Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Nowhere Man
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 207
|
Topic: Length of songs Posted: October 15 2006 at 23:21 |
I definately like my songs on the longish side. 8+ minutes. It's one of the things that attracts me to prog greatly. A longer song can have a lot more depth and style than a short one. Not that I don't like songs that are short. I actually find the mere 30 second long "Stop" from The Wall enjoyable.
|
|
 |
pinkyfloydyfan
Forum Groupie
Joined: October 09 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 78
|
Posted: October 15 2006 at 23:08 |
I prefer longs WHEN it's so good!
BUT, it gives less interest when the group lost themselves with no direction, no unity. I don't like free jazz or free rock, it's cacophony, a big mess for me.
Talk about Supper's Ready! Gates! Echoes! Shine on! Close! Think what it can give with a 70 minutes of that!
Is there a song about that long, now? (70 minutes?) I don't tink so...
|
We are pilgrims!
|
 |
yesfan88
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 357
|
Posted: September 15 2006 at 20:14 |
I voted for mini-epics, but many of my favorite songs are longer. It's just that there are a lot more mini-epics, so there are a lot of good mini-epics.
|
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"- Evelyn Beatrice Hall
|
 |
darkshade
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 19 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 10964
|
Posted: September 12 2006 at 23:17 |
i guess since most of my favorite bands (minus Gentle Giant and Rush) play a lot of 10-15 minute songs, i guess ill go with that one, but i dont care as long as the music is good
|
|
 |
Taril
Forum Newbie
Joined: August 14 2006
Location: St.Augustine,FL
Status: Offline
Points: 30
|
Posted: September 12 2006 at 23:02 |
I prefer the 10 - 15 minute range songs.
But really I like anything as long as its not under 4 minutes. Cause usualy stuff under 4, or 5 minutes is pop, or the like. Not always, but alot of the time.
Edited by Taril - September 12 2006 at 23:03
|
Bright Ambassadors of Morning
|
 |
k_crimson
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 12 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 32
|
Posted: September 12 2006 at 16:53 |
i tend to like the 7+ minute songs. KC songs like 21CSM and Epitaph wouldn't be the same if they were shorter. Some just need to be stretched out like that to be great.
|
"the wall on which the prophets wrote is cracking at the seams."
|
 |
NecroManiac
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 29 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 224
|
Posted: September 11 2006 at 19:56 |
I've always respected and admired true epics that can hold me interested enough to finish, and I tend to get easily lost in them. So I voted that. But Mini epics are not far behind. Long songs and short songs sometimes bug me though, for they tend to either be too long or too short....
|
What's yer faovrite album? =^_^=
|
 |
Mandrakeroot
Forum Senior Member
Italian Prog Specialist
Joined: March 01 2006
Location: San Foca, Friûl
Status: Offline
Points: 5851
|
Posted: September 11 2006 at 05:13 |
1) Mini epics
2) Long songs
3) True Epics
4) Short songs
|
 |
Jochem
Forum Newbie
Joined: June 24 2006
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 22
|
Posted: September 10 2006 at 19:43 |
I choose 15+. Lot's of songs on my favorite song list are 15+.
my top 10 alone has
Pink Floyd - Echoes
Tool - Disposition/Reflection/Triad
Edge of Sanity - Crimson
Tool - Wings for Marie
I - Meshuggah
Dogs - Pink Floyd
those are already 6 songs over 15 minutes with some over 20 and Crimson being 40 minutes so yea.
|
|
 |
mystic fred
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252
|
Posted: September 10 2006 at 16:20 |
how long is a piece of string?
15+ minute epics are the essence of Prog - no other genre (except classical or jazz) would get away with that!
|
 Prog Archives Tour Van
|
 |
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: September 10 2006 at 16:20 |
Prefered length is between 6 and 9 minutes.
the best songs usually are a bit longer running up to 25 minutes, but most songs of that length will get boring at some points.
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
 |
Benjamin_Breeg
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 05 2006
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 229
|
Posted: September 10 2006 at 16:16 |
mini epics rulez =)
|
|
 |
daz2112
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 18 2006
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 4483
|
Posted: September 10 2006 at 16:13 |
15+ love the epics!
|
In the constellation of cygnus,There lurks a mysterious force...The black hole
|
 |
eduardossc
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 257
|
Posted: September 08 2006 at 04:58 |
I don't think lenght is important. I used to check the lenght at the back of every album right away. Sometimes that is a clue to know about the quality of an album. Nowadays, I don't care.
