Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: August 27 2008 at 19:57 |
"Everyone thought we were a hard metal band," Adam Jones recalled to Chuck Crisfulli in Guitar Player, "but our tastes run through Joni Mitchell, King Crimson, Depeche Mode, and country {music}. We're not a metal band, rock band, or a country band. We're Tool."
...so that settles it - new subgenre needed : Teuhl
|
What?
|
|
topofsm
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698
|
Posted: August 27 2008 at 20:54 |
^ Dean, your post is made of win.
laplace wrote:
topofsm wrote:
I've always thought of metal as a more intelligent form of music. |
than what? |
Most music except for Jazz and Classical. I tend think of it as the most intelligent musical genre where a musical education isn't all that necessary. Not that I like the musically stupid metal bands.
|
|
|
alanerc
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2007
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 278
|
Posted: August 27 2008 at 22:27 |
They're heavy, but not to be in heavy prog they're more... toolish
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20694
|
Posted: August 28 2008 at 03:01 |
JROCHA wrote:
Lately I been thinking should Tool be in the Heavy Prog category. Yeah they have metal in their music but they are not really a all Prog Experimental metal band like a Isis or Pelican . Choose yes or no. And Tool haters stay away from this poll there are many of you on this site!
|
Isis and Pelican are Post Metal bands ... that's only one half of this combined category. The other half is Experimental Metal, and IMO that's a good description of Lateralus.
|
|
|
hawkcwg
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 07 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 381
|
Posted: August 28 2008 at 14:52 |
Tool is becoming a little to mainstream for me you know they kinda seem like they're going to be the next disturbed you know they have some good songs but those get played way to much on crappy radio channels. And there music is becoming almost poppy
|
|
|
sleeper
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
|
Posted: August 28 2008 at 18:56 |
^There's nothing "poppy" about 10 000 Days.
|
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
|
JROCHA
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 18 2007
Location: Oakland, KS
Status: Offline
Points: 1501
|
Posted: August 28 2008 at 18:58 |
Hey Hawkcwg i wouldn't call a 7 minute song poppy. And also Wings pt 1 and 2 from 10,000 days far from pop.
|
Somewhere out of a memory of lighted streets on quiet nights...
|
|
hawkcwg
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 07 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 381
|
Posted: August 28 2008 at 19:00 |
I just think they are getting to mainstream. Pretty much if they are played on the mainstream popular radio stations they are poppy and mainstream.
|
|
|
JROCHA
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 18 2007
Location: Oakland, KS
Status: Offline
Points: 1501
|
Posted: August 28 2008 at 19:06 |
So would you call Rush,Pink Floyd,Tull,and Yes pop ? Because there music gets played on mainstream rock radio all the time.
|
Somewhere out of a memory of lighted streets on quiet nights...
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: August 28 2008 at 19:23 |
I'll leave the Crossover Prog door open just incase...
|
What?
|
|
hawkcwg
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 07 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 381
|
Posted: August 28 2008 at 20:06 |
I would call there overplayed mainstream stuff pop. And Yes was considered pop when they started out. And Jethro Tull and Pink Floyd def. had some poppy stuff. But you know not all pop is bad but most of it like anything by these new boy groups and popular women are usually pretty lame, and The Beatles was also considered pop in some aspects.
|
|
|
hawkcwg
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 07 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 381
|
Posted: August 28 2008 at 20:07 |
I would call there overplayed mainstream stuff pop. And Yes was
considered pop when they started out. And Jethro Tull and Pink Floyd
def. had some poppy stuff. But you know not all pop is bad but most of
it like anything by these new boy groups and popular women are usually
pretty lame, and The Beatles was also considered pop in some aspects.
|
|
|
MovingPictures07
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
|
Posted: August 28 2008 at 20:08 |
Dean wrote:
"Everyone thought we were a hard metal band," Adam Jones recalled to Chuck Crisfulli in Guitar Player, "but our tastes run through Joni Mitchell, King Crimson, Depeche Mode, and country {music}. We're not a metal band, rock band, or a country band. We're Tool."
...so that settles it - new subgenre needed : Teuhl
|
Haha, we'd have so many subgenres if we did that with all of the bands. It would solve everything though.
Edited by MovingPictures07 - August 28 2008 at 20:08
|
|
|
Avantgardehead
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2006
Location: Dublin, OH, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1170
|
Posted: August 29 2008 at 02:37 |
HughesJB4 wrote:
Avantgardehead wrote:
Doesn't fit in heavy prog, but they're definitely not metal either.
|
Why?
|
Rock riffs, rock structure, rock emphasis on vocalist. Basically, compare Tool to any real metal band and the glaring differences become glaringly apparent.
|
http://www.last.fm/user/Avantgardian
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.