Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
WalterDigsTunes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
|
Posted: July 15 2010 at 14:19 |
Phideaux wrote:
You call it "filler", I call it a rare opportunity to see someone's more "raw" creative ideas.
|
That's what bonus tracks are for. Keep the album as hard-hitting and concise as possible as to not dilute the potency of the work.
|
 |
Alitare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 08 2008
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 3595
|
Posted: July 15 2010 at 14:16 |
The single moment I hate most in all of prog is when Geddy Lee blurts out in his corny "Angelic" drone: ...And the meek shall inherit the earth.
Gosh, it's so self important and cheesy! Oh, and boy is it dumb! I mean, Beefheart could sleep-talk more engaging lyrics and content. It's not even a real Anthem inspiration! Peart butchers the ideology of the text. That, and he turns it into this corny space fantasy pack of overlong sewer....
Ahem, boy, I sure do like Rush a good deal!
|
 |
idoownu
Forum Groupie
Joined: April 01 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 75
|
Posted: July 15 2010 at 14:02 |
|
 |
Chris S
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
|
Posted: July 04 2010 at 01:52 |
Adams Bolero wrote:
Pretentiousness doesn't mean bad. The fact that TFTO is based on the works of Paramahansa Yogananda is one of the reasons I love prog; it is a genre of music that is unafraid to experiment and try new things even if it they risk ridicule for doing it. |
|
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
 |
VanVanVan
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 756
|
Posted: July 04 2010 at 00:35 |
Jake Kobrin wrote:
Tarquin Underspoon wrote:
The real answer here is Thick as a Brick.
I find it completely hilarious that, after 40-odd years, we are STILL being had by Ian Anderson's overtly pretentious send-up of a genre. It's in our top 10, for crying out loud. Then again, it really is awfully good...
....And this, my friends, is what we call "irony". |
Hahaha... It's a GREAT album, but it's true that it was actually Anderson poking fun at the genre and trying to be as overblown and pretentious as possible! It was intended to be a joke! |
Nonetheless, the intent does not undermine the quality; lucky for us! 
|
"The meaning of life is to give life meaning."-Arjen Lucassen
|
 |
Phideaux
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 27 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 378
|
Posted: July 04 2010 at 00:31 |
What I love is that art rock music can both be a joke and be serious. It's not so set in its ways as is pop music, or even Jazz (although I suppose some Jazz can be playful).
Thank the Gods for spectacle (and spec-a-tacles) and ambition and indulgence. Sometimes a band wants to make a double album because they want to stretch out and have a bit of fun and create something that "breathes" a little.
You call it "filler", I call it a rare opportunity to see someone's more "raw" creative ideas.
Single albums sometimes are so manicured it's hard to feel the outer edges of possibility.
Yay for the pretentious moments in progressive rock!
|
 |
Jake Kobrin
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 20 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1303
|
Posted: June 09 2010 at 01:57 |
Tarquin Underspoon wrote:
The real answer here is Thick as a Brick.
I find it completely hilarious that, after 40-odd years, we are STILL being had by Ian Anderson's overtly pretentious send-up of a genre. It's in our top 10, for crying out loud. Then again, it really is awfully good...
....And this, my friends, is what we call "irony". |
Hahaha... It's a GREAT album, but it's true that it was actually Anderson poking fun at the genre and trying to be as overblown and pretentious as possible! It was intended to be a joke!
|
|
 |
uduwudu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2603
|
Posted: June 09 2010 at 01:41 |
richardh wrote:
Thats not to say that I don't appreciate Genesis with Gabriel but I get the feeling that they were just too clever for their own good and Lamb represents a tipping point where Genesis and prog in general was in distinct danger of disappearing up its own anus (although as I've said it does contain many wonderfull moments). |
What does? The anus? And many more to come?  Seriously not all prog is ambitious, Many bands who play in a symphonuc rock style nowm who were not innovative (e.g. Satarcastle? to Wobbler) are not breaking new ground but sounding ever so retro. It may work well in introducing new audiences to the music so it's not necessarily a bad thing. But then originality is a difficult beast so I don't want to negatively critise, just make an observation about prog rock and ambition. cheers
|
 |
uduwudu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2603
|
Posted: June 09 2010 at 01:32 |
Those who accused prog rockers of pretention were doing so for divisive political reasons. It was just an insult out of mean spirited-ness.
