Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Moonchild: What is going on?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMoonchild: What is going on?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
himtroy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2009 at 14:25
I think it's all god, I'm a fan of the real chill end nine minutes
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2009 at 15:32
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

The final nine minutes of "Moonchild" is a blight on an otherwise fine album.

Improvisation is one thing...doing something a horde of crippled six-year-old could do is quite another.

I love Moonchild, especially those nine minutes. Best part of the album. Seriously!
Actually that seemingly unstructured part is indeed very well structured; the lyrics are totally reflected in that part. Example: The very end of Moonchild, where something like a melody comes up, is "the smile from a sunchild", in other words: The sun rises. Immediately before that you can hear the Moonchild play "hide and seek with the ghosts of dawn". If you take the lyrics sentence for sentence you will find that each line has a counterpart in that instrumental section.


Yes, but that doesn't mean I want to subject myself to it.

And I am not at all convinced that all these lovely interpretations are objectively valid (poor adverb, but I cannot think of another); in other words, I am not convinced that there was any intent on the part of King Crimson to make the nine minute improvisation a reflection of the lyrics.  I tend to think these interpretations are all drummed up to make something nonsensical make sense.

Happens quite often, really.

This interpretation is not drummed up at all. I suggest you listen to the track again, and closely. You can even hear the Moonchild sing "You can't find me, you can't find me, neener neener neener" during the "hide and seek" part.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2009 at 15:34
Originally posted by progvortex progvortex wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

The final nine minutes of "Moonchild" is a blight on an otherwise fine album.

Improvisation is one thing...doing something a horde of crippled six-year-old could do is quite another.

I love Moonchild, especially those nine minutes. Best part of the album. Seriously!
Actually that seemingly unstructured part is indeed very well structured; the lyrics are totally reflected in that part. Example: The very end of Moonchild, where something like a melody comes up, is "the smile from a sunchild", in other words: The sun rises. Immediately before that you can hear the Moonchild play "hide and seek with the ghosts of dawn". If you take the lyrics sentence for sentence you will find that each line has a counterpart in that instrumental section.


Yes, but that doesn't mean I want to subject myself to it.

And I am not at all convinced that all these lovely interpretations are objectively valid (poor adverb, but I cannot think of another); in other words, I am not convinced that there was any intent on the part of King Crimson to make the nine minute improvisation a reflection of the lyrics.  I tend to think these interpretations are all drummed up to make something nonsensical make sense.

Happens quite often, really.


I agree. This notion that the instrumental portion of Moonchild is anything more than just music holds no validity. However, I don't mean to say that I don't enjoy Moonchild. I think that musically it is valid; the timbre of the instruments and interactions between the players is truly amazing to my ears.

BUT.... even so, I will admit that Moonchild can not stand alone. To me, Moonchild is a sort of dreamy hallway leading to the triumphant Court of the Crimson King. The hallway alone holds no grand significance, but just the thought of what comes at the end of the hall is what raises the hair on the back of my neck.
 
There is no notion that it's anything other than music of course, but surely you can see that there is validity in mine and Baldfriede's analysis that goes beyond mere poetic interpretation.
 
It's simply that the musical devices used make the composer's intentions obvious, like the thunderstorm in Beethoven's 6th, the moon imagery in "Pierrot Lunaire", the cheesey musical devices and "wrong notes" in Mozart's "Musikalischer Spass", the more basic seasonal imagery in Vivaldi's famous work, and the rather more subtle nautical references in Debussy's "La Mer" - it's programme music.
 
 
I like your description of a hallway, but tend to think of Moonchild more as the landscape through which the traveller must journey before he reaches the Court of the Crimson King, in which this strange, elfin creature exists - the presence of her character is almost tangible.
 
 
Why don't you think that the music describes the lyrics, especially given the rather exact examples given - is it simply that you don't hear it, or is there something in the music that informs you otherwise?
 
What does the sudden shift to the major from a non-established key signify to you, for example?
 
Do you really think it's not a significant event - just something random that happens to co-incide with the lyric at (roughly) that point?
 
 
Question specifically to Epignosis - what in the music makes you think that it was not the intention of the composers to re-interpret the lyrics?
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32581
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2009 at 15:35
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

The final nine minutes of "Moonchild" is a blight on an otherwise fine album.

Improvisation is one thing...doing something a horde of crippled six-year-old could do is quite another.

I love Moonchild, especially those nine minutes. Best part of the album. Seriously!
Actually that seemingly unstructured part is indeed very well structured; the lyrics are totally reflected in that part. Example: The very end of Moonchild, where something like a melody comes up, is "the smile from a sunchild", in other words: The sun rises. Immediately before that you can hear the Moonchild play "hide and seek with the ghosts of dawn". If you take the lyrics sentence for sentence you will find that each line has a counterpart in that instrumental section.


