Print Page | Close Window

How Your Music Collection Is Organised

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: General Music Discussions
Forum Description: Discuss and create polls about all types of music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=107022
Printed Date: May 04 2024 at 20:44
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: How Your Music Collection Is Organised
Posted By: presdoug
Subject: How Your Music Collection Is Organised
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 12:21
  I have gone through quite a big change lately in how my music collection is organised.
        Basically, with my collection existing now with CDs only (and it has been that way for a while) I have my prog CDs filed in a half-hazard way now. That way, when I browse through things, less things get overlooked in the process of looking at things, which is kind of cool. Variety is the spice of life! The only exception to this is my Triumvirat, and Eddy Marron collections, where everything is grouped together.
             With my Classical music collection, I still have every work accessible, but only with the very best version of a given symphony or piano concerto or sonata available. Other versions have been stored away and archived. That way, I get more variety in my music accessing and listening, with my focus on the "creme de la creme" of versions. Things are half-hazard, as well, except for my CDs of my favorites Bruckner, Richard Strauss, Berlioz and Mahler, all grouped together.
             How do the rest of you organise your music? Do you still have hard copies of things at all, now? 



Replies:
Posted By: Blinkyjoh
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 12:36
Everything by alphabet, except Yes, Genesis and Marillion all have their own shelves. I only listen to CDs in the car. At home, it is all in computer/windows media player.

i used to have like 200 records but i'm a total idiot who threw them out instead of taking them with me when moving.

I've been building up my collection via amazon/thrift stores, so i have about 340 now.
I have a cheap prepac stand, that holds around 320 or so. Now that i have too many, i basically pull one crap one out for every new good one i get.

So, my ( i am so embarrassed ) my Honeymoon Suite and Glass Tiger cds and stuff are just haphazardly stored on the side :)



Posted By: TeleStrat
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 13:17
All in alphabetical order by band name.
My original vinyl from the 60s and 70s is divided into two sections. Imports (500+) and US releases (1200+).
The new vinyl I'm collecting now (350+) is in a third section.


Posted By: Barbu
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 13:25
Non-alphabetical chronological order.

-------------



Posted By: Guldbamsen
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 13:29
Short answer: it isn't. I think my Floyd releases are the only ones who've managed to stick together.
I actually rather like my collection scattered haphazardly on shelves. Every time I look for an album it becomes an adventure in itself.

-------------
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 13:41
Initially I never bothered organising my record collection at all because even when my LP collection topped over 300 albums I knew where everything was and didn't need a filing system, However, my sister didn't so in 1979 while I was away at University she catalogued and re-organised my LP collection into alphabetical order so she could find stuff (and as payment she liberated half my Moody Blues collection, which by some strange co-incidence didn't get recorded in the catalogue she compiled). While I hated the alphabetised system it seemed disrespectful to then un-re-organise it all so until the advent of CDs I continued to store vinyl LPs in the system she'd imposed. Years later when CDs arrived I initially organised them by the colour of their spines because they were ugly enough as it was so creating a rainbow of CDs on the shelves looked much prettier. While this was aesthetically pleasing wife (aka "she-who-must-be-obeyed") did like that because she couldn't find anything so I decided grouped them by vague music style and/or genre, with the exception of Philip Glass and Pink Floyd who got their own respective shelves in the racking stacking system, and she-who-must-be-obeyed's 15 CDs where put on their own shelf away from my (by then) several thousand albums.

Then that became all too much to store in one room so the collection overflowed from the dining room to the living room to the conservatory and now into the spare bedroom and any thought of organising them in any meaningful way flew out the window. Since my daughter and her husband moved back in to the family home any hope of accessing my vinyl collection has also flown out the window as all their belongings are now stored in front of the wall-units they are shelved in so all new purchases are for now being kept in the hall-way. On the CD front, once again I have run out of storage shelf-space but now have reached the point where I have also run out of wall-space to stack the Ikea towers I've been buying to store them in. I fear the only two options remaining are the master bedroom (I doubt I'll swing that one past she-who-must-be-obeyed) or the attic. Ouch

But in answer to your question - haphazard and very random.


