Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21820
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:35 |
^ Have a look at the band list of one of the leading labels in prog - InsideOut. You'll find that about half of those bands play Prog Rock ...
|
|
 |
Orion-GER
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 03 2006
Location: Bhutan
Status: Offline
Points: 43
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:39 |
Quote: Those death/black metal bands seem to most affect young
listeners who still are searching for their taste (I listened to crap
music too about 5 years ago, it wasn't that bad but not far better).
Things like total lack of clean vocals means ofcourse lack of skill,
but mainly they just try to make people shocked that they're different
or scary, although it's totally the opposite. Propably they grow up
like I did.
Sorry, but that sounds very arrogant to me! BTW: Why should the lack of clean vocals has anything to do with lack of skill!?  Quote: Metal (and prog metal)
are now propably at the peek of their popularity and hopefully the
trend soon goes to more balanced situation.
Heavy Metal had its peek in the eighties of course, Progressive Metal at the beginning of the nineties, when the forefathers QUEENSRYCHE, FATES WARNING and DREAM THEATER released some very successful singles and sold a lot of records. 
|
 |
Ed_The_Dead
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4928
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:45 |
HM... so this place has become the official "heal Peter prog metal clinic"...
How bout some Fates Warning for download?
There isn't any, sadly... but why not stream it?
A pleasant shade of grey 
|
|
 |
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:51 |
Like I've been saying; Metal - and primarily the Rock 'n' Roll aspect
thereof - is not seen as a diluting element. An accepted Prog Metal band
can be 80% Metal and 20% Prog, but any other genre has to have at least
60% Prog in it for people to even consider calling it Prog.
I blame Spock's Beard for ushering in AOR/US Radio Rock as a 100%
accepted not-worth-mentioning aspect of a Prog band, which then isn't
too far removed from Metal's more mainstream side.
Edited by Teaflax - July 03 2006 at 17:53
|
|
 |
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:51 |
Prog-Country and Prog-Rap aren't being added to the site because there is a very distinct difference between those styles and Rock; whereas metal is more of an offshoot or natural progression of Rock N Roll music.
In years prog won't be known purely for the prog-metal bands. Metal is a very popular genre now so of course many of bands are taking this template and pushing its limits and thus deserve inclusion here. But there are plenty of bands making music now that has nothing to do with metal like Mars Volta and Dredg. There's plenty of retro symphonic bands, lots of new interesting RIO coming out, many things that have nothing to do with metal. You just notice the prog-metal more because it was absent from every other decade basically.
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
 |
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 17:54 |
Aaron wrote:
then would wouldn't need all those gay ads that are everywhere
|
How are the ads here homosexual, Aaron?
|
|
 |
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:07 |
Teaflax wrote:
Like I've been saying; Metal - and primarily the Rock 'n' Roll aspect thereof - is not seen as a diluting element. An accepted Prog Metal band can be 80% Metal and 20% Prog, but any other genre has to have at least 60% Prog in it for people to even consider calling it Prog.
I blame Spock's Beard for ushering in AOR/US Radio Rock as a 100% accepted not-worth-mentioning aspect of a Prog band, which then isn't too far removed from Metal's more mainstream side.
|
I tend to agree with this point though; it seems that if a metal band has the slightest progressive tendency it gets added here. While there are clearly more progressive non-metal bands which are still fighting their way onto the archives.
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
 |
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:14 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
the top 10 albums are 50% metal, 50% rock. |
The
problem being that the "Rock" in "Progressive Rock" was far more
inclusive when coined than it is being taken as today. It was used as
Rock in the sense that Morrissey, Simple Minds, AC/DC, Prefab Sprout,
Celtic Frost, Jean-Michel Jarre, The Clash and Metallica are all
Rock; not in the sense of a style of music necessarily based in
Blues/Rock tonality.
Arguably, very few of the original cast of Prog Rock played around with
Blues/Rock harmonies and structures, and when they did it was usually
an anomaly. So, anything called "progressive" that includes such is going
to be a step back to a more common and accepted style of music. And to
an extent that's fine; constant innovation isn't necessarily the be-all
and end-all of music, but it does need to be acknowledged as being a
very real phenomenon, instead of being swept under the carpet.
I believe that without that behavior, the gap between Prog and PM would be seen as being far, far wider than it is today.
As it is now, when the significant mainstream aspects of certain Prog
bands are pointed out, it awakens great ire, which tends to end in "it
doesn matter" or "everyone knows that", neither of which I agree with.
