Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Nobel Prize for Literature goes to Bob Dylan
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedNobel Prize for Literature goes to Bob Dylan

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 13>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2016 at 09:10
^I agree that Cash had a much more powerful voice. Also, you're right: I can't imagine Dylan's songs being performed by any proper singer, there's not enough melody or at least a sense of contour to warrant a true vocalist. 

That has to do with the music itself: simplistic at max, nothing of interest. 

Dylan's type of music is a unique art I have to say: technically not brilliant, musically irrelevant, but lyrically good (if not Nobel-worthy) and with other values. I just would call it something else. 


Edited by The T - October 25 2016 at 09:12
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2016 at 09:02
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

This is the thing for me: Dylan doesn't sing. He kinds of speak with rhythm and some hint of melody. Obviously it depends where I'm coming from in musical background but I'd say any person I know can sign as well as Dylan. It doesn't require any musical training (I don't want to say talent because I guess you have to at least be able to stay in key). 

I agree with this but this mostly also has to do with the nature of the music itself.  Many Johnny Cash songs are also like this (the difference being Cash has a much better, way more powerful voice). Yes, anybody who can hold a key can sing Dylan but it is also not possible to sing these songs any other way.  Jeff Buckley covered one Dylan track; horrendous, oversang it to death. I don't believe you could ask Dylan to suddenly stop singing gentle country-rock and perform Script for a Jester's Tear on stage but he wasn't even trying anyway.  Also, even John Lennon is only a little better that way.  Anybody can sing Imagine or for that matter most of the Lennon-rendered tracks on Beatles albums (at least Macca uses something that could be called range).  Lennon just gets away with it because his voice is more pleasant than Dylan.  There are plenty of celebrated but fairly mediocre/average singers in rock.   


Edited by rogerthat - October 25 2016 at 09:05
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2016 at 08:54
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

[QUOTE=SteveG] ^Roger, there's a difference between having a screechy high voice and a nasal voice. Screechy high vocals go with hard rock and heavy metal. Nasal vocals go with nothing.

So are you telling me that Stevie Wonder or Bon Scott are just screechy (which they are not in the first place) and not nasal (which they absolutely are)?  
Singing through the nose and not from the back of the throat is a Dylan technique. Bon is screechy and pitches high on Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap, but not through the nose. With Wonder, I don't know where you, or others, get the notion that he's nasal. His singing, when high, is quite flat, and that can be annoying. Perhaps its time to upgrade your listening equipment if you feel that these other singers are even remotely on the same plane as Dylan.
 
To help you distinguish, listen to anything sung by Dave Cousins and compare it with Stevie Wonder and tell me who actually sings nasal.

We are talking about different kinds of nasality here.  Yes, Wonder doesn't literally sing through the nose nor do Scott or Meine.  In that sense, they are not nasal in quite the same way as Dylan.  But there is an inherent nasality in their voice and perhaps YOU need to upgrade YOUR listening equipment if you can't hear it.  ;)  Now don't bite because you were asking for it there.  Compare a pure voice like Engelbert Humperdinck with Wonder and the difference is obvious...or at least should be.  It is in that context that I said nasality by itself does not equal non singing/poor technique.  Some singers just have a more nasal voice than others even if they use good technique and Wonder obviously uses good technique because he's still got it after all these years.


Edited by rogerthat - October 25 2016 at 09:06
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2016 at 08:51
.......

Edited by rogerthat - October 25 2016 at 08:54
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2016 at 08:19
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

How low the standards of singing have fallen... (my opinion of course). 

Not really;  few people think, have ever thought, Dylan has or had a good voice.   They didn't care because they recognized his unique offerings.   I'm going past that and proclaiming his singing superior (IMO, however one qualifies that) to modern singers such as, say, Mark Knopfler, a Bob Dylan emulator if there ever was one.



Mark Knopfler is another musician I would never qualify as a good singer. 

