Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Kanye West's weird prog obsession
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedKanye West's weird prog obsession

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Icarium View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 21 2008
Location: Tigerstaden
Status: Offline
Points: 34090
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Kanye West's weird prog obsession
    Posted: February 07 2011 at 01:50
Outkast samples Focus
 


Edited by aginor - February 07 2011 at 01:51
Back to Top
Earendil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 17 2008
Location: Indiana, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1584
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 22:36
I just listened to his new album today, and it's actually surprisingly good.  I really enjoyed it and respect him for sampling prog. Blind haters should stop arguing that he somehow is disrespecting KC by sampling them. Listen to the album with an open mind first!
Back to Top
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8633
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 25 2010 at 23:42
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

NPJ: No, you don't have to pay for sampling. In fact, if you sample someone's song, they have to pay you.


Shenanigans. I call shenanigans on Textbook.
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2010 at 04:31
NPJ: No, you don't have to pay for sampling. In fact, if you sample someone's song, they have to pay you.

Edited by Textbook - December 23 2010 at 04:44
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2010 at 02:46
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

I don't care if anyone likes it. But if you're not going to call it an art form I have a problem.

Of course most of it is trash. So is most prog, most rock, etc.

 

Of course it's music and therefore art. Music, for me, is every organized set of sounds for artistic purposes.

But with sample-based music, I feel cheated. It won't fulfill my artistic needs. It's like readymade objects of Marcel Duchamp.
Back to Top
npjnpj View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2010 at 01:14
After all this discussion I'd really like to know whether any of these Rap erm.... artists? ever pay any royalties for the stuff they erm.... lifted?

I think that would make quite a difference. There's a whole world of difference between nicking stuff and paying tribute. Or doesn't that apply in Rap-Land?
Back to Top
fasolplanetarium View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: December 21 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 20:48
How about everyone stop debating whether or not sampling is stealing and disseminate the issue a little bit? It depends on HOW you sample. That has been asserted many times here. Some people completely emulate the melody of a song and some people(like many RAP artists use the sample to piece it into a different melody, rhythm et al). Can anyone really say sampling is cheap? Think about it abstractly-isn't music really piecing together abstract SOUNDS and making a composition? Is that not what art achieves? 

I'm not being histrionic in making this analogy: saying that sampling is cheap is like saying that oil paint is a sh*tty medium and that because it looks so elegant and expressive, that it's "cheating". There are so many profound musicians that utilize sampling-not just other songs but sounds. Some of you forget that sampling doesn't only entail sampling a SONG.

Olde English 800 laden rant over. 


Edited by fasolplanetarium - December 22 2010 at 20:49
"Anxiety is the dizziness of freedom."
-Kierkegaard

My music blog: endless-sound.blogspot.com
Back to Top
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8633
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 20:41
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

I get it. If any of the 12 notes of the chromatic scale are played, its just like sampling and if you think you have not stolen from someone else you are a hypocrite. Awesome.

I think I will go "write" Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart Club Band. It will be mine because I recorded it on my computer and pressed the play button.It will be exactly the same as if I got an ensemble together and learned the songs and practiced them for hours before we got it sounding ok.


1) I have no idea what you mean by the first paragraph. It is being argued that sampling is the same as playing a classical riff on guitar. Essentially sample theft apologists are attempting to say that playing a recording on a playback device is the same as playing a sequence of notes on a guitar. So why a sequence? Why not 1 note? Been done before. Same duration, same dynamic.

2) I think you're trying, first of all, to rant against sampling by comparing it to copying an entire song, not altering it, and just releasing it under a different name. Really? Who dictates what the cut off point is? I decide when it starts and when it stops. Its art. I made it. I guess I should have a beat over it with a big 40 hz bass drum every 4 beats.  Uh...tell me where that happens. Kid Rock using Sad But True in its entirety and jabbering some nonsense over it, though one could argue no more nonsense than the original lyrics. Most sampling is a melodic hook used in an entirely different genre and context, more often than not combined with an original melody or song by the sampler (re: Kanye). Or the whole song could be composed of samples, but not just one sample. A dozen or so. (re: Endtroducing.....). It takes a lot of skill to do something like that and have it sound fresh and cool. What's fresh and cool is what is dictated by major media outlets. I listen to new music, check my playlist. Mainstream "fresh and cool' is not something that I suddenly started loathing because I am old. I was a young guy when the first sample heads were mucking about, it was equally awful then.   Additionally, I have Fruity Loops, I have made songs from it using samples, both my own and snipped from others music, it is not hard, it is outrageously easy. Is it fresh and cool? Me or you don't decide that. Individually yes, but what gets mass produced, no. There are millions of people out there that can do exactly what Kanye does, probably better, they just don't get to play the game. Secondly, you seem to have an idea that electronic music is simply inferior to acoustic music. Weird. Yes, it is weird that you have made that correlation from anything I have said.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_Symphonic_Library

When you have this and a good notation program, humans are all but obsolete.


Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 16:21
I don't care if anyone likes it. But if you're not going to call it an art form I have a problem.

Of course most of it is trash. So is most prog, most rock, etc.

 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 16:03
I will never get that sampling thing.


