Anyone a fan of rap
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: General Music Discussions
Forum Description: Discuss and create polls about all types of music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=24183
Printed Date: April 29 2024 at 02:18 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Anyone a fan of rap
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Subject: Anyone a fan of rap
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:55
Personally I have little respect for it because of its lack of musicality and creativity; I see it as moving music away from an art form and transforming it into a sort of vehicle for comercial sucess, and I also believe it promotes a negative message. However as a form of singing I am greatly intrigued and believe it needs to be explored further in other styles, Pain of Salvation have used it to great sucess. I express a great deal of emotion and is rather unique.
I must admit to being recently impressed by one rapper, Kanye West. He creates some very interesting beats and backs them up with his great rapping.
EDIT: Due to a spelling error I was complimenting Kanye's ability to rape women instead of his singing, now corrected.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Replies:
Posted By: Bern
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:58
I have some hope in the genre itself but I don't think any of the rap I've heard yet is substantial. Most rap I've heard is composed of 3-5 notes repeated over and over again.
I think we need more musical rap (a thing I've personally never heard. If you know some musical rap, just tell me.)
We also need lyrics other than : f**k, bitches, ass
IMO someting interesting could come out from rap someday.
------------- RIP in bossa nova heaven.
|
Posted By: Dirk
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 16:00
No!
|
Posted By: TheProgtologist
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 16:00
I like the hardcore,old school kind of stuff...like NWA.
And I LOVE Public Enemy.
-------------
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 16:07
Bern wrote:
I have some hope in the genre itself but I don't think any of the rap I've heard yet is substantial. Most rap I've heard is composed of 3-5 notes repeated over and over again.
I think we need more musical rap (a thing I've personally never heard. If you know some musical rap, just tell me.)
We also need lyrics other than : f**k, bitches, ass
IMO someting interesting could come out from rap someday.
|
Kanye West actually recently released a live album where he's backed by an orchestra. It's not developed as fully as it could be but it's a start.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: Bern
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 16:12
Posted By: Hector Gilbert
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 17:09
I like most of the rap music that I've bothered to pursue (I have about thirty albums in the style). It's just a nice change every once in a while from rock music to hear something with more of a focus on vocal clarity. It's also very rhythm-oriented, which is a feature that makes it stylistically different from most prog rock. So I guess if prog rock to you represents something of an ideal state for all other music to live up to, you're never going to get into it. But if you want a change from your usual listening, there it is. To those who are curious, Public Enemy's landmark album It Takes A Nation Of Millions To Hold Us Back and A Tribe Called Quest's The Low End Theory would be among the best albums to start with. It Takes A Nation... is very sample-heavy, but in 1988 that was the point - it was much easier/cheaper back then to take a riff here, a drum sound there and cobble it together into an entirely different context. The unrelenting sociopolitical commentaries would also be relatively palatable to those who are particularly tired of the clichés of chart rap. The Low End Theory mainly served to outline the social climate of 90s America, with a particular emphasis on the music business and the group's frustration with it. Stylistically the album showed heavy jazz influences (albeit put in the context of simple grooves) and sounds a lot less rigid then most rap music even today.
|
Posted By: wolf0621
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 17:26
If only George Bush could stop not caring about people like him...
|
Posted By: Kotro
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 18:56
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
Personally I have little respect for it because of its lack of musicality and creativity; I see it as moving music away from an art form and transforming it into a sort of vehicle for comercial sucess, and I also believe it promotes a negative message. |
You obviosly are not familiar with French Hip Hop. Manau, for instance, is one of the freshest aproaches to music I've heard, with their album "Panique Celtique". And then there is MC Sollar...
------------- Bigger on the inside.
|
Posted By: Bj-1
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 19:01
I hate gangsta' rap etc, but some regular rap songs are very good, IMO. Also, I think some alternative/experimental rap is cool, though it isn't something I would buy.
------------- RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on! http://www.last.fm/music/Exerior" rel="nofollow - EXERIOR Experimental tech/death/progmetal from Norway!
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 19:03
I like a bit of Eminem and de La Soul.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Empathy
Date Posted: June 02 2006 at 19:27
I do think there are hip hop artists that do something different and creative. de la Soul was classic... I also enjoy some Snoop Dog, Busta Rhymes, and Outkast.
------------- Pure Brilliance:
|
Posted By: Ghandi 2
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 00:38
Hehehe. You know, "rapper" has two p's; the word with one p means one who rapes. Which is ironic considering most rap lyrics :-)
I do not like Rap because there's little to no melody. The song Hey Ya by Outkast makes me want to break something.
------------- "Never forget that the human race with technology is like an alcoholic with a barrel of wine." Sleepytime Gorilla Museum: Because in their hearts, everyone secretly loves the Unabomber.
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 00:43
I have a great hope in Rap........I hope that people will soon get bored and vanishes as a nightmare.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: bhikkhu
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 01:00
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
I have a great hope in Rap........I hope that people will soon get bored and vanishes as a nightmare.
Iván | I couldn't agree more Unfortunately I had this thought about twenty years ago, and it still hasn't happened. There have been some sporadic moments of quality, but of course they weren't profitable enough. I remember a movement in the '90s called street Jazz. They had actual music playing, and intelligent lyrics. No wonder it didn't catch on.
------------- a.k.a. H.T.
http://riekels.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow - http://riekels.wordpress.com
|
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 03:03
I heard some rhythmically and lyrically impressive rap, but the only names I can remember are MC Solaar, The Metrics (they rapped on one of the albums by Steve Coleman) and Roots Manuva (talk about crazy lyrics, I'm yet to hear anything as out there in prog). Actually, I'd like to hear more...
|
Posted By: Serguilloche
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 11:33
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
Personally I have little respect for it because of its lack of musicality and creativity; I see it as moving music away from an art form and transforming it into a sort of vehicle for comercial sucess, and I also believe it promotes a negative message. However as a form of singing I am greatly intrigued and believe it needs to be explored further in other styles, Pain of Salvation have used it to great sucess. I express a great deal of emotion and is rather unique.
I must admit to being recently impressed by one raper, Kanye West. He creates some very interesting beats and backs them up with his great raping. |
isn't the term 'rapist'?
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Serguilloche/?chartstyle=Bubbles">
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 17:45
Kanye West is safe, dumbed-down mainstream crap with a veneer of
sophistication that's as fake as Bruce Springsteen's "working man"
image. There is so much more inetersting stuff going on in the
underground, and pleanty of rappers who are much, much better than he
is.
Jean Grae. No one can touch her - that's the first thing you need to know.
Quasimoto/Madlib/Yeterday's New Quintet, Dr Octagon/Kool Keith, MF
Doom, Aesop Rock, RJD2, Innerstance Beatbox, DJ Shadow and many more
are far more creative and progressive than the safe, cross-overy
blandness of Kanye.
-------------
|
Posted By: kenmeyerjr
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 19:07
Gee, if the genre has been around 20 years and has not disappeared, you think that might give you a clue that it is a valid genre? I have to admit, the close mindedness of many of the people here give me pause to associate myself with prog.
Hector, great choices.
------------- If you like art of musicians, check my site (the music section) and tell me what you think! http://www.kenmeyerjr.com
|
Posted By: kenmeyerjr
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 19:08
Oh, and Tea, there is nothing fake about Springsteen's working man image...obviously, he is not living on welfare, but I think he has earned both is salary and his status. And, considering how much he donates of both is money and time to things like food banks and such, I think the time has come for people to stop dumping on him just because he is successful.
------------- If you like art of musicians, check my site (the music section) and tell me what you think! http://www.kenmeyerjr.com
|
Posted By: Zargus
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 19:31
I loved Rage against the machine when i was younger and first got intrested in music but they played Metal/rap, and yes some eminem songs was very good i think, havent any albums by him but i liked some songs yes i did. but no im never was a big fan and now days i dont lisen to any rap. But my sister lisen to much rap and yes some of it is preety good i have to say some very bad.
-------------
|
Posted By: TheProgtologist
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 19:49
I also really like Dr. Dre's album The Chronic,great tunes and it is very well produced.
Has anyone here ever heard of a hip-hop band called The Roots?They focus on live instrumentation and play traditional instruments.Their albums Things Fall Apart and Phrenology are incredible.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 22:07
kenmeyerjr wrote:
Gee, if the genre has been around 20 years and has not disappeared, you think that might give you a clue that it is a valid genre? I have to admit, the close mindedness of many of the people here give me pause to associate myself with prog.
|
Yes we're very close minded:
- We listen a genre that's hated or ignored by 99% of the people.
- We never cared for what DJs or magazines say
- We spend thousand of dollars in the music we love
- We care about a broad genre that includes influences of Rock, Classical, Jazz, Folk, etc.
- We never cared for charts.
- We're always ready to experiment.
I guess we're anything but close minded, and sorry If I'm not scared because you refuse to associalte with Prog Rock, because you always say the same thing and you're always back.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: June 03 2006 at 22:11
I like the old stuff, when rap was either fun, party music or political. I even like old Ice Cube and Dr. Dre because they had very good storytelling and creative melody lines. Nowadays, rap is a pathetic self-parody.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 04:23
Some people refuse rappers the status of real musicians on the grounds that they neither play an instrument, nor have musical knowledge.
Funnily enough though, when the same people are confronted with basic facts that some very high-profile musicians think otherwise (and even go as far as to co-operate with the rappers they consider creative), these people are quick to dismiss the aforementioned musicians' knowledge, experience and judgement, and claim their own (fragmentary and limited) knowledge as equal, or even superior, to that of these musicians. A good (if maybe a bit extreme) example of a similar situation would be that 'Simpsons' episode, in which Homer vehemently argues astrophysics with Stephen Hawking. Ridiculous, really.
Can you spell 'hypocrite'?