This is the thing for me: Dylan doesn't sing. He kinds of speak with rhythm and some hint of melody. Obviously it depends where I'm coming from in musical background but I'd say any person I know can sign as well as Dylan. It doesn't require any musical training (I don't want to say talent because I guess you have to at least be able to stay in key). 
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2016 at 05:07
... the other thing to bear in mind is the difference between pitch and timbre as that can affect our perception of whether someone is actually singing high to just sounding like they are. A note sung with a reedy timbre will have a lot of odd harmonics where the third harmonic can be the same "volume" as the fundamental, so if someone is singing G3 this means that G5 will also be present so the combined note will sound "bright". In head-voice this means that resonance plays a key role in how the note will sound as the nasal cavity will respond more to the harmonic than the fundamental and you will perceive the G5 pitch more even though the note sung is actually G3.
What?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2016 at 04:45
^ technically it depends on where in the mask area the bulk of the resonance occurs and the timbres those areas add to the overall sound. Wonder uses a combination of throat and "front of face" (for want of a better description) which includes palate, cheek and nasal areas that adds brightness to his voice and that varies by how he places his tongue within his mouth while singing (just watch his vids). As I implied before with Dylan's speaking voice, his technique is limited to being predominately nasal cavity resonance because his tongue is comparatively inactive while he speaks and sings and that blocks throat resonance.
What?
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2016 at 04:18
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

^Roger, there's a difference between having a screechy high voice and a nasal voice. Screechy high vocals go with hard rock and heavy metal. Nasal vocals go with nothing.

So are you telling me that Stevie Wonder or Bon Scott are just screechy (which they are not in the first place) and not nasal (which they absolutely are)?  
Singing through the nose and not from the back of the throat is a Dylan technique. Bon is screechy and pitches high on Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap, but not through the nose. With Wonder, I don't know where you, or others, get the notion that he's nasal. His singing, when high, is quite flat, and that can be annoying. Perhaps its time to upgrade your listening equipment if you feel that these other singers are even remotely on the same plane as Dylan.
 
To help you distinguish, listen to anything sung by Dave Cousins and compare it with Stevie Wonder and tell me who actually sings nasal.


Edited by SteveG - October 25 2016 at 04:36
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2016 at 04:13
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

If one equally eviscerates Jon's and Geddy's and Phil's voices, sure.   But when it comes to those singers, most prog fans forgive, forget, and give a wink to their friends with a cheery "That's not a lady singing, I swear!"   They don't really have much choice, do they, if they want to listen to a third of the progrock cornerstone bands.

Anderson and Lee sing high. Anderson is not a distraction to me. Geddy, especially early on, is. But the main problem with Dylan is that his nasal vocals are so forced that they have become a caricature. Geddy may sing like a hinge but it's genuine and not a vocal shtick. As for Knopfler, his vocals are real, and naturally, are much less nasal, if at all.

Edited by SteveG - October 25 2016 at 04:22
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2016 at 02:22
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

If one equally eviscerates Jon's and Geddy's and Phil's voices, sure.   But when it comes to those singers, most prog fans forgive, forget, and give a wink to their friends with a cheery "That's not a lady singing, I swear!"   They don't really have much choice, do they, if they want to listen to a third of the progrock cornerstone bands.

I did say some people cannot give a free pass to Jon or Geddy and I'd hazard a guess that most prog fans who like Yes or Rush don't find their vocals distracting or annoying. In fact if you look at the majority of popular male singers they are singing in the upper tenor range which pitches them in the lower mezzo-soprano range of "lady" singers. Dylan is high baritone to low tenor without any real technique (this lack of technique is evident when you hear him speak) and all of it in the nasal voice or with nasal resonance. Stevie Wonder (a tenor) only enters the (nasal) head voice when hitting the higher notes in his range (which admittedly is most of the time) but at least he is capable of chest singing and can manage the transition between the two with ease. [I know people claim wide vocal ranges for many singers but I tend to regard them by where they are most comfortable and where they spend most of their time so while Dylan can go from C#2 to F5, the excursions are rare (and not strictly sung), as Madan says, it's mostly "monotonic"]

But, as I said, it's the aural aspect, the aural aspect of Jon's and Geddy's vocals fits the music as though it were simply another instrument, you cannot make that claim about Dylan even when he has a full backing band because the backing music is just a vehicle for his singing. Dylan is a singer-songwriter so should be compared against other singer-songwriters.


Edited by Dean - October 25 2016 at 02:23
What?
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2016 at 18:44
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

^Roger, there's a difference between having a screechy high voice and a nasal voice. Screechy high vocals go with hard rock and heavy metal. Nasal vocals go with nothing.

