Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: June 18 2014 at 06:10
Atavachron wrote:
But the myth was a reality, just a deeply mis-produced one. As for the rest you see differently, all I can say is maybe one day everyone posting here will have a chance, accidentally or not, to sit down, listen to both the original and the remake, and be able to not only compare them but fully take them in. Maybe no one will change their mind, or maybe they'll hear what Paul McCartney always did: a musician's record made by a people's band.
Between 1966 and the mid-80s when bootleg versions of SMiLE began appearing it had attained a mythological status - everyone knew it existed but few had ever heard it, and not in its entirety as Brian Wilson envisioned it. Even from the bootlegs no one could recreate what Wilson had envisioned, they could only imagine what it could have been like - everyone assumed (hoped, wished, prayed, believed) it was better than Smiley Smile and it achieved this by word-of-mouth and hearsay alone - it became the myth of SMiLE.
Sure, you can listen to the recent issues of Brian Wilson Presents SMiLE and The Smile Sessions (I have both) and appraise them for what they are, but that is not what this thread is discussing.
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65864
Posted: June 18 2014 at 01:24
But the myth was a reality, just a deeply mis-produced one. As for the rest you see differently, all I can say is maybe one day everyone posting here will have a chance, accidentally or not, to sit down, listen to both the original and the remake, and be able to not only compare them but fully take them in. Maybe no one will change their mind, or maybe they'll hear what Paul McCartney always did: a musician's record made by a people's band.
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65864
Posted: June 18 2014 at 00:53
^ Yes but it existed, and was fairly close to a complete vision in outline and some completed material. Smiley Smile was Smile in spirit, was undoubtedly heard by anyone who knew any work by the band was worth hearing, and therefore had to have had influence. An ethereal influence perhaps, but a real one.
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: June 18 2014 at 00:26
Atavachron wrote:
Dean wrote:
For many years (erm... 40?) SMiLE was more a myth than a reality so the number of bands that could have even remotely been influenced by it would be pretty small. Of course some may have been influenced by the myth of SMiLE, or at least the idea of SMiLE, but more would have been influenced (at the time) by Pet Sounds.
Yes and no; Smiley Smile was widely distributed in '67, it just was so bizarre and unlike typical Beach Boys, no one knew what to make of it. I think some thought it was a joke-- a novelty like the Beatles Fan Club issues, Christmas Albums, etc.
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65864
Posted: June 17 2014 at 20:49
Dean wrote:
For many years (erm... 40?) SMiLE was more a myth than a reality so the number of bands that could have even remotely been influenced by it would be pretty small. Of course some may have been influenced by the myth of SMiLE, or at least the idea of SMiLE, but more would have been influenced (at the time) by Pet Sounds.
Yes and no; Smiley Smile was widely distributed in '67, it just was so bizarre and unlike typical Beach Boys, no one knew what to make of it. I think some thought it was a joke-- a novelty like the Beatles Fan Club issues, Christmas Albums, etc.
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65864
Posted: June 17 2014 at 20:26
SteveG wrote:
I do indeed know the context of Hendrix's statement and it was as I have stated. The point of my post was to demonstrate the quickly changing musical trends as well as social and cultural back drops by which music is greatly judged. The Beach Boys never had the same critical acclaim that the Beatles enjoyed or were the media darlings that the Beatles were. Furthermore, they were not taken seriously within the newly established counter culture and were quickly dismissed as unhip musical relics. All these factors combined with the fact that the music of Smile in any of it's released forms remains critically subpar to that of Pet Sounds is the basis for my opinion.
Bullsh*t-- I'd bet any amount of money that is not how Hendrix meant it, and I put the burden on you, sir, to show otherwise. Until then, Jimi will be rolling over until this slander is corrected. Around the time he died Hendrix, according to him and others, intended to move in a direction closer to what the BBs had been doing (art-rock), and away from his acid-blues jam music. "The Beach Boys never had the same critical acclaim as the Beatles" ? Who's acclaim do you speak of? Many critics, if that's who you mean, didn't like the Beatles any more than the Beach Boys.
And one more thing; "The music of Smile in any of its released forms remains critically subpar to that of Pet Sounds is the basis for my opinion." Now I know you're talking out of your ass: The music on SS subpar to Pet Sounds ? It seems that you're making most of this up-- anyone with enough listening experience and an appreciation of ambitious music could tell Pet Sounds was a dull pop venture, and that Smile was not.