We're all entitled our likes and dislikes - but ultimately there are people more qualified to judge art than your everyday person is. And following up on this - to the rap haters here: Steve Coleman, Matthew Shipp and Anthony Braxton say you don't know sh*t. And I'm sure they're not the only accomplished artists to say that.
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 08:38
kenmeyerjr wrote:
Oh, and Tea, there is nothing fake about
Springsteen's working man image...obviously, he is not living on
welfare, but I think he has earned both is salary and his status. And,
considering how much he donates of both is money and time to things
like food banks and such, I think the time has come for people to stop
dumping on him just because he is successful. |
I don't dump on him because he is succesful, I dump on him because A)
he sucks, B) his style is an image just as much a Mötley Crüe's
eyeliner, scarves and teased hair were, C) he sucks and D) he's part of
the "honesty and feeling are the only things that matter in art"
movement that has been dragging music down for so many years. Also,
because he sucks.
-------------
|
Posted By: Jimbo
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 08:56
Rap music was actually the first genre that spoke to me on some level (mind you, I was 12! ).
Nevertheless, I think it's a valid genre, and I can still listen to
some of the better acts (A Tribe Called Quest, The Roots, Pharcyde,
Outkast, Dälek, early Don Johnson Big Band etc.) when the feeling
strikes me.
50 Cent and MTV rap in general, is absolutely terrible, though.
-------------
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 09:06
Jimbo has it right about "Fiddy" and MTV rap. I can understand that people sl*g off the genre if that's all they've heard.
Yes, I forgot The Pharcyde on my list. Their debut is a stone-cold
classic of the genre, and has a stylistic breadth that you don't really
notice at first. Ace stuff.
-------------
|
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 09:12
Teaflax wrote:
kenmeyerjr wrote:
Oh, and Tea, there is nothing fake about Springsteen's working man image...obviously, he is not living on welfare, but I think he has earned both is salary and his status. And, considering how much he donates of both is money and time to things like food banks and such, I think the time has come for people to stop dumping on him just because he is successful. |
I don't dump on him because he is succesful, I dump on him because A) he sucks, B) his style is an image just as much a Mötley Crüe's eyeliner, scarves and teased hair were, C) he sucks and D) he's part of the "honesty and feeling are the only things that matter in art" movement that has been dragging music down for so many years. Also, because he sucks.
|
Are you implying something ?
And you're so right about that "honesty and feeling" thing .
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 11:42
Visitor13 wrote:
Some people refuse rappers the status of real musicians on the grounds that they neither play an instrument, nor have musical knowledge.
Not only because they don't play instruments or have knowledge, but mostly because the music they play mostly lacks of elements of the music such as melody.
Funnily enough though, when the same people are confronted with basic facts that some very high-profile musicians think otherwise (and even go as far as to co-operate with the rappers they consider creative), these people are quick to dismiss the aforementioned musicians' knowledge, experience and judgement, and claim their own (fragmentary and limited) knowledge as equal, or even superior, to that of these musicians. A good (if maybe a bit extreme) example of a similar situation would be that 'Simpsons' episode, in which Homer vehemently argues astrophysics with Stephen Hawking. Ridiculous, really.
Do you know if we have musical knowledge? Do you know how many years we have studied music? Knowing music is not the same as being successfull, because in that case low profile musicians as Barclay James Harvest or Strawbs not so successful would be ignorants.
BTW: Talking about astriphisics is not the same as talking about music. Astrophysics is a very complex science that requires detailled and specialized studies. Music is an art that of course requires studies but any person has enough feeling and understanding to knos if something is good or not.
Can you spell 'hypocrite'?
We're all entitled our likes and dislikes - but ultimately there are people more qualified to judge art than your everyday person is.
Most of the people here are not "everyday persons" we know about music we study structires, influences, sounds and some of us even music.
Michael Jackson is successful but he has proved he knows a sh!t about music.
And following up on this - to the rap haters here: Steve Coleman, Matthew Shipp and Anthony Braxton say you don't know sh*t. And I'm sure they're not the only accomplished artists to say that.
That's the difference between you and some us, you trust blindly in what other persons say, we have enough confidence to trust in what we believe.
Iván
|
-------------
|
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 13:48
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Visitor13 wrote:
That's the difference between you and some us, you trust blindly in what other persons say, we have enough confidence to trust in what we believe.
Iván
|
|
So did Homer Simpson .
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 16:19
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Not only because
they don't play instruments or have knowledge, but mostly because the
music they play mostly lacks of elements of the music such as melody | Let's see:
A) The voice is an instrument.
B) Melody is not the be-all and end-all of music. If it were, the
mostly identical - and, mind you, very easy to write - melodies of most
Blues (and much Rock) would disqualify it from any serious discussion.
C) Timing is a much more rare and difficult to achieve commodity than the ability to play scales.
D) Whether you play an instrument or not isn't an indicator of the
relative complexity of what you are doing. Playing a twelve bar Blues
or regular Pop/Rock bass line is much, much easier than being a truly
good rapper.
E) Sometimes the groove is the thing (or "thang"). The difference
between a Minneapolis groove, a Washington DC Go-Go groove and Clyde
Stubblefield (that's James Brown's drummer - the most sampled man in
the world) groove is subtle, and extremely difficult to differentiate
between when playing. I have a friend who spent years learning how to
drum, spent hours practicing, and even attended PIT in Los Angeles. He
could probably play with most of the Prog bands I've heard, except for
the very upper echelon of complexity - the guy is mad skilled. But he
quit playing when he realised that he could never make it into Prince's
band - he could not accurately find the groove.
F) All art that is unique and/or difficult to emulate is valid. If
anyone can do it, it's pointless. Not just anyone can rap on the level
of Eminem - hell, few untrained people could rap like 50 Cent, and he sucks.
-------------
|
Posted By: salmacis
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 16:35
I hate rap- always have. What I want from music is superlative musicianship or superlative vocals- preferably both. Rap, at least in my experience has neither. Too much of it is sampled from old funk records from the 60s/70s and I do not relate to the ranting vocals that doesn't equate to anything I'd call singing. Controversial maybe, but I've had that opinion for years and have heard nothing to make me change my mind. It is the genre alongside dance music that I loathe above all else. It just doesn't agree with me at all...
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 16:55
^Oh, yeah. Real controversial. You and 50 million other people feel this way.
It's absolutely fine not to like it (especially if you've only been
exposed to the mainstream aspects of it), but to think that it's easier
to do well than, say, play in a regular Pop/Rock band trying to sound
like U2 is just deluded.
Also, "Dance" is a pretty sweeping statement, especially if you include
IDM. The difference bwteen a House act and someone like Squarepusher
(or even less heavily "musical" acts like Orbital or The
Propellerheads) is as great as between Backstreet Boys and Genesis
circa 1976.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 22:07
Teaflax wrote:
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Not only because they don't play instruments or have knowledge, but mostly because the music they play mostly lacks of elements of the music such as melody | Let's see:
A) The voice is an instrument.
I always thought that (read older posts about multi instrumentalists) but to speak fast is not equal to sing IMHO, I believe rap is some form of poetry (Not new BTW, Spanish poets used to read their works backgroiunded by Flamenco guitar players who made increddible music).
B) Melody is not the be-all and end-all of music. If it were, the mostly identical - and, mind you, very easy to write - melodies of most Blues (and much Rock) would disqualify it from any serious discussion.}
Not the only element, but I believe one of the most inportant. And your word about melody are absurd because you can make millions of different melodies and BTW agaun the toimming in Rock is much more similar than the melodies.
I believe that melody is not everything, but music needs it.
C) Timing is a much more rare and difficult to achieve commodity than the ability to play scales.
Tead the previous.
D) Whether you play an instrument or not isn't an indicator of the relative complexity of what you are doing. Playing a twelve bar Blues or regular Pop/Rock bass line is much, much easier than being a truly good rapper.
In foirst place, the playing instrument is only a copy from another post to answer it, but anyway, I valñuate higher a band that plays their instruments and writes their music than boys/girls bands that only perfoprm what others did
There must be millions of rappers in USA alone, you can find one in every corner without having the minimum knowledge of musical theory so hard, it cant be.
But a good Rock band is not so easy to find.
E) Sometimes the groove is the thing (or "thang"). The difference between a Minneapolis groove, a Washington DC Go-Go groove and Clyde Stubblefield (that's James Brown's drummer - the most sampled man in the world) groove is subtle, and extremely difficult to differentiate between when playing. I have a friend who spent years learning how to drum, spent hours practicing, and even attended PIT in Los Angeles. He could probably play with most of the Prog bands I've heard, except for the very upper echelon of complexity - the guy is mad skilled. But he quit playing when he realised that he could never make it into Prince's band - he could not accurately find the groove.
Vangelis could never made it yto Yes and Elton John could never made it to King Crimson (Both made auditions) and this says nothing about their skyills, only that they were not the kind of musicians those bands were searching for.
F) All art that is unique and/or difficult to emulate is valid. If anyone can do it, it's pointless. Not just anyone can rap on the level of Eminem - hell, few untrained people could rap like 50 Cent, and he sucks.
I believe all Rap sucks, at least all what I heard, and I heard more rap performers than Rock bands.
Iván
|
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 22:57
Visitor13 wrote:
So did Homer Simpson . |
Sorry, but your example is very poor:
- To talk about astrophysics you need to study a lot of years, to talk about music you only need taste and sensibility. I have the luck to know 23 out of 25 departments of Perú (A bit more than 33% of USA size) and seen native peruvians with no studies playing not guitars (too expensive) but the national charango made by them, not flute,. but the modest pentaphonic quena, plus an ibncredible variety of instruments. This guys make beautiful melodies that are played by the best orchestras in the world, they don't hae studies, but thay can talk about music with anybody and are 1,000% more inventive and original than rapers.
- Most people here can debate with any musician you want, maybe most are not too technicall, but they know what they listen.
Just to end, i rather have enough confidence and trust in my beliefs that base my absolutely unique taste in what another person say.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 23:06
Oh, lord...