So are you telling me that Stevie Wonder or Bon Scott are just screechy (which they are not in the first place) and not nasal (which they absolutely are)?  I think you've got Scott confused with Brian Johnson in that case.  Scott clearly relied on the nasal cavity a heck of a lot as did Klaus Meine and in Stevie's case the nasality is very obvious.  David is spot on about this.  As these singers sing over a much larger range (octave and dynamics wise both) we let it go.  In Dylan's case, it becomes more irritating because of the nature of the music itself, it's much more monotonic (for lack of a better word).   By the way, Klaus does sound quite monotonic and irritating live because he becomes very flat (as in, lacking energy) and sings everything in the same level.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2016 at 16:44
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

How low the standards of singing have fallen... (my opinion of course). 

Not really;  few people think, have ever thought, Dylan has or had a good voice.   They didn't care because they recognized his unique offerings.   I'm going past that and proclaiming his singing superior (IMO, however one qualifies that) to modern singers such as, say, Mark Knopfler, a Bob Dylan emulator if there ever was one.





Edited by Atavachron - October 24 2016 at 18:59
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2016 at 16:28
If one equally eviscerates Jon's and Geddy's and Phil's voices, sure.   But when it comes to those singers, most prog fans forgive, forget, and give a wink to their friends with a cheery "That's not a lady singing, I swear!"   They don't really have much choice, do they, if they want to listen to a third of the progrock cornerstone bands.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2016 at 16:20
Yes, you can. If something is annoying to the point of distraction then it is impossible to make allowances for it regardless of the talent behind it. Some people cannot give a free pass to Geddy or Jon, or Peter or Phil because they cannot listen to their singing, some people cannot listen to Mike Oldfield because they don't like his guitar tone. The whole point of music is its aural aspect (which is another reason why a Literature prize is so inappropriate), and that is more important than the lyrical and even musicological content because no one here (and I mean no one) can seriously appreciate a piece of music just by reading the manuscript score or the lyric sheet.

Recognising Dylan's talent is another matter altogether, and no one here is taking any of that away from him.
What?
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2016 at 15:55
No--  you can't give an 'annoying voice pass' to guys like Geddy Lee and Jon Anderson because you recognize their talent, then turn around and not do the same for Dylan.   Nasal and annoying to be sure, but also authoritative and genuine.    I can't stand Bruce Dickinson's singing and ridiculous lyrics but I give him credit for having a good ear and a strong delivery.

What's being missed about Dylan's voice is its authenticity.   He is a true road singer, a ramblin' man, the real deal whether you take pleasure in that or not.   Not many of those left with Johnny Cash gone and guys like Lemmy dying off.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2016 at 11:19
^Roger, there's a difference between having a screechy high voice and a nasal voice. Screechy high vocals go with hard rock and heavy metal. Nasal vocals go with nothing.
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2016 at 09:55
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

He has a great voice, or maybe I should say he is a great singer.  I'm not even that big a fan and I can hear the greatness in his vocal ability and expression.  That it's nasal and annoying to is irrelevant

How low the standards of singing have fallen... (my opinion of course). 

Well, Stevie Wonder, Bon Scott, Klaus Meine, plenty of talented singers have nasal voices which some people may find annoying.  I think nasality isn't such a bad thing as it is made out to be.  This is rock music, after all, not classical.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2016 at 07:20
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

He has a great voice, or maybe I should say he is a great singer.  I'm not even that big a fan and I can hear the greatness in his vocal ability and expression.  That it's nasal and annoying to is irrelevant

How low the standards of singing have fallen... (my opinion of course). 
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2016 at 04:41
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

He has a great voice, or maybe I should say he is a great singer.  I'm not even that big a fan and I can hear the greatness in his vocal ability and expression.  That it's nasal and annoying to is irrelevant

Hmm. Perhaps if one is deaf. Ermm
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 22 2016 at 20:59
Oh he leaned, he leaned plenty, and on some first-rate fellas; Robbie Blunt, Cozy Powell, Barrimore Barlow, Phil Collins, and some good young Americans for his fourth and fifth.   That said, he is also a very good songwriter (as rock singers go) and his encyclopedic knowledge of Blues and Blues phrasing helps, I'm sure.


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 13>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.115 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.