![]() |
The Beatles vs. Pink Floyd |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 23456 11> |
| Author | |
MonsterMagnet
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 31 2010 Location: Liège, Belgium Online Status: Offline Posts: 488 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: The Beatles vs. Pink FloydPosted: February 01 2011 at 09:07 |
|
The Beeeeeeatles!
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Progarchives.com
Advertisement |
Sponsored links (registered users, log in to remove) |
|
|
|
Stool Man
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 30 2007 Location: Anti-Cool (anag Online Status: Offline Posts: 1306 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 03 2011 at 16:53 |
|
Floyd every time, against anyone
|
|
|
rotten hound of the burnie crew
|
|
![]() |
|
thehallway
Collaborator
Eclectic Prog Team Joined: April 13 2010 Location: Dorset, England Online Status: Offline Posts: 1433 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 04 2011 at 11:04 |
|
This poll is as massive in music as comparing Christianity to Islam! I'm agnostic with this pair of fantastic bands. |
|
![]() |
|
thehallway
Collaborator
Eclectic Prog Team Joined: April 13 2010 Location: Dorset, England Online Status: Offline Posts: 1433 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 04 2011 at 11:05 |
|
No wait.... The Beatles are bigger than Jesus, I forgot! |
|
![]() |
|
CloseToTheMoon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 28 2010 Location: Michigan Online Status: Offline Posts: 223 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 06 2011 at 14:40 |
|
Beatles for song craft Floyd for album craft......and the fact that they actually toured.
|
|
|
It's funny how the colors of the real world only seem really real when you viddy them on the screen.
|
|
![]() |
|
Schindleria Praematu
Forum Newbie
Joined: February 04 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 19 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 06 2011 at 16:39 |
|
The Beatles of course were a bigger influence, and made better pop songs, but we're on a progresive rock site, so Pink Floyd has to be the winner out of the two, Dark Side of the Moon, Wish You Were Here, Animals, and The Wall, are all time prog classics.
|
|
![]() |
|
Greg W
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2004 Location: Chicago Online Status: Offline Posts: 3803 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 06 2011 at 16:41 |
|
Jethro Towse
|
|
![]() |
|
Jarvig
Forum Newbie
Joined: February 09 2011 Location: Denmark Online Status: Offline Posts: 25 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 09 2011 at 17:19 |
|
Easy. Pink Floyd is the best band ever. Beatles bigger and more important. But - for me - not as good.
|
|
![]() |
|
maani
Special Collaborator
Founding Moderator Joined: January 30 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2563 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 09 2011 at 18:54 |
|
Simple answer: You wouldn't even have PF without The Beatles, so...
The Beatles.
|
|
![]() |
|
b4usleep
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 21 2009 Location: Istanbul Online Status: Offline Posts: 618 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 10 2011 at 02:58 |
|
Beatles is good for beginning. A good starting point to climb Pink Floyd mountain.
|
|
|
Really don't mind if you sit this one out.
My words but a whisper, your deafness a shout. |
|
![]() |
|
ten years after
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 07 2007 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 924 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 10 2011 at 04:20 |
|
I prefer Pink Floyd to the Beatles in the sense that i will play their music more often and, on balance, enjoy it more. However, the Beatles represent so much more than just music. They are nostalgia, history, politics, fashion, comedy, movies, growing up, drugs, front page news, biography, religion and love. They are larger than life. They are John, Paul, George and Ringo. They are the single iconic representation of an entire decade.
Pink Floyd can't compete with all that.
|
|
![]() |
|
Roj
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 02 2008 Location: Manchester, UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 2244 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 10 2011 at 07:59 |
|
This is, I presume, some kind of joke?
Floyd by several light years.
|
|
![]() |
|
zravkapt
Collaborator
Post Rock Team Joined: October 12 2010 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 1376 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 10 2011 at 08:13 |
|
The Beatles were better breakdancers while Pink Floyd had better bagpipe solos.
|
|
![]() |
|
overmatik
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 15 2009 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 91 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 15 2011 at 08:22 |
|
You know what, the thing with judging the Beatles is the fact that the Beatlemania still lives in the hearts of millions of people, so they judgment of Beatles's music is distorted. Let us see some 50 years from now when all the people who were alive in the 60s are dead, and let's see how the new generation will rate the Beatles and the Floyd.
But then again, to some people on this forum Radiohead is better than the Floyd, so you never know...
|
|
|
"Wear the grudge like a crown of negativity. Calculate what we will or will not tolerate. Desperate to control all and everything. Unable to forgive your scarlet letterman."
|
|
![]() |
|
Slartibartfast
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Online Status: Offline Posts: 26083 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 15 2011 at 19:28 |
|
If you limit the bands to the overlap period, I give a slight edge to the Beatles. Another one of those pairings where I wouldn't be without either in my collection.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Steven Brodziak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 24 2010 Location: usa Online Status: Offline Posts: 484 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 15 2011 at 21:38 |
|
There isn't a Beatles song that was ever recorded that can make put me into another world like old Floyd can and does.
Floyd by leaps and bounds.
Beatles were talented, no doubt but not for sheer sound of Floyd.
Floyd has so many FUM's (F.U. moments)
|
|
|
Well, there it is. (Amadeus)
|
|
![]() |
|
maani
Special Collaborator
Founding Moderator Joined: January 30 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2563 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 15 2011 at 23:47 |
|
ten years after:
"However, the Beatles represent so much more than just music. They are nostalgia, history, politics, fashion, comedy, movies, growing up, drugs, front page news, biography, religion and love. They are larger than life. They are John, Paul, George and Ringo. They are the single iconic representation of an entire decade. Pink Floyd can't compete with all that."
Superbly put!
Overmatik:
"You know what, the thing with judging the Beatles is the fact that the Beatlemania still lives in the hearts of millions of people, so they judgment of Beatles's music is distorted. Let us see some 50 years from now when all the people who were alive in the 60s are dead, and let's see how the new generation will rate the Beatles and the Floyd."
Actually, you have it exactly backward. It is almost a certainty that 100 years from now, 200 years from now, 300 years from now, The Beatles' music will still be played - like Bach, Beethoven, Mozart - while Pink Floyd (as amazing as they are) will be a distant memory (like....Frescobaldi...LOL)
Peace.
|
|
![]() |
|
overmatik
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 15 2009 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 91 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 17 2011 at 12:12 |
Wow, I didn't know you had the ability to preview the future? Just because you think that way doesn't mean it will happen, you know that, right?What I can guarantee you is that 100 years from now Kanye West, Lady Gaga and Katy Perry won't be remembered, but that one is easy to foresee... |
|
|
"Wear the grudge like a crown of negativity. Calculate what we will or will not tolerate. Desperate to control all and everything. Unable to forgive your scarlet letterman."
|
|
![]() |
|
Stonebolt
Forum Groupie
Joined: May 04 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 91 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 18 2011 at 09:06 |
|
I went with Pink Floyd. I love both bands. The Beatles are more consistent for me. There is some Pink Floyd that I don't consider any good, but the good Pink Floyd stuff is well... really good.
|
|
![]() |
|
Stonebolt
Forum Groupie
Joined: May 04 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 91 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 18 2011 at 09:10 |
Kanye and Katy? No. Gaga, possibly. We still remember Micheal Jackson and Elvis don't we. They were the pop monarchs of their day. And Elvis was over fifty years ago, who's to say he won't last another fifty? |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 23456 11> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |