Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Musicianship: Roger Waters
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMusicianship: Roger Waters

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
criticdrummer94 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 16 2011
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 431
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Musicianship: Roger Waters
    Posted: April 09 2012 at 19:42
Something new I wanna try is find out what you all think of the musicianship of certain Prog musicians. No focus on songwriting, vocals, lyrics etc just how they played their instrument. I'm starting with one Roger Waters. What do you all think of his bass playing and occasional acoustic guitar playing? I think as a bassist he was quite original at times and acoustic was kinda standard but not bad.

MY IDOLS
Back to Top
Horizons View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 20 2011
Location: Somewhere Else
Status: Offline
Points: 16952
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2012 at 19:43
For me - his vocals and lyrics blow anything he's played out of the water.
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.
Back to Top
Harry Hood View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1305
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2012 at 23:12
He knows how to play in 7/8. Makes him a better musician than Gilmer.
Back to Top
yanch View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2010
Location: Lowell, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 06:17
I think he's a solid bass player, but not spectacular. His playing suits the music he writes. His acoustic playing is adequate.
Back to Top
infandous View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 23 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 07:59
For a guy who supposedly picked up the bass for the first time a year or two before Piper was recorded, I'd say he did pretty well.  On the whole though, he's an adequate bassist and okay guitarist.  As someone else said, his vocals and lyrics are really what made him famous, not his instrument skills (or lack thereof).
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 08:11
He is average.
Back to Top
HolyMoly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: April 01 2009
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 26133
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 08:20
I think he and Mason sound great together in the Floyd, but I'd also say that in terms of technical skill, they are one of the least gifted rhythm sections in progressive rock.  Just goes to show that technical skill isn't everything.
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran
Back to Top
Sagichim View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: November 29 2006
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 6632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 08:23
When I think about great influencial bass players, I never think about him. The music he writes, is the music he is capable of playing, which is more than fine!
Back to Top
ghost_of_morphy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 10:38
Competent seems to sum up the views here.  He's much better on the vision side of things than the execution side.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32482
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 11:05
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

He is average.
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13249
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 11:43
He's certainly not the greatest bass player of all time, that's for sure, but he did also have outstanding moments. Set The controls comes immediately to mind. It was, however, his lyrical and musical visions that set him apart.
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 12:06
Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

I think he and Mason sound great together in the Floyd, but I'd also say that in terms of technical skill, they are one of the least gifted rhythm sections in progressive rock.  Just goes to show that technical skill isn't everything.

Also shows how they differenciated (sp?) from the "actual" prog movement, Yes, Genesis, King Crimson, Gentle Giant, etc.
Back to Top
silverpot View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 19 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 14:15
Originally posted by Harry Hood Harry Hood wrote:

He knows how to play in 7/8. Makes him a better musician than Gilmer.


You do know that the intro to Money was played with both Roger on bass and Gilmour on guitar, don't you? That's the reason it sounds so "fat".

Anyway, I do like Roger's playing, he has a very good sense of timing. 
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 19618
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 14:39
Originally posted by Harry Hood Harry Hood wrote:

He knows how to play in 7/8. Makes him a better musician than Gilmer.
 
 
Mmmmhhh!!!!....
 
- there are rumours that Waters might have been as weak a bassist as Mason was a technically weak drummer - both were referred as "the engineers (they met at Uni in engineering school), whereas Wright & Gilmour were referred as "the musicians" ...
- The more impressive bass passages in studio floyd albums were actually played by Gilmour, such as Sheep, Have A Cigar, One Of These Days (where they both play bass at first)
- I have seen pictures where it is Wright that tunes Roger's bass (granted, that was before the electronic tuners were invented, so you had to do it by ear)...
 
But no matter these "rumours", Roger had to pull his bass parts in concerts, so he can't have been that bad either...
 
Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

I think he and Mason sound great together in the Floyd, but I'd also say that in terms of technical skill, they are one of the least gifted rhythm sections in progressive rock. Just goes to show that technical skill isn't everything.
As Wright said (thinking of Waters, no doubt) that ideas were superior to technique
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Edited by Sean Trane - April 10 2012 at 14:41
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Fox On The Rocks View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2011
Location: Toronto, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 5012
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 14:56
Nice thread Smile He's a decent bass player and his guitar playing gets the job done. I think he's perfect for a band like Floyd, but if he was in Yes or Return To Forever, I don't think he could keep up with the other band members.
Back to Top
desistindo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 4321
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 15:05
We are talking about a bass player. Bass players dont have to be spetacular. In fact, ive never listen to a "bad bassist", the only bass player who plays bad is those who want to play more than they are capable, since you have to focus, essentialy, in harmony. So, yes, Waters doesnt disappoints.
Back to Top
Dellinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12608
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2012 at 17:21
Bass player may not have to be spectacular, but if they are, then it's a great plus. That's what makes Squire the (perhaps) favourite bass player in PA (as far as the polls I've seen go).
Back to Top
Pekka View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 03 2006
Location: Espoo, Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 6435
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2012 at 03:06
I think it's noteworthy that on his Amused to Death album Waters plays bass on two of the fourteen songs, and on both of them he shares the bass duties with someone else. So while he was reasonably adequate to play the bass on PF records (except the parts he left for Gilmour to perform), he clearly had no bassist ego left in the 90s. Why not get good session guys in instead.
Back to Top
spknoevl View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 14 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 296
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2012 at 07:44
He's certainly not a great bassist, but when I saw PF live back in 76 he held his own, including improvising (or so it seemed) some bass lines during an open section in one of the songs.
http://martinwebb.bandcamp.com

The notes are just an interesting way to get from one silence to the next - Mick Gooderick
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 16163
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2012 at 10:02
Hi,
 
Funny thread.
 
In talking to Roger, or discussing this on his website, he would be the first to tell you he doesn't give a damn if he's a good bass player or not. He's more interested in making sure it sounds right and is the right moment and expression for his piece of music!
 
And I think that we forget this about music ... that some music is NOT defined by scales or what you know, as much as it is by a feeling to augment/illustrate either a word or a feeling ... and it has less to do with music and its childish and metronomic nature that we start learning with, and mostly NEVER graduate from, than it does the piece itself.
 
Roger, I think, looks at himself as a composer and writer first ... the rest is all incidental, and if he can add to it, he will, and if not, he will get someone else to do it. But being a bass player for the sake of being a bass player ... ??? that's not Roger, never was, and never will be ... and if you think that is what determines Roger ... you're up the wrong tree!
 
Btw, remember that Gilmour was a guitar instructor, thus him being able to play bass or help Roger or anyone else is probably natural to him!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.