Edited by Atavachron - June 18 2014 at 03:21
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65864
Posted: June 17 2014 at 20:14
^ There's nothing strange about it-- it's just other people
seeing what you do not. They were the first rock band to
take the
form seriously. Up to then it was Buddy Holly, Everly Brothers, the bubblegum pop-act-of-the-week, (some quite brilliant I might add), until Brian and
brothers decided to treat rock as a real art form even though it was a
largely snickered-at young person's fad.
"Smiley Smile
makes Pepper look like commercial trade music" may indeed be, as
Lemming has suggested, defensive, but it is in defense of a group
laughed-at even though they were responsible for the earliest form of
Art Rock as we understand it today, produced with love and far more
musical ambition than the Beatles or Hendrix or f*cking Genesis for
that matter. Yes Brian was crazy, yes the music sounds
dated and tween-oriented, yes they were a product of the early '60s
before psychedelia became the norm. But they were also artists; serious,
adult, ambitious, and it was because of what Brian saw was possible
that we have modern rock in the evolutionary state it is.
Or was.
Edited by Atavachron - June 17 2014 at 20:39
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Posted: June 17 2014 at 16:27
Dean wrote:
SteveG wrote:
Dean, great suggestion. I remember being a young music fan that, along with my friends, that tried so hard to reconstruct the lost Smile album from outtakes, bootlegs, and the like, that we probably never even seriously considered the music!! So, I can clearly see how someone could have been influenced by the myth or idea of Smile. Again, well done.
I've never been a Beach Boys fan but back in 1969/70 a friend at high-school was into them in a big way, I remember that he would speak of Brian Wilson and the SMiLE album with the same near-mystical reverence that the rest of my friends would have for Syd Barrett.
Yes, After my initial fascination with the early 60's icons had worn off it was strange to see people still fascinated by and revering people like Brian Wilson but I guess that's a prog fan for you.
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: June 17 2014 at 15:00
SteveG wrote:
Dean, great suggestion. I remember being a young music fan that, along with my friends, that tried so hard to reconstruct the lost Smile album from outtakes, bootlegs, and the like, that we probably never even seriously considered the music!! So, I can clearly see how someone could have been influenced by the myth or idea of Smile. Again, well done.
I've never been a Beach Boys fan but back in 1969/70 a friend at high-school was into them in a big way, I remember that he would speak of Brian Wilson and the SMiLE album with the same near-mystical reverence that the rest of my friends would have for Syd Barrett.
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Posted: June 17 2014 at 14:21
Dean wrote:
For many years (erm... 40?) SMiLE was more a myth than a reality so the number of bands that could have even remotely been influenced by it would be pretty small. Of course some may have been influenced by the myth of SMiLE, or at least the idea of SMiLE, but more would have been influenced (at the time) by Pet Sounds.
Dean, great suggestion. I remember being a young music fan that, along with my friends, tried so hard to reconstruct the lost Smile album from outtakes, bootlegs, and the like, that we probably never even seriously considered the music!! So, I can clearly see how someone could have been influenced by the myth or idea of Smile. Again, well done.
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Posted: June 17 2014 at 14:13
Atavachron wrote:
SteveG wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
^ So you don't like Smiley Smile and you don't like Smile. That means you probably wouldn't have liked the original album as conceived back in '67, which if given the proper attention likely would've rivaled Sgt. Pep for new and original pop music. Smiley Smile, even as released in its stillborn state, was bold; a whole new way of looking at experimental rock music which in '67 made Piper at the Gates of Dawn and Freak Out look undisciplined, and the Beatles tame. It is a breakthrough if completely unacknowledged masterwork.
If the original Smile album was released as conceived back in 1967, I highly doubt that it would have rivaled Sgt. Pep. any more than the Four Season's Genuine Imitation Life Gazette album did when it was released in '69, as the musical times had quickly changed with the advent of acid rock mixed with social consciousness. As Jimi Hendrix once opined after first hearing Hereos and Villians, the song sounded to him like a "psychedelic barber shop quartet". (His observation was not meant to be a compliment.) However, without a machine to alter past events, the best we can do is speculate.
Smiley Smile makes Pepper look like commercial trade music, even unfinished. And how do you know Hendrix meant his comment as a slight? Do know the context of the statement, or are you assuming that's how he meant it? I gather the latter, as it fits your viewpoint. In reality, Mr. Hendrix was quite adept at where pop music and rock 'n roll was headed and would have seen the LP for what it was: an innovation. He was too sensitive and open to all musics, and besides 'Heroes and Villains' is just one cut off the record, and a great one BTW. It was "Psychedelic Barbershop", that was the point. Hendrix heard that new sound and probably wished he'd been as good and well-organized as the Beach Boys. They did as much or more for the art of rock than Jimi ever did when he was alive.