What's the point of sampling?  Play your damn thing on a instrument. Or if you can't play an instrument, push a few buttons, do a few mouse clicks, program a synth, drum-machine, sequencer, computer. Be creative. I'm fine when people use digital sampling keyboard when they can not afford grand piano, but sampling pieces of another song? Loop and patterns?  No thanks. Fine with sampling non-musical sounds: ambient noises, famous speech, movie lines. But when a musician is sampling another musician it's like a half-stealing. I guess you can get creative in that process too, but I just don't like it. Besides, most of the samples sound as a half-baked attempt to make cash on a already known/already written hook. Just one of the reason I never like sample-based musical styles.


*rant mode off


Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 15:23

Someone go listen to Edan's Echo Party and then tell me sampling is not an art form.

 
Let's also not forget Since I Left You.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 14:39
Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

I get it. If any of the 12 notes of the chromatic scale are played, its just like sampling and if you think you have not stolen from someone else you are a hypocrite. Awesome.

I think I will go "write" Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart Club Band. It will be mine because I recorded it on my computer and pressed the play button.It will be exactly the same as if I got an ensemble together and learned the songs and practiced them for hours before we got it sounding ok.


Nope, but you've done just as much 'stealing' in each case.

Maybe you should go listen to a song in question. If you call DJ Shadow or Girl Talk theft, you'll still be wrong, but at least you'll have an idea of what's going on.

EDIT: It's still composition. Only instead of using notes as your building blocks, you use samples of others songs.


Edited by Equality 7-2521 - December 22 2010 at 14:50
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 14:37
Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

Yes, being derivative and being an outright thief are very different. Playing an instrument and using a passage from a classical composer is far different than pressing a button connected to a digital recording device that plays the exact recording of someone else's composition. 


What exactly is the difference? One 'theft' occurs with an instrument, the other with a computer. It's just a difference in means. One is right and the other wrong just because people here like prog and dislike rap.







Just because you don't get the difference does not mean there is not one.

A musician playing a classical piece is like a painter painting a portrait of my Christmas and putting the painting in his leaving room. A rapper with a recorded sample in his song is like coming over and taking the tree to put in his living room.


Just because you think there's a difference doesn't make it so.

Your analogy makes no sense at all. You can call it an analogy, but it's not even close to being the same.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 14:11
Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

I get it. If any of the 12 notes of the chromatic scale are played, its just like sampling and if you think you have not stolen from someone else you are a hypocrite. Awesome.

I think I will go "write" Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart Club Band. It will be mine because I recorded it on my computer and pressed the play button.It will be exactly the same as if I got an ensemble together and learned the songs and practiced them for hours before we got it sounding ok.


1) I have no idea what you mean by the first paragraph.

2) I think you're trying, first of all, to rant against sampling by comparing it to copying an entire song, not altering it, and just releasing it under a different name. Uh...tell me where that happens. Most sampling is a melodic hook used in an entirely different genre and context, more often than not combined with an original melody or song by the sampler (re: Kanye). Or the whole song could be composed of samples, but not just one sample. A dozen or so. (re: Endtroducing.....). It takes a lot of skill to do something like that and have it sound fresh and cool. secondly, you seem to have an idea that electronic music is simply inferior to acoustic music. Weird.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_Symphonic_Library

When you have this and a good notation program, humans are all but obsolete.
Back to Top
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8633
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 14:02
I get it. If any of the 12 notes of the chromatic scale are played, its just like sampling and if you think you have not stolen from someone else you are a hypocrite. Awesome.

I think I will go "write" Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart Club Band. It will be mine because I recorded it on my computer and pressed the play button.It will be exactly the same as if I got an ensemble together and learned the songs and practiced them for hours before we got it sounding ok.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 13:53
Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

Yes, being derivative and being an outright thief are very different. Playing an instrument and using a passage from a classical composer is far different than pressing a button connected to a digital recording device that plays the exact recording of someone else's composition. 


What exactly is the difference? One 'theft' occurs with an instrument, the other with a computer. It's just a difference in means. One is right and the other wrong just because people here like prog and dislike rap.







Just because you don't get the difference does not mean there is not one.


Since we're getting really close to just declaring sampling lack talent, I'll just dispel that before it becomes an issue.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endtroducing
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 13:50

Yeah I know and what about all the "borrowing" from classical composers that so many prog bands have done?

Back to Top
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8633
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 13:48
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

Yes, being derivative and being an outright thief are very different. Playing an instrument and using a passage from a classical composer is far different than pressing a button connected to a digital recording device that plays the exact recording of someone else's composition. 


What exactly is the difference? One 'theft' occurs with an instrument, the other with a computer. It's just a difference in means. One is right and the other wrong just because people here like prog and dislike rap.







Just because you don't get the difference does not mean there is not one.

A musician playing a classical piece is like a painter painting a portrait of my Christmas and putting the painting in his leaving room. A rapper with a recorded sample in his song is like coming over and taking the tree to put in his living room.


Edited by Tapfret - December 22 2010 at 13:53
Back to Top
zravkapt View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 12 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 6451
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 13:24
Anyone who hates sampling should also hate the mellotron...an instrument designed to manipulate pre-recorded sounds.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 13:22
I wonder how many people here have actually heard the album. A rapper uses a 4 second sample of a prog song in one song on an entire album and suddenly he's a parasite thief with no talent. Nice.

I do think it's curious that the best songs on his album are the one's with prominet samples though (Blame Game, Power, Lost in the World). Though All of the Lights is still fantastic.

It sags a lot in the middle though.

Also, I suspect very few prog fans here have put the p***y in a sarcophagus.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.508 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.