Yeah, there's a rapper on every street corner in the USA, and there's a
flamenco guitarist on every block in Madrid and a fiddler on every roof
in Krakow. Are you for real?
It's at least as hard to find a good rapper as it is to find a
good Rock band. And rapping is not "to speak fast" - if it were, then
you could do it now, and I promise you that even if you spent a week
with a coach practicing, you wouldn't stand at chance at making the
cut, and you certainly couldn't come up with the goods in a freestyle
rap battle, where you have to improvise your lyrics as you go.
I've heard two different aspiring rappers try to do Eminem's The Real
Slim Shady, and even though they'd both rehearsed it meticulously, they
were so obviously off - even though they knew it all by heart. Groove
is hard, ask any professional musician, and they'll agree.
Conversely, I heard some kids play Iron Man outside my window last
Saturday (don't ask), and they wer godawful, but they got that song
down. I like that song a lot, but it is NOT hard to play.
Seriously, you are free to feel that in order for you to enjoy music,
it needs to have melody. There is nothing at all wrong with that - it's
definitely one of my main criteria in most music I listen to - just not
all. This is why Blues bores me, it is entirely predictable, because it
has very strict conventions and the melodies seem entirely incdental
rather than worked out and polished to be just right.
Anyways, you're free to feel Rap sucks (just like I freely think that
Springsteen and Live suck), but it's silly to think it's any easier
than it is to play yer average everyday Pop/Rock.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 04 2006 at 23:22
Teaflax wrote:
Oh, lord...
Yeah, there's a rapper on every street corner in the USA, and there's a flamenco guitarist on every block in Madrid and a fiddler on every roof in Krakow. Are you for real?
Maybe you don't know what pleonasm means? Well using terms as in any corner or everywhere are forms of pleonasm, literarian figures to say there are a lot.
But just check any label's rappers rooster, easily you can find at least 100 per label that released an album, you can go to any club and find a lot of rappers.
Even here in Perú, if you don't have cable you're condemned to see 20 or 30 new rappers each week making the samme crap and they all sound pretty much the same.
But you can't find hundreed of Flamenco musicians with albums and much less fiddlers in Krakov (Which BTW is a stupis stereotype because you will find more ballalaika players than fiddlers).
It's at least as hard to find a good rapper as it is to find a good Rock band. And rapping is not "to speak fast" - if it were, then you could do it now, and I promise you that even if you spent a week with a coach practicing, you wouldn't stand at chance at making the cut, and you certainly couldn't come up with the goods in a freestyle rap battle, where you have to improvise your lyrics as you go.
Well, record industry manages very well to find 10 or 20 rappers per week.
I've heard two different aspiring rappers try to do Eminem's The Real Slim Shady, and even though they'd both rehearsed it meticulously, they were so obviously off - even though they knew it all by heart. Groove is hard, ask any professional musician, and they'll agree.
Grove without melody and well developed harmonies means nothing at all.
Conversely, I heard some kids play Iron Man outside my window last Saturday (don't ask), and they wer godawful, but they got that song down. I like that song a lot, but it is NOT hard to play.
Well I listen at least 20 new reggaeton artists (Variation inspired in reggae and rap) and all suck, but they can play as bnad as any average rapper.
Seriously, you are free to feel that in order for you to enjoy music, it needs to have melody. There is nothing at all wrong with that - it's definitely one of my main criteria in most music I listen to - just not all. This is why Blues bores me, it is entirely predictable, because it has very strict conventions and the melodies seem entirely incdental rather than worked out and polished to be just right.
And you don't believe Rap is predictable?????? Endless repetition of one or two chords with a guy SPEAKING FAST ad nauseam?? I find that much more predictable.
Anyways, you're free to feel Rap sucks (just like I freely think that Springsteen and Live suck), but it's silly to think it's any easier than it is to play yer average everyday Pop/Rock.
If there are thousands of rappers that manage to release an album and sell a lot, and only a bunch of Rock bands that achieve the same success, I must assume that's easier.
Iván
|
-------------
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 00:06
Teaflax wrote:
Kanye West is safe, dumbed-down mainstream crap with a veneer of sophistication that's as fake as Bruce Springsteen's "working man" image. There is so much more inetersting stuff going on in the underground, and pleanty of rappers who are much, much better than he is.
Jean Grae. No one can touch her - that's the first thing you need to know.
Quasimoto/Madlib/Yeterday's New Quintet, Dr Octagon/Kool Keith, MF Doom, Aesop Rock, RJD2, Innerstance Beatbox, DJ Shadow and many more are far more creative and progressive than the safe, cross-overy blandness of Kanye.
|
I'll be sure to check these people out, as I'm not a very big fan of the genre I am very out of touch with the underground or even the mainstream for that matter.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: Equality 7-2521
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 00:08
Teaflax wrote:
kenmeyerjr wrote:
Oh, and Tea, there is nothing fake about Springsteen's working man image...obviously, he is not living on welfare, but I think he has earned both is salary and his status. And, considering how much he donates of both is money and time to things like food banks and such, I think the time has come for people to stop dumping on him just because he is successful. |
I don't dump on him because he is succesful, I dump on him because A) he sucks, B) his style is an image just as much a Mötley Crüe's eyeliner, scarves and teased hair were, C) he sucks and D) he's part of the "honesty and feeling are the only things that matter in art" movement that has been dragging music down for so many years. Also, because he sucks.
|
I agree especially with points A and C.
------------- "One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 00:31
Which BTW is a stupis stereotype because you will find more ballalaika players than fiddlers).
Well, gee, why do you think I chose it as a counter to YOUR stupid stereotype?
Well, record industry manages very well to find 10 or 20 rappers per week.
And at least as many new Rock bands or any other kind of act they're looking for. WHat is your point, exactly?
Grove without melody and well developed harmonies means nothing at all.
And some would say melody and harmonies without
groove mean nothing at all. The point is still not about your presonal
preference, but whether or not this is something anyone can do, and you
have no case for that, I fear.
Well I listen at least 20 new
reggaeton artists (Variation inspired in reggae and rap) and all suck,
but they can play as bnad as any average rapper.
And what on EARTH does that have to do with how easy it is to play Iron Man, or many other highly respected Rock tunes?
And you don't believe Rap is
predictable?????? Endless repetition of one or two chords with a guy
SPEAKING FAST ad nauseam?? I find that much more predictable.
I don't know what it is you've heard, but a good
rap pushes, pulles and changes phrasing, emphasis and rhyme scheme
throughout. I defy you to rap along to something as mainstream as The
Real Slim Shady (as we've mentioned it before, and you should eb able
to find it easily) even with a lyric sheet in front of and three runthroughs.
Anyways, you're free to feel Rap sucks (just like I freely think that
Springsteen and Live suck), but it's silly to think it's any easier
than it is to play yer average everyday Pop/Rock.
If there are thousands of rappers
that manage to release an album and sell a lot, and only a bunch of
Rock bands that achieve the same success, I must assume that's easier.
What do you base this on? Which thousands of
rappers? Against which few bands? Even if you were to find more rappers
than Rock bands in the charts at any one time, that only tells you the
genre is more popular.
Here is the UK singles chart for this week:
1
Sandi Thom
I Wish I Was A Punk Rocker
2
Gnarls Barkley
Crazy
3
Keane
Is It Any Wonder
4
Infernal
From Paris To Berlin
5
Pink
Who Knew
6
Ronan Keating & Kate Rusby
All Over Again
7
Oakenfold Ft Brittany Murphy
Faster Kill Pussycat
8
Nelly Furtado
Maneater
9
LL Cool J Ft Jennifer Lopez
Control Myself
10
Primal Scream
Country Girl
That's two Rap tunes, four Pop vocalists, two Rock bands and two Dance
tunes, both with non sampled singing. It seems those thusands of
rappers haven't had much impact on the chart this week, eh? Maybe it's
a June slump, or something. The following ten spots hold only two more
rappers, one of which is a guest on an RnB tune, and three proper
bands, one singer/songwriter and a classic crooner (the smooth Tony
Christie). In the following twenty songs, there are no more than four
rappers and eight or so "proper" bands. All interspersed with some
novelty tunes, trashy Techno, etc.
Oh, and as for complexity, if Primal Scream's Country Girl took more
than three minutes to write they're either daft or lazy. It's not even
a song - it's like a sketch for a basic idea for a song. I'd much
rather hear someone with skill perform something he does well than
listen to that dross.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 02:04
Teaflax wrote:
Which BTW is a stupis stereotype because you will find more ballalaika players than fiddlers).
Well, gee, why do you think I chose it as a counter to YOUR stupid stereotype?
That was exactly my point, you can't use stupid sterotypes, but if you use them let them at least be related o the country.
And at least as many new Rock bands or any other kind of act they're looking for. WHat is your point, exactly?
Again, that's my point Record Industry invest more in rap musicians, it's cheaper and you have thousands of them, they don't search for good Rock bands anymore.
And some would say melody and harmonies without groove mean nothing at all. The point is still not about your presonal preference, but whether or not this is something anyone can do, and you have no case for that, I fear.
That's not musically correct, there is a lot of music, classical and popular without groove, but very few expressions without melody.
And what on EARTH does that have to do with how easy it is to play Iron Man, or many other highly respected Rock tunes?
Because this mediocre pseudo musicians sing the same tracks as famous rap artists at least with the same terrible quality IMO.
I don't know what it is you've heard, but a good rap pushes, pulles and changes phrasing, emphasis and rhyme scheme throughout. I defy you to rap along to something as mainstream as The Real Slim Shady (as we've mentioned it before, and you should eb able to find it easily) even with a lyric sheet in front of and three runthroughs.
First don't dare me to rap anything, because I'm not a rapper, never tried and never will.
And again thoise mysterious good rappers everybody talks about but nobody mentions.
What do you base this on? Which thousands of rappers? Against which few bands? Even if you were to find more rappers than Rock bands in the charts at any one time, that only tells you the genre is more popular.