-------------
What?


Posted By: BaldFriede
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 13:48
All musical styles m9ixed together, sorted by artists alphabetically, but for each artist chronologically, with the exception of classical composers which appear alphabetically by name and work.


-------------


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.


Posted By: Guldbamsen
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 13:50
^^
Oh the horrors of storaging music!
I do however trust you to come up with some ingenious solution, Mr Masterbuilder
How about a fake wall with room for cds on the inside? Maybe the-one-who-must-be-obeyed won't notice.


-------------
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams


Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 13:56
It's currently organized by type of music or genre...but I basically know where everything is.......I keep saying I'm going to alphabetize it all but it has yet to happen.

-------------
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin


Posted By: Guldbamsen
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 14:01
I too have dabbled with the idea of organising my collection - hell I even had a Krautrock/Electronic section at one point that I really dug...but I never care enough to actually pull myself together and spend 4 hours filing music that at some future point will end up completely scrambled...again. Life is too short.

-------------
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams


Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 14:12
Alphabetical by artist and then alphabetical by album title.  My collection is spread throughout the house in 4 different rooms including the master bedroom.  It has not been updated in a while however, so recent purchases were haphazardly strewn throughout the home.  However, this past weekend, I sorted and alphabetized the newer purchases into various boxes and they are now organized and awaiting a merging of new into old. 


-------------


Posted By: Guldbamsen
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 14:14
I need a butler

-------------
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams


Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 14:17


-------------


Posted By: Guldbamsen
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 14:19
I'd like another one thanks

-------------
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams


Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 14:43
I reorganize my collection every six lunar months, using a semi-alphabetical, semi-chronological, half-numerological, half-sound spectrum order.
I used to try a combination of the decimals of Pi, the Golden Number and the Kabbalah to have a more rational system, but I was lost after trying to include some calculus from Gödel in this method.


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 14:44
Originally posted by Guldbamsen Guldbamsen wrote:

I'd like another one thanks
greedy, you couldn't have finished the first one that quickly....


-------------
What?


Posted By: ClemofNazareth
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 15:13
I tossed or gave away many hundreds of cassettes and CDs five years ago during a cross-country relocation.  Kept a couple shelves of obscure, out-of-print and private label ones and they're shelved in no particular order.

Still have 800-900 vinyl albums which I add to regularly.  Those are alphabetical except for the multi-disc sets which are mostly displayed on bookshelves.

Really though except for some vinyl albums that were never released on CD, I rarely play anything except digital music now (Spotify, Amazon player, or stuff I ripped myself from my own collection).



-------------
"Peace is the only battle worth waging."

Albert Camus


Posted By: Quinino
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 17:17
It seems I'll be the lonely black sheep in this herd: everything bought/ripped in FLAC format (when available) and stored on the Pc and from there on memory cards to take with me (mobile, car)
At home classified alphabetically by band and then by date via Foobar database/player (hard copies go to the atttic)
I dearly recall the LPs of my youth but that is all past for me now Cry took the digital road and never looked back


Posted By: zappaholic
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 19:16
Alphabetically by artist, chronologically within artist.  Various-artists comps at the end, alphabetically by title.  Genre doesn't enter into it.  Makes everything easy to find.




-------------
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." -- H.L. Mencken


Posted By: emigre80
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 19:17
Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

Alphabetical by artist and then alphabetical by album title.  My collection is spread throughout the house in 4 different rooms including the master bedroom.  It has not been updated in a while however, so recent purchases were haphazardly strewn throughout the home.  However, this past weekend, I sorted and alphabetized the newer purchases into various boxes and they are now organized and awaiting a merging of new into old. 
 
you did that just so you could post it on this thread, didn't you?


Posted By: Finnforest
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 19:46
Originally posted by Barbu Barbu wrote:

Non-alphabetical chronological order.



My favorite answer.  My old prog friend had his massive collection this way, down the very day of release....it was fun to see it that way.




