![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345 11> |
Author | ||
Easy Money ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 11 2007 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 10744 |
![]() |
|
It really depends on how you define progressive rock. To me classic progressive rock is defined by King Crimson, Gentle Giant, Yes, ELP, VdGG and Genesis. Pink Floyd doesn't really fit with all that to me.
Pink Floyd up through Dark Side is one of my all-time favorite bands, after that I like certain songs, but to me they have a lot more in common with other bands who take a blues, pop and gospel(whether they are conscious of it or not, Floyd has a huge American gospel influence in their music) backdrop and then blow it into huge porportions. The difference between Floyd and albums like Disraeli Gears and Electric Ladyland is that Floyd presents their music in an air of mystery more conducive to 'prog-rockers' and they tend to chain their musical ideas together rather than present seperate songs. Also their voices have that light British art-school quality favored by the prog crowd. |
||
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446 |
||
![]() |
||
darksideof ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: February 22 2007 Location: Newark N.J. Status: Offline Points: 2318 |
![]() |
|
POP/ROCK Album?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/ https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/ |
||
![]() |
||
LeInsomniac ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 22 2006 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 315 |
![]() |
|
I gota say something about this. Whenever a discussion is about: is Pink Floyd this or that; i gotta say something. Yes its true, Pink Floyd were a progressive rock group, and one of the best, I might add, though they're really not my cup of tea in my day by day life, I simply love albums like Piper's, Animals, WYWH, Dark Side and The Wall. This said, now comes what I REALLY wanted to say.
Well, its a bit difficult to analyse if they were the most influential PROG rock group. In one side, its true, they were the most influential ROCK group, what I mean by this, is that, although they weren't (in my opinion of course) the most experimentalist (they were because they made rock music evolve in the sixties, i wont get into much details, there are people here who know better the work of PF, than me) being that King Crimson, Gentle Giant, Yes and others made works that tried to push the rock genre to other side; PF however stayed in more prog pop world, and developed essentially with a Dark Side and The Wall a great number of fans, and nowadays they're considered by the comercial rock world magazines as the best rock group ever, which is really wrong I might add, theres no best rock group ever; if you mean theyre imnportant because they marked an age, thats true, but such groups as The Who, Beatles and Rolling Stones are considered the best rock acts ever, and thats not entirely true, apart from the great music they made, which isnt in discussion here; theyre considered the best by people who never heard prog groups, but as all, in the end is just a matter of taste. Maybe I dwelled a bit here, and lost my point, but yeah, essentially theyre the most influential and known rock group, but i dont consider them the most influential prog-rock group. WHen I hear Dark Side and I hear Close to the Edge, or any album from GG until Free Hand; or any Criimson album from ITCOTCK to RED; or any Zappa album; I doubt theyre the most influential prog-rock group. And I know I'm going to be attacked by saying this. Bear in mind that I like Piink Floyd, and I'm interested in developing my interest in their music. Let's just argue peacefully about this ok? Edited by LeInsomniac - July 24 2008 at 11:45 |
||
![]() |
||
darksideof ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: February 22 2007 Location: Newark N.J. Status: Offline Points: 2318 |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/ https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/ |
||
![]() |
||
darksideof ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: February 22 2007 Location: Newark N.J. Status: Offline Points: 2318 |
![]() |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6vBMmSvgkY
Rick Wakeman: " In the beginning GOD created Pink Floyd". yeap he said that..Mr.Rick wakeman.
Pete Townsend: " A Pink Floyd gig is the only reason why I missed a "THE WHO" show period. On January the 20th 1967 I skip an Who's gig" to take "ERIC CLAPTON" to see "SID BARRETT".
look! what is the line up for this Pink Floyd tribute album? man...... all Prog Pioneers....!
![]() This for those that say that Pink Floyd isn't the most influential progressive rock band ever!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() All that clapping for the MIGHTY PINK FLOYD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![]() Edited by darksideof - July 24 2008 at 13:05 |
||
http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/ https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/ |
||
![]() |
||
el böthy ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: April 27 2005 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 6336 |
![]() |
|
I would say Floyd is more influential in rock in general, but Crimson is probably more influential, or just as much as Floyd, in prog
|
||
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
soundsweird ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: December 08 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 408 |
![]() |
|
Pink Floyd was never called a prog band until after the heyday was over. All through the 60's and 70's they were referred to by everyone as "Space Rock"or just "Space Music", along with groups like Hawkwind. I guess critics in the 80's who didn't really know better lumped them in with other prog bands, but I've never considered them "prog". My first Pink Floyd album purchase was "Ummagumma" in 1970. |
||
![]() |
||
Certif1ed ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
![]() |
|
Floyd were an essential part of, if not the first band in the Progressive music scene in the late 1960s (and "everyone" called it the Progressive music scene!), so Floyd can easily be argued to be the first Prog band.