Just check any TV program from USA by cable, any sit comedy, anyy musical program, even MTV and you'll see all are gull of mnediocre rappers.
Here is the UK singles chart for this week:
1That's two Rap tunes, four Pop vocalists, two Rock bands and two Dance tunes, both with non sampled singing. It seems those thusands of rappers haven't had much impact on the chart this week, eh? Maybe it's a June slump, or something. The following ten spots hold only two more rappers, one of which is a guest on an RnB tune, and three proper bands, one singer/songwriter and a classic crooner (the smooth Tony Christie). In the following twenty songs, there are no more than four rappers and eight or so "proper" bands. All interspersed with some novelty tunes, trashy Techno, etc.
- I'm not talking about UK, where Rap is not remotely as popular as USA,
- There may be thousands of rappers that sell enough to feed the musical industry, but not necessarilly will reach the charts.
- This even makes my point stronger, they are so bad that this thousand of Rap musicians don't even reach the mediocre Pop 40 tracks despite they will kill for this.
Oh, and as for complexity, if Primal Scream's Country Girl took more than three minutes to write they're either daft or lazy. It's not even a song - it's like a sketch for a basic idea for a song. I'd much rather hear someone with skill perform something he does well than listen to that dross.
Why should I care for an alternative House Dance band? I rather listen ELP, Yes. Genesis that listen that kind of music...So....What's your point using this poor example?
It's funny, when I quote you I use all your post, you avoid cenral parts of mine, good strategy.
Iván
|
-------------
|
Posted By: Bryan
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 02:25
Ivan, you say that it's easy to just be a rapper, and that tons of them are being churned out at a ridiculous rate. Is this not also true of generic mainstream rock bands? As even Teaflax has admitted during the course of this discussion, most rap is admittedly trash. Nobody here is trying to convince you that 50 Cent and the other rap you would hear on the radio is any form of artistic genius, all we're saying is that you need to look beyond the surface. The way you're looking at rap is the equivalent to if somebody took the Arctic Monkeys, The Strokes, The Libertines and whichever other generic rock acts are popular right now and declared on the basis of those that "rock music has no validity as an art form". It's true that there are tons of generic gansta-rap artists polluting the music industry, and it's true that now pretty much any stupid kid in high school now believes he can become the next generic gangsta-rap artist and fancies himself one, but is this not equally true of rock? Have there not been COUNTLESS awful garage bands formed by people with absolutely nothing to contribute creatively to their form of music?
What we're saying is that you need to look further, into the rap artists we don't all hear about. I know that pretty much none of the modern rock bands you appreciate (if any at all) would be known beyond a very small group of serious fans, why should rap be any different? I'm no specialist on the rap scene, but the artists people have already been mentioning are all extremely valid examples of how there's plenty of creative rap buried within the overflowing gangsta atrocity that takes up most of the genre. You could argue that these artists are too rare to really be worthy of using in an argument, but I'd say the proportions are about the same as they would be with rock.
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 02:53
Ivan, I only edited to make it a bit briefer, and maybe to spare you an
embarrasment or two, but I see now that that is certainly pointless. As
for the centrality, I will avoid quoting anything this time, so you
won't feel hard done by.
So, you're simultaneously arguing that there's A) loads of awful rap
infesting the music biz, and B) but that it's so bad it doesn't reach
the charts. Seems the music industry is shooting themselves in the
foot, then, putting out all this stuff that doesn't sell. Also, who
gives a toss what's in the US charts? They've been a worse quagmire of
total crappitude than the UK charts for decades - at least in the UK,
something interesting and qualitative (and even lower-p progressive)
does rear its head from time to time.
And, oh dear, Primal Scream is not a House band, never have been - they incorporated some dance elements on one album
ten years ago, or something. Country Girl is a Rawk n Roll tune if ever
there was one, as all their releases in the last decade have been. Like
The Rolling Stones with a lobotomy (yeah, that bad).
It goes back to the same argument I'm making with Iron Man; how easy it
is to play basic Rock n Roll, okay? (and more specifially in the case
of Country Girl, how incredibly easy it must have been to write). http://www.primalscream.net/www/ - Judge for yourself . That's where your sudden dragging in of Reggaeton is absolutely baffling.
I have mentioned several good rappers, earlier in this thread.
And you won't try rapping because...? If it's so bloomin' easy - and
I'm not even asking you to create anything, just replicate what is
already there - it really should be a breeze. Right? Are ye scared, lad?
And I have to say that "that is not musically correct" is a hilarious
comeback. There are plenty of non-tonal, non-harmonic purely percussive
forms of music from Japanese taiko drumming to the drums of Burundi
(the latter is such a cultural force in Burundi they have a drum on
their flag) and absolutely tons where rhythm is the major element.
Any program from the USA or sitcom? Let me see...I watch Lost, Arrested
Development (RIP), Scrubs, The Office, Rome, Law & Order, Law &
Order: CI, CSI, Battlestar Galactica and Thief. There might have been
some Rap in the background of the last one, but not a note of it in any
of the others. Care to try again, Mr Generalize Without Proof?
My point is that you're tilting at the wrong windmill. Complacency and
narrow-mindedness are the two major threats music faces, not whether
someone sings or not, or if the emphasis is on rhythm over melody. Yes,
I too prefer Yes and Genesis to...well any rapper, even the bestest
ones in the whole world - but that doesn't mean that I cannot
appreciate the considerable accomplishments of someone like Jean Grae
who does five different rap styles as a one-woman possee in http://www.virgin.net/music/musicvideos/theherbaliser_generals.html - The Herbaliser's single Generals .
(Note that the styles are pastiche, but all rhythmically more intricate
than a Wakeman Moog solo - the second one, "Cheech Marina", is my
favorite) You may not like it, but you're just being silly if you
cannot acknowledge that a great measure of skill has gone into
devising, creating and performing in five distinct styles and voices in
one song.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 12:18
Teaflax wrote:
Ivan, I only edited to make it a bit briefer, and maybe to spare you an embarrasment or two, but I see now that that is certainly pointless. As for the centrality, I will avoid quoting anything this time, so you won't feel hard done by.
Thank you for being so gentle, that's why people love you so much, because you're usually so comprehenful...BAH...You don't quote what you can't answer.
Don't spare me nothing pal, I have debated here with people that has more solid arguments than your's, and people like Certified or Bryan that are a real challenge. You may scare newbies as you have done before being rude and self indulgent, but don't try it with me, you won't succeed.
So, you're simultaneously arguing that there's A) loads of awful rap infesting the music biz, and B) but that it's so bad it doesn't reach the charts. Seems the music industry is shooting themselves in the foot, then, putting out all this stuff that doesn't sell. Also, who gives a toss what's in the US charts? They've been a worse quagmire of total crappitude than the UK charts for decades - at least in the UK, something interesting and qualitative (and even lower-p progressive) does rear its head from time to time.
A track doesn't need to reach the charts to be business for a label, with only a cou´ple million copies is enough to make business.
And, oh dear, Primal Scream is not a House band, never have been - they incorporated some dance elements on one album ten years ago, or something. Country Girl is a Rawk n Roll tune if ever there was one, as all their releases in the last decade have been. Like The Rolling Stones with a lobotomy (yeah, that bad)
Anyway I never heard or cared for that band, it's described in Allmusic as Dance, Techno and Dance, you can check http://www.allmusic.com - www.allmusic.com if you don't trust them you can check Musicmatch or Artist Direct, all say exactly the same, but probably you know better than the rest of the world
It goes back to the same argument I'm making with Iron Man; how easy it is to play basic Rock n Roll, okay? (and more specifially in the case of Country Girl, how incredibly easy it must have been to write). http://www.primalscream.net/www/ - Judge for yourself . That's where your sudden dragging in of Reggaeton is absolutely baffling.
Who are you? or better Who you believe you are? your opinions are 100% valid and what all the rest of the world thinks ois wrong? I've seen Reggaeton artists making cover versions of Eminem and a lot of Rap artists, that's my point.
I have mentioned several good rappers, earlier in this thread. And you won't try rapping because...? If it's so bloomin' easy - and I'm not even asking you to create anything, just replicate what is already there - it really should be a breeze. Right? Are ye scared, lad?
I'm not a singer, I smoke a package a day, I can't rap, but I can't sing any Rock song either. So what does this proves?
And I have to say that "that is not musically correct" is a hilarious comeback. There are plenty of non-tonal, non-harmonic purely percussive forms of music from Japanese taiko drumming to the drums of Burundi (the latter is such a cultural force in Burundi they have a drum on their flag) and absolutely tons where rhythm is the major element.
Yeah and there's Tibetian Yodeling, and purely percussive fotrms of music in Africa, but they escape to the general rule.
Most musical forms you mention are specific ethnic or fok forms of expression that escape to the paramethers of music in many cases, but Rap is a popular genre that ofteh tops USA charts, so they should have at least some musicality that I can't find.
Any program from the USA or sitcom? Let me see...I watch Lost, Arrested Development (RIP), Scrubs, The Office, Rome, Law & Order, Law & Order: CI, CSI, Battlestar Galactica and Thief. There might have been some Rap in the background of the last one, but not a note of it in any of the others. Care to try again, Mr Generalize Without Proof?
Since when are Law & Order, Battlestar Gallactica, Rome, CSGI, Arrested Development, The Office soitcoms?????
Don't expect to find rap in a futuristic Sci Fi or legal shoiw too much rap.
BTW: I seen rap artists more than once in Scrubs.
