imitator category.

Phil Collins have doubts him self in a interview a couple of decades ago when someone ask him if he thought that Marillion was better than Genesis. But let's put aside the better or not comparaison and let's say that i think that it's enjoyable to listen to new bands that show a 70's influence in their music. That is a testimony to the greateness of those bands.
Music is the refuge of souls ulcerated by happiness.

Emile M. Cioran







Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 08:04
I think the problem is more with the melodic variety of prog...or R&B for that matter, most rock/pop genres, as far as I can tell (except, the alt rock side can be both melodically great and adventurous).   Even considering that Magma looms large in the 70s, I would say I am not really dissatisfied at all with what new or 80s avant prog I have heard (precious little, admittedly), indeed I love it.  The problem is when you stack up Genesis or Yes to bands like Flower Kings.  Or Radiohead to Flower Kings, but that's again more my preference. Wink  I find the melodic side of modern prog really dull, made worse that the songs have to be padded and dragged till they reach a suitably epic length.  Particularly, in the case of Genesis, they weren't just melodic and accessible (they seem to get frequently dubbed as such these days!), their structures were often very interesting and Hackett did a lot of interesting and ahead-of-its-time stuff on guitar...like the tapping on Hogweed. Interesting not because it's seven years before Eruption but because of the musical context he chose.  Today's melodic prog bands are often very technically adept but this doesn't seem to translate into adventurous music. 

So...no, I don't think liking 70s music is a nostalgia thing at all...I would go so far as to suggest that if you are actually persuaded that people rating Genesis or Yes highly is purely a nostalgia thing, then maybe you badly want to like new bands more than old bands. I don't distinguish between them at all in that respect, beyond the context of the period...I mean, there's more alternative rock around these days, in the 70s it used to be blues based, so on and so forth.  I would readily place OK Computer in a list of my favourite rock (including prog) albums but can't think of a single modern melodic prog album that I like anywhere near that much.
Back to Top
American Khatru View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 28 2009
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 732
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 08:08
^ Well, as happens in here, I was talking imo.  I'll say this for IQ, those first few albums, imo, were tough for me to take seriously - but after that they stopped almost quoting Genesis songs (and Yes's Gates and I don't have space to say what else) and got to their own sound, a sound influenced by great music (whatever my opinion might be on the results).  So, "IQ have created their own sound despite the Genesis influence", yes, though perhaps 'in spite of' isn't entirely accurate.  There's some 'because of' too, if you will; it must have been difficult and educational to choose that great band for an ideal.

Why must my spell-checker continually underline the word "prog"?

Back to Top
rdtprog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Heavy, RPI, Symph, JR/F Canterbury Teams

Joined: April 04 2009
Location: Mtl, QC
Status: Offline
Points: 5138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 08:26
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:



So...no, I don't think liking 70s music is a nostalgia thing at all...I would go so far as to suggest that if you are actually persuaded that people rating Genesis or Yes highly is purely a nostalgia thing, then maybe you badly want to like new bands more than old bands.


I didn't say that i like more the new bands than the old bands. I just like both erea and that, its just difficult for me to say that some of the 70's bands are better than some of the best bands of today. It's another time, another experience with my own history and the new music context where we are today, with more music, more styles. It is more difficult for new bands to stand out today compare to the 70's. The 70's experience was for me different, more exciting. I am not sure that the cause was totally link to the superior quality of all those 70's bands, but also to the social and cultural context of that time mixed with my discovery of a new kind of music; the progressive rock.
Music is the refuge of souls ulcerated by happiness.

Emile M. Cioran







Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 10:07
Originally posted by rdtprog rdtprog wrote:

  I am not sure that the cause was totally link to the superior quality of all those 70's bands, but also to the social and cultural context of that time mixed with my discovery of a new kind of music; the progressive rock.