I do indeed know the context of Hendrix's statement and it was as I have stated. The point of my post was to demonstrate the quickly changing musical trends as well as social and cultural back drops by which music is greatly judged. The Beach Boys never had the same critical acclaim that the Beatles enjoyed or were the media darlings that the Beatles were. Furthermore, they were not taken seriously within the newly established counter culture and were quickly dismissed as unhip musical relics. All these factors, combined with the fact that the music of Smile in any of it's released forms remains critically subpar to that of Pet Sounds, is the basis for my opinion.
A Rum Tale by Procol Harum has instrumental characteristics of a quirky Brian Wilson ballad. It's in 3/4 and has the feel and odd but melodic chord voicings often stroked by Wilson. The Residents seemed to grab the instrumental style on Smile and that is evident on Mark Of the Mole, Tunes of Two Cities, Fingerprince. 10CC were influenced vocally and occasionally instrumentally on Original Soundtrack, Sheet Music, and How Dare You. Very Smile related and also on Godley and Creme.
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: June 17 2014 at 09:26
For many years (erm... 40?) SMiLE was more a myth than a reality so the number of bands that could have even remotely been influenced by it would be pretty small. Of course some may have been influenced by the myth of SMiLE, or at least the idea of SMiLE, but more would have been influenced (at the time) by Pet Sounds.
I have to admit that I'm not familiar with the Smiley Smile album but do acknowledge that what became Brian Wilson Presents Smile is mostly brilliant, prescient and hugely influential. However, the claim that Smiley Smile (which I've only heard as a piecemeal compilation) makes Sgt Pepper sound like commercial trade music is disingenuous at best and defensive at worst (and there are at least two other Beatles albums I think superior to the routinely overstated Pepper) What Hendrix thought of any music in his lifetime will never serve as any litmus test of quality in my book (Jimi's output is incredibly patchy) When you say they in the context of the Beach Boys, who exactly do you mean? (Forgive my ignorance, but I'm guessing that the creative muse was not just Brian?)
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65864
Posted: June 16 2014 at 21:37
SteveG wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
^ So you don't like Smiley Smile and you don't like Smile. That means you probably wouldn't have liked the original album as conceived back in '67, which if given the proper attention likely would've rivaled Sgt. Pep for new and original pop music. Smiley Smile, even as released in its stillborn state, was bold; a whole new way of looking at experimental rock music which in '67 made Piper at the Gates of Dawn and Freak Out look undisciplined, and the Beatles tame. It is a breakthrough if completely unacknowledged masterwork.
If the original Smile album was released as conceived back in 1967, I highly doubt that it would have rivaled Sgt. Pep. any more than the Four Season's Genuine Imitation Life Gazette album did when it was released in '69, as the musical times had quickly changed with the advent of acid rock mixed with social consciousness. As Jimi Hendrix once opined after first hearing Hereos and Villians, the song sounded to him like a "psychedelic barber shop quartet". (His observation was not meant to be a compliment.) However, without a machine to alter past events, the best we can do is speculate.
Smiley Smile makes Pepper look like commercial trade music, even unfinished. And how do you know Hendrix meant his comment as a slight? Do know the context of the statement, or are you assuming that's how he meant it? I gather the latter, as it fits your viewpoint. In reality, Mr. Hendrix was quite adept at where pop music and rock 'n roll was headed and would have seen the LP for what it was: an innovation. He was too sensitive and open to all musics, and besides 'Heroes and Villains' is just one cut off the record, and a great one BTW. It was "Psychedelic Barbershop", that was the point. Hendrix heard that new sound and probably wished he'd been as good and well-organized as the Beach Boys. They did as much or more for the art of rock than Jimi ever did when he was alive.
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281
Posted: June 16 2014 at 13:48
That's an easy one! Brian Eno!
"Driving Me Backwards" (Though that one could have also been influenced by early Zappa) "Some Faraway Beach" "Some Of Them Are Old" "Back In Judy's Jungle" "The Great Pretender" "Put A Straw Under Baby" "Taking Tiger Mountain" "The Big Ship" "Golden Hours" "Everything Merges With The Night"
Edited by KingCrInuYasha - June 16 2014 at 13:50
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.242 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.