Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
The Lost Chord
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 23 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1907
|
Topic: Apocolypto Posted: December 12 2006 at 21:41 |
Just saw the new Mel Gibson film "Apocolypto". Curious if anyone else has seen it? Got fantastic reviews, and I found it to be quite dissapointing; a real shock for me!
The movie i felt was just poorly put together, and was really just eye candy in the end. Beautiful costumes and environments, and filmed well...but man, this was NO Braveheart or Passion!
My bro said it was so unrealistic because it was based on a myth? Never heard that, I thought it was going to be historicaly correct and crap but damnwas it WAY off.
It was "meh"
|
 |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: December 12 2006 at 21:44 |
Ya, I was underwhelmed too. It was a really unique film, and I assume a good aspect of Myan civilization, something neglected in major films, but it was just a little too weird for its own good. It had a nice story, and I thought it picked up during the last half, even if it relegated to a well-trodden path of "chase movie."
|
|
 |
KoS
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
|
Posted: December 12 2006 at 21:46 |
I though it was a brilliantly paced action film. The visuals were gorgeous. the music added to it
I don't think it was unrealistic, except for the running part. the Mayans were not exactly a peaceful civilization.
|
 |
Drew
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 12600
|
Posted: December 12 2006 at 21:50 |
Is it violent?
|
|
 |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: December 12 2006 at 21:53 |
Yeah, but only really bad during a ritual scrifice part, which leaves about no aspect of ritual sacrifice to be imagined. Everything else is basically Braveheart on a lesser scale with fewer dismemberings.
Edited by stonebeard - December 12 2006 at 21:55
|
|
 |
Drew
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 12600
|
Posted: December 12 2006 at 21:54 |
^^ ok cool- I just saw Blood Diamond- and I am kinda done with violent movies for a while- WAY too intense for me to see another like it for a while.
Edited by Drew - December 12 2006 at 21:54
|
|
 |
The Lost Chord
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 23 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1907
|
Posted: December 12 2006 at 22:21 |
I also didnt find the movie "gory" at all really. Come on, this movie compared to what we have seen was childs play! So, what, a few guys get hit with spears and bows, and they are bludgened instead of having their heads cut off. At times it had disturbing themes, but it wasnt like braveheart where blood was splattered on the screen after a guys leg was sliced off.
Also, this movie if taken seriously was INCREDIBLY unrealistic!
Spoilers:
How did he get his wife and child out of that impossible dilemma of being in a rain filled hole? How did they even SURVIVE beyond a DAY in there!??!?! and PREGNANT!??
The main character was shot through the side with an arrow, and runs for about 2 days from his enemies...who SOMEHOW follow him like a STRAIGHT line through a JUNGLE. Impossible.
He RUNS from a jaguar...Impossible.
He is then shot AGAIN in the sholder, and LIVES, and SAVES HIS WIFE AND CHILD AND BABY!!! omfg.
i remember coutning them as the movie went along...and why does this little girl have the voice of a woman when shes telling the omen???
The movie just BAGH dissapointed me on so many levels. "meh"
P.S., I found the main characters acting to be horrible, with his "I am in front of a camera right now" looks every other cene. Awful.
Edited by The Lost Chord - December 12 2006 at 22:23
|
 |
yesfan88
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 357
|
Posted: December 12 2006 at 22:22 |
All of Mel Gibson's movies are wildly historically inaccurate, so I usually don't watch them. I heard "Apocolypto" was just a bunch of gratuitous violence, so I handn't planned on seeing it.
|
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"- Evelyn Beatrice Hall
|
 |
moreitsythanyou
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: April 23 2006
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 11682
|
Posted: December 12 2006 at 22:24 |
There's a better option: Apocalypso.... great song by Mew
sorry to have wasted your time 
|
 <font color=white>butts, lol[/COLOR]
|
 |
cuncuna
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 29 2005
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 4318
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 00:01 |
Mel Gibson = Not prog.
Fellini = RIO / Avant prog.
|
¡Beware of the Bee!
|
 |
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin & Razor Guru
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 07:54 |
Are the bad guys English in this movie? Usually are...
|
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
 |
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 09:10 |
The Lost Chord wrote:
Just saw the new Mel Gibson film "Apocolypto". Curious if anyone else has seen it? Got fantastic reviews, and I found it to be quite dissapointing; a real shock for me!
The movie i felt was just poorly put together, and was really just eye candy in the end. Beautiful costumes and environments, and filmed well...but man, this was NO Braveheart or Passion!
My bro said it was so unrealistic because it was based on a myth? Never heard that, I thought it was going to be historicaly correct and crap but damnwas it WAY off.
It was "meh" |
If you are looking for historical accuracy don't go looking for it in Gibson's films.Braveheart is filled with so many historical innaccuracies it is laughable.
The pinnacle battle in the film?That battle is called the Battle of Stirling Bridge.Did you see a bridge in the battle?The bridge played an extremely pivotal role in the battle,because the British had to cross it to get to Wallace's forces and could only send a certain number of men across at a time,two abreast.
So I don't ever go into a Gibson movie looking for historical accuracy anymore.
Edited by TheProgtologist - December 13 2006 at 09:10
|
|
 |
The Lost Chord
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 23 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1907
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 11:08 |
Well, it was more so the feel or realism that I was looking for...not so much accuracy. I could care less if there are a few things scewed by the movie, but Apocolypto was just taking away the entire FEEL of a civilization like that...I just didnt even believe it.
|
 |
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 16:58 |
Ok....I see what you are getting at.I really have no desire to see the movie,I honestly didn't even know it had been released yet.
|
|
 |
Arsillus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 17:24 |
Meh, it was okay, but Blood Diamond was much, much better.
|
 |
cuncuna
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 29 2005
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 4318
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 20:21 |
Mel Gibson's """"" 'movies' """"" (notice the extra "'s) should be commented in the "Just for fun" section. Once, on a very long highway travel (6 hours), I saw myself out of bateries, meaning without music, and not having a book at hand (at least an unread one). So, in order to take my mind out of the sad reality of a long trip, I decided to follow the movies they had. A DVD containing "The patriot" and "Braveheart". That's enough Mel Gibson for the rest of my lifetime.
|
¡Beware of the Bee!
|
 |
The Lost Chord
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 23 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1907
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 20:46 |
I love braveheart and the passion, I think those are beautifuly made movies, historically incorrect or not...I dont care, the movies kicked ass!
|
 |
cuncuna
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 29 2005
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 4318
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 21:26 |
Too figurative for me, I'm affraid. Some sort of neoclassic attitude in the overall plot, and too guided, lineal stories, representing values that I'm not certain about how much of values they really are. As for artistry, even those anonimous Star Trek movies directors can do that. Not challenge at all. As for beauty, Wes Anderson goes far beyond if compared. Off course, eyes must be prepared to see beyond shape. If not, this are movies anyway.
|
¡Beware of the Bee!
|
 |
Ghandi 2
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1494
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 21:39 |
I just want to laugh at Mel Gibson because I think he got the Mayans and the Aztecs confused: the Mayans were dead LONG before Cortez came. Their civilization essentially vanished, and it is speculated that they had deforested the surrounding area so much that they were destroyed by floods or something because of erosion or changes in the weather. I saw something on PBS about it a while ago.
Some people I knew saw it and said it was pretty good. I wasn't going to see it anyway so I don't really care.
|
 |
cuncuna
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 29 2005
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 4318
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 23:13 |
Well, I've been reading about it and I have a huge question: ¿Why using a Greek word as title for a movie about Mayans?.
|
¡Beware of the Bee!
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.