Yes, but that doesn't mean I want to subject myself to it.

And I am not at all convinced that all these lovely interpretations are objectively valid (poor adverb, but I cannot think of another); in other words, I am not convinced that there was any intent on the part of King Crimson to make the nine minute improvisation a reflection of the lyrics.  I tend to think these interpretations are all drummed up to make something nonsensical make sense.

Happens quite often, really.

This interpretation is not drummed up at all. I suggest you listen to the track again, and closely. You can even hear the Moonchild sing "You can't find me, you can't find me, neener neener neener" during the "hide and seek" part.


You missed the first sentence of my reply.  I've emphasized it for you.  LOL
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2009 at 16:17
That's your privilege.I enjoy that part very much and definitely don't belong to the "skipper" fraction of this site.

By the way: I think it is amazing that King Crimson's first album has such high ratings, given that so many people don't like that part, even some who gave the album five stars. After all, it takes up more than 20% of the album.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Tsevir Leirbag View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 03 2009
Location: Montréal
Status: Offline
Points: 8321
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2009 at 16:22
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Aragorn224 Aragorn224 wrote:

I dunno, really.

Great contribution, but at least you got a post in!
 
LOL
 
* And then I got a post in too
Les mains, les pieds balancés
Sur tant de mers, tant de planchers,
Un marin mort,
Il dormira

- Paul Éluard
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32581
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2009 at 16:39
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

That's your privilege.I enjoy that part very much and definitely don't belong to the "skipper" fraction of this site.

By the way: I think it is amazing that King Crimson's first album has such high ratings, given that so many people don't like that part, even some who gave the album five stars. After all, it takes up more than 20% of the album.


I like the album a lot, but that's mainly the reason it only got a three from me (though there are a couple of other reasons).
Back to Top
Nuke View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 271
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2009 at 18:04
I don't know, I tend to rate stuff on it's merits, and the rest of the album is good enough that even if moonchild was the worst song in the history of the universe, the album would still get 5 stars from me. It's not like one song can ruin the others. 
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 02:33
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



Yes, but that doesn't mean I want to subject myself to it.
You missed the first sentence of my reply.  I've emphasized it for you.  LOL
 
 
Seems odd, therefore, that you should have such a strong opinion on the piece, and be so certain about its qualities (or lack thereof) while not actually having listened closely - or even intend to.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 04:28
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

[
This interpretation is not drummed up at all. I suggest you listen to the track again, and closely. You can even hear the Moonchild sing "You can't find me, you can't find me, neener neener neener" during the "hide and seek" part.

Ok..I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, but on  my copy, I don;t have this bit.

This is turning into the big Moonchild hoax.
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 05:18
Moonchild is a classic piece.......................beginning, middle, end...period. I wouldn't have wanted it any other way.
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 06:37
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

[
This interpretation is not drummed up at all. I suggest you listen to the track again, and closely. You can even hear the Moonchild sing "You can't find me, you can't find me, neener neener neener" during the "hide and seek" part.

Ok..I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, but on  my copy, I don;t have this bit.

This is turning into the big Moonchild hoax.

There is a short part towards the end of the song, before it becomes melodic, where the guitar repeats a phrase that goes "dum-dadada-dadada-dadadadum, dum-dadada-dadada-dadadadum"; this is what definitely reminds me of some kind of "neener neener neener" rhyme.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 06:57
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

[
This interpretation is not drummed up at all. I suggest you listen to the track again, and closely. You can even hear the Moonchild sing "You can't find me, you can't find me, neener neener neener" during the "hide and seek" part.

Ok..I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, but on  my copy, I don;t have this bit.

This is turning into the big Moonchild hoax.

There is a short part towards the end of the song, before it becomes melodic, where the guitar repeats a phrase that goes "dum-dadada-dadada-dadadadum, dum-dadada-dadada-dadadadum"; this is what definitely reminds me of some kind of "neener neener neener" rhyme.

And the "You can't find me, you can't find me"?
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 08:06
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

[
This interpretation is not drummed up at all. I suggest you listen to the track again, and closely. You can even hear the Moonchild sing "You can't find me, you can't find me, neener neener neener" during the "hide and seek" part.

Ok..I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, but on  my copy, I don;t have this bit.

This is turning into the big Moonchild hoax.

There is a short part towards the end of the song, before it becomes melodic, where the guitar repeats a phrase that goes "dum-dadada-dadada-dadadadum, dum-dadada-dadada-dadadadum"; this is what definitely reminds me of some kind of "neener neener neener" rhyme.

And the "You can't find me, you can't find me"?

I was speaking of "neener neener" rhymes in general. But since they are playing Hide and Seek, the neener-rhyme probably refers to that.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 08:12
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

[
This interpretation is not drummed up at all. I suggest you listen to the track again, and closely. You can even hear the Moonchild sing "You can't find me, you can't find me, neener neener neener" during the "hide and seek" part.