Prog had a definite agenda back when it was born, and "playing Rawk"
wasn't on there.
Edited by Teaflax - July 03 2006 at 18:15
|
|
 |
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21820
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:42 |
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
Teaflax wrote:
Like I've been saying; Metal - and primarily the Rock 'n' Roll aspect thereof - is not seen as a diluting element. An accepted Prog Metal band can be 80% Metal and 20% Prog, but any other genre has to have at least 60% Prog in it for people to even consider calling it Prog.
I blame Spock's Beard for ushering in AOR/US Radio Rock as a 100% accepted not-worth-mentioning aspect of a Prog band, which then isn't too far removed from Metal's more mainstream side.
|
I tend to agree with this point though; it seems that if a metal band has the slightest progressive tendency it gets added here. While there are clearly more progressive non-metal bands which are still fighting their way onto the archives. |
Now that sounds like you never even looked at the Prog Metal additions chart.
|
|
 |
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21820
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:44 |
Teaflax wrote:
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
the top 10 albums are 50% metal, 50% rock. | The
problem being that the "Rock" in "Progressive Rock" was far more
inclusive when coined than it is being taken as today. It was used as
Rock in the sense that Morrissey, Simple Minds, AC/DC, Prefab Sprout,
Celtic Frost, Jean-Michel Jarre, The Clash and Metallica are all
Rock; not in the sense of a style of music necessarily based in
Blues/Rock tonality.
Arguably, very few of the original cast of Prog Rock played around with
Blues/Rock harmonies and structures, and when they did it was usually
an anomaly. So, anything called "progressive" that includes such is going
to be a step back to a more common and accepted style of music. And to
an extent that's fine; constant innovation isn't necessarily the be-all
and end-all of music, but it does need to be acknowledged as being a
very real phenomenon, instead of being swept under the carpet.
I believe that without that behavior, the gap between Prog and PM would be seen as being far, far wider than it is today.
As it is now, when the significant mainstream aspects of certain Prog
bands are pointed out, it awakens great ire, which tends to end in "it
doesn matter" or "everyone knows that", neither of which I agree with.
Prog had a definite agenda back when it was born, and "playing Rawk"
wasn't on there.
|
I will not go there ... it's no good. But I find it interesting how you're trying to turn this thread into a SB/AOR discussion.
|
|
 |
Barla
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 13 2006
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 4309
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:47 |
Classic Prog will always be more popular than Prog Metal, because the origin of Prog is there.
|
 |
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:50 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
Teaflax wrote:
Like I've been saying; Metal - and primarily the Rock 'n' Roll aspect thereof - is not seen as a diluting element. An accepted Prog Metal band can be 80% Metal and 20% Prog, but any other genre has to have at least 60% Prog in it for people to even consider calling it Prog.
I blame Spock's Beard for ushering in AOR/US Radio Rock as a 100% accepted not-worth-mentioning aspect of a Prog band, which then isn't too far removed from Metal's more mainstream side.
|
I tend to agree with this point though; it seems that if a metal band has the slightest progressive tendency it gets added here. While there are clearly more progressive non-metal bands which are still fighting their way onto the archives. |
Now that sounds like you never even looked at the Prog Metal additions chart.
|
Actually Mike I look at it quite frequently, but I see the point you are making so let me rephrase myself: It seems that a metal band needs to be less progressive than a rock band needs to be to gain admission.
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
 |
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21820
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 18:53 |
^ Tell me: which bands that were accepted (in the chart) do you think are not prog enough, and which Rock bands do you think are progressive enough but aren't accepted here? Maybe that will help me understand your point.
|
|
 |
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:05 |
Prog Metal I feel shouldn't be included: Blind Gaurdian, Nevermore, Michael Romeo. And not on the chart that have never struck me as prog: Kamelot, Pagan's Mind, and Rhapsody
Bands I feel should be added: Blue Oyster Cult, Coheed & Cambria, and The Flaming Lips.
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
 |
Rocktopus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:23 |
Ed_The_Dead wrote:
mystic fred wrote:
Prog is not becoming Metal,
Prog Metal is Prog's little kid brother - noisy, loud, arrogant, outspoken, irascible, bad tempered, bombastic, complicated, intelligent, brilliant.
my..... look how he's grown!!!!  |
Beautiful definition!   |
I disagree. That's giving it far too much credit.
I think most of prog-metal is more the lazy brother that never moves
out of his parents house. Metals origins are as old as progrock.