-------------



Posted By: BaldFriede
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 20:29
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Originally posted by Barbu Barbu wrote:

Non-alphabetical chronological order.



My favorite answer.  My old prog friend had his massive collection this way, down the very day of release....it was fun to see it that way.



Makes it difficult to find something. Also finding the exact release date may prove to be difficult.


-------------


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.


Posted By: Finnforest
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 20:42
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Originally posted by Barbu Barbu wrote:

Non-alphabetical chronological order.



My favorite answer.  My old prog friend had his massive collection this way, down the very day of release....it was fun to see it that way.



Makes it difficult to find something. Also finding the exact release date may prove to be difficult.



For me I would totally agree, it was. 
For him, he could spot the disc he wanted like a raptor eyeing a vole.  Knew right where every title would be.  LOL


-------------



Posted By: Nogbad_The_Bad
Date Posted: June 16 2016 at 21:26
All my old rock, jazz & blues is in storage bins in the garage, the prog is alphabetical by band & chronological with band. I have room for maybe 200 more before I have to move another bunch into storage. There's no chance of additional cabinets so I'm going to have to have to have a think about it before long. 

-------------
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/


Posted By: Ozark Soundscape
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 01:10
format > artist, alphabetically > album, chronologically


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 01:24
So, all you lovers of Alphabetti spagetti - how do you actually do it? 

I mean in reality, in the real world, how for example do you physically re-organise half your collection just because the next CD you've bought is from an artist whose name begins with "M"? 

Assuming that your CD storage looks something like this:

or this:
or if you are true prog fan, like this:
Do you leave gaps in every section on the off-chance that the next purchase will slot into the vacant space, or do you shuffle everything along one space each time you buy an new album? 




-------------
What?


Posted By: BaldJean
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 01:31
the only reason we differentiate between classical music and the rest is that it does in our opinion not make much sense to sort classical music by performer. I don't think "I want to listen to the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra or Friedrich Gulda now", I think "I want to listen to the Brandenburg Concertos or the Moonlight Sonata now"


-------------


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 01:32
Oh, just like they do in record stores. Wink

-------------
What?


Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 05:45
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

So, all you lovers of Alphabetti spagetti - how do you actually do it? 

I mean in reality, in the real world, how for example do you physically re-organise half your collection just because the next CD you've bought is from an artist whose name begins with "M"?
[...]
Do you leave gaps in every section on the off-chance that the next purchase will slot into the vacant space, or do you shuffle everything along one space each time you buy an new album? 



For my part, I reorganize my collection each time I bought new CDs. In fact, the new CD will spend a few days out, near the record player, before joining its comrades once I "domesticated" it. So, I can wait the week-ends to spend at least half an hour to do the musical chairs with my records.
Now, my biggest problem would be records with an unusual format:
- CD coming with a book or some heavy booklet (Alice Cooper, Orphaned Land...)
- CD sold in a 25cm cover like if it was a 45rpm, or CD from Yoshida Tatsuya's own label Magaibutsu;
- CD put in a metal box ŕ la PIL (cf. Jean Louis' second album, Morse)
I had to take a shoe box to put these... "special cases"...


Posted By: Nogbad_The_Bad
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 05:56
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

So, all you lovers of Alphabetti spagetti - how do you actually do it? 

I mean in reality, in the real world, how for example do you physically re-organise half your collection just because the next CD you've bought is from an artist whose name begins with "M"? 

Do you leave gaps in every section on the off-chance that the next purchase will slot into the vacant space, or do you shuffle everything along one space each time you buy an new album? 


I leave gaps throughout the collection. I tend to keep a pile of new stuff for 3 or 4 months and then put aside an hour or so to insert them into the shelves. I only have around 1700 cds so it doesn't take too long to do.


-------------
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/


Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 05:59
1700 CDs? Wow, you must need a whole room for them!


Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 06:47
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

So, all you lovers of Alphabetti spagetti - how do you actually do it? 

I mean in reality, in the real world, how for example do you physically re-organise half your collection just because the next CD you've bought is from an artist whose name begins with "M"? 