I don't think, other than people like WalterDigsTunes, anybody is saying ALL 70s bands are better than ALL modern bands.  But it does sound unreasonable to me to say that the consensus that Genesis is a better band than Pendagron is on account of reasons other than the music itself.  As somebody else put it, I wasn't born to witness either the 70s or the 80s and it's possible that if I hadn't discovered prog, I may have never taken interest in IQ. But the first time I heard Firth of the fifth, one of my first prog songs, I went, "Wow, this is amazing, this is quite like nothing I have heard before. " And so it went on and on...there was much fantastic musical exploration in the 70s which is missing in the newer melodic prog bands.  It seems they emphasise more the melodic and accessible nature of say Genesis rather than their adventurousness.  I simply cannot think of any 80s onwards melodic prog rock album that packs a punch the way Lamb Lies Down on Broadway does...not even any of Marillion's albums, and I love Marillion.

Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13260
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 12:14
I'm 45 now, and I am still trying to avoid falling into the easy trap of assuming that all was right in the "old days" and all is crap now. It was never true and I refuse to become a grumpy old man denigrating all that is new.

I started listening to Yes in 1977 - that's what turned me onto prog in the first place. Genesis soon followed, with Floyd, Crimson, VDGG, and the rest of those incredible bands of that era. I still listen to my 70's collection now. I bow to no one in my love of that era.

But, equally, what this site, more than anything else, should teach us is that there is still a wealth of great talent and music out there. In fact, I would argue that modern prog bands have it a little harder these days, what with the predominence of processed music and reality TV & etc.

I really do think that we live in exciting times, what with the opportunities that new technology brings us, and the fact that we still have some great new bands creating exciting and challenging music.

So, yes the love for the 70's can easily be a nostalgic thing. We just need to avoid falling into the trap of believing that it was the be all and end all.
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 14:26
Originally posted by Gerinski Gerinski wrote:

[QUOTE=progpositivity]
I bet the number of masterbands or masterpieces came out in a 90's 5-year period do not reach even 1/10th as compared to the period 70-75.


If we're talking prog, then this is correct, but if we're talking in general, I don't think so. Human creativity does not just suddenly drop down from time to time.
Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 14:34
Personally, I believe that, if anything, music is just as good now as it ever was in the 70s---if not more. There are tons of innovative, imaginative, and enjoyable artists that have been releasing modern music, especially in the realms of electronic music.

I'm not sure how much nostalgia has in people's evaluations of music though. I would say, similarly to Dean on the previous page, that there is good and bad music pretty much throughout every decade.
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 22:31

I am listening to Joe Walsh's Barnstorm album as I type this (yeah wrong forum).  It certainly brings me back to a time long forgotten, those Rocky Mountain highs of my youth, living at literally 6800 ft...not a lot of oxygen up there.  It's also very intelligent, and  has many proggy or at least spacy moments (back then there was not much diffentientation...)  in spite of the overall country-rock feel, and as well as a bitchin' version of Turn To Stone.  I don't know, the synth washes drag me in.  I hear the great songs, and make no mistake they are great songs..mama says be careful.  They still speak to me, am I senile, or are they special?   Is it nostalgia, or am I longing for another shot at my misspent youth?  I don't know.  I suppose it's nostalgia.  I hear Birdcall Morning.  Takes me back to that Rocky Mountain high, not gonna find it here in the city.  Coming down.. to see you.

 Now that I think about it, that's nostagia.  Times lost that will never be recovered.
 
At the time, I was more than likely listening to Lizard.   No such remembrances of Lizard.
 
That would be the difference.
      


Edited by jammun - April 24 2010 at 22:44
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 23:26
To further the discussion, as I type this, I am now listening to The Crazy World of Arthur Brown, that one with the psychedelic cover, the one with Fire.  Been listening to this one for hmm 40 years.  I have no fond reminiscenses to relate w/r/t this album.  It just is.  Crane's organ.  Why is it so cold out here?  That's what he sez.  There's your difference.
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 00:56
Originally posted by kingfriso kingfriso wrote:

Nostalgia is having warmth feelings of a gone time you witnessed. I did not witness a thing of the seventies prog movement (I'm 21) and therefore my focus on '70 prog can't be nostalgia.

Having that said, I do think the historical element of the seventies prog gives it some extra magical vibe. It makes it sound more special then the new Porcupine Tree record, who I saw playing a little while ago.
You can be nostalgic for a time that you didn't exist. Maybe there's a better word for it than nostalgia, but some people are definitely caught up in the mythos of the '60s and '70s, and that has to color their perceptions about music.