If short songs were a flaw, Gentle Giant would be a bad band, and they are great. Many of their songs are fairly short, but still, show way more ideas than any song in tales from topographic oceans. Take anything in Octopus for example.
There may be hundreds of small pointless songs around as well. As any small song in THE WALL that seem to be nothing but introduction notes with only one idea.
I find the best written songs within the 8 - 12 minutes of lenght. It feels like that's the perfect space to present clear ideas, evolve them, show a climax and keep the momentum at the top. Examples are everywhere.
A "true epic" may also become a true filler: All Tales of topographic, Dogs, Sheep, Pigs (last three with only 3 to 6 real minutes of original music, the rest, either being filler or copy paste), Echoes, Atom, Close to the edge (With middle section as filler and the second part identical to the first).
We'll find magnificent well written, colorful and full of imagination epics such as Supper's, Thick as a Brick, Shine and Tarkus.
My point is, the music has to fulfill some requirements to be good. These are: Creativity, originality, feeling, passion, imagination, songwriting, energy....But lenght?....Anyone can turn a 5 minutes song into a 20 song. Ask YES and Floyd who were able to write at least 6 or 7 with only one true idea in mind, the rest.....Copy-paste and random notes with no purpose whatsoever.
Edited by eduardossc - September 08 2006 at 05:05
|
 |
Moekk
Forum Groupie
Joined: April 22 2006
Location: Austria
Status: Offline
Points: 62
|
Posted: September 03 2006 at 19:50 |
stupid question, cause a songlength has nothing to say about the quality of a song. So there cant be a prefered songlenght
|
 |
reality
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 29 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 318
|
Posted: September 01 2006 at 17:22 |
I was watching the first episode of the american TV show Miami Vice the other day and it came to the part when Ol' Phil Collins "In The Air Tonight" was on and Sonny was about to get in his car, then suddenly that drum roll hits as the lights from the hot Miami street reflect off of the front of his speeding black car! Just plain cool!
My point is that section was about thirty seconds long and the drum roll about three and yet it is implanted in my brain forever. And the feeling invoked with a hint of the tune can last a very long time after watching\hearing it.
As for Beatles tunes, they may be 4:00 minutes long but some of them contain such compacted content and loaded emotion that it is hours worth of music in 4:00 minutes.
It is like the difference between a good short poem and bad long prose. The prose may ramble on explaining everything with as many words as there is and realy lack in substantial content; while a good short poem uses only necassary words but they are perfectly placed within the structure and stuffed to the brink with meaning and emotion, while the prose may be longer in lenghth, the short poem is substancialy longer in content and ideas and emotion.
For me the joy of listining is not the sound that makes my ear drums vibrate, it is how my mind interprets the sound as well as the ideas and emotions conveyed in the tune.
I am impressed when someone can write an epic song that is under 4:00 minutes but few can do that. When it needs to take longer that is also good (just as standerd prose or long poetry can be good) but when it gets to excess or just rambles for no reason it is not good music.
|
 |
Seyo
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 08 2004
Location: Bosnia
Status: Offline
Points: 1320
|
Posted: September 01 2006 at 15:50 |
RaúlGuate wrote:
Or in other words, do you like short songs, long songs, mini epics or true epics. I'd go with long songs (a band can say what they have to say in this length) followed closely by true epics (love to hear a story).
|
Well, first of all, I like good music and good songs, no matter if they are 30 seconds or 30 minutes... You can't judge music by that way, it's not the long jump competition! 
|
 |
willy
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 19 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 167
|
Posted: September 01 2006 at 12:43 |
Length doesnt matter. The complexity, creativity and talent poured into a song is what counts.
|
|
 |
Ed_The_Dead
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4928
|
Posted: September 01 2006 at 09:23 |
Hermanes wrote:
As crappy spam learns : 'Size matters'
I enjoy extreme long songs. I think many bands make their best efforts to compose a 'magnus opus'.
|
True, True, I find myself enjoying those tracks over 15 mins most. I just love a good +20mins epic...
|
|
 |
toolis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 26 2006
Location: MacedoniaGreece
Status: Offline
Points: 1678
|
Posted: September 01 2006 at 06:50 |
depends... i can easily get bored by a short track and if a 20' epic is great, like Tarkus, i feel sorry that it ended...
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.