Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Libor10
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 19 2005
Location: Czech republic
Status: Offline
Points: 692
|
Posted: May 23 2013 at 09:28 |
Hmmm, even as I love both of them, Steve Hackett for me... Especially counting their solo career. I'm surprised about voting status so far anyway - I'd expect lesser difference between them.
|
|
|
progbethyname
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 30 2012
Location: HiFi Headmania
Status: Offline
Points: 7849
|
Posted: May 23 2013 at 10:08 |
Hackett. Nothing beats Cinema show for me!!
|
Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣
|
|
Gerinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
|
Posted: May 23 2013 at 10:34 |
It was about their solo albums
|
|
Stool Man
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 30 2007
Location: Anti-Cool (anag
Status: Offline
Points: 2689
|
Posted: May 23 2013 at 10:44 |
Steve Hillage
|
rotten hound of the burnie crew
|
|
chopper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20029
|
Posted: May 23 2013 at 12:11 |
Stool Man wrote:
Steve Hillage |
Well, I voted for Hackett, but this would have made it more interesting.
|
|
twosteves
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 01 2007
Location: NYC/Rhinebeck
Status: Offline
Points: 4085
|
Posted: May 23 2013 at 19:54 |
Gerinski wrote:
I have always been a bit puzzled by how mediocre Howe's solo music is (apart from the typical acoustic guitar solo pieces) while is work with Yes is so fantastic. It just reinforces my feeling of how important was Jon Anderson's contribution to Yes compositions. |
I sorta know what you mean but the best Yes (70's) was mostly written by ANderson/Howe---the sort of Lennon/McCarthy of Yes in their prime---I don't think much of Anderson's solo work either--he is best as a collaborator in Yes and I think he knows it---I mean I think Jon's ego may have thought at one time he could be a solo artist of the caliber of Gabriel or Hackett but that never happened.
|
|
iluvmarillion
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 09 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 3242
|
Posted: May 25 2013 at 04:06 |
To be fair to Steve Howe, a lot of what he does is Crossover Prog, whereas Steve Hackett mostly stays within the style of Gabriel era Genesis. Unfair comparison.
Edited by iluvmarillion - May 25 2013 at 04:06
|
|
uduwudu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
|
Posted: May 25 2013 at 04:30 |
An interesting comparison. Howe does great work with Yes and puts Asia on the map - the moment he goes - so do I. Neither can sing worth a dime.The track "Australia" from Beginnings had me wondering if my (then) turnntable was running slow.
The remark about Anderson and Howe compositions rings strong. Sometimes certain duos act in conjunction. Lennon, McCartney, Page, Plant, Thelma and Louise etc. Howe plays great guitar of course and operates in a way that is anti-rock being a contemporary Chet Atkins. But he works best in the context of adding to work rather than initiating them (solo). Hackett is more practiced at solo albums - nearly 40 years of not being in any but his own bands. Both are versatile, innovative - I's go for Howe's acoustic work more as he seems to demonstrate some more identity there but Hacket kind of fills that area that could be where Gilmour, May and Manzanera have not gone (if that makes sense, it may be the vino calypso doing it bit there.)
The best example should have been GTR. Oh dearie me. Oh god. Sob. Trying to be prog and pop can be done but it needed a deftness of touch. Neither are blues based forms, one is classical work based, the other is sophisticated (not ham-fisticated) work. The best pop (mini symphony of harmonic detail supporting a strong melody with a matching if contrasting chorus - think ABBA or The Beatles) and the best classical (Albinoni to Francseco Zappa ;) and all points in between). GTR manged to avoid all of this. Bless the 198ps and the industry determined to milk a financial reward. Industry - go for a musical intent and you will actually benefit financially. Unless the non gate keeper directed work of Led Zeppelin's example has passed you by. The GTR might have been that blend of adventurous music with top tunes identifying the music rather than a pandering (chasing a nonexistent audience)... sorry about that it still gets me worked up.
Where was I? Listening to BOC and sipping the vino... H or H? I suppose the closest way of comparing the two objectively is Symphonic Yes (with Genesis drummer Bruford - yes I am joking a bit) and Vangelis's singer Anderson as well as Tull's orchestrator, the former Make David Palmer- no longer kidding - not is he/ she). Compared to Hackett's revisiting Genesis.
