Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Is Prog becoming Metal?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIs Prog becoming Metal?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 11>
Author
Message
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21820
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:35
^ Have a look at the band list of one of the leading labels in prog - InsideOut. You'll find that about half of those bands play Prog Rock ...
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Orion-GER View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: July 03 2006
Location: Bhutan
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:39
Quote: Those death/black metal bands seem to most affect young listeners who still are searching for their taste (I listened to crap music too about 5 years ago, it wasn't that bad but not far better). Things like total lack of clean vocals means ofcourse lack of skill, but mainly they just try to make people shocked that they're different or scary, although it's totally the opposite. Propably they grow up like I did.
Sorry, but that sounds very arrogant to me! BTW: Why should the lack of clean vocals has anything to do with lack of skill!? Wacko

Quote: Metal (and prog metal) are now propably at the peek of their popularity and hopefully the trend soon goes to more balanced situation.
Heavy Metal had its peek in the eighties of course, Progressive Metal at the beginning of the nineties, when the forefathers QUEENSRYCHE, FATES WARNING and DREAM THEATER released some very successful singles and sold a lot of records.Approve
Back to Top
Ed_The_Dead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 29 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:45
HM... so this place has become the official "heal Peter prog metal clinic"...Wink
 
How bout some Fates Warning for download?
 There isn't any, sadly... but why not stream it?
 
A pleasant shade of greyBig smile
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:51
Like I've been saying; Metal - and primarily the Rock 'n' Roll aspect thereof - is not seen as a diluting element. An accepted Prog Metal band can be 80% Metal and 20% Prog, but any other genre has to have at least 60% Prog in it for people to even consider calling it Prog.

I blame Spock's Beard for ushering in AOR/US Radio Rock as a 100% accepted not-worth-mentioning aspect of a Prog band, which then isn't too far removed from Metal's more mainstream side.



Edited by Teaflax - July 03 2006 at 17:53
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:51
Prog-Country and Prog-Rap aren't being added to the site because there is a very distinct difference between those styles and Rock; whereas metal is more of an offshoot or natural progression of Rock N Roll music.
 
In years prog won't be known purely for the prog-metal bands. Metal is a very popular genre now so of course many of bands are taking this template and pushing its limits and thus deserve inclusion here. But there are plenty of bands making music now that has nothing to do with metal like Mars Volta and Dredg. There's plenty of retro symphonic bands, lots of new interesting RIO coming out, many things that have nothing to do with metal. You just notice the prog-metal more because it was absent from every other decade basically.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:54
Originally posted by Aaron Aaron wrote:

then would wouldn't need all those gay ads that are everywhere
 
How are the ads here homosexual, Aaron?
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:07
Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:

Like I've been saying; Metal - and primarily the Rock 'n' Roll aspect thereof - is not seen as a diluting element. An accepted Prog Metal band can be 80% Metal and 20% Prog, but any other genre has to have at least 60% Prog in it for people to even consider calling it Prog.

I blame Spock's Beard for ushering in AOR/US Radio Rock as a 100% accepted not-worth-mentioning aspect of a Prog band, which then isn't too far removed from Metal's more mainstream side.

 
I tend to agree with this point though; it seems that if a metal band has the slightest progressive tendency it gets added here. While there are clearly more progressive non-metal bands which are still fighting their way onto the archives.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:14
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:


the top 10 albums are 50% metal, 50% rock.
The problem being that the "Rock" in "Progressive Rock" was far more inclusive when coined than it is being taken as today. It was used as Rock in the sense that Morrissey, Simple Minds, AC/DC, Prefab Sprout, Celtic Frost, Jean-Michel Jarre, The Clash and Metallica are all Rock; not in the sense of a style of music necessarily based in Blues/Rock tonality.

Arguably, very few of the original cast of Prog Rock played around with Blues/Rock harmonies and structures, and when they did it was usually an anomaly. So, anything called "progressive" that includes such is going to be a step back to a more common and accepted style of music. And to an extent that's fine; constant innovation isn't necessarily the be-all and end-all of music, but it does need to be acknowledged as being a very real phenomenon, instead of being swept under the carpet.

I believe that without that behavior, the gap between Prog and PM would be seen as being far, far wider than it is today.

