Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Top 10s and lists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 35 minutes length
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closed35 minutes length

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
paganinio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 07 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1327
Direct Link To This Post Topic: 35 minutes length
    Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:08
==List of Classic Era Prog Albums That Are 35 Minutes in Length==

I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".

Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.

Then I remembered it was actually 2112 that was 35 minutes long. But then I checked, it was actually close to 39 minutes.

Now I'm confused. I really do remember a classic era prog album with the laughable length of 35 minutes. I just can't remember which one. Care to solve the puzzle for me?


Back to Top
The Truth View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 19 2009
Location: Kansas
Status: Offline
Points: 21795
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:12
You actually check length of albums to grade them?

Ermm
Back to Top
Slaughternalia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 17 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 901
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:15
I fink there are a bunch of GG albums that are short as balls
I'm so mad that you enjoy a certain combination of noises that I don't
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:17
Longer than 45 minutes = filler

In non-electronic prog music at least.
Back to Top
SaltyJon View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 28772
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:17
I don't listen for length (though when looking into a new band, I buy for length, if at all possible Embarrassed).  I care more about the quality of the music on the album than the quantity. 
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:21
LOL, you're corrupted by the post-modern age.

Any album that exceedes the 50 minutes length is just crap, solid fact, you can check wikipedia. 
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:23
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:


I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".

Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.

Then I remembered it was actually 2112 that was 35 minutes long. But then I checked, it was actually close to 39 minutes.


Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32588
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:24
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:



I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".

Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.




Your post took less than 35 seconds to read.  Therefore it is lame.
Back to Top
paganinio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 07 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1327
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:42
You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70 minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:45
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:

You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70 minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.

...Likewise concerning 35 minute album.Approve
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32588
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:49
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:

You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70 minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.


That's what...she said?  Ermm

Back to Top
SaltyJon View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 28772
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:49
I enjoy plenty of very long albums.  I don't require the length to enjoy an album, though.
Back to Top
colorofmoney91 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: March 16 2008
Location: Biosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 22774
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:51
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Longer than 45 minutes = filler

In non-electronic prog music at least.
Back to Top
presdoug View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8920
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 22:22
In all types of music i love length, it is not essential, but i like it
Back to Top
MoodyRush View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 04 2011
Location: Here Be Llamas
Status: Offline
Points: 383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2012 at 22:33
Per un Amico is under 35 minutes and every bit a masterpiece. Length doesn't matter as long as the quality of the music is. Quality>Quantity as they say.
Follow me down to the valley below.
Moonlight is bleeding from out of your soul.
-Lazarus
Back to Top
Canterzeuhl View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 06 2011
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 452
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 19 2012 at 00:45
Length means nothing if you don't know how to use it.
Back to Top
2dogs View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 03 2011
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 705
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 19 2012 at 01:26
Nico's "The Marble Index" was kept down to 30 minutes due to a concern that listeners might kill themselves. Nowadays it comes as an expanded 2 CD set with alternate versions and extra songs. At least someone is taking action against the population problem.
Back to Top
Matti View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 15 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 2171
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 19 2012 at 03:06
Originally posted by 2dogs 2dogs wrote:

Nico's "The Marble Index" was kept down to 30 minutes due to a concern that listeners might kill themselves. Nowadays it comes as an expanded 2 CD set with alternate versions and extra songs. At least someone is taking action against the population problem.
 
LOL I'm still alive! Lucky me.
Back to Top
Harold-The-Barrel View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 05 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 659
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 19 2012 at 03:38
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:



I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".

Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.




Your post took less than 35 seconds to read.  Therefore it is lame.
 
X 2
You must be joking.....Take a running jump......
Back to Top
JS19 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 10 2010
Location: Lancaster, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 1321
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 19 2012 at 04:57
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:

You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70 minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.

WHO'S THAT UNDER THE BRIDGE??

Oh and can't you just listen to two 35min albums in a row? If you print of an album cover and glue it onto the top of the second album you can make it look like you're listening to the same album. True story.

I now can't listen to Marillion - Misplaced Childhood without it being followed immediately by The Dillinger Escape Plan - Option Paralysis. They are both half of the same album don't you know?

Originally posted by Canterzeuhl Canterzeuhl wrote:

Length means nothing if you don't know how to use it.

Big smile


Edited by JS19 - January 19 2012 at 04:58
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.188 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.