It's true they didn't use the word "Prog" back then, I suppose...
|
||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
||
![]() |
||
Easy Money ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 11 2007 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 10744 |
![]() |
|
We didn't use the word "prog', but "back then" we (progressive rock fans in the states, early 70s) certainly referred to bands like Crimson, Genesis, Yes, ELP, PFM etc as progressive rock. I think we sort of lumped Floyd in there too although they really were not playing the same kind of compositions as the previously mentioned bands. Floyd was also often grouped with bands like Hawkwind and called "space rock", which has already been mentioned. As early as the late 60s and early 70s FM stations in the states that played long songs and album sides were called progressive rock radio or underground radio. I know, I was listening to these stations all the time. Edited by Easy Money - July 29 2008 at 07:25 |
||
![]() |
||
sircosick ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: January 29 2007 Location: Chile Status: Offline Points: 1264 |
![]() |
|
It actually depends on how important would you consider alternative rock nowadays in the music scene.......
Peace. |
||
The best you can is good enough...
|
||
![]() |
||
SouthSideoftheSky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Symphonic Team Joined: June 29 2008 Location: Close To The... Status: Offline Points: 1965 |
![]() |
|
My point of view on this matter has already been defended by some others but I would like to add some thoughts. Is Pink Floyd the most influential prog rock band? I would have to say No, but not because they were not influential, but because they were not a prog rock band. I always thought that Pink Floyd was an extremely influential psychedelic rock band with an enormous influence ON prog rock. Just like The Beatles, The Who, The Moody Blues, Deep Purple and some others, Pink Floyd surely contributed to the creation of prog rock which would make them either proto-prog or prog-related. Or am I wrong? Pink Floyd’s first album came out already in 1967, the same year as Beatles’ Sgt. Pepper’s album (another factor that was an important influence on prog rock without being prog itself). I thought that prog rock began first in 1969/70 with King Crimson’s debut album, Renaissance’ debut album and then in the early 70’s with bands like Yes, Genesis and ELP(?) By that time Pink Floyd had released many albums already and most importantly, I think, they were already famous before prog rock even started. Maybe later on Pink Floyd was influenced back by prog bands just like The Who probably were when they did Quadrophenia in 1973. But the fact that The Who was influenced by prog bands and came close to prog later on doesn’t make them a “genuine” prog band does it? So, even if Pink Floyd influenced many prog bands in the late 60’s and then were influenced themselves by prog bands in the 70’s doesn’t make them a prog band. They had an influence on non-prog bands too right? The Moody Blues is another band that I think was very influential on prog but without being prog themselves. The Moodies had success already in 1967 with their debut. This album, Days Of Future Past, as well as the subsequent ones were very influential on prog, but were they really prog? Maybe Jethro Tull could prove me wrong because I do consider them prog even if they had success with their two first albums that weren’t really prog. Am I being inconsistent in considering JT prog but not Moody Blues and Pink Floyd? I don’t know. |
||
![]() |
||
MovingPictures07 ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: January 09 2008 Location: Beasty Heart Status: Offline Points: 32181 |
![]() |
|
This would be my post as well. Fantastic summarizing. ![]() ![]() ![]() I'm glad you posted it for me. ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
SouthSideoftheSky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Symphonic Team Joined: June 29 2008 Location: Close To The... Status: Offline Points: 1965 |
![]() |
|
Thanks! I'm glad I could be of some service
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
splyu ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 06 2008 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 316 |
![]() |
|
Considering Kraftwerk are categorized as "Progressive Electronic" on here... I'd say they are easily as influential as PF - not on the progressive scene obviously, but on the general music scene.
|
||
![]() |
||
Steve-A ![]() Forum Groupie ![]() Joined: August 26 2008 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 54 |
![]() |
|
Don't try to argue it with Gilmour though, because he actually said in a recent interview that Pink Floyd were not a progressive rock band, but an art rock band.
|
||
![]() |
||
Dr. Occulator ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 04 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 649 |
![]() |
|
Haven't read all the posts so excuse me if this has already been said.