As it is now, when the significant mainstream aspects of certain Prog bands are pointed out, it awakens great ire, which tends to end in "it doesn matter" or "everyone knows that", neither of which I agree with. Prog had a definite agenda back when it was born, and "playing Rawk" wasn't on there.


Edited by Teaflax - July 03 2006 at 18:15
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21820
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:42
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:

Like I've been saying; Metal - and primarily the Rock 'n' Roll aspect thereof - is not seen as a diluting element. An accepted Prog Metal band can be 80% Metal and 20% Prog, but any other genre has to have at least 60% Prog in it for people to even consider calling it Prog.

I blame Spock's Beard for ushering in AOR/US Radio Rock as a 100% accepted not-worth-mentioning aspect of a Prog band, which then isn't too far removed from Metal's more mainstream side.

 
I tend to agree with this point though; it seems that if a metal band has the slightest progressive tendency it gets added here. While there are clearly more progressive non-metal bands which are still fighting their way onto the archives.


Now that sounds like you never even looked at the Prog Metal additions chart.
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21820
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:44
Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:


the top 10 albums are 50% metal, 50% rock.
The problem being that the "Rock" in "Progressive Rock" was far more inclusive when coined than it is being taken as today. It was used as Rock in the sense that Morrissey, Simple Minds, AC/DC, Prefab Sprout, Celtic Frost, Jean-Michel Jarre, The Clash and Metallica are all Rock; not in the sense of a style of music necessarily based in Blues/Rock tonality.

Arguably, very few of the original cast of Prog Rock played around with Blues/Rock harmonies and structures, and when they did it was usually an anomaly. So, anything called "progressive" that includes such is going to be a step back to a more common and accepted style of music. And to an extent that's fine; constant innovation isn't necessarily the be-all and end-all of music, but it does need to be acknowledged as being a very real phenomenon, instead of being swept under the carpet.

I believe that without that behavior, the gap between Prog and PM would be seen as being far, far wider than it is today.

As it is now, when the significant mainstream aspects of certain Prog bands are pointed out, it awakens great ire, which tends to end in "it doesn matter" or "everyone knows that", neither of which I agree with. Prog had a definite agenda back when it was born, and "playing Rawk" wasn't on there.


I will not go there ... it's no good. But I find it interesting how you're trying to turn this thread into a SB/AOR discussion.LOL
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Barla View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 13 2006
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 4309
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:47
Classic Prog will always be more popular than Prog Metal, because the origin of Prog is there.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:50
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:

Like I've been saying; Metal - and primarily the Rock 'n' Roll aspect thereof - is not seen as a diluting element. An accepted Prog Metal band can be 80% Metal and 20% Prog, but any other genre has to have at least 60% Prog in it for people to even consider calling it Prog.

I blame Spock's Beard for ushering in AOR/US Radio Rock as a 100% accepted not-worth-mentioning aspect of a Prog band, which then isn't too far removed from Metal's more mainstream side.

 
I tend to agree with this point though; it seems that if a metal band has the slightest progressive tendency it gets added here. While there are clearly more progressive non-metal bands which are still fighting their way onto the archives.


Now that sounds like you never even looked at the Prog Metal additions chart.
 
Actually Mike I look at it quite frequently, but I see the point you are making so let me rephrase myself: It seems that a metal band needs to be less progressive than a rock band needs to be to gain admission.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21820
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:53
^ Tell me: which bands that were accepted (in the chart) do you think are not prog enough, and which Rock bands do you think are progressive enough but aren't accepted here? Maybe that will help me understand your point.
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:05
Prog Metal I feel shouldn't be included: Blind Gaurdian, Nevermore, Michael Romeo. And not on the chart that have never struck me as prog: Kamelot, Pagan's Mind, and Rhapsody
 
Bands I feel should be added: Blue Oyster Cult, Coheed & Cambria, and The Flaming Lips.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:23
Originally posted by Ed_The_Dead Ed_The_Dead wrote:

Originally posted by mystic fred mystic fred wrote:

Prog  is not becoming Metal,  
Prog Metal is Prog's little kid brother - noisy, loud, arrogant, outspoken, irascible, bad tempered,  bombastic, complicated, intelligent, brilliant.
my..... look how he's grown!!!!Wink
Beautiful definition!LOLClap


I disagree. That's giving it far too much credit.

