Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - PFs DVD PULSE
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPFs DVD PULSE

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
dima_olkov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 23 2005
Location: Russian Federation
Status: Offline
Points: 143
Direct Link To This Post Topic: PFs DVD PULSE
    Posted: October 09 2006 at 05:50

Hi All!

Why don't I see latest Floyd's double DVD PULSE on the archives? It was released quite some time ago... and I even remember that it was added and then deleted...
PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull
Back to Top
pero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 05:54
Because it's boring. Not as Wall, but still.
 
Pompei are the best PF DVD. Maybe because they were young
Back to Top
dima_olkov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 23 2005
Location: Russian Federation
Status: Offline
Points: 143
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 05:56
:-)
 
first of all, this is one of the greatest concerts ever recorded (and I just love Pompei too)...
 
second, this is not a reason for not including it :-)
PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67470
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:00
Back to Top
dima_olkov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 23 2005
Location: Russian Federation
Status: Offline
Points: 143
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:01

I think this is CRAP. Why did they put two totally different releases under ONE?

PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67470
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:04
If the track listings are correct, I wouldn't say they're totally different.
Back to Top
dima_olkov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 23 2005
Location: Russian Federation
Status: Offline
Points: 143
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:06
Originally posted by Vompatti Vompatti wrote:

If the track listings are correct, I wouldn't say they're totally different.
 
Well, DVD has so many bonus material... and sound and picture quality are simply incomparible. So the reviews should be obviously different... shouldn't they?
PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67470
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:14
^They probably should, but isn't it the same thing with Live at Pompeii, which is also listed only once?
Back to Top
dima_olkov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 23 2005
Location: Russian Federation
Status: Offline
Points: 143
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 06:14
i think they should...
PF, Genesis, KC, Yes, VdGG, GG, Camel, Jethro Tull
Back to Top
Froth View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 19 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 461
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 07:24
whilst pulse should obviously be in the archives, i'm no fan of it. Its not really floyd is it? More like Gilmore with a billion other musicians trying to make up for the loss of Waters and even then they fall well short of the mark. they make floyd sound like 'classic rock'. Nothing compared to the sheer genius of 'live at Pompeii', probbably the best set list in the bands history
Back to Top
andu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 27 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 07:25
if it's a different release, it should be treated as such imo.
Back to Top
eugene View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 30 2005
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 2703
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 08:06
I am no fan of Pulse and find it to be very mediocre, I have not watched/listened to latest re-release of it, but I've heard my friend telling about it, and I am pretty sure that it's much better than previous release, it's better to such extent that will invoke much better reviews and consequently should be treated as different album IMO.
 
 
carefulwiththataxe
Back to Top
rushaholic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 13 2005
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1141
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 09:22
Originally posted by Froth Froth wrote:

whilst pulse should obviously be in the archives, i'm no fan of it. Its not really floyd is it? More like Gilmore with a billion other musicians trying to make up for the loss of Waters and even then they fall well short of the mark. they make floyd sound like 'classic rock'. Nothing compared to the sheer genius of 'live at Pompeii', probbably the best set list in the bands history


Live at Pompei is no doubt one of the greatest shows ever recorded.  But your comments regarding Pulse are way off.  This is a fantastic live show.  Yea, no Waters.  I would have like them to continue with him as well.  However, the rest of the band was there and they put on one hell of a show.

Can hardly compare the two though.  Very different times and circumstances.  Both still great.
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 11:38
The site policy is that re-releases are not listed separately. There are many LPs which are re-issued as CDs with bonus tracks of course, and the "Pulse" DVD is essentially the same thing.
 
Feel free to mention your reviews though, anyhting which differentiates the DVD. 
Back to Top
Man Overboard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 07 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 3830
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 14:28

How can a DVD be the "same" release as a CD?  Video adds so much to a show...  case in point, I had an audio version of Arena's "Caught In The Act" for a while, but it wasn't until I got the DVD that I appreciated it...  my review was completely different LOL

Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 16:04

No, not the same as the CD MOConfused, it's a re-release of the version which was on VHS video.

Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2006 at 16:11
I believe this Pulse is an edition, done with bonus feature, perhaps improvements etc. As Easy Livin said, policy places such (aproximate or exact) releases under a general view, not under ambiguations, extensions, separations. I support that policy. Thumbs Up
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.213 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.