Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Progressive Metal Pioneers?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProgressive Metal Pioneers?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 13>
Author
Message
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65860
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2008 at 23:48
ah, if only the Witch sounded that good live.. ah well LOL

'For the Future' was nice to see, I like how sloppy but actually quite tight they were

..here's some unusually good footage of Colosseum ll from an old British broadcast, scroll down about halfway, three full vids;
http://matari_sage.at.infoseek.co.jp/colosseum2.html




Back to Top
The Whistler View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2008 at 01:06
Why won't you guys just fess up and admit that Tull invented progressive metal already? Sheesh...
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2008 at 04:04
There's little doubt that Tull, among a large number of others, produced some music that's at the roots of metal - probaby even Progressive Metal - but I remain unconvinced that they invented it...
 
 
(undated - looks like 1975, given the length of Ian's Beard) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqZmtq5LhFo&feature=related
 
- Thanks for the excuse to go trawling for early Tull vidz... like I needed one Big%20smile
 
 
Now if you'd said Mk II Deep Purple, then I'd be more tempted to agree...
 
(1969) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oE8R1OztUc&feature=related (actually, the concerto is pretty dire - but you've got to admire the hard work and innovation that went into it).
 
 
...and because that Colosseum II video reminded me that Andrew Lloyd Webber could be Prog; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHcFBjj5FNE
 
 
Oh yes, I was going to dig up some Sweet:
 
ACTION: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4GXV-lCGJ8&feature=related
 
 
For fun:
Ballroom Blitz - the original http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrBDivsSe3k
 
...and the Scorps covering the Sweet, singing the songs in German:
 
 
The roots are extremely entertaining Wink


Edited by Certif1ed - April 16 2008 at 08:16
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2008 at 04:16
I'll loook forward to watching those clips later. The Sweet were influenced by heavy rock (The Healer could practically be Deep Purple Mk4) and they even had the odd prog moment - the long version of Love Is Like Oxygen for example has an almost Tubular Bells like middle section.
What?
Back to Top
BigHairyMonster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 08 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 115
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 17 2008 at 21:24
Well since my initial arguments were pretty well dismissed, I will present some evidence as to why I think these are the forerunners of prog-metal:

Sir Lord Baltimore:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mALWRFeGcI0
Sir Lord Baltimore:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aTNdCkww6E&feature=related
Blue Cheer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlDPzlVSv8A
Queen (A song from the first album, 1972): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fad25vmn4U&feature=related
and if this isn't an early form of prog metal: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgjMf1ENVgk&feature=related



Big Hairy Monster's debut CD
"View" coming soon!
www.bighairymonster.com
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 17 2008 at 22:44

we might consider Atomic Rooster, or -- going out on a limb here -- TRex. 

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2008 at 02:50
Originally posted by BigHairyMonster BigHairyMonster wrote:

Well since my initial arguments were pretty well dismissed, I will present some evidence as to why I think these are the forerunners of prog-metal:

Sir Lord Baltimore:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mALWRFeGcI0
Sir Lord Baltimore:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aTNdCkww6E&feature=related
Blue Cheer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlDPzlVSv8A
Queen (A song from the first album, 1972): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fad25vmn4U&feature=related
and if this isn't an early form of prog metal: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgjMf1ENVgk&feature=related

 
No problems with such bands being the forerunners - and I'd include Spooky Tooth, Vanilla Fudge (at a push), Yardbirds, Cream, Led Zep, Black Sabbath, May Blitz, High Tide, Arzachel, Khan, Pink Fairies, Groundhogs et al among their numbers.
 
I don't think any of those bands fit into the rank of "Pioneer", though;
 
1. Sir Lord Baltimore - the overall sound is not in the same "metal" ball park as, for example, UFO - it's closer to 1970s hard rock in style, rooted in the sound of Cream/Yardbirds. The riffing and drumming is in much the same vein as Led Zep - perhaps a little more quirky and certainly looser. It's very easy to hear this as a precursor to the metal sound and style, but not a consolidation, like the Scorpions or the Sweet.
 
The soloing, while fast, is non-constructed, and pure pentatonic bluff. Contrast this with what Schenker did. The changes are all pretty much in the same key - there's no harmonic experimentation or hints at Classical music. Ritchie Blackmore was well ahead of the game here - Mark II Purple are a stronger heavy metal root, and hint strongly at Prog Metal, while I don't really hear a link here.
 
Perhaps you could pick out some bits and pieces that demonstrate the pioneering?
 
 
2. Blue Cheer. Oh come on!
 
Blue Cheer are the antithesis of Progressive - they turned it up to 11 and let rip. They're at the very root of hard rock and heavy metal - just for the up to 11 thing and the monster riffs - but that's it. There's no Progressive connection here, musically speaking. This video demonstrates what I'm talking about perfectly - unless you think I've missed something.
 
