Musicians Fight: Andrew Latimer or David Gilmour

Gilmour for transcendence, skills and composition.

Gandalff wrote: However, what's the important for me, <FONT style=": #ff8888">Gilmour has never recorded any similar crap like "The Single Factor" or "Stationary Traveller".

That's also debatable

i think in a fight (brawl), David would hav won, he is more fitt, and actualy have some impressive bicepts when he flexes the guitar.

Although I like David Gilmour a lot, I've never really considered his playing to be very emotional. Latimer, on the other hand, is awesome and very emotional as the aforementioned Lady Fantasy live version can attest. I voted Latimer.

Gilmour. There's just too many great songs he's associated with for me to even consider Latimer. I even like Gilmour's solo albums.

skorziks wrote: Anyone who cries while playing their own songs is either conceited, hamming it up, or a sissy.

Both fantastic and emotive players like few others but had to vote for Gilmour, maybe because I'm more familiar with his discography but I find that he has the most emotive playing, quantity wise at least, perhaps not quality wise.

Latimer. 

Both have a sound I really like, but my vote goes to Gilmour, because of his knack for knowing when enough is enough. And his solos are also always "humable". Take Dogs for instance, where do you find the melody? In the guitar solo no doubt, not in the sung parts. Gilmour is simply a much better melody maker. A fact I think is the reason why Pink Floyd is such a much more successful band than Camel.