My point is that you're tilting at the wrong windmill. Complacency and narrow-mindedness are the two major threats music faces, not whether someone sings or not, or if the emphasis is on rhythm over melody. Yes, I too prefer Yes and Genesis to...well any rapper, even the bestest ones in the whole world - but that doesn't mean that I cannot appreciate the considerable accomplishments of someone like Jean Grae who does five different rap styles as a one-woman possee in http://www.virgin.net/music/musicvideos/theherbaliser_generals.html - The Herbaliser's single Generals . (Note that the styles are pastiche, but all rhythmically more intricate than a Wakeman Moog solo - the second one, "Cheech Marina", is my favorite) You may not like it, but you're just being silly if you cannot acknowledge that a great measure of skill has gone into devising, creating and performing in five distinct styles and voices in one song.
Well I don't appreciate any form of rap that I heard untiol today, all are IMO repetitive forms of poetry that use one single chord (Usually copied wihout authorization of the real artist) that prove no talent.
If you like Cheech Marina or Lean Grae you are free to listen them, for me are just some form of cheap poetry that has little relation with music.
Iván
|
-------------
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 16:07
Just this before I give up; do you honestly believe that an album or single that doesn't make it into the charts could possibly sell "a couple of million" copies, or are you exaggerating wildly for effect?
In the US, you need sales of a half a milion to reach gold record status, in the UK 300 000 is platinum.
But I guess you think that gold and platinum record awards are being
handed out left and right to artists who never make it into the charts.
And since you obviously don't read what I actually write (if you did,
you would know that Jean Grae and Cheech Marina are one and the same),
I'll just drop it, except to repeat this; biggest threat to music:
complacency and narrow-mindedness. You've got at least one of those in
spades.
-------------
|
Posted By: GoldenSpiral
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 16:15
Teaflax wrote:
Kanye West is safe, dumbed-down mainstream crap with a veneer of
sophistication that's as fake as Bruce Springsteen's "working man"
image. There is so much more inetersting stuff going on in the
underground, and pleanty of rappers who are much, much better than he
is.
Jean Grae. No one can touch her - that's the first thing you need to know.
Quasimoto/Madlib/Yeterday's New Quintet, Dr Octagon/Kool Keith, MF
Doom, Aesop Rock, RJD2, Innerstance Beatbox, DJ Shadow and many more
are far more creative and progressive than the safe, cross-overy
blandness of Kanye.
|
for Dr Octagon, MF Doom and above all, the great DJ Shadow!
I haven't heard the others, but I will check them out when I get a chance. hip-hop has just as much potential to be progressive as rock does IMO, it's just a sad fact that most of it and its culture do not want to progress.
May I also recommend: Dalek and Beam, for those who doubt.
------------- http://www.myspace.com/altaic" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/altaic ALTAIC "Oceans Down You'll Lie" coming soon
|
Posted By: wolf0621
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 19:10
Teaflax wrote:
Just this before I give up; do you honestly believe that an album or single that doesn't make it into the charts could possibly sell "a couple of million" copies, or are you exaggerating wildly for effect?
In the US, you need sales of a half a milion to reach gold record status, in the UK 300 000 is platinum. But I guess you think that gold and platinum record awards are being handed out left and right to artists who never make it into the charts.
And since you obviously don't read what I actually write (if you did, you would know that Jean Grae and Cheech Marina are one and the same), I'll just drop it, except to repeat this; biggest threat to music: complacency and narrow-mindedness. You've got at least one of those in spades.
|
I'm sensing some hostility here......I do think "wrap" sucks, at least the stuff that I've heard. Then again, I haven't really sought it out either (based on the aforementioned sucky exposure), so it's entirely possible that there's better material out there & I haven't tripped over it yet...Have heard some Kanye W though (see my prior comment of two sentences ago)...
Anyone who "samples" another's work w/o permission & releases it as part of their own "new" release is no friend of mine......Unfortunately, although this applies to anyone, the wrap & hip hop establishments seem to have chosen this path far too often...
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 20:23
It's true that a lot of rap, particularly in the mainstream, and
particularly after the success of Puff Daddy and The Fugees (the Kanye
West of its time; critically acclaimed, but actually quite vapid), use samples
as a way of just basically doing a cover version with the verse removed
and (often very bad) rapping stuck in there. This is just pointless.
But using samples to create something that is actually new, like for
instance Coldcut or Lionrock do, is perfectly valid. Collage is a valid
form of visual art, so why shouldn't that be the case for music? The
problem comes when you use a sample and do not add anything significant
to it - then you are riding on the coattails of the sampled artist, and
that's reprehensible. But it's silly to deride sampling as a tool simply because it's often misused.
Also, another refutation of one Ivan's weird statements. Here's the track list for the Scrubs soundtrack CD:
1. Superman - Lazlo Bane
|
|
|
2. All In My Head - Shawn Mullins
|
|
|
3. Fresh Feeling - Eels
|
|
|
4. Good Time - Leroy
|
|
|
5. Good Life - Francis Dunnery
|
|
|
6. New Slang - The Shins
|
|
|
7. Beautiful World - Colin Hay
|
|
|
8. Hold On Hope - Guided By Voices
|
|
|
9. Fighting For My Love - Nil Lara
|
|
|
10. Dracula From Houston - Butthole Surfers
|
|
|
11. Hooch - Everything
|
|
|
12. Hallelujah - John Cale
|
|
|
13. Have It All - Jeremy Kay
|
|
|
14. End Credit Score - Jan Stevens
|
|
|
15. Overkill - Colin Hay
|
|
|
Well, what do you know? Not a rapper in sight. All good, solid band or
singer/songwriter action, and I recall no Rap ever used in the series,
and I think I've seen every episode bar two, and although my memory
isn't the very best in the world I think I'd recall if it was a running
theme. Hey, they even had The Technicolor Spree as guests in one
episode, and they're borderline Prog, and Francis Dunnery used to be in
It Bites. Hm, funny old world, isn't it?
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 05 2006 at 22:27
Teaflax wrote:
Just this beYfore I give up; do you honestly believe that an album or single that doesn't make it into the charts could possibly sell "a couple of million" copies, or are you exaggerating wildly for effect?
In a wide population like USA artists can reach Gold and platuinuum albums but never reach the charts.
In the US, you need sales of a half a milion to reach gold record status, in the UK 300 000 is platinum. But I guess you think that gold and platinum record awards are being handed out left and right to artists who never make it into the charts.
First I'm not talking about RAP in UK, only in USA, so please don't insist in using that market in reference to Rap.
Again Gold disks are not awards are almost a certificate that they reached a certain number of sales that's all. You may reach a very high number of salesin a lapse of one year and never reach the charts
And since you obviously don't read what I actually write (if you did, you would know that Jean Grae and Cheech Marina are one and the same), I'll just drop it, except to repeat this; biggest threat to music: complacency and narrow-mindedness. You've got at least one of those in spades.
You are right I don't know very much about RAP never said it and can't care less about it, except when I read about it in a Progressive Rock site where I believe shouldn't even be mentioned.
I just listen a song, the name of the author or any reference the radio makes. If I like it I investigate if I don't like it (As in the case of Rap) I honestly couldn't care less to investigate who is who.
And again it's a paradox to call people who listen the most unpopular of the Rock genres closed minded, call that to all those radi stations and magazines that have ignored and/or atttacked Progressive Rock for 3 decades.
Iván
|
BTW: I heard and/or seen Rap performances in Scrubs at leat 3 or 4 times, don't ask me for names because I don't know or care about, neither I know the reason why they didn't oincluded this s tracks in a CD, maybe their target market is not Rap listeners.
-------------
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 00:00
Big on bluster, thin on facts - and I'm beginning to sense a modus
operandi here. You don't take in information and you don't offer
information. I have to ask; how old are you, Ivan?
Find me an act - Rap or not - that has sold gold in the US in the last few years without hitting at least the
Top 40. Some quick googling shows that a likely figure to creep into
the US Top 40 is about 20-25 000 copies sold/week. So, in order to be
certain to stay out of the top forty even on a slow week, you need to
sell below 15 000 at all times. To make a gold record at that rate
takes 66 weeks. More than one year and three months. It takes twice
that to make platinum.
This is not taking into account that few records sell steadily and our
set peak would be the high mark of what is usually a curve with quite a
sharp dropoff after the first few weeks. So, I'm guessing that a gold
selelr that never hit the charts would be quite an anomaly.
Or is there a mythical subset of Rap - or any other music - that sells
in steady, fairly small streams for more than a year without ever
getting much exposure? A dark underbely of music that no one knows
about but that's making the record companies millions of
dollars? I find it unlikely, and it certainly isn't how record
companies are making money off of Rap music, which seems to be your
rather baffling point.
I know what you'll say now; it costs nothing to make a Rap album.
That's neither here nor there. The production costs are - to the
label, if not the artist - a very minor part of costs involved. PR,
manufacturing and distribution probably account for 90% of the cost.
The way record companies operate is they sign twenty acts, toss them
out there, see what sticks and dump the nineteen that don't sell. They
don't support acts that don't chart for very long - they used to, but
that was decades ago.
Also, as far as Scrubs goes, it's certainly not an anomaly. Pretty much
every big sitcom from the last ten years is entirely Rap free;
Everybody Loves Raymond, Frasier, Seinfeld, Friends, The King of
Queens, Two and a Half Men, The World According to Jim, Spin City,
Ellen, Dharma and Greg, Will & Grace, The Office, My Name is Earl,
etc. Care to try again?
By the way, here's http://scrubs.mopnt.com/music/ - a complete listing of the music in Scrubs ,
knock yourself out. I saw nothing Raplike in Season 5, and I couldn't
be bothered to go through more - it's your prerogative to find the
facts to support your statement. Suffice it to say that if you do find
one or two, they're in quite a minority position.
Prog has most certainly gotten a bad rap (heh) throughout the years,
that's indubitable. The fact that it doesn't have the slightest bearing
on what it is we're arguing seems to not deter you, however.
Let's review:
You claim thousands of rappers release albums and sell a lot, and very
few rock bands do. Evidently, you only allow the US charts to prove
this, although that was never made clear until you were proven wrong.
Currently on the Billboard chart's top ten there are four rap-related
songs, two of which have rappers only guesting on "actual" songs. There
are 17 in the following forty, four of which are similar guest
appearances. I admit, that is quite a lot, but not the flood you claim.
Its less than half, and only 30% if you count only "pure" Rap, rather
than guest appearances.
As for your indignation about me mentioning non-sitcom shows
(pointless, mind you, what with the list above), this is your quote on
how much Rap there is on TV: "Just check any TV program from USA by
cable, any sitcom, any musical program, even MTV". I listed "any TV
program from the US".
But I'll give you one of the things from the quote above (don't let it go to your head); there is one hell of a lot of bad Rap on MTV. And that's why there's MTV2, which plays stuff like Muse, Radiohead and PRR.
Oh, and for the record, The Office is a sitcom.
Facts, Ivan. Ain't they a bitch?
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 01:40
Are you scaping to the peripheric data?
Why did you avoid the central point.
BTW: Rap artists are cheaper than Rock bands, they release one album, the label squeez them and they leave them to find a new rapper, at the end, you can find a lot of them anywhere.
BTW 2: We don't have MTV 2 here, so I can't give an opinion.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 02:31
SCRUBS doesn't use Rap tracks??
Episode 4.01 - "My Old Friend's New Friend" Scene: J.D. imagines his clock singing (the actual song later repeated as Turk dances around the car). "Rapper's Delight" by Sugar Hill Gang. Album: various
Episode 4.05 - "Scene: Elliot and Molly school Turk on rap. "Still DRE" performed by Sarah Chalke and Heather Graham. Originally by Dr. Dre feat. Snoop Dogg. Album: '2001'
Episode 4.08 - "My Last Chance" Scene: J.D. considers how beer can cause death (background music). "Bust A Move" by Young MC. Album: 'Stone Cold Rhymin''
And only checlked partially the fourth season.
The funny thing is that I don't know as many rap titles as you probably know and could find four in 3 minutes.
Facts, Teaflax Ain't they a bitch?
BTW: This thread has already bored me, you can stay with all the rap you want, honestly there's a lot more of better music to worry about and a lot of work to be done.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Rocktopus
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 03:24
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
BTW: This thread has already bored me
|
You have to blame yourself for that bit.
Mainstream Hip Hop is as awful as mainstream rock. A fantastic,
overlooked album from a couple of years ago is: Deep Puddle Dynamics:
The Taste of rain...Why Kneel. (contains a multipart suite!) With nine
members, all losely connected to the Anticon collective.
------------- Over land and under ashes In the sunlight, see - it flashes Find a fly and eat his eye But don't believe in me Don't believe in me Don't believe in me
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 06:09
And thou avoidest the central point. Let's see if you can actually find
it, Sir "What? It's not that I can't argue the case, I'm just boooored
with it". Hint, it is a question involving time spent on planet Earth.
-------------
|
Posted By: wolf0621
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 07:19
"It's true that a lot of rap, particularly in the mainstream, and particularly after the success of Puff Daddy and The Fugees (the Kanye West of its time; critically acclaimed, but actually quite vapid), use samples as a way of just basically doing a cover version with the verse removed and (often very bad) rapping stuck in there. This is just pointless.
But using samples to create something that is actually new, like for instance Coldcut or Lionrock do, is perfectly valid. Collage is a valid form of visual art, so why shouldn't that be the case for music? The problem comes when you use a sample and do not add anything significant to it - then you are riding on the coattails of the sampled artist, and that's reprehensible. But it's silly to deride sampling as a tool simply because it's often misused."
Yes, but the key to the above is "add anything significant"...I wasn't deriding the sampling process or audio collages, but addressing the ownership & permission angle. If you're using whole musical passages written & owned by other artists, even if you're adding a couple of new elements or lyrics, and not giving credit or getting prior permission to do this it's stealing...Just ask George Harrison (if you could), whose use of another's melody wasn't nearly as blatant as what I'm referring to...
Riding other's coattails is a well-established practice in music, so using your same argument re: sampling & collages, why shouldn't that be considered OK as well? It's all a matter of degree really, and a judgement call as to whether the artist has "added anything significant"...
Not familiar with Coldcut (sounds like a sandwich ingredient), they may be doing something legit, I don't know...And why not deride methods that're often being misused? Maybe that'll put more of a spotlight on the issue & get some of these questionable acts to stop doing it!
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 08:40
^You might as well complain about guitars because some people use them
to play tunes that are ripped off. That's all I'm saying.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 12:09
Teaflax wrote:
And thou avoidest the central point. Let's see if you can actually find it, Sir "What? It's not that I can't argue the case, I'm just boooored with it". Hint, it is a question involving time spent on planet Earth. |
During three posts you been rubbing on my face the stupid fact that that in a sitcom as Scrubs there was no Rap (You said Raples) but inmediately when I prove you're wrong or lying (Not in your mind so I can't guess) you change the subject, but that is not new in you.
You dare to call me close minded but you kept talking crap about Kansas:
Teaflax wrote:
When the basic ingredient in the song writing is something that goes intrinsically against the genre, it makes it not entirely of that genre. Is Kansas an AOR/Classic Rock/Rawk band with Symphonic leanings? Abso-damn-lutely. It's got lots of condiments and big slice of melted cheese - but it's still a pork burger. |
So, I criticize a non Prog genre in a Prog site but you kept insulting a band most of us love, but because there was no answer so you insisted.
Teaflax wrote:
I think Kansas maybe qualifies as Redneck Prog, or something. They need a modifier which sets them apart, because it's such an obvious difference |
Then I proved you that Kansas made great stuff, but you weren't ready to loose so you changed your argument
Teaflax wrote:
So, sorry, while there are certainly many elements that are Pure Prog about Kansas, they will always be a Pork Burger to me. |
In other words they are good, have great songs, they have pure Prog elements but still crap
Then I proved you thatany Symphonic band from any part of the world has differences with British Symphoonic and you VANISHED
That's your tactic, we all know it,now you change subject and avoid themes when you're proved wrong, keep on going.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 12:35
Wow. You perform the mother of all irrelevant subject changes in order
to accuse me of changing the subject (which I haven't done even once on
this thread; it's always been about your inability to deal with various
aspects of reality). That's either a meta statement - in which case,
bravo - or breathtakingly hypocritical.
You'll note - if you go back and read really carefully
this time
- that I was smart enough to set up a caveat in the Scrubs section;
that it would be in an absolute minority even if you did find some.
This was also the case, not least since the music refences you
mentioned are not even full featured songs - of which almost every
episode of Scrubs contains one, and which would be the only musical
content really worth discussing, because it is an editorial choice (as
in: "we approve of this music") rather than just an aspect
of storytelling. They are instead short snippets used for effect in
flashbacks or fantasy sequences. So, your argument about the
all-pervasive nature of Rap is not in any way vindicated, nor am I
proven wrong.
Sorry.
Also, you never proved anything about Kansas (in fact, I don't
remember you proving even one of your wild statements in anyone's mind
but your own). Well, okay, you did prove that they had some songs with
less vocals, thus being less terrible by default. It really isn't all
that narrow-minded to reject something for having major aspects that
are too simplistic, mainstream and commercial, I think you'd have to
agree.
But, you know, I really shouldn't argue AOR/Soft Rock or the artistic
bankruptcy of most Rock with someone who seriously likes Meat Loaf.
That's just too mean, even for me. But, hey, if that's your thing, no
wonder you like Kansas.
So, tell me again how someone sells millions without charting, and how
all sitcoms are full of Rap. Enlighten me as to why it is not
"musically correct" to make music that you don't like? Explain also why
you can make such cocksure judgements on music when you seem to know
awfully little about how it is actually composed and performed? You did
claim not to be psychic, after all.
Either way, you crack me up, Iván. Don't take it so bloody seriously,
but do try to think things through before you blurt them out, and -
please - try to accept when you are proven wrong (and before you get
all huffy, you cannot prove me wrong on the almighty suckitude of
Kansas, nor can I prove you wrong about the suckiness of Rap - these
are matters of taste - let's try to stick to facts, shall we?).
-------------
|
Posted By: GoldenSpiral
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 13:03
Last ditch effort to save this thread from total Hellfire and Damnation (i.e. closure at the hands of the admins):
Does anyone have suggestions for good (maybe even progressive?) hip-hop artists? I'll toss out the fact that our well-respected Avant/RIO homeboy MIKE PATTON recently did an album with the X-ecutioners...
------------- http://www.myspace.com/altaic" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/altaic ALTAIC "Oceans Down You'll Lie" coming soon
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 13:29
Well, I did list some of that above, but do definitely start with
Endtroducing... by DJ Shadow. Lots of obscure Prog Rock samples hidden
deep in there.
Anything off of Coldcut's own label Ninja Tune is a pretty safe bet
(especially Jaga Jazzist a Norwegian Jazz/Electronica/Prog mix that's
really mind-blowing). Also, most everything on Mo' Wax is pretty
adventurous and lower-p progressive.
If you're looking for more Electronica-based stuff that has a
progressive vibe, I'd recommend Squarepusher and Amon Tobin as starting
points.
If you look into Madlib/Quasimoto/Yesterday's New Quintet, be forwarned
that his stuff is all over the place, from fairly regular Hip Hop via
Reggae to out-and-out Jazz.
Respected Rap artists in the underground scene are Aesop Rock, MF
Doom/Dr Octagon Del Tha Funkee Homosapien, Jurassic 5, Prefuse 73,
Quannum and Latyrx, but I'm really no expert on that and have only a
few such releases.
For historical grounding, some old school acts that moved away from
just talking ryhtmically over a drum machine; A Tribe Called Quest, De
La Soul, Gang Starr, Eric B and Rakim, Black Sheep and The Pharcyde.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 13:41
Teaflax wrote:
Wow. You perform the mother of all irrelevant subject changes in order to accuse me of changing the subject (which I haven't done even once on this thread; it's always been about your inability to deal with various aspects of reality). That's either a meta statement - in which case, bravo - or breathtakingly hypocritical.