Assuming that your CD storage looks something like this:
or if you are true prog fan, like this:
Do you leave gaps in every section on the off-chance that the next purchase will slot into the vacant space, or do you shuffle everything along one space each time you buy an new album? 


I didn't leave gaps.  That is why all my newer purchases are sorted within boxes.  Once I start the project of merging the new with the old I should probably leave a few gaps for later purchases.  Maybe 2 or 3 gaps per shelf?  Or one shelf per case.  Hmmm.. A quandary.

-------------


Posted By: Mascodagama
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 08:46
I am in the process of getting rid of all jewel cases (really don't like them, and very inefficient) and storing the CDs and booklets in boxes like this:



Each suspended wallet is double-sided, so I put the booklet in the front pocket and the disc in the back pocket. Each box stores 250 CDs this way.  I don't worry too much about alphabetical, chronological or thematic ordering because I enter the box and envelope number of each CD in a spreadsheet so I can search for what I want. The back inserts for the CDs are bagged up and stored separately as I'll only ever want them if I sell something.

Well, above is the theory. The fact is I have filled three boxes and have four more empty ones to fill, and the last time I did any work on this was a year ago Embarrassed

As for CDs that are in digipacks or other carboard packages, and box sets, they aren't organised at all EmbarrassedEmbarrassed

Neither is vinyl, though I don't have enough vinyl for this to be a problem, and don't buy vinyl except where CD isn't an option (and then rarely).



Posted By: Nogbad_The_Bad
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 09:08
Last bi-annual filing day




-------------
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/


Posted By: TeleStrat
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 11:15
It would drive me crazy if my albums were not in alphabetical order. If I'm looking for a specific album I have to at least know where to start looking.
For the jacket spines to be facing out you have to put "Z" on the bottom row left and "A" on the top right. If you buy a lot of music you have to have room for your collection to grow up and to the right.
There is no perfect way to do it. If you own a lot of albums and plan on buying more then a certain amount of work will always be involved. 


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 11:29
Originally posted by ClemofNazareth ClemofNazareth wrote:

I tossed or gave away many hundreds of cassettes and CDs five years ago during a cross-country relocation.  Kept a couple shelves of obscure, out-of-print and private label ones and they're shelved in no particular order.

Still have 800-900 vinyl albums which I add to regularly.  Those are alphabetical except for the multi-disc sets which are mostly displayed on bookshelves.

Really though except for some vinyl albums that were never released on CD, I rarely play anything except digital music now (Spotify, Amazon player, or stuff I ripped myself from my own collection).


My friend....I will gladly take all that vinyl that you do not play anymore, off your hands!! Big smile

The 250 or so CDs I have are in a file cabinet, nice old wooden cabinet my wife found at antique shop, holds the CDs in nice fashion in the top two drawers, just open a drawer and easily thumb thru the cases. Those do not get played too often at all.


The 500 or so vinyl I have is all alphabetized on shelves with band label dividers, this was due to my wife always complaining she could not find something easily....the boss wins! LOL 

I also keep two wood boxes that hold about 150 albums near my audio system which are the heavy rotation LPs. Couple times a year I will rotate out bunches to keep things fresh to my ears. I find it easier to flip thru vinyl with the fronts towards me rather than trying to read the 5-6mm wide album spines in my shelves.



-------------


Posted By: Barbu
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 11:59
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Originally posted by Barbu Barbu wrote:

Non-alphabetical chronological order.



My favorite answer.  My old prog friend had his massive collection this way, down the very day of release....it was fun to see it that way.



Makes it difficult to find something. Also finding the exact release date may prove to be difficult.



For me I would totally agree, it was. 
For him, he could spot the disc he wanted like a raptor eyeing a vole.  Knew right where every title would be.  LOL

Yep, Finn.

-------------



Posted By: JD
Date Posted: June 17 2016 at 13:21
Like this :

Both collections are Alphabetical by artist and then chronological within the artist. Bootlegs / Self made assorted CD's to to the end of the artist's section.