I'd basically agree with dean. I think the depth of change in the music industry is overrated as well. Ivan was talking about Charisma taking a chance, but there are more than enough independent labels these days to fill the void left by them, so it's not a fair comparison. Any difference is in how the majors are run, and I'll concede that there are no Ornette Colemans on Atlantic anymore. But there's k-os and Porcupine Tree, which may be close enough. And if it's not, there are so many other outlets for your music these days!
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10377
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 04:40
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by kingfriso kingfriso wrote:

Nostalgia is having warmth feelings of a gone time you witnessed. I did not witness a thing of the seventies prog movement (I'm 21) and therefore my focus on '70 prog can't be nostalgia.

Having that said, I do think the historical element of the seventies prog gives it some extra magical vibe. It makes it sound more special then the new Porcupine Tree record, who I saw playing a little while ago.
You can be nostalgic for a time that you didn't exist. Maybe there's a better word for it than nostalgia, but some people are definitely caught up in the mythos of the '60s and '70s, and that has to color their perceptions about music.

I'd basically agree with dean. I think the depth of change in the music industry is overrated as well. Ivan was talking about Charisma taking a chance, but there are more than enough independent labels these days to fill the void left by them, so it's not a fair comparison. Any difference is in how the majors are run, and I'll concede that there are no Ornette Colemans on Atlantic anymore. But there's k-os and Porcupine Tree, which may be close enough. And if it's not, there are so many other outlets for your music these days!

there is still a lot of excellent music out there; I agree to that. but not necessarily in prog. most of the newer albums just bore me, including Porcupine Tree. a band which is excellent but never gets mentioned by anyone are The Red Masque. now that is fresh prog, in my opinion


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
rdtprog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Heavy, RPI, Symph, JR/F Canterbury Teams

Joined: April 04 2009
Location: Mtl, QC
Status: Offline
Points: 5138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 05:28
Yes there is still good music these days, and for me i find enough bands to like in the prog world to keep me busy for a long time. But i have to listen to a variety of prog to fulfil my needs. I am just starting now to appreciate some avant-garde stuff like Univers Zero and Present. That brings something refreshing in my usual symphonic listening. 
Music is the refuge of souls ulcerated by happiness.

Emile M. Cioran







Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 05:51
Originally posted by Tsevir Leirbag Tsevir Leirbag wrote:

Originally posted by ProgressiveAttic ProgressiveAttic wrote:

Originally posted by gottagetintogetout gottagetintogetout wrote:


Originally posted by WalterDigsTunes WalterDigsTunes wrote:


Originally posted by The Quiet One The Quiet One wrote:

Originally posted by King By-Tor King By-Tor wrote:

I'm 22 and I say that music from the 70s is, in large, better than what we get today. So no.


 

This. (and I'm 16)
That (and I'm 21).
This (and I'm 14)


I am 18 and I agree with the previous post! + you can't compare Genesis to the bunch of Genesis imitators that is the Neo-Prog genre....

On the other hand if Genesis (or Yes, Gentle Giant, etc.) didn't exist I would be a huge Marillion (or Starcastle, Yezda Urfa, etc.) fan...but just because there is nothing better
 
NOT THIS!
By the way I'm fifteen. There were excellent bands, but there still are! Some are even better than those who were in the seventies.
As Greg said, just take (for exemple) avant-progressive or musique actuelle.
I was 14 when first heard Meddle and Pawn Hearts, 15 for Close To The Edge and Moving Waves, 16 when Dark Side of the Moon, Selling England By The Pound and Birds Of Fire were released. I listened to Wish You Were Here, Rubicon and The Snow Goose when they came out in 1975. When I was 21 it was Incantations and Touch Me (The Enid) and Please Don't Touch (Steve Hackett). I was 22 when I saw The Wall and bought Robert Fripp's Exposure.
 
