Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rush: How did they conquer the 80's with integrity
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRush: How did they conquer the 80's with integrity

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5101
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2014 at 12:12
Rush 80's music was great, even if I had discovered them with A Farewell To Kings, then Hemispheres, Caress of Steel etc, I never felt let down by the turn they took at the turn of the 80's, I embraced it quite readily. First of all it was quite gradual, slowly progressing with each album to a more accessible and yet elaborated sound. And yes, they went into a more accessible territory but they never fell into the easy pop-sounding verse-chorus format. Rush was the example of how to get accessible while not compromising the music quality. I also have the impression that they did never seek explicitly for pop-hits, while other bands clearly did. Rush seeked for some airplay and popularity but never at the expense of doing crap.

At the time I really liked much of the 'commercialized' Prog, Genesis Abacab, Yes 90125 (not Owner of a Lonely Heart but I liked a lot all the rest of the album), Asia debut etc, so contemporary Rush were even better than all those.
Back to Top
HolyMoly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: April 01 2009
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 26133
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2014 at 09:50
Speaking of music videos, I fondly recall Rush's video for "Distant Early Warning" - with a kid riding on a cruise missile like it was an amusement park ride.  That was a pretty effective image.  And there was a video for "Big Money" too, but all I remember about that one was seeing a drum stick falling through the air in slow motion.
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17509
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2014 at 09:42
I think Genesis departed more from their 70's roots than Rush did. Loosing two main members, it seems Genesis had to do something to keep going. We all know Phil Collins has a pop side to him (More Fool Me, Mad Man Moon, Follow You Follow Me) and he took over as the flavor of Genesis, but they did it well enough to attract another legion of fans.

To me Yes with 90125 and Big Generator, were closer to what Rush did but Yes were more commercially accepted, by that I mean on the FM radio. Rush still did not dominate the FM radio waves, but only with Tom Sawyer and Spirit of Radio, the rest of the success was still via album sales and droves of under ground fans, mainly the prog community.

Back then it seemed if you dominated the FM dial PLUS music videos on MTV, you were a commercial pop success. Gosh, I remember seeing the Yes videos played over and over and over...Rush not into music videos.

Bottom line I think Rush incorporated the "new wave 80s" sound into their music just enough to keep it fresh but not fall off the edge like people view Genesis and Yes did. Rush lyrics were still based on albums like Hemispheres, AFTK and 2112....whereas Genesis and Yes were writing more about love and feelings, emotions and relationships.

The Police and these other new wave bands had that in their lyrics, but Rush picked up on the music side, the sound that they were making and incorporated that into their 80's albums. The progressive and hard rock/metal fans obviously liked it and made them some of their best selling albums....There is some amazing music on those albums.
Back to Top
HolyMoly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: April 01 2009
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 26133
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2014 at 09:27
I think at the time, Rush's embrace of 80s sounds was viewed pretty negatively, at least I was a bit turned off by it (especially when Power Windows came out, I thought they had gone too far with that one).  The difference is really how well it has aged.  With the passage of time, the Rush 80s stuff has held up very well.  I think this may have to do with the the fact that their music, even when heavily synthesized, was not done so in a trivial or superficial way.  The arrangements still had the same depth and sophistication  they had before, maybe even more depth.  In 1985, all I heard was "KEYBOARDS! AAUGH!" but now I hear it as creative orchestration. 

Yes, on the other hand (not to pick on them, but just using your example), used 80s sounds in a much more "novelty" oriented way.  It didn't feel as genuine and as well integrated into the musical ideas like Rush's did.
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran
Back to Top
WrytXander View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 09 2014
Location: Turkey
Status: Offline
Points: 237
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2014 at 09:26
I'm no expert, but I'd have to assume that their early Led Zeppelin-esque hard rock sound coupled with the success of 2112 were effective. 2112 had a 20-minute prog epic, yes, but it also had such radio songs as Passage to Bangkok, Lessons, Tears etc.

Rush also always kept an eye out for recent musical movements and incorporated those into their sound. You can definitely notice some of the reggae influence on the 1980 masterpiece Natural Science.

1981's Moving Pictures was definitely a commercial-friendly prog rock album. Their sound was still hard and heavy, which may have led a lot of teenagers to believe they were a hard rock band. Hell, I never noticed the odd time signatures and the proggy atmosphere in that album back when I was first getting into them; they all sounded like amazing hard rock songs!

Add incredible musicianship and great songwriting to the equation, and voila! A commercially successful prog rock band.

This may be a somewhat shallow view on the topic, but I meant it as a "general elements" list anyway...
20+ prog bands discovered and explored in 3 years, still going strong...
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20521
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2014 at 09:07
Rush's most popular albums Moving Pictures, Permanent Waves and Signals, which were released in the eighties, incorporated musical motifs from popular groups at the time from the Police to Ultravox incorporating synths, electronic drums and reggae into thier sound. Why did Rush's music remain so authentic while music produced by Progressive artists at the same time like Yes and Genesis were viewed as commercially compromised?

Edited by SteveG - September 09 2014 at 09:15
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.398 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.