|
 |
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30203
|
Posted: June 09 2010 at 00:55 |
Gerinski wrote:
richardh wrote:
^ 'Pretentiousness' is bad if the band is overstretching themselves. Lamb has some wonderfull songs but why exactly does it need so much filler to make it a double? Possibly for innocent reasons just to provide enough material for a grand theatrical experience which would be fair enough. But isn't there also an element of self aggrandisement..oh look at us we can do a double album with obscure ideas and look intellectually superior as a result..? Thats pretentious! |
I think Genesis were among the least pretentious of all the big ones, and I would describe The Lamb as "ambitious" rather than "pretentious". No fillers for my taste, it's perfectly OK. |
All prog is 'ambitious'. Genesis were not really diferent than other bands its just that they had more intellectual clout within their midst to say ELP or Yes and were prepared to make the most of it. However on a taste level I actually prefer Genesis after Gabriel left (up to and inc Duke) as the music grabs me emotionally yet still retains powerfull musical ideas.Thats not to say that I don't appreciate Genesis with Gabriel but I get the feeling that they were just too clever for their own good and Lamb represents a tipping point where Genesis and prog in general was in distinct danger of disappearing up its own anus (although as I've said it does contain many wonderfull moments).
Edited by richardh - June 09 2010 at 00:56
|
 |
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: June 09 2010 at 00:20 |
InClouds wrote:
topographicbroadways wrote:
Adams Bolero wrote:
Pretentiousness doesn't mean bad. The fact that TFTO is based on the works of Paramahansa Yogananda is one of the reasons I love prog; it is a genre of music that is unafraid to experiment and try new things even if it they risk ridicule for doing it. |
being pretentious is what prog is all about but this thread is about when it was taken too far and i don't think tales was one of them |
Pretentious is defined as: having or creating a deceptive outer appearance of great worth; ostentatious. It is something that has the appearance of worth, without possessing actual worth; it's a derogatory term. So wouldn't it be more accurate to say that prog is ambitious, rather than pretentious? Just a thought.
|
I agree completely and I think lazland also addressed it as did I. I think pretentious is being interpreted here or these days in general as taking oneself too seriously. But what is too seriously? Is the listener not getting ahead of himself in deciding when an artist is taking himself too seriously? Pretentious just seems to be shorthand for long length of track and verbose lyrics.That's just ambition and for God's sake, there's nothing wrong with ambition even if it may not always produce the best results.
|
 |
InClouds
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 30 2010
Location: MInnesota, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 109
|
Posted: June 09 2010 at 00:15 |
topographicbroadways wrote:
Adams Bolero wrote:
Pretentiousness doesn't mean bad. The fact that TFTO is based on the works of Paramahansa Yogananda is one of the reasons I love prog; it is a genre of music that is unafraid to experiment and try new things even if it they risk ridicule for doing it. |
being pretentious is what prog is all about but this thread is about when it was taken too far and i don't think tales was one of them |
Pretentious is defined as: having or creating a deceptive outer appearance of great worth; ostentatious. It is something that has the appearance of worth, without possessing actual worth; it's a derogatory term. So wouldn't it be more accurate to say that prog is ambitious, rather than pretentious? Just a thought.
Also:
Nightshine wrote:
Dream Theater.
/thread
|
Persuasive argument. You have swayed my mind with your profound insight.
Edited by InClouds - June 09 2010 at 00:19
|
 |
Gerinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5160
|
Posted: June 08 2010 at 15:56 |
richardh wrote:
^ 'Pretentiousness' is bad if the band is overstretching themselves. Lamb has some wonderfull songs but why exactly does it need so much filler to make it a double? Possibly for innocent reasons just to provide enough material for a grand theatrical experience which would be fair enough. But isn't there also an element of self aggrandisement..oh look at us we can do a double album with obscure ideas and look intellectually superior as a result..? Thats pretentious! |
I think Genesis were among the least pretentious of all the big ones, and I would describe The Lamb as "ambitious" rather than "pretentious". No fillers for my taste, it's perfectly OK.
|
 |
Nightshine
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 210
|
Posted: June 08 2010 at 13:58 |
Dream Theater.
/thread
|
 |
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30203
|
Posted: June 08 2010 at 13:52 |
cstack3 wrote:
Squire's stage attire in this Youtube clip is pretty damn pretentious!
GREAT song, though! There was a better version on YouTube (more in sync), but I guess it got yanked.