The Dream Theater sound is all about comformity and following a
recipies with no real space for genuine progression. When a metal band
in that vein is considered progressive, its always because they've been
stealing some old tricks from Yes or Rush etc... (some would say from
Spocks Beard or Flower Kings, but they are copycats themselves) .Thats
regressive.
Music that really pushes boundries and doesn't stick to any given
rules, can't fit in a subgenre that is so specialized as prog-metal.
Modern progressive groups like Secret Chiefs 3 with their orchestral
soundtracks, folk and ethnic/Indian percussion and melodies, cabaret
music, avant-garde experiments, electronica and extreme-metal is also
called prog-metal here. Very misleading.
New prog doesn't need to be hard dark or aggressive. Check out the
rising american folk-prog scene with Faun Fables, Sufjan Stevens (when
will he be added?)
And undoubtly Stereolab, Tortoise and Radiohead are doing more daring
original stuff, than metal with keyboard bands like Symphony X,
Psychotic Waltz or Kamelot.
I grew up with complex thrash and death-metal as a teenager, and still
love plenty of bands in that genre a lot. But I have no urge to try and
get them incuded in the archives. Simply because they don't belong
here.
BTW:Still can't believe the childish, pompous goth of Nightwish and
Lacrimosa are here, and not progfolk pioneers Incredible String Band.
The focus must clearly be wrong.
|
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
|
 |
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21820
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:26 |
^ I believe that the term "sourpuss" might apply here.  BTW: Explain to me how Psychotic Waltz can be called "metal with keyboards"? 
Edited by MikeEnRegalia - July 03 2006 at 19:27
|
|
 |
Teaflax
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:32 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
I will not go there ... it's no good. But I find it interesting how you're trying to turn this thread into a SB/AOR discussion.
|
If
you don't see the correlation, you're just sticking your head in the
sand. Without the genre having been moved closer to mainstream/Rock tonalities and
harmonies, this would never have become an issue. The Beard paved the path that Symphony X walked in on.
Edited by Teaflax - July 03 2006 at 19:34
|
|
 |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:37 |
Here's another question:
Do you think this would even be an issue if the majority of prog metal was inspiring or lush and joyous instead of depressing and/or dark?
I've certainly not been expose to as many prog metal bands as Jody, Mike or Ivan, but I know enough to say that maybe Symphony X and DT are the only bands I've heard that don't bring me down, even though sometimes their music may be depressing.
|
|
 |
goose
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:46 |
To reply to a number of posts incoherently at the same time and make a number of useless points, here I am:
Firstly, I think that the number of new members who are exclusively into prog metal is a Good Thing for progressive rock. Why? Well, see how many new members are still both exclusively into prog metal and posting here six months after they join. I admit that I myself found my way here through searching for a Dream Theater album, and now I'm interested in only a handful of the prog metal listed here (although I've also discovered some metal bands which I find much more progressive {using the word as an adjective there} than what's often considered prog metal..!) and a wide array of progressive rock, encompassing RIO, Zeuhl and much more, as well as other musicians, particularly on the jazz side.
I do think that metal can be darkly beautiful, even as an extension of Van der Graaf Generator or some of King Crimson's late '70s stuff (by "extension" I don't mean "better", simply darker). That said, I do think that very little metal bears anything like the sort of richness that I associate with earlier prog bands.
Perhaps prog metal, if a band's intending to be pigeonholed as such, is more limited than an umbrella term of progressive rock, but I certainly think there are progressive (adjective, again) bands that have very strong connections to metal that are incredibly diverse: from Kayo Dot's mournful trombone solos to Fantomas' spastic stop-start attack to Behold... the Arctopus' neverending flurry of unharmonic notes to Isis' droning and crushing repetition. And yes, these are all negative sounding words, but I don't think it follows that this is one-dimensional music.
I've forgotten where I was going with this. It'll have to stay as a collection brief insights into the odd processes that are my present thoughts.
|
 |
Mikerinos
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Planet Gong
Status: Offline
Points: 8890
|
Posted: July 03 2006 at 19:55 |
It wouldn't be a bad idea to have a separate forum for Progressive Rock and Prog Metal. Although I like Prog Metal (although not as much as classic Symphonic), even I get sick of the 50 DT and Tool threads a day. By forum, I mean like the "Prog Music Lounge" we're in now, only for Prog Metal.
Edited by Bluesaga - July 03 2006 at 19:56
|
|
 |