Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Posted: February 01 2012 at 17:58
While in the grand scheme of things, an animal going extinct is no big deal, I do think it's terrible that people want to selfishly kill and exploit beautiful creatures like the giant panda and tiger for money. Can I morally condemn the? Hardly, but it makes me sad to see people want to remove beauty and diversity from the natural world.
But really, it's the tiger, rhinoceros, elephant, and so on I feel sorry for. Those giant pandas basically have it coming to them. The stupid f**kers won't even have sex. How does this happen? Gawd...
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64419
Posted: February 01 2012 at 18:38
Luckily we may be moving into a time when sport hunting will start to be seen as the disgusting and cowardly activity it is. Hunting for meat is different, though Sara Palin's aerial sniping is about as bad as it gets, the little pussy.
I love meat so I'm not against killing animals, but non-consumptive hunting is next to murder; worse, it takes advantage of animals' vulnerabilities, and those convicted of illegal or unnecessary slaughter should be imprisoned for a very long time.
Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Posted: February 01 2012 at 19:05
Atavachron wrote:
Luckily we may be moving into a time when sport hunting will start to be seen as the disgusting and cowardly activity it is. Hunting for meat is different, though Sara Palin's aerial sniping is about as bad as it gets, the little pussy.
I love meat so I'm not against killing animals, but non-consumptive hunting is next to murder; worse, it takes advantage of animals' vulnerabilities, and those convicted of illegal or unnecessary slaughter should be imprisoned for a very long time.
I admit that sport hunting creeps me out, but I guarantee you contribute more suffering to the world eating hamburger or chicken than the hunter does killing a deer. Your dramatic distinction between those two because of the intent is bizarre, the act is the same. And we seriously don't censor pussy? But b*****d and w**k are too hardcore....
Edited by Henry Plainview - February 01 2012 at 19:06
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: February 01 2012 at 19:13
We can censor pussy if you want, then dick, willy, peter, john thomas, cock, nuts, balls, plums, stones, tits (including the blue tit, long-tailed tit, coal tit, willow tit, bearded tit, marsh tit and siberian tit), then booby (blue-footed and trap), jugs, mellons, buns, butts... I could continue.
Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Posted: February 01 2012 at 19:17
Poaching is indefensible, hunting can be acceptable especially where culling is required for the environments sake and overgrazing. As well as indigenous folk working their land.
But as one thread comment said....buying from your local Tesco or Costco is hunting in a roundabout way
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Posted: February 01 2012 at 19:20
Dean wrote:
We can censor pussy if you want, then dick, willy, peter, john thomas, cock, nuts, balls, plums, stones, tits (including the blue tit, long-tailed tit, coal tit, willow tit, bearded tit, marsh tit and siberian tit), then booby (blue-footed and trap), jugs, mellons, buns, butts... I could continue.
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64419
Posted: February 01 2012 at 19:23
Henry Plainview wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
Luckily we may be moving into a time when sport hunting will start to be seen as the disgusting and cowardly activity it is. Hunting for meat is different, though Sara Palin's aerial sniping is about as bad as it gets, the little pussy.
I love meat so I'm not against killing animals, but non-consumptive hunting is next to murder; worse, it takes advantage of animals' vulnerabilities, and those convicted of illegal or unnecessary slaughter should be imprisoned for a very long time.
I admit that sport hunting creeps me out, but I guarantee you contribute more suffering to the world eating hamburger or chicken than the hunter does killing a deer. Your dramatic distinction between those two because of the intent is bizarre, the act is the same.
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
Posted: February 01 2012 at 21:00
I'm fine with hunting for food and population culling in certain circumstances. I've never understood sport hunting without the food component, and wouldn't participate. As far as illegal poaching of critically endangered animals, very bad. In fact people who kill elephants just to cut off their ivory and leave them rot, I'd love to see them hang.
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29625
Posted: February 01 2012 at 21:41
Dean wrote:
We can censor pussy if you want, then dick, willy, peter, john thomas, cock, nuts, balls, plums, stones, tits (including the blue tit, long-tailed tit, coal tit, willow tit, bearded tit, marsh tit and siberian tit), then booby (blue-footed and trap), jugs, mellons, buns, butts... I could continue.
It is the autobleeper after all. Why not be creative? Hoo hoo, ding a ling, naughty bits, pee pee, enormous tracks of land...
Going number one, going number two, going number three...
The double backed beast...
Lest we forget - rock 'n' roll.
Edited by Slartibartfast - February 01 2012 at 21:48
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Joined: July 27 2010
Location: Tel Aviv
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Posted: February 02 2012 at 11:14
I mean hunting for sport and poaching is morally probably rather questionable, but I can't really criticize it considering I'm no vegetarian and pay money that helps expand the massive food industry- probably one of the most disgusting and immoral monsters in the world. So yeah it's bad, but in a way we are all immoral in this.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Poaching - do you think it is ok/fine
Topic Options
akamaisondufromage wrote:
