Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Canada, oh Canada...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedCanada, oh Canada...

 Post Reply Post Reply
Poll Question: Should Canada provide sanctuary to U.S. military deserters?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
9 [60.00%]
2 [13.33%]
2 [13.33%]
2 [13.33%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
ClemofNazareth View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Folk Researcher

Joined: August 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4659
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Canada, oh Canada...
    Posted: July 14 2008 at 23:11
Just curious, especially on what Canadians think about this subject...

BTW, before anyone attacks me personally please note I am a 12 year U.S. Marine Corps veteran, so I have earned the right to any opinion I choose to have Wink.


"Peace is the only battle worth waging."

Albert Camus
Back to Top
WinterLight View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 09 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 424
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2008 at 23:27
The only answer that respects even minimally the concept of democracy is that it's up to Canadians to decide the policies of their government. 
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2008 at 00:03
It's sad.... It's just sad....
 
 
Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2008 at 01:01
Canida can do what ever it wants, its up to america to get americans to serve, if canada wants to help so be it, if not i'm sure it wouldent be too much a streach to wall off both our borders.
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
Hirgwath View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 262
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2008 at 02:38
Originally posted by WinterLight WinterLight wrote:

The only answer that respects even minimally the concept of democracy is that it's up to Canadians to decide the policies of their government. 


I'm not disagreeing with you, but another important feature of any democracy is openness to immigrants and some pluralism.

That said, I want to point out that draft dodgers (during the Vietnam era, especially) were not cowards. The vast majority of them wanted no part in a war that they felt was based on shaky moral ground. They fled because of their beliefs.

And one of the great features of both Canada and the US is that we have always accepted people who are fleeing because their former society did not tolerate their beliefs.

Skwisgaar Skwigelf: taller than a tree.

Toki Wartooth: not a bumblebee.
Back to Top
WinterLight View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 09 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 424
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2008 at 10:41
Originally posted by Hirgwath Hirgwath wrote:


 
Originally posted by WinterLight WinterLight wrote:


The only answer that respects even minimally the concept of democracy is that it's up to Canadians to decide the policies of their government. 

I'm not disagreeing with you, but another important feature of any democracy is openness to immigrants and some pluralism.

While I agree that "openness to immigrants" and "pluralism" are general desiderata, I don't think that it's a necessary criterion of a democratic state.  In any case, my original point is that it is not for the US to decide--it's a decision for Canadians to make.


That said, I want to point out that draft dodgers (during the Vietnam era, especially) were not cowards. The vast majority of them wanted no part in a war that they felt was based on shaky moral ground. They fled because of their beliefs.

I agree completely with what you said.  It is scandalous the way the US media portrays them as selfish, craven, middle-class brats.  Although many came from relatively privileged backgrounds (compared to the Vietnamese who were to be slaughtered), they resisted conscription out of commitment to principles.


And one of the great features of both Canada and the US is that we have always accepted people who are fleeing because their former society did not tolerate their beliefs.

I can't speak intelligently about Canada, but that's certainly not the case for the US:  Washington has opened and closed its gates as to its benefit.

Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2008 at 13:26
Personally, as one who opposes the Iraq war, here is my two cents.
If you enlisted in the army, you chose to serve the army. As far as I know, you are not given a checklist of places, causes or wars that you can opt out of.
Vietnam was different, in that the draft was still in effect. But for a volunteer army, consciencious (sorry , can't find the correct spelling) deserter sounds like an easy way out of combat when faced with that possibility.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Hirgwath View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 262
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2008 at 17:07
^Good point, debrewguy, but you have to admit, they *could* have anticipated fighting a war that was based on  "just war" theory, rather than a preemptive strike.

Skwisgaar Skwigelf: taller than a tree.

Toki Wartooth: not a bumblebee.
Back to Top
Hirgwath View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 262
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2008 at 17:13

I can't speak intelligently about Canada, but that's certainly not the case for the US:  Washington has opened and closed its gates as to its benefit.

Not always, but you have to admit America has a pretty great track record on the whole "accepting the oppressed masses" thing. Imperfect, (like the ban on Chinese immigration), but still very open. I guess I was speaking in terms of ideals.

Skwisgaar Skwigelf: taller than a tree.

Toki Wartooth: not a bumblebee.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2008 at 17:54
Originally posted by Hirgwath Hirgwath wrote:

^Good point, debrewguy, but you have to admit, they *could* have anticipated fighting a war that was based on  "just war" theory, rather than a preemptive strike.

I do believe that this option is not available when you sign up. So it's all or nothing.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Hirgwath View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 262
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2008 at 00:51
Legally or morally? Legally you're obviously correct, but morally I don't see how it matters.

Remember, America had never self-consciously engaged in preemptive war before now.

Skwisgaar Skwigelf: taller than a tree.

Toki Wartooth: not a bumblebee.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2008 at 11:14
Originally posted by Hirgwath Hirgwath wrote:

Legally or morally? Legally you're obviously correct, but morally I don't see how it matters.

Remember, America had never self-consciously engaged in preemptive war before now.


Morally speaking, you're signing up with an organization whose existence is based on the fact that it will fight in the conflicts and wars deemed necessary by the government.
Again, I believe that there is no exemption listed on your enrollment that you can check off.
And just to repeat myself, I do not, and have not ever, supported the Iraq war. I do support the war in Afghanistan, however.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 19636
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2008 at 09:26
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:

 
Personally, as one who opposes the Iraq war, here is my two cents.
If you enlisted in the army, you chose to serve the army. As far as I know, you are not given a checklist of places, causes or wars that you can opt out of.
 