 
3. Queen.
 
A bit harder - and perhaps a borderline case, especially with their first two albums. Perhaps Queen II ought to be considered Prog Metal, in a way. Let's face it, Queen were Queen, and they were a unique, pioneering band that fits almost any rock category you care to put them in.
 
Extremely talented and Progressive band - there's no doubt in my mind that they wrote Progressive Rock, and they were certainly an influence on The Sweet (who themselves are only borderline "Pioneers" - their most progressive song is "Love is LIke Oxygen" - the extended version. I only included some vids from them to show the link between Glam and Metal/Prog Metal) - and were in turn influenced by Uriah Heep (especially in the vocal harmonies), among others - but I don't really hear their influence in any Progressive metal I've ever heard. Queen were/are inimitable, and most Prog Rock doesn't compete with them in terms of complex structuring and virtuosic performance.
 
Maybe some of the PM afficiandos can put me straight here - but I don't "feel" Queen (even early Queen) as pioneering PM. They wrote songs that have a kind of metal feel - but there's something else in their music that stops them being "proper" metal.
 
Just my feeling, of course.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
CCVP View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 15 2007
Location: Vitória, Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 7971
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2008 at 16:43
My eyes cheat me, or is said here that Jethro Tull, a freaking rock band that, during the 70's, made prog rock (according to Ian Anderson himself) is one of the roots of progressive metal? WHAT? i am leaving this thread right now. Cant take this anymore! I bet next step is to convince everybody that the post Hackett genesis is the best phase of Genesis, that journey and styx are Zeuhl bands, and that Zappa is 20 year old
Back to Top
Squonkman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 08 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2008 at 17:03
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

King Crimson pre-dates Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, and even Rush with the development of prog metal
 
 
I agree. The heavier parts of early Crimson did influence progressive metal, so for that they are rightly considered a pioneer, and I think any progressive metal band would consider them an influence and a pioneer. King Crimson probably has influenced more progressive bands than any other band in history in a variety of types of progressive rock. Progressive metal is certainly one of them. I also would think of Metallica as a prog metal pioneer. Certainly any progressive metal bands that arose in the 90s would have been raised on Metallica.


Edited by Squonkman - April 18 2008 at 17:07
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2008 at 17:06
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

we might consider Atomic Rooster, or -- going out on a limb here -- TRex.



Maybe Atomic Rooster, but I don't think they've influenced anyone, a pitty...Love their debut and of course their total masterpice DWBY.

They're heavy, but not metal, just like DP or BS or Led or even The Who.
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2008 at 17:57
I think it all depends on the definition of the word "pioneer". in my opinion the pioneer of a certain movement does not necessarily have to belong to the movement itself, because it is the objective of a pioneer to prepare the way


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 18 2008 at 19:07
Originally posted by CCVP CCVP wrote:

My eyes cheat me, or is said here that Jethro Tull, a freaking rock band that, during the 70's, made prog rock (according to Ian Anderson himself) is one of the roots of progressive metal? WHAT? i am leaving this thread right now. Cant take this anymore! I bet next step is to convince everybody that the post Hackett genesis is the best phase of Genesis, that journey and styx are Zeuhl bands, and that Zappa is 20 year old
 
Calm down dear CCVP, soon enough, Frank Sinatra will appear as the original mastermind of progressive-metal...
 
Well, they gave Tull a Grammy for best metal recording after all...LOL
Back to Top
lucas View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 06 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 19 2008 at 08:55
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

[QUOTE=CCVP]
 Well, they gave Tull a Grammy for best metal recording after all...LOL
 
For "crest of a knave" isn't it ? Metallica should have earned the Grammy instead...
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 20 2008 at 04:39
Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

I think it all depends on the definition of the word "pioneer". in my opinion the pioneer of a certain movement does not necessarily have to belong to the movement itself, because it is the objective of a pioneer to prepare the way
 
All hail Elvis Presley - pioneer of Prog... Tongue
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 20 2008 at 04:48
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

I think it all depends on the definition of the word "pioneer". in my opinion the pioneer of a certain movement does not necessarily have to belong to the movement itself, because it is the objective of a pioneer to prepare the way
 
All hail Elvis Presley - pioneer of Prog... Tongue
 
Ah come on, you forgot Fats Domino!Tongue
 
Originally posted by HughesJB4 HughesJB4 wrote:

Originally posted by Real Paradox Real Paradox wrote:

Rush all the way dude. They were the first heavy prog band, and basically every progressive metal band site them as main influence, specially DT.
 
Go back and read the rest of the topic first. We have been round and round on whether Rush is a prog metal pioneer many times, and I imagine some of the people that have been posting in this topic for a few pages now are getting sick of Rush coming up.
An influence is not the same thing as a pioneer, a point we already established many pages back.
 
 
I hope you get my point. Oh yeah, that was backing up Certif1ed, just in case anyone got confused there.