Ok..I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, but on  my copy, I don;t have this bit.

This is turning into the big Moonchild hoax.

There is a short part towards the end of the song, before it becomes melodic, where the guitar repeats a phrase that goes "dum-dadada-dadada-dadadadum, dum-dadada-dadada-dadadadum"; this is what definitely reminds me of some kind of "neener neener neener" rhyme.

And the "You can't find me, you can't find me"?

I was speaking of "neener neener" rhymes in general. But since they are playing Hide and Seek, the neener-rhyme probably refers to that.

This is all in your head of course and has no bearing on reality.
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 10:50
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

[
This interpretation is not drummed up at all. I suggest you listen to the track again, and closely. You can even hear the Moonchild sing "You can't find me, you can't find me, neener neener neener" during the "hide and seek" part.

Ok..I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, but on  my copy, I don;t have this bit.

This is turning into the big Moonchild hoax.

There is a short part towards the end of the song, before it becomes melodic, where the guitar repeats a phrase that goes "dum-dadada-dadada-dadadadum, dum-dadada-dadada-dadadadum"; this is what definitely reminds me of some kind of "neener neener neener" rhyme.

And the "You can't find me, you can't find me"?

I was speaking of "neener neener" rhymes in general. But since they are playing Hide and Seek, the neener-rhyme probably refers to that.

This is all in your head of course and has no bearing on reality.

I don't think so. That guitar figure does sound like a mocking nursery rhyme for sure. Anyway, what I try to demonstrate is that these final nine minutes of "Moonchild" are anything but pointless noodling, as Cert1fied already pointed out. Whether one actually hears the lyrics of the song reflected in those nine minutes is up to the listener. But with a bit of imagination it certainly is possible. So while part of it may be in my head, at least some part of it is in the music too.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32581
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 11:08
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



Yes, but that doesn't mean I want to subject myself to it.
You missed the first sentence of my reply.  I've emphasized it for you.  LOL
 
 
Seems odd, therefore, that you should have such a strong opinion on the piece, and be so certain about its qualities (or lack thereof) while not actually having listened closely - or even intend to.


My only opinion is this: "I strongly dislike it because it sounds like noodling and therefore is not enjoyable to me."

A movie may have deep meaning throughout, but if it's boring to me, I'm not going to want to sit there and analyze or dissect.  It's that simple.

I feel no ill-will toward those who think "Moonchild" a masterpiece.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2009 at 02:12
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

 

My only opinion is this: "I strongly dislike it because it sounds like noodling and therefore is not enjoyable to me."

A movie may have deep meaning throughout, but if it's boring to me, I'm not going to want to sit there and analyze or dissect.  It's that simple.

I feel no ill-will toward those who think "Moonchild" a masterpiece.

Fair enough, but I just thought you might have had a reason for describing my interpretation as "not objectively valid" and "drummed up", and disputing that there was any compositional attempt to reflect the lyrics other than you simply don't like it.

These seem like strong opinions to me - I just thought that you may have had some reasoning behind them.


Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

...I am not at all convinced that all these lovely interpretations are objectively valid (poor adverb, but I cannot think of another); in other words, I am not convinced that there was any intent on the part of King Crimson to make the nine minute improvisation a reflection of the lyrics.  I tend to think these interpretations are all drummed up to make something nonsensical make sense.

Happens quite often, really.

I think, if you read what I wrote in my review, listen to the music along with the lyrics - and the example music I gave from Schoenberg - and consider programme music generally, that my description holds a fair amount of water, objectively speaking.

Schoenberg adopted particular sounds and textures in the segments of Pierrot Lunaire that explicitly describe aspects of the moon - of course, the entire piece does, which is why the general flavours of the piece have these sounds consistently - but the 4 pieces in question are more strikingly similar to each other - and the music in the improvisational section of Moonchild is very similar harmonically and stylistically, if less texturally (due to different instrumentation) to Schoenberg's.

Of course, we cannot ever be 100% objective about music - or anything, if we really wanted to be pedantic about the meaning of objectivity. But we can inject a degree of objectivity by picking up on compositional devices, especially commonly used ones, which are very rarely random. As far as I know, only John Cage and his followers adopted truely random compositional methods.

The sudden change to the major chord, for example, is used by Beethoven in his Pastoral Symphony to indicate the sun appearing at the end of the thunderstorm (and we know he did this intentionally from his notes) - so my guess at the link with the lyrics is far from "invalid", but based on common use of this device: Note that it's not only Beethoven who used this type of change for this effect.


If you have a "valid" argument to support the opposing opinion, then that's great - that's what makes debate. 

Don't dismiss my interpretations as "drummed up" just because you don't like the piece - I think my reasoning is fairly sound.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.484 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.