SRXXXIII: Engelbert Humperdinck, In Memoriam

Oh Loek, don't remind me that your tastes have this serious flaw. 

badassery

We all know Moonchild is the best track.

Muhahahhahaha

I have a naive question to ask and then a naive comment to make about two different things.

I have to put by plate in the sink first though and out the kettle on.

I also have a question which is actualy not so hard to make

I think art should belong to everyone, especially the really expensive art I can't afford, including architecture and some of the design furniture.

aginor wrote: I still like to think their is overlapping thematics on both albums

That's probably true, since prog HAS to be overcomplicated.

I think they made the second album as a better version of the first.

My question is probably silly but anyhow...

If there is indeed a nuclear meltdown in one or two of the reactors in Fukushima, then surely it could potentially have effects outside of Japan?  I mean, if someone gets affected by but does not realise and they then travel the world, could this not therefore be quite concerning?

Also, much like the two Atomic Bombs and Chernobyl, wouldn't the atmosphere also be affected and also potentially affect such things as Climate Change?

My other comment/question is:

Do you think modern/new and intelligent/techinical music is often deemed as terrible by many people because in many cases, familiarity breeds contempt?  Most elements of music have been covered now, so most new music is recycling the old.  I know a lot of people enjoy new music just as much as old music but in some genres, like Neo-prog, symphonic-prog, post-rock and some others, a lot of the music sounds very similar to each other and those genres then often become somewhat of a joke in some circles.

Is it more the fault of the potential listener in not liking familiarity or is it something else?