Vinyl




CD



I do leave gaps at the end of each shelf for new additions but every so often I have to go to the end and pull everything back to make room again. This picture shows me in the midst of thinning the herd, which is why there are such big gaps at the ends.  I have about 4 copy box lids worth of CD's to go to the trade-in store.


-------------
Thank you for supporting independently produced music


Posted By: uduwudu
Date Posted: June 30 2016 at 06:52
Strict alpha, release, album, CDingle order with oddities at the back. I cannot (this has happened) find a CD album if say, the 1993 release is where a 1995 release is. Rock , jazz and classical (composer) are the three main sections. Bootlegs in CD bins which are a hideous sight and remain covered. Genses and Zappa bootlegs have their own boxes; the Zeppelin Floyd and other usual suspects are stupefyingly vast in quantity. These are kept (hopefully) in strict date order or nothing would be found...

Used to store "proper" CDs in wallets. Turned out to be a poor idea, damaging art etc. I dislike jewel cases still.

The dozen or so LPs (waste of time etc) sit in a corner. So much for the LP of Lucifer Rising.

Space is limited so a tremendous amount remains on hard drives. I now have to organise these. Improvised shelves happen now. It's all very Heath Robinson but without the sanity. Especially filing the oversized items.

One of my primary cases has shelves that are level, but not consistently wide. That... is so annoying.

Movie DVDs are in no order. To paraphrase The Who, I Can see For Piles and Piles....

Y'know how it's bad when GFs, etc...  hate your collection (for some ungodly reason); I have so much stuff someone else's GF had to weigh in (help share the hate). Solidarity sister... (I think she was actually ok with her bf's mindbogglingly huge porn collection - I saw it once - but my music was a bad thing...) That was ages ago.

I was once taken seriously when I said I could not go out as I had to alphabetisize my t shirt collection. Fortunately these are not as plentiful as they were...

This collection has been moved and it takes on a life of it's own when they get shelved in corridors and go round flats and house interiors.


Posted By: BunBun
Date Posted: July 24 2016 at 15:48
My music collection is pretty straightforward. I have some CDs that I store in slim, black containers. Therefore, if I need something, I can just kick pull it out, take the lid of and grab what I need. My concert blurays and dvds are also stored in similar black containers. I think it looks much more slick than seeing the spines all the time.

Anyways, my LPs, my preferred format of collecting, are stored in alphabetical order and then I order the albums by the same artist in chronological order. It might not be the most convenient thing because everynow and then I forget if this so and so album came out before or after that so and so album.

For my digital collection, I use MusicBee, its a free site you can quick download, and there is a lot of flexibility in how you want to customize it.


Posted By: Darious
Date Posted: July 25 2016 at 14:58
Here's my system: my music collection is divided into months, in which given albums were issued. And so, in Julies I take out a batch of albums which became available in July, and listen to them within the month of July. Just as if I have only bought them. Just as it was intended by the artist/publisher (for instance Yes insisted on their Going For The One to be issued on 7/7/77). Next month - next batch - Augusts, etc. This way all albums from my collection are being served equally over a year and also they (albums) bond with seasons of the year. You know how it is whey some albums feel more wintery and others more summery. The register of all albums is being kept on spreadsheet.

-------------
Writing about truth is a little bit like getting your dick out in public and hoping no one laughs (Steve Hogarth)


Posted By: Pastmaster
Date Posted: July 25 2016 at 15:00
I sort my music collection first by format (CD, Cassette, Vinyl), then by genre, then each genre's respective artists alphabetically. 


Posted By: Terrapin Station
Date Posted: July 25 2016 at 16:48
Alphabetical by artist, going by first names and/or articles (even for individual's names), with "The" as the only exception.  Then chronologically within an artist.  That's it.   I don't categorize by genres or anything like that.  Anything else I've tried in the past has just turned into a big mess where I couldn't find stuff.

I used to alphabetize "library style"--so for individuals, by their last names, no articles counted, etc., but I changed once I started using computers more.  The only reason I still ignore "The" is just because there are so many of them.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk