Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30223
Posted: June 07 2010 at 13:14
rod65 wrote:
Show me a spectacle, or any work of art that does not utterly conform to mainstream expectations, that can't be labeled pretentious from a certain point of view, paticularly as time passes and tastes change. I think that if an artist does not have the courage to risk being called pretentious he/she is not much of an artist. Also, especially where live performances are concerned, we need to remember that big stadium rock, prog or otherwise (ex. the flying piano), is largely about spectacle--the shared experience of spectacle. Of course it's pretentious. It's supposed to be. That's part of the fun.
So all 'spectacle' is pretentious?
I think we are getting away from the point. Spectacle can be just visual and impressive without having an air of pretentiousness.Or it can have meaning and a message (perhaps hidden). If the band think it dentotes something more important than what it is ..then its pretentious.The flying piano clearly has no meaning whatsover so in my mind carries no real pretentious aspect that I can discern (just pure showbiz). On the other hand a rock musician performing a self composed piano concerto with a large orchestra very obviously is pretentious. I think the lines can easily be drawn.
Joined: January 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1601
Posted: June 07 2010 at 13:10
Brain Salad Surgery. They realised they were good and started acting like it. Unfortunately they could never compare to things like their first album, Pictures, and the single good song on Tarkus (tarkus).
Which of you to gain me, tell, will risk uncertain pains of hell?
I will not forgive you if you will not take the chance.
Joined: January 28 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 248
Posted: June 07 2010 at 13:02
Show me a spectacle, or any work of art that does not utterly conform to mainstream expectations, that can't be labeled pretentious from a certain point of view, paticularly as time passes and tastes change. I think that if an artist does not have the courage to risk being called pretentious he/she is not much of an artist. Also, especially where live performances are concerned, we need to remember that big stadium rock, prog or otherwise (ex. the flying piano), is largely about spectacle--the shared experience of spectacle. Of course it's pretentious. It's supposed to be. That's part of the fun.
Joined: February 09 2010
Location: The South of TX
Status: Offline
Points: 771
Posted: June 06 2010 at 18:06
Tarquin Underspoon wrote:
The real answer here is Thick as a Brick.
I find it completely hilarious that, after 40-odd years, we are STILL being had by Ian Anderson's overtly pretentious send-up of a genre. It's in our top 10, for crying out loud. Then again, it really is awfully good...
....And this, my friends, is what we call "irony".
I'm not so sure. If you cloak pretentiousness in parody and welcome it with irony, what do you get?
Something, no doubt. But is it really a pretentious moment?
Joined: February 09 2010
Location: The South of TX
Status: Offline
Points: 771
Posted: June 06 2010 at 17:51
Falx wrote:
It takes up two entire LPs, in all fairness TFTO deserves a mention too
Now, Quadrophenia on the other hand, is a masterpiece.
There is no "fairness" in prog. Everbody who listens is judge, jury, and executioner. The anarchy of the genre is reflected in the music. The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway and Tales From Topographic Oceans are masterpieces. They are what separate prog fans from popular rock fans.
PS My post may be The Most Pretentious Moment on this site.
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5160
Posted: June 06 2010 at 17:00
I second the opinion that the prog masters in their golden years were not any more pretentious than many other pop-rock stars such as Michael Jackson, Madonna or Kylie Minogue. Freddy Mercury has my respect for his wonderful music in early Queen but he was a master of pretentiousness like few others.
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30223
Posted: June 06 2010 at 15:39
lazland wrote:
KingCrimson250 wrote:
I do have to agree with TFTO. I enjoy the album but it definitely seems to be the point when prog became too much for the mainstream to handle.
Interestingly enough, I've never really seen the charge of "pretentious" levelled at King Crimson. Is that because the critics were more accepting of them, or just because Yes and ELP were easier targets?
Simple answer to that question - it's because Fripp had a hissyfit after Red in 1974, and did no more KC until the early 80's. All of the snot nosed, gobby punks had thrown their vitriol at the prevalent bands in 76 or 77 like Floyd, Yes, et al.
Certainly some truth in that although if ELP had not made Works Volume One and stopped at Brain Salad Surgery then I reckon they still would have been a target. I expect Red was an album that found favour with some punks because of the grungy feel while ELP's heavy use of electronics and more meandering style probably didn't!
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13870
Posted: June 06 2010 at 14:05
KingCrimson250 wrote:
I do have to agree with TFTO. I enjoy the album but it definitely seems to be the point when prog became too much for the mainstream to handle.
Interestingly enough, I've never really seen the charge of "pretentious" levelled at King Crimson. Is that because the critics were more accepting of them, or just because Yes and ELP were easier targets?
Simple answer to that question - it's because Fripp had a hissyfit after Red in 1974, and did no more KC until the early 80's. All of the snot nosed, gobby punks had thrown their vitriol at the prevalent bands in 76 or 77 like Floyd, Yes, et al.
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Posted: June 06 2010 at 14:01
There's nothing from '70's prog that I would categorize as pretentious. All of the critics that pooped out that word with regard to prog are another matter.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Joined: October 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 573
Posted: June 06 2010 at 13:54
I do have to agree with TFTO. I enjoy the album but it definitely seems to be the point when prog became too much for the mainstream to handle.
Interestingly enough, I've never really seen the charge of "pretentious" levelled at King Crimson. Is that because the critics were more accepting of them, or just because Yes and ELP were easier targets?
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13870
Posted: June 06 2010 at 13:42
ProgressiveAttic wrote:
DT-PT wrote:
rogerthat wrote:
I really really dislike the part where a voice introduces all the instruments in Mike Olfield's Tubular Bells. Big deal! Felt it was very condescending and self-important.
I like that part.
Me too!
It was meant to be funny in a kind of schoolboy way - that's why Stanshall was asked to do it (after, apparently, Cleese refused).
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30223
Posted: June 06 2010 at 03:36
I don't agree that the flying piano thing was pretentious.It was pure showbiz and a lot of fun (and a little bit dangerous for the protagonist)
I do however agree with Works Volume One, Lamb and TFTO. Long double sided prog albums are all (with one exception) a complete pain and certainly represent the point when some famous prog bands 'jumped the shark'.(The exception is Aphrodites Child '666')
Joined: April 05 2008
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 1243
Posted: June 05 2010 at 22:39
DT-PT wrote:
rogerthat wrote:
I really really dislike the part where a voice introduces all the instruments in Mike Olfield's Tubular Bells. Big deal! Felt it was very condescending and self-important.
I like that part.
Me too!
Michael's Sonic Kaleidoscope Mondays 5:00pm EST(re-runs Thursdays 3:00pm) @ Delicious Agony Progressive Rock Radio(http://www.deliciousagony.com)
Joined: January 16 2010
Location: Thunder Bay CAN
Status: Offline
Points: 4395
Posted: June 05 2010 at 22:06
rogerthat wrote:
I really really dislike the part where a voice introduces all the instruments in Mike Olfield's Tubular Bells. Big deal! Felt it was very condescending and self-important.
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Posted: June 05 2010 at 21:59
lazland wrote:
None - If people just looked at ridiculous "celebrities" such as the Big Brother mob, Cheryl Cole, bloody Jordan, "Madge" Madonna running around in catsuits when she's old enough to be most of the audiences mother, they would realise that is true pretension.
I kind of agree with this too but in a different way. I find stuff like Nightwish or Metallica's S&M (not to mention Scorpions's own symphony + rock effort) more pretentious because it, at least to me, feels like an attempt to pass off the music as something more sophisticated than it really is. I don't know why people would call the old prog bands' attempts to bring jazz and classical influences to rock pretentious because, if anything, they were trying to give a different and possibly more resonant context for such music so that rock fans could relate to it. It seems like adventure is equated to pretension when it comes to prog.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.160 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.