Edited by HughesJB4 - April 20 2008 at 04:57
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 20 2008 at 12:36
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

I think it all depends on the definition of the word "pioneer". in my opinion the pioneer of a certain movement does not necessarily have to belong to the movement itself, because it is the objective of a pioneer to prepare the way
 
All hail Elvis Presley - pioneer of Prog... Tongue
 
False.. we all know prog was created in an obscure cave in southwest France, called Cro-Magnon...
(we'll get there..I'm sure)
Back to Top
heyitsthatguy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 17 2006
Location: Washington Hgts
Status: Offline
Points: 10094
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 20 2008 at 12:41
Originally posted by Squonkman Squonkman wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

King Crimson pre-dates Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, and even Rush with the development of prog metal
 
 
I agree. The heavier parts of early Crimson did influence progressive metal, so for that they are rightly considered a pioneer, and I think any progressive metal band would consider them an influence and a pioneer. King Crimson probably has influenced more progressive bands than any other band in history in a variety of types of progressive rock. Progressive metal is certainly one of them. I also would think of Metallica as a prog metal pioneer. Certainly any progressive metal bands that arose in the 90s would have been raised on Metallica.


BUT KING CRIMSON DIDN'T PLAY PROGRESSIVE METAL SO THEY COULDN'T HAVE PIONEERED IT A;FDHSA;KFHJ;ADKFGHJAD;KJFGHADLKFJGHDAKFJGHDSLKFGHJDSLFKGJHDSLFKGJHDLFGKJH

YOU NEED TO HAVE DONE SOMETHING TO HAVE DONE SOMETHING


Edited by heyitsthatguy - April 20 2008 at 12:44


Back to Top
laplace View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 06 2005
Location: popupControl();
Status: Offline
Points: 7606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 20 2008 at 14:15
Originally posted by heyitsthatguy heyitsthatguy wrote:



Originally posted by Squonkman Squonkman wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

King Crimson pre-dates Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, and even Rush with the development of prog metal



I agree. The heavier parts of early Crimson did influence progressive metal, so for that they are rightly considered a pioneer, and I think any progressive metal band would consider them an influence and a pioneer. King Crimson probably has influenced more progressive bands than any other band in history in a variety of types of progressive rock. Progressive metal is certainly one of them. I also would think of Metallica as a prog metal pioneer. Certainly any progressive metal bands that arose in the 90s would have been raised on Metallica.
BUT KING CRIMSON DIDN'T PLAY PROGRESSIVE METAL SO THEY COULDN'T HAVE PIONEERED IT A;FDHSA;KFHJ;ADKFGHJAD;KJFGHADLKFJGHDAKFJGHDSLKFGHJDSLFKGJHDSLFKGJHDLFGKJHYOU NEED TO HAVE DONE SOMETHING TO HAVE DONE SOMETHING


*giggles*

Actually I'd say it was still being pioneered; almost every time I bite ze bullet and listen to a new extreme prog album for the sake of staying modern, it's the worst prog metal album I've ever heard, and since I don't really like much metal, the fact that the form still has further to move away from my tastes means it must still be advancing. =)

Edited by laplace - April 20 2008 at 14:18
Back to Top
Squonkman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 08 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 21 2008 at 00:15
Originally posted by heyitsthatguy heyitsthatguy wrote:

Originally posted by Squonkman Squonkman wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

King Crimson pre-dates Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, and even Rush with the development of prog metal
 
 
I agree. The heavier parts of early Crimson did influence progressive metal, so for that they are rightly considered a pioneer, and I think any progressive metal band would consider them an influence and a pioneer. King Crimson probably has influenced more progressive bands than any other band in history in a variety of types of progressive rock. Progressive metal is certainly one of them. I also would think of Metallica as a prog metal pioneer. Certainly any progressive metal bands that arose in the 90s would have been raised on Metallica.


BUT KING CRIMSON DIDN'T PLAY PROGRESSIVE METAL SO THEY COULDN'T HAVE PIONEERED IT A;FDHSA;KFHJ;ADKFGHJAD;KJFGHADLKFJGHDAKFJGHDSLKFGHJDSLFKGJHDSLFKGJHDLFGKJH

YOU NEED TO HAVE DONE SOMETHING TO HAVE DONE SOMETHING
 
 
like someone else in this thread said above, you don't need to have played in that style to be a pioneer. A pioneer blazes the trail for those to come later. Any progressive metal band worth its salt will cite Crimson as an influence. I just saw 2 young bands this past year that were prog metal and definitely had KC influences, Nebelnest and Indukti.
 
Chuck Yeager was never an astronaut, but he is absolutely a pioneer of space flight. He and test pilots like him paved the way for the original Mercury astronauts that followed.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 21 2008 at 05:10
^False.. we all know prog was created in an obscure cave in southwest France, called Cro-Magnon...  didn't someone just say that? Confused
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 13>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.