I think most of prog-metal is more the lazy brother that never moves out of his parents house. Metals origins are as old as progrock.

The Dream Theater sound is all about comformity and following a recipies with no real space for genuine progression. When a metal band in that vein is considered progressive, its always because they've been stealing some old tricks from Yes or Rush etc... (some would say from Spocks Beard or Flower Kings, but they are copycats themselves) .Thats regressive.

Music that really pushes boundries and doesn't stick to any given rules, can't fit in a subgenre that is so specialized as prog-metal. Modern progressive groups like Secret Chiefs 3 with their orchestral soundtracks, folk and ethnic/Indian percussion and melodies, cabaret music, avant-garde experiments, electronica and extreme-metal is also called prog-metal here. Very misleading.

New prog doesn't need to be hard dark or aggressive. Check out the rising american folk-prog scene with Faun Fables, Sufjan Stevens (when will he be added?)

And undoubtly Stereolab, Tortoise and Radiohead are doing more daring original stuff, than metal with keyboard bands like Symphony X, Psychotic Waltz or Kamelot.

I grew up with complex thrash and death-metal as a teenager, and still love plenty of bands in that genre a lot. But I have no urge to try and get them incuded in the archives. Simply because they don't belong here.

BTW:Still can't believe the childish, pompous goth of Nightwish and Lacrimosa are here, and not progfolk pioneers Incredible String Band. The focus must clearly be wrong.
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21820
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:26
^ I believe that the term "sourpuss" might apply here.Wink

BTW: Explain to me how Psychotic Waltz can be called "metal with keyboards"?WackoLOL


Edited by MikeEnRegalia - July 03 2006 at 19:27
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:32
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:


I will not go there ... it's no good. But I find it interesting how you're trying to turn this thread into a SB/AOR discussion.LOL
If you don't see the correlation, you're just sticking your head in the sand. Without the genre having been moved closer to mainstream/Rock tonalities and harmonies, this would never have become an issue. The Beard paved the path that Symphony X walked in on.


Edited by Teaflax - July 03 2006 at 19:34
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:37
Here's another question:
 
Do you think this would even be an issue if the majority of prog metal was inspiring or lush and joyous instead of depressing and/or dark?
 
I've certainly not been expose to as many prog metal bands as Jody, Mike or Ivan, but I know enough to say that maybe Symphony X and DT are the only bands I've heard that don't bring me down, even though sometimes their music may be depressing.
Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:46
To reply to a number of posts incoherently at the same time and make a number of useless points, here I am:

Firstly, I think that the number of new members who are exclusively into prog metal is a Good Thing for progressive rock. Why? Well, see how many new members are still both exclusively into prog metal and posting here six months after they join. I admit that I myself found my way here through searching for a Dream Theater album, and now I'm interested in only a handful of the prog metal listed here (although I've also discovered some metal bands which I find much more progressive {using the word as an adjective there} than what's often considered prog metal..!) and a wide array of progressive rock, encompassing RIO, Zeuhl and much more, as well as other musicians, particularly on the jazz side.

I do think that metal can be darkly beautiful, even as an extension of Van der Graaf Generator or some of King Crimson's late '70s stuff (by "extension" I don't mean "better", simply darker). That said, I do think that very little metal bears anything like the sort of richness that I associate with earlier prog bands.

Perhaps prog metal, if a band's intending to be pigeonholed as such, is more limited than an umbrella term of progressive rock, but I certainly think there are progressive (adjective, again) bands that have very strong connections to metal that are incredibly diverse: from Kayo Dot's mournful trombone solos to Fantomas' spastic stop-start attack to Behold... the Arctopus' neverending flurry of unharmonic notes to Isis' droning and crushing repetition. And yes, these are all negative sounding words, but I don't think it follows that this is one-dimensional music.

I've forgotten where I was going with this. It'll have to stay as a collection brief insights into the odd processes that are my present thoughts.
Back to Top
Mikerinos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Planet Gong
Status: Offline
Points: 8890
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:55
It wouldn't be a bad idea to have a separate forum for Progressive Rock and Prog Metal.  Although I like Prog Metal (although not as much as classic Symphonic), even I get sick of the 50 DT and Tool threads a day.  By forum, I mean like the "Prog Music Lounge" we're in now, only for Prog Metal.


Edited by Bluesaga - July 03 2006 at 19:56
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.