(If I only listened to music that was released before I was born my record collection would be nothing but Samuel Hoffman and Yma Sumac albums)
 
I'm now 53. Yesterday I placed a pre-order with Burning Shed for the new Anathema album, We're Here Because We're Here - on a relative scale I am as excited and full of the same boyish level of anticipation about getting that as I was with buying Animals or Relayer back in the day. Even if it doesn't live up to expectiations, and after a 7 year wait it's going to be a tough one, it's still going to be a fine album (because Steven Wilson says it is Wink). Already this year Orphaned Land's The Way Of The OrwarriOR has impressed me greatly.
 
I still get a buzz from new music. It just has to try a little harder to really impress me, but it does.
What?
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 06:05
I find the '70's to be the golden age of prog, but punk didn't kill prog, commercialitis didn't kill it.  Plenty of good stuff happening now.  You can count me in as a happy camper.  Still there's plenty out there in prog for me to discover from that decade and an even larger universe of stuff happening these days  I'm almost sympathetic to those who are stuck on the '70's prog.  You have set yourself up for a limited universe to explore, so less to deal with, less money required, etc...
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Progosopher View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 12 2009
Location: Coolwood
Status: Offline
Points: 6393
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 13:12
As one who survived the era, there will always be some sense of nostalgia for me when I hear one of my old favorites.  At the same time, I do not wish to relive those years and do not try to do so vicarously through music.  Over the last few years, and largely to do with Prog Archives, I have been rediscovering the 70s by being guided to bands from the time I new little to nothing about.  Some of my new old favorites include Gryphon, Khan, Grobschnitt, none of whom I knew about at the time, and Eloy, Jade Warrior, Osibisa, whom I did.  Ultimately, though, the simple answer is, "No."  I listen to music from that time because I enjoy it, and there is still plenty there for me to explore, along with newer works.
The world of sound is certainly capable of infinite variety and, were our sense developed, of infinite extensions. -- George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty"
Back to Top
XunknownX View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 158
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 21:09
The golden era of rock music will NEVER be repeated, you can't create the universe twice,
Back to Top
bufoalvariusamen View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: April 25 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 22:11
not for me.  I'm 28 and was raised on what my dad listened to, so alot of the newer bands I listen to today are very similar to all of that classic stuff.
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 16165
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 26 2010 at 01:44
Originally posted by rdtprog rdtprog wrote:

I have some thoughts for many years about our evaluation of the quality of the 70's music big bands like Yes, Genesis, KC, VDGG etc.I want know if it's a sure thing that we can say that those bands made better music then today's bands or all the bands coming from the 80's and 90's. I have doubts about it. Is Genesis better then Marillion or IQ, for example? Could it be a nostalgia thing. Could it be that those who experience the 70's music at the time were discovering a new thing and by so were more open to appreciate the phenomenon? ...
 
I think it is.
 
It is really sad that we can speak volumes about a lot of Genesis, ELP and KC, but we would rather trash Dream Theater and many other bands, than appreciate some amazing body of work by many other bands.
 
That's not to say that what those bands did was bad at all. It simply was a time that allowed the music to expand and people to do more on their own and many scenes in many countries took advantage of it all.
 
I just re-listened to a Robin Williamson interview, and he spares no quarter in saying that "it was all a media creation, anyway ... " and here we are being just like the "media" and making sure that there are favorites or better representatives of the word "progressive" ... which doesn't exist.
 
Robin's comment was mostly about the "psychedelic era", but in the end, it applies so well, and one quickly realizes how well educated some people are and how well they know themselves and how they want to experience and experiment with music. We, simply do not like that aspect of it, and I am not sure that we are willing to discuss something that sometimes includes "invisibles" in a conversation.
 
You would think that these guys are still trying to proove that ghosts do exist in a scientific manner that has nothing to do with the world they live in! Our science is not going to work in another universe. It might have some similar things, but generally it will not! And the same here. I am simply not sure that enough people here can see the larger picture, enough to understand that this is not a personal attack as much as it is a plea to open up your minds to listening to other things and learning from each culture and area and the arts around them.
 
A board like this is good to get things started, but sadly, I am not sure that we can get past that point. And I would like to see us take that step and start treating too much of this stuff as "hits" and "top ten", which the majority of posts really are!
 
Thanks for asking, I do believe that is a really good question and deserves serious attention, and a mirror with it!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.160 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.