Ahhh...the good old days, Squire wearing capes, big boots etc.!! And thin!! Happens to the best of us! |
Not convinced that having bad fashion sense is really pretentious. Rush used to wear similar things around Caress Of Steel time (1975) but have admitted this was just because they wanted to wear jeans and t-shirts but at the time you were'nt allowed to!
|
 |
cstack3
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7514
|
Posted: June 08 2010 at 02:50 |
Squire's stage attire in this Youtube clip is pretty damn pretentious!
GREAT song, though! There was a better version on YouTube (more in sync), but I guess it got yanked.
Ahhh...the good old days, Squire wearing capes, big boots etc.!! And thin!! Happens to the best of us!
|
 |
uduwudu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2603
|
Posted: June 08 2010 at 02:32 |
Tony Banks has said in interviews that there was a little bit of filler material on Lamb. Some of this is music that is / was part of the theatrical experience - probably giving Gabriel plenty of time to look like a human haemmorhoid i.e. change costumes. Not sure about the self aggrandisement bit. They were in such a hurry to get6 it finished they probably would have settled for a single LP just to ease the pressure. But it is the sort of work that needs a fair bit of room to be portrayed. Nowadays it would be a single CD (probably) and no one would blink an eye. But a multi box set of wax cylinders... oops I mean 2 record set had to be it. Genesis never quite struck me as the sort of gys who might think how wonderful and superior they are (despite having the public school education.) This sort of interview would be interesting but I really think their own intelligence and demeanour stops them from being too obviously pratty. It was really the punk press (here we go..  .) that fostered these ideas.
|
 |
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30203
|
Posted: June 08 2010 at 00:46 |
^ 'Pretentiousness' is bad if the band is overstretching themselves. Lamb has some wonderfull songs but why exactly does it need so much filler to make it a double? Possibly for innocent reasons just to provide enough material for a grand theatrical experience which would be fair enough. But isn't there also an element of self aggrandisement..oh look at us we can do a double album with obscure ideas and look intellectually superior as a result..? Thats pretentious!
|
 |
uduwudu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2603
|
Posted: June 07 2010 at 22:03 |
Is pretentious a bad thing? Aiming to achieve higher planes? IMHO nothing in prog rock is badly pretentious though personal taste dictates perception. I find that dumbed down pop music (i.e. the producers assume the audience is so stupid as to accept one chord no melody type cut and paste songs) to be arrogant, patronsing and insulting. Prog rock does not talk down to it's audience. Certainly much may be oblique but this after all cerebral music. it can be a challenge until you get used to the idea. Move on to Magma then...  Imagine (if you can) Tales as a pop chorus type effort... doesn't scan. Lamb Lies Donw has some top tunes Ititle track. IT), a great atmosphere and a sense of the absurd a dig at Broadway, the Rolling Stones and unauthorised and impromptu sex changes. Only knock and know all... To accuse music of pretension... is this not the equivant of trying to keep chains on it, only have parameters of expression that are within the collective good...? Actually when I saw this title in this thread I thought this might be a good comedy moment. Flowers on heads and flying pianos, swirling capes and make up etc... the more shall we say, superficial elements of this music as deemed necessary to get the content htrough to an audience whose taste is / has been "guided" by an industry are funny - to varying extents. These bits are the entertainment.. Not that verything released is a total success but that's our individual taste - allowed to be unconfined by fashion industry diktat.
|
 |
rod65
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 28 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 248
|
Posted: June 07 2010 at 21:06 |
richardh wrote:
rod65 wrote:
Show me a spectacle, or any work of art that does not utterly conform to mainstream expectations, that can't be labeled pretentious from a certain point of view, paticularly as time passes and tastes change. I think that if an artist does not have the courage to risk being called pretentious he/she is not much of an artist. Also, especially where live performances are concerned, we need to remember that big stadium rock, prog or otherwise (ex. the flying piano), is largely about spectacle--the shared experience of spectacle. Of course it's pretentious. It's supposed to be. That's part of the fun.  |
So all 'spectacle' is pretentious? 
I think we are getting away from the point. Spectacle can be just visual and impressive without having an air of pretentiousness.Or it can have meaning and a message (perhaps hidden). If the band think it dentotes something more important than what it is ..then its pretentious.The flying piano clearly has no meaning whatsover so in my mind carries no real pretentious aspect that I can discern (just pure showbiz). On the other hand a rock musician performing a self composed piano concerto with a large orchestra very obviously is pretentious. I think the lines can easily be drawn. |
Fair enough. I see your point.
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.