Each time I take one of your statements and prove they are FALSE, you change subject, you maybe woin't notice that, but everybody else notices it.
You'll note - if you go back and read really carefully this time - that I was smart enough to set up a caveat in the Scrubs section; that it would be in an absolute minority even if you did find some. This was also the case, not least since the music refences you mentioned are not even full featured songs - of which almost every episode of Scrubs contains one, and which would be the only musical content really worth discussing, because it is an editorial choice (as in: "we approve of this music") rather than just an aspect of storytelling. They are instead short snippets used for effect in flashbacks or fantasy sequences. So, your argument about the all-pervasive nature of Rap is not in any way vindicated, nor am I proven wrong.
You were smart enough?....You're also modest.
BTW: You said it was absolutely rapless, and in your usually arrogant way you gave a list and clearly stated "There's nothing remotely close to Rap" and again you were WRONG.
Sorry.
Also, you never proved anything about Kansas (in fact, I don't remember you proving even one of your wild statements in anyone's mind but your own). Well, okay, you did prove that they had some songs with less vocals, thus being less terrible by default. It really isn't all that narrow-minded to reject something for having major aspects that are too simplistic, mainstream and commercial, I think you'd have to agree.
Yes, if you call redneck Prog or Pork Burger to an icon and pioneer of ¨Progressive Rock is ok, but if anybody dislikes a genre THAT HAS NO RELATION WITH THIS FORUM IS WRONG
How convinient, almost as convinient as escaping from a thread where everybody was giving solid arguments against your arrogant and xenophobic statements.
But, you know, I really shouldn't argue AOR/Soft Rock or the artistic bankruptcy of most Rock with someone who seriously likes Meat Loaf. That's just too mean, even for me. But, hey, if that's your thing, no wonder you like Kansas.
So again it's wrong to like a band formed by one of the most talenteds piano players and one of the best voices, but it's ok to like an unimaginative an lack of talent and musicality genre as Rap.
At least Kansas has a place here (Want it or not, they are going to stay) and there's people asking to include Steinman and Meatloaf (Something with what I don't agree) but they made quality music, with Rhythm, melody and harmony.
Plus 100% original material.
So, tell me again how someone sells millions without charting, and how all sitcoms are full of Rap. Enlighten me as to why it is not "musically correct" to make music that you don't like? Explain also why you can make such cocksure judgements on music when you seem to know awfully little about how it is actually composed and performed? You did claim not to be psychic, after all.
You said they were rapless, I proved you were wrong, and I don't believe Rap is music, I stand on my believes, it's just a spoken form of poetry with background chords repeated ad nauseam (In many cases stolen from real artists).
Either way, you crack me up, Iván. Don't take it so bloody seriously, but do try to think things through before you blurt them out, and - please - try to accept when you are proven wrong (and before you get all huffy, you cannot prove me wrong on the almighty suckitude of Kansas, nor can I prove you wrong about the suckiness of Rap - these are matters of taste - let's try to stick to facts, shall we?).
Kettle...Pot? So calling Kansas Pork Burger and Redneck Prog is alright, but saying I HATE RAP is wrong?
And which are your facts to call Kansas Pork Burger or Redneck Prog, maybe you hate Rock from USA, already Kansas was in your target and now is Meatloaf.
Iván
|
-------------
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 13:51
You don't even read what I write, Iván. That is very sad (not to
mention rude), as I write a lot and put effort into it, so I'm going to
stop now.
Meatlof... That really was the final nail in your credibility coffin.
You have proven me wrong on absolutely nothing (except for some minor
nitpicking, which is just childish), and have been proven wrong on the
overarching and salient facts time and time again.
As for the truly central question that you keep avoiding; If you are
out of your teens, I am genuinely sorry to hear that. If not, then I
hope that time will bring you wisdom.
Peace,
Your friend in Prog, John.
-------------
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 14:12
Just check his profile Tea...it ain't hard!
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 15:33
Teaflax wrote:
You don't even read what I write, Iván. That is very sad (not to mention rude), as I write a lot and put effort into it, so I'm going to stop now.
Again kettle...pot...You dare to call me rude???
Have you noticed that you made fun of:
- A member who mentioned Evanescense and you almost made fun of him.
- Another member mentioned Wiggenstein and you replied saying: Who is that? Frankenstein's transvestite brother?
- You made fun of members who liked Kansas and insulted one of the most respected bands.
- You defend Rap with nails and teeth but you attack people who like Meatloaf
- Another member replies you and you make fun of a minor grammar mistake
Meatlof... That really was the final nail in your credibility coffin.
Why? Please enlighten me with your almighty wisdom. Listening one of the best voices in Rock and a very talented piano player and composer as Jim Steinman is wrong?
Or do you coinsider it redneck music as in the case of Kansas?
You have proven me wrong on absolutely nothing (except for some minor nitpicking, which is just childish), and have been proven wrong on the overarching and salient facts time and time again.
Gosh, you're stubborn you started with the quotes and songlists from a sitcom that you rubbed repeteadly on my face until you were proved wrong.
As for the truly central question that you keep avoiding; If you are out of your teens, I am genuinely sorry to hear that. If not, then I hope that time will bring you wisdom.
Yes, I'm sorry also, I wish I was in my teens to be younger, but not for other reason.
Have you ever asked yourself why all people replies your posts with hostility? Can't it be that the problem is being cause by yourself or maybe you think this is a complot?
I read peaceful members who always are far from hostility answering you in a rude way, because you're an expert provoking people. You start a topic and when your facts are proved wrong you just jump to another thing.
Peace,
Your friend in Prog, John.
Oh, nice touch to manipulate, I love it, it almost made me
But this is my last reply in this thread, I promissed to avoid it and I will do it.
Iván
|
-------------
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 16:20
Snow Dog wrote:
Just check his profile Tea...it ain't hard!
|
Ah, right. Well, most profiles tend to be not very filled in, so it didn't occur to me.
The bleeder's older'n me. *shock, horror*
-------------
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 16:33
Teaflax wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Just check his profile Tea...it ain't hard!
|
Ah, right. Well, most profiles tend to be not very filled in, so it didn't occur to me.
The bleeder's older'n me. *shock, horror*
|
But not as old as me.
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 16:41
Teaflax wrote:
The bleeder's older'n me. *shock, horror*
|
How do you feel being offensive? Is that a pleassure for you? Does you feel better or even more smart than you claim you are?
That's the reason why normally nice people ofth9is forum is being rude with you, because you ask for it.
And BTW: The phrase "Your Friend in Prog" was only a vulgar manipulation of your part (As I already knew). But I won't fall in your game.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: GoldenSpiral
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 16:42
are you children QUITE done yet?
jiminy cricket! this has gone on long enough...
------------- http://www.myspace.com/altaic" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/altaic ALTAIC "Oceans Down You'll Lie" coming soon
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 16:50
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Teaflax wrote:
The bleeder's older'n me. *shock, horror*
|
How do you feel being offensive? Is that a pleassure for you? Does you feel better or even more smart than you claim you are?
That's the reason why normally nice people ofth9is forum is being rude with you, because you ask for it.
And BTW: The phrase "Your Friend in Prog" was only a vulgar manipulation of your part (As I already knew). But I won't fall in your game.
Iván |
I can't believe I'm doing this but.......
......Ivan, "bleeder" is virtually a term of endearment in UK English, the English that Teafalx has been using.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 16:59
That guy doesn't half hold a grudge, does he? Good lord... You'd think I'd insulted his mother, or something.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 17:02
Bleeder: 2 British : http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/rotter - ROTTER ; also : http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/bloke - BLOKE
I find it offensive, maybe you just don't know the meaning as you didn't knew what redneck or pork burger means?
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 17:55
Wow,I've just read the WHOLE of this thread,every last word (rumblings from another place) and I am at a loss to see why someone would want this thread closed.There have been arguments but it has never boiled over into that scarcely definable territory named "across the line" . I think that an argument about taste is pointless. To Mr Teaflax I would say that once you start your "argument" by dismissing an artist, a band or genre with a casual "it sucks" then you set the tone for the level of discussion. To Ivan I would say "as above" Oh and "bleeder" is NOT offensive where I live,it is, as Snow Dog states,a term of endearment.
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 18:12
Tony R wrote:
Wow,I've just read the WHOLE of this thread,every last word (rumblings from another place) and I am at a loss to see why someone would want this thread closed.There have been arguments but it has never boiled over into that scarcely definable territory named "across the line" . I think that an argument about taste is pointless. To Mr Teaflax I would say that once you start your "argument" by dismissing an artist, a band or genre with a casual "it sucks" then you set the tone for the level of discussion. To Ivan I would say "as above"
Agree with all the above.
Oh and "bleeder" is NOT offensive where I live,it is, as Snow Dog states,a term of endearment.
When a term has two meanings as in this case you must be carefull using them there are terms that are completely normal in Perú but if I used them with a person from Argentina or Chile will be pretty offensive.
If I ak for a "Cajetilla de cigarros" /Pacckage of cigarrettes in Perú) there's no problem, but if I use the same term in Argentina, probably I would be thrown out of the store for calling the owner a whore or the owner a pimp, not sure.
If somebody asks me for the time in Perú and I don't have a watch I would answer "Son las cinco y pico" (It's 5 and a bit more) if I said that to a lady in Chile (And I did it once) I will be probably insulted for using a vulgar reference to a prenis.
If I don't know the British terminology, I check the dictionary, and if the dictionary mentions two offensive meanings (Both offensive), the person that's using them must avoid them, specially after a discussion.