Hackett by a short and curly.
|
|
Tom Ozric
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15916
|
Posted: May 25 2013 at 05:18 |
Another vote for Hackett. No contest. Steve Howe in YES . Steve Howe solo (and please don't ever, EVER sing lead....).
|
|
uduwudu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
|
Posted: May 25 2013 at 05:51 |
|
|
infocat
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 10 2011
Location: Colorado, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4671
|
Posted: May 25 2013 at 07:11 |
I think Hackett's voice has actually been quite good on recent albums.
|
-- Frank Swarbrick Belief is not Truth.
|
|
uduwudu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
|
Posted: May 25 2013 at 07:47 |
infocat wrote:
I think Hackett's voice has actually been quite good on recent albums.
| Ah, the blessings of auto tune. Unless it is a coincidence. So long as he writes, plays guitars and gets worthies like Mr Wetton to do the vox - and bass! then all is well. Shame H and H did not get JW and the rest of Asia to do the super group thing. Fashions eh.
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: May 25 2013 at 08:00 |
uduwudu wrote:
infocat wrote:
I think Hackett's voice has actually been quite good on recent albums.
|
Ah, the blessings of auto tune. Unless it is a coincidence.
So long as he writes, plays guitars and gets worthies like Mr Wetton to do the vox - and bass! then all is well. Shame H and H did not get JW and the rest of Asia to do the super group thing. Fashions eh.
|
I disagree. I positively like Hackett singing on his own solo albums but i doubt autotune goes anywhere near him.
|
|
|
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
|
Posted: May 25 2013 at 14:43 |
Snow Dog wrote:
uduwudu wrote:
infocat wrote:
I think Hackett's voice has actually been quite good on recent albums.
| Ah, the blessings of auto tune. Unless it is a coincidence.So long as he writes, plays guitars and gets worthies like Mr Wetton to do the vox - and bass! then all is well. Shame H and H did not get JW and the rest of Asia to do the super group thing. Fashions eh. |
I disagree. I positively like Hackett singing on his own solo albums but i doubt autotune goes anywhere near him. |
I actually like/love most of Hackett's singing, even early on. He has gotten better too. Squackett vocals were exceptional. I like his vocal on the Genesis Revisited version Fountain of Salmacis too. It holds up surprisingly well next to Gabriel's.
Edited by HackettFan - May 25 2013 at 15:00
|
|
resurrection
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 08 2010
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 254
|
Posted: May 26 2013 at 11:20 |
I voted for Steve Hackett; yet Steve Howe is a marvellous virtuoso. Perhaps it raises that old argument about taste and content.
|
|
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20622
|
Posted: May 27 2013 at 19:40 |
Hackett......and it's surprising that as good as Howe is his solo work hasn't been more interesting.
|
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
|
|
twosteves
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 01 2007
Location: NYC/Rhinebeck
Status: Offline
Points: 4085
|
Posted: May 28 2013 at 08:15 |
dr wu23 wrote:
Hackett......and it's surprising that as good as Howe is his solo work hasn't been more interesting. |
I think Howe's solo work with his son is some great stuff --his solo stuff is getting better but not exactly as proggy as Hackett.
|
|
Moogtron III
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
|
Posted: May 28 2013 at 08:50 |
Blacksword wrote:
Not sure why, but I've never been inspired to listen to a Steve Howe solo album. |
Me neither. I know some songs from his first solo album and doesn't make me curious to check his albums out. Hackett's first 4 solo albums are amazing!
|
|
Barbu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 09 2005
Location: infinity
Status: Offline
Points: 30850
|
Posted: May 28 2013 at 13:20 |
Haven't heard Cured. Only heard 5 Howe solo. No vote.
|
|
Mirror Image
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2111
|
Posted: April 07 2014 at 23:50 |
If my avatar is any indication, then Hackett wins by a country mile. No contest really. Howe's work with Yes is fantastic of course, but Hackett's solo work is quite fine while Howe's solo albums aren't emotionally/intellectually stimulating in any way to me.
Even though this wasn't asked but I prefer Hackett overall as a musician/songwriter than Howe, but I don't think Yes wouldn't have been the same without the edginess and virtuosity of Howe.
Edited by Mirror Image - April 08 2014 at 20:02
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.