Vietnam was different, in that the draft was still in effect. But for a volunteer army, consciencious (sorry , can't find the correct spelling) deserter sounds like an easy way out of combat when faced with that possibility.
 
 
As half Canadian myself, that's pretty close to what I think.....
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2008 at 13:42
Well we just sent a couple of deserters back just this week. These guys volunteered and in exchange for a coollege education they had to serve 5 years if I`m not mistaken. I served in the military myself and found myself in some hot spots. I mean what are you joining up for ? The military is not a country club and perhaps one the most unfair jobs going regardless of what you do. The current slogan for recruiting in Canada for the three services is Join The Fight. That`s what you`re joining up for to fight. And if you don`t want to fight don`t join. So I would say send them back and let the Americans deal with these bums.

As far as Vietnam, the dumbest war in history, goes that was different. Some guys came to Canada some went to Sweden and other European countries. I would say in that circumstance we should give them asylum. My cousin who is Canadian did two tours in Vietnam flying Hueys got shot down a few times. So here we are giving Americans refuge while our boys are volunteering while their boys are running scared to Canada. I don`t have the exact figure but quite a few Canadians fought with American forces in Vietnam an many didn`t come back.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 19636
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2008 at 07:11
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

Well we just sent a couple of deserters back just this week. These guys volunteered and in exchange for a coollege education they had to serve 5 years if I`m not mistaken. I served in the military myself and found myself in some hot spots. I mean what are you joining up for ? The military is not a country club and perhaps one the most unfair jobs going regardless of what you do. The current slogan for recruiting in Canada for the three services is Join The Fight. That`s what you`re joining up for to fight. And if you don`t want to fight don`t join. So I would say send them back and let the Americans deal with these bums.

As far as Vietnam, the dumbest war in history, goes that was different. Some guys came to Canada some went to Sweden and other European countries. I would say in that circumstance we should give them asylum. My cousin who is Canadian did two tours in Vietnam flying Hueys got shot down a few times. So here we are giving Americans refuge while our boys are volunteering while their boys are running scared to Canada. I don`t have the exact figure but quite a few Canadians fought with American forces in Vietnam an many didn`t come back.
 
Hi Ian,
I'd say things are a little different south of ther border though....
 
In Canada, you know you're getting in the army to serve and defend your country, and since Canada acts civilly in the world, the army is a safe place to be, eventually serving in peace-keeping force asthr high danger point.....
 
 
Sothbound, the US is an offensive (in matters of defence) nation where you're likely to go fighting for private interest (Exxon and Texaco and Bush enterprises in Irak) or Isreal (Iran), not the nation (that was eventually Afghamistan)
 
I can still feel  a bit sorry for those that had that enlisted before 9/11 , thinking the risk  was relatively minimal of heading into another foresseable Vitetnam-type fiasco like  Irak. But for those that enlisted since, they were pretty dumb thinking of the army as a career......
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2008 at 11:07
Well these particular guys enlisted after 911. I think the problem with these guys volunteering is that they don`t really understand the implications of being in the US military particularily combat roles such as the infantry or as a gunship or fighter pilot the chances are that you are going to be sent to some hot spot these days.  Because the American forces are beginning to be spread rather thin they need all the guys they can get and the recruiters are not being as selective and neglect to properly inform these young men and women about exactly what they`re getting themselves into. For many of these young people who have limited education I guess joining the service is better than working at a McJob or no job at all. It`s kind of sad they go over to Iraq or Afghanistan and get killed or maimed for life and they`re no more than 19 20 years old. But then again war has always been a young man`s game. Unfortunately since the American Civil War the Americans have traditionally taken heavy losses.

On the other hand the Canadians I have talked to coming back from Afghanistan have a clearer picture of what the freak is going on. We also have a lot of reservists over there who have taken leave from their civy jobs to go over and are attached to  the Princess Pats, Royal 22nd, 2 RCR or a support unit and many have been casualties. We have a different minset than the Americans and are generally better trained and informed. Nothing against the Americans here but this is a fact.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 19636
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2008 at 11:15
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

 Because the American forces are beginning to be spread rather thin they need all the guys they can get and the recruiters are not being as selective and neglect to properly inform these young men and women about exactly what they`re getting themselves into. For many of these young people who have limited education I guess joining the service is better than working at a McJob or no job at all.
 
You know how the different European marines used to get recruits for centuries??? They'd start paying drink, than get you completely drunk, get you to sign the enlisment papers and throw you on the boat still drunk a few minutes before taking to sea.....
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2008 at 11:39
well until recently many European countries had conscription but I think that this has been discontinued in many countries. I had a high school buddy that had to go and do his time as a radar technician in the Swedish Air Force. I think Switzerland still maintains a part-time army and air force with just a handful of regular units. I`ve met a few Swiss Air pilots and they all had to fly jets for the Flugwaffe twice a year. I have this friend from Germany who is now anexecutive chef in a large hotel who got his cooking papers serving in the German Army. Of course he had to go through basic training with all the other guys. I guess if you play your cards right the military can work for you. It worked for me.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.