Iván
|
-------------
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 18:25
Ivan,I would say that you must have a very old dictionary,but no doubt you've cited a 2006 version from the UK. I'm not sure that I concede your point about something having two meanings,because I can assure you that bleeder, whilst slightly patronising in this usage, would not be considered offensive to a native English speaker,nor is it reasonable to expect people to double-check every word for innuendo. A classic example from the UK is the use of the word "bugger". I guarantee if I called you a "loveable old bugger" you'd be extremely offended yet the word has become little more than an affectionate and jocular term of address.This interpretation of the word is 100% consistent acroos the whole country.
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 18:44
Tony R wrote:
Ivan,I would say that you must have a very old dictionary,but no doubt you've cited a 2006 version from the UK.
Tony, I'm using the 2006 Merriam Webster online dictionary
I'm not sure that I concede your point about something having two meanings,because I can assure you that bleeder, whilst slightly patronising in this usage, would not be considered offensive to a native English speaker,nor is it reasonable to expect people to double-check every word for innuendo.
Honestly I do it, if something has two meanings I usually avoid it and you know me enough to known that I do.
A classic example from the UK is the use of the word "bugger". I guarantee if I called you a "loveable old bugger" you'd be extremely offended yet the word has become little more than an affectionate and jocular term of address.This interpretation of the word is 100% consistent acroos the whole country.
But not everybody here is Britsh Tony, not even Teaflax, according to his profile he's from Sweden.
BTW Loveable old bugger by the context is being used doesn't sound offensive.
Iván
|
-------------
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 19:05
Actually, I'm Swedish/Austrian/American, but I can do a pretty good
Scottish brogue and a cartoon version of Irish. I write fairly
transatlantically, although I tend to favor American spellings.
But I'm sadly not too surprised that Ivàn reads all sorts of things
into my writing that isn't there, especially after my genuinely offered
olive branch was seen as a terrible and manipulative move. So I will
simply not address him again, since there's no point to it.
I'm just sorry for his sake that he takes this entire thing so bleedin' seriously.
-------------
|
Posted By: wolf0621
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 19:08
"To Mr Teaflax I would say that once you start your "argument" by dismissing an artist, a band or genre with a casual "it sucks" then you set the tone for the level of discussion."
I believe that I also earlier stated that I thought wrap & hip hop sucked, at least the stuff that I've heard...Conceding that I couldn't possibly have heard everything (no one has...I hope) & that there may be some wonderful acts out there, I'm comfortable with my judgement of that particular material...Wasn't trying to set any particular tone, just stating my honest opinion, others can disagree & I'll still sleep well tonight... ...If given the choice to scour the wrap/hip hop world for listenable tunes vs, say, rock or prog, I believe my choice would be clear as to where I'd concentrate my efforts!
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 19:18
To state that a band "sucks" is one thing to dismiss a whole genre in such terms is quite obviously asinine. However,differences in taste underpin this whole debate.That said,I dont want to breath new life into what has becaome a moribund thread...
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 19:44
Well, let me just add this; I think anyone who knows a bit about music
should be able to respect a lot more music than they actually would
want to listen to.
There's a lot of music I can tell certainly has merit, but that grates
on my ears or is just not interesting. To keep this vaguely on-topic, I
offer up the production work of Timbaland, which I find to be
incredibly daring sometimes and usually quite groundbreaking, but I
wouldn't actively listen to anything he's produced.
And for all my defending of Rap as a valid genre, it's not something I
listen to particularly often. I used to feel pretty much like Iván does
back in the 80's, and even thought I would get in on the act, and make
me some sweet cash. Seeing as I was a singer, spoke unaccented English,
wrote song lyrics regularly, and had access to several recording
studios, spitting out a Rap tune or two shouldn't be that difficult.
Well, as it turned out, it was a damned sight more difficult than I had
thought - and this was even before increase in rhythmic and structural
sophistication of underground Rap which happened during the 90's.
I've played the bass in a Blues/Rock combo, sung in Prog and Pop
groups, drummed in a Punk band and to this day create music on my
keyboard here at home, so I have some sense of what goes into making
music, even though I know very little about musical theory. In my
experience, rapping well - and do note that I find that most rapping
you hear on MTV does not qualify - very difficult indeed.
And to freestyle it - that's just breathtaking to see someone do well.
I have an acquaintance who is a rapper in the band Hearin' Aid. He's a
good enough rapper, but when you realise that a lot of what he does is
almost completely improvised, it's almost unfathomable. When you
see him do one take, flub a line and then start over, except now with a
completely different lyric...that's impressive.
Again, it's nothing I would listen to, but you have to respect the craft.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 20:09
Teaflax wrote:
Well, let me just add this; I think anyone who knows a bit about music should be able to respect a lot more music than they actually would want to listen to.
Wise words , hope you apply them also when you talk about such bands like Kansas and even non Prog as Meatloaf and I'm 100% sure there will be no problems.
Iván
|
-------------
|
Posted By: GoldenSpiral
Date Posted: June 06 2006 at 22:07
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Teaflax wrote:
Well, let me just add this; I think anyone who knows a bit about music should be able to respect a lot more music than they actually would want to listen to.
Wise words , hope you apply them also when you talk about such bands like Kansas and even non Prog as Meatloaf and I'm 100% sure there will be no problems.
Iván
| |
Anyone who knows a bit about music also knows about what they DON'T like, and it's fine to not like a band if you have heard them and know why you can't connect with them. His point is that maybe you could show respect for some hip-hop artists without actually being obligated to listen to them regularly, instead of dismissing them out of hand.
I dont want to be choosing sides in this little catfight, but that's how I feel about that subject...
------------- http://www.myspace.com/altaic" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/altaic ALTAIC "Oceans Down You'll Lie" coming soon
|
Posted By: wolf0621
Date Posted: June 07 2006 at 07:41
^Boy, the political correctness in this latest thread is palpable. So let me put all of you at ease. Here's the greatest possible love for the following musical styles (even though I don't like 'em or listen to 'em, but at least some of its practitioners are probably very skilled):
Wrap
Hip Hop
Traditional Swiss Yodeling
Electronic Rumba Music played on Hammond Organ
Tibetan Folk Music
Music of the Mongolian Steppes
Classical Music performed on zither & washboard
"To state that a band "sucks" is one thing to dismiss a whole genre in such terms is quite obviously asinine"...I'm sure Tony R that you meant this in the best possible way (you forgot the emoticon) ...
Actually I never said that all of it sucked, just the (very limited) material that I've been exposed to which left me wondering how these acts ever got signed & released...So I'll repeat myself (again) since some folks apparently have to read something repeatedly for it to register (note use of emoticon here):
"I believe that I also earlier stated that I thought wrap & hip hop sucked, at least the stuff that I've heard...Conceding that I couldn't possibly have heard everything (no one has...I hope) & that there may be some wonderful acts out there, I'm comfortable with my judgement of that particular material"...Note use of phrases " at least the stuff that I've heard", " there may be some wonderful acts" & " that particular material", and nothing such as "all of wrap/hip hop sucks" or the like...
So if you interpret the above as condemning those entire genres then you're free to do so...In my mind, the stock of those particular musical styles doesn't go through the roof with me based on my personal experience, and doesn't make it very likely for me spending lots of time researching other examples that I might like... After all, as was stated previously: " differences in taste underpin this whole debate", so when I say that I think what I've heard so far sucks, that's particular to my possibly different musical taste vs yours...Is that too harsh a condemnation of those entire styles of music?
Hey, if my initial 20-30 exposures to Jazz had been negative I might've felt the same way about it too, but still wouldn't come out & say that all of Jazz sucks (just the stuff I've heard)...
And finally a warning to all others, in case you plan to voice your displeasure re: any of the above listed musical styles in future threads...Make sure you pay the proper love & respect to these styles even if your personal experience to date was negative...Political correctness & love for all mankind demand it! ...Oops, almost forgot:
Can't we all just get along???
|
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 07 2006 at 08:34
Well, Wolf. I don't see why it is that you feel the need to continuously spell it Wrap?
It's only marginally less annoying than the ever-popular (c)Rap and
doesn't really do anything except note that you don't like it. Imagine
someone trying to discuss their lack of appreciation for Progressive
Rock and calling it "Frog Rock" throughout. It doesn't really add
anything to the discussion.
Now, I'm not saying that there aren't certain genres I am
disrespectful of - or at least some of the signature acts of those
genres (and it's inevitably about me seeing them as pandering to a
lowest common denominator, an accusation that certainly fits the bill
for most mainstream Rap) - but I still don't see the point of warping
their names, unless maybe it's done once for effect when trying to make
a particular point.
-------------
|
Posted By: wolf0621
Date Posted: June 07 2006 at 10:19
Posted By: Teaflax
Date Posted: June 07 2006 at 13:21
wolf0621 wrote:
Has Ivan run out of gas? | I've stopped responding to him, since he he reads way too many things into what I write.
wolf0621 wrote:
What time is it in
Peru (or in Sweden for that matter)? | It's currently 7:20 PM here in Sweden, I would guess Peru is about 7-8 hours earlier, around mid-day.
wolf0621 wrote:
You know, I could possibly be
turned around on this whole topic with some further convincing
arguments (but I do draw the line at yodeling, I don't care how many
hours per day of practice are involved)! | If
you want to ease your way into getting comfortable with some of the
sounds and tropes of the genre, you could do worse than the already
recommended Endtroducing... by DJ Shadow. It doesn't contain any
rapping, as I recall - or if it does, there's not much of it - and it's
often been described as Prog/Hip Hop album. So, that will give you a
familiarty with the general nature of the genre, without being overtly
unfamiliar.
If that works for you, then try anything by Jean Grae, who by dint of
being a smart woman is obviously a bit removed from that male bragging
Gangsta Rap that probably is the main exposure most people get to Rap,
so you don't have those overtones. Her rhythmic sophistication is
pretty much self-evident to anyone who listens closely.
Now, if all that works out...well, then check the two lists posted earlier in the thread.
-------------
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: June 07 2006 at 13:38
Once a member starts to attack the Moderator then it is time to acknowledge that the thread has run its course. That's a (w)rap folks!!
|
|