Floyd probably were the most influential band to get progressive rock in the mainstream public eye and accepted as an alternate music to pure pop or rock. However I certainly do not think they were the most influential prog band musically and artistically....I'd have to go with Yes, Crimson, Genesis & Gentle Giant. |
||
My Doc Told Me I Have Doggie Head.
|
||
![]() |
||
topofsm ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 17 2008 Location: Arizona, USA Status: Offline Points: 1698 |
![]() |
|
Well I do see Pink Floyd as truly progressive, but I can understand why people wouldn't think that way.
However, I think they are definetely the most influential prog band. Not influential to prog fans, but the most overall influential prog band. No other prog band has influenced more fans of music then these guys.
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Dr. Occulator ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 04 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 649 |
![]() |
|
Influenced in what way?...to expose prog rock to a wider audience or influence future bands in a particular musical style...I agree with former but disagree with the latter. |
||
My Doc Told Me I Have Doggie Head.
|
||
![]() |
||
topofsm ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 17 2008 Location: Arizona, USA Status: Offline Points: 1698 |
![]() |
|
Well they have influenced the music making process of many bands in any way. For example, pretty much any fan of rock has at least heard of Pink Floyd and millions of people have heard their music. I can also say from experience that many musicians at folk festivals cite Pink Floyd as one of their influences. Many classical musicans I know are huge fans of Pink Floyd, and quite a few jazz fans like Pink Floyd.
However, I can't say the same for Yes, King Crimson, ELP, Genesis, Gentle Giant, Rush, or Jethro Tull. I can say that the latter bands have influenced more people who are mostly just fans of prog rock. Most prog bands will cite these bands more than Pink Floyd, at least in my experience.
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
BaldJean ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: May 28 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 10387 |
![]() |
|
first of all: Pink Floyd DID change their style substantially. while the early albums were very psychedelic the latter ones lost that psychedelic touch, and they became the big epic makers. the turning point probably was "Dark Side of the Moon", though the process was a gradual one. It is probably because of the gradual nature of style change that you don't realize it, but compare their early albums to their latter ones, and you will get the drift. the more this epic style evolved the worse they became; "Animals" is already quite boring, and I never understood the high rating of that album. 2nd: what the punks really attacked was the lack of spirit, which became obvious in many prog rock bands in the middle of the 70s; they were just going through the motions. Pink Floyd only was a prominent name; they certainly were not influential for the development of Punk. Van der Graaf Generator had a lot more influence there. Pink Floyd were also, compared to other prog bands, pretty simple in their musical structure, especially harmonically. so they don't have much of an influence their either. they did have a great influence on the development of sounds though; actually sounds were their biig forte. however, for their latter albums they forgot about that forte and replaced "sounds" with "sound", meaning "acoustical endeavours" with "perfection and sterility". they did what they sung about themselves in the song "Wish You Were Here". 3rd: there have been dance versions of songs from lot of other prog bands, not only Pink Floyd. even Gentle Giant have been mistreated that way; there was a post about it somewhere in the forum. anyway, "dance version" is a pretty misleading term; I actually believe that some of the originals are a lot more danceable than these so-called "dance versions". adding a heavy 4/4 beat only makes the dance more monotonous, which sadly applies to the moronic masses. dance is an art form. as to the Floydian clones: I am not quite sure which bands you refer to. the only one that really comes to my mind is Eloy. but that's probably because Pink Floyd are not one of my favorite bands at all; I like some of their old albums, especially "Ummagumma" and ""Meddle", perhaps to a certain extent "Wish You Were Here"", but most of the stuff which is awed by many simply leaves me cold. I am not too fond of neo-prog though and try to avoid it; perhaps some of the clones can be found there. Dream Theater, however, are definitely not Floyd clones; they have a completely different approach to music. so, after contradicting all your arguments, let us take a look at what the real influence of Pink Floyd was. as Certif1ed already mentioned, they were an influence on the Krautrock scene. that influence is a bit coincidental though. using drugs (and whatever Waters may say today, Pink Floyd did use drugs) will lead to this kind of, in lack of a better word for it, "fraying out" of music which is typical for some of the early Pink Floyd music as well as for early Karutrock.. their strive towards sound perfection, which I mentioned before, definitely also was a big influence, though in my opinion not a positive one. it led to the sterility of most of the newer music. so yes, they were influential, but not the way CVVP means Edited by BaldJean - September 09 2008 at 05:30 